ESReality - Where Gaming Meets Reality
Not Logged In | Login | Register
14:16 CDT - 787 users online
All Posts
WHAT YEAR IS IT (6 comments)
Posted by jstn @ 22:57 CDT, 13 April 2025 - iMsg
I got it in my head to play Quake again and remembered I used to bum around this place constantly back then. Last time I played was circa 2013 probably I think. What'd I miss?

Is like QL still ass but the only place anyone plays anyway? Is Q3 still 12 dudes on IRC? Does that one brain damaged english dude still rant about Q4 and militia every other day? Did cooller get conscripted to fight in Ukraine and, if so, is rapha planning a daring and romantic rescue mission? Someone fill me in here. I heard czm solved math finally.

I did hop on QL and play a few duels and I actually won all of them instead of getting stomped 20-0 so obviously someone went and fucked something up somewhere because that's never been a thing before.
882 Hits
RECOVER DELETED ACCOUNT (No comments)
Posted by Primal @ 18:01 CDT, 8 April 2025 - iMsg
Is it possible to recover my recently deleted account from qlstats?
163 Hits
250 FPS QL League - Season 2 (1 comment)
Posted by Danmer @ 12:58 CDT, 2 April 2025 - iMsg
250 FPS QL League returns with a second season!

The league will run for two months, starting on April 12, 2025. There will be a lot of interesting matches for the total prize pool 3,500$ by EGB. They also provide an opportunity to place bets on each match. So you can even earn a little money if you know the players well enough.

The league will start with four qualifying tournaments for everyone. First and second places will advance to the main part, where they will play with 8 invited players in a round-robin system. The top four players will compete in the super final for an additional prize.

The fate of the next seasons depends on your support: reposts, views, reactions, comments, and bets. So don't let us down!

Schedule, streams, rules, links, etc: https://250fps.com

246 Hits
Quake Strike v0.82 (1 comment)
Posted by baron Railgun @ 19:34 CDT, 31 March 2025 - iMsg
I made Quake Strike, which is a combination between Quake3 and Counter Strike mechanics, which you can play versus your friends if they are skilled at fps players but not so good at Quake, given increased weapon damage, movement hinder if you wear too much armor, increased gauntlet damage based on the scarcity of player's health (the lesser health you have, the bigger the damage), increased lightning damage versus armored opponents, bc electricity versus iron, weapon and items spawn increased to 30 s and more, like in Quake2, to strategize more, and so on.

Mod based on ioquake3,
link for the code and exes here:

https://github.com/baronRailgun/QuakeStrike-v0.82

Gonna set a server online as well at a later time.


The code have only been tested versus bots, their code have not been modified though, yet. It should work ok with players though.


small gameplay footage here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWgmVuYNOCA&t=1s
Edited by baron Railgun at 13:55 CDT, 4 April 2025 - 374 Hits
Magnetic keyboard (No comments)
Posted by BalkanFM @ 17:01 CDT, 29 March 2025 - iMsg
Anyone have any experience with these type of keyboards? Im interested because of the instant activation and deactivation that you can configure.. im thinking about getting one to be able to play defrag and jump with the spacebar like im used to after so many years. I just cant get myself to jump with mouse2 and i think its a bad option for all other quakes as it hinders your aiming.
Please post some suggestions which one to get
455 Hits
Best mouse in 2025 (4 comments)
Posted by BalkanFM @ 16:52 CDT, 29 March 2025 - iMsg
So whats the mouse to get nowadays? 1000hz, no smoothing and no accel or other processing interfering.. no negative/positive accel when doing fast motions and a high malfunctioning speed.. quality switches that are responsive and fast.. thats what im looking for in a mouse if anyone has any suggestions based on those criteria
Edited by BalkanFM at 17:37 CDT, 29 March 2025 - 770 Hits

<< Comment #1 @ 12:47 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By \0/ fragerr 
using 85 but voted 105 :P
<< Comment #2 @ 12:48 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By 2k2_2 Nukm 
going for 105 because thats how i play :D
100 (current?) and 110 are also fine i guess, the rest isnt really suited for a stream imho
<< Comment #3 @ 13:14 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By England rexobb 
i think 110 is a bit too high for stream.. 105 is perfect.
<< Comment #4 @ 13:40 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By Belgium Po0dle 
somewhere between the lines of 110-115
<< Comment #5 @ 14:20 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By Finland juM8o 
its fine as it is, if stream would be wide-screen then i would vote for 105 or 110
<< Comment #37 @ 16:36 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By ezQuake f0cus  - Reply to #5
agreed here. It makes a big difference.

4:3 aspect ratio should use 100 imo.
16:10/16:9 should use 110+
<< Comment #6 @ 14:43 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By Quake 3 (black) ddk 
i play with 90, but 100 is the best to go with for the stream. makes it look a bit faster paced, without sacrificing visibility or making it look arcadish and shit.

something else about the stream, try to tone down the banter out of the game. it gets pretty cringe worthy tbh.
Edited by ddk at 14:47 CDT, 28 July 2009
<< Comment #8 @ 16:54 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By badys tshirt Badb0y  - Reply to #6
i agree it looks that way faster.

what is banter?
<< Comment #10 @ 16:57 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By 2k2_2 Nukm  - Reply to #8
banter - das Wortgeplänkel
Edited by Nukm at 16:57 CDT, 28 July 2009
<< Comment #21 @ 08:03 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>
By Quake 3 (black) ddk  - Reply to #8
the random stuff they talk about that isn't related to the game, either during, after or before the game.
<< Comment #26 @ 06:26 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By Unset fur*q  - Reply to #6
It's 2good's fault imo. Joe actually knows what he's doing, but 2good only just muddles his way through most of the time. Can get very boring, confusing and tedious at times, and ultimately brings the quality down. But on the other hand 2good does speak from a players point of view, commenting on strategic pro's and cons and calls the item timing. This is a real benefit to the viewers.
<< Comment #27 @ 09:43 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By Germany - Hamburg unihumi  - Reply to #26
In general, they both do a great job!
<< Comment #30 @ 10:11 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By Unset fur*q  - Reply to #27
In your opinion
<< Comment #39 @ 19:26 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By Iceland hnns  - Reply to #30
In your opinion
<< Comment #43 @ 05:07 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>
By \0/ fragerr  - Reply to #39
In your opinion
<< Comment #47 @ 10:43 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>
By 004 bsk  - Reply to #43
In my opinion, your opinion on this opinion is just your opinion.
<< Comment #35 @ 16:26 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #26
Erm, it's Joe who constantly brings up random topics/stories which are long winded and end up being little more than "I saw a fox once".

Anyway, I like it like this.
<< Comment #36 @ 16:34 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By Unset fur*q  - Reply to #35
That's him being polite. What do you want him to say, "stfu infecting me with your banal sense of humour" ? Man, 2good reminds me of Halfwit from big brother, dribbling on nonsense bs due to nerves in social situations.
<< Comment #46 @ 10:42 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>
By 004 bsk  - Reply to #6
Each to his own - that's one of the things I love about this stream.

What I find far more cringeworthy is the usual commentary: "He picked up red. Okay, now he picked up mega. Oh, there's a fight. Okay, he killed him. Now he's picking up red."

Either you like the OT banter or you don't. But having Jay on board to time the items for us, talk about the angles of attack and generally offer the player's perspective just sets this stream above everything else I've seen before.
<< Comment #48 @ 18:06 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #46
Play by play is so utterly pointless usually because it's of the POV you are watching. Seriously what's the point of play by play casting of what you can see?

It would be much better if that part of the casting was of the stuff you can't see.
<< Comment #49 @ 05:43 CDT, 1 August 2009 >>
By 004 bsk  - Reply to #48
Your opinions are relevant to my interests.
<< Comment #7 @ 14:52 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By Seychelles im a tree 
surely it depends on widescreen or 4:3?
<< Comment #9 @ 16:54 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By Sweden pface 
playing and watching are 2 different things. i think its best watching demos or live under 100 (95) when watching because its easier to see the opponent player at far distance.

btw the picmip should be 10 and fullbright set to 1...
<< Comment #11 @ 17:15 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
105-110 fov best for 16:9/10 widescreen

100 fov for 4:3 screen

cg_forceenemymodel tankrj/bright

dont y' all agree?
<< Comment #19 @ 05:15 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>
By Finland duumed  - Reply to #11
keel/bright
<< Comment #28 @ 10:07 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By Denmark light  - Reply to #11
keel/bright indeed :> tankjr makes it all look weird.
<< Comment #38 @ 16:38 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By ezQuake f0cus  - Reply to #11
yes, but keel instead of tank.

On the FOV based on Aspect Ratio, yes definitely agree there.
<< Comment #57 @ 16:35 CDT, 5 August 2009 >>
By Quake 3 (black) deafquaker  - Reply to #11
make it to keel/bright, y' all ... -_^

cheers
<< Comment #12 @ 17:26 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By Italy exp! 
just turn off the fucking music lol
<< Comment #13 @ 17:31 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By Sweden pface  - Reply to #12
hehe, gg
<< Comment #14 @ 19:46 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #12
No ;'(
<< Comment #15 @ 21:07 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By RI-US ia 
Instead of taking the fov that gets the most votes, I think you should average the fov by votes for each value, so that the total user base is happier. (though if everyone votes dishonestly there'll just be a lot of 120's and 90's picked.)

Right now the average fov is...

105.3 = [ 120*2 + 115*3 + 110*36 + 105*24 + 100*32 + 95*2 + 90*2 ] / 101

woot


i voted 110, so i'm shooting myself in the foot by advocating this, but it's democratic
Edited by ia_ at 21:16 CDT, 28 July 2009
<< Comment #17 @ 23:24 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By Canada efassd  - Reply to #15
Different kinds of Democracy... Doing what you suggested makes sense, but means that no one is "completely" happy, whereas taking the option with the most votes means a smaller portion of people are in complete support, even though the majority get shafted.

...doesn't mean much for a FOV poll, but it's a semi-interesting topic.
<< Comment #16 @ 22:56 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>
By Swedish Shaft Torzelan 
100!
<< Comment #18 @ 05:08 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>
By QW stafu 
105 imo. 110/100 seem to be the most common, so 105 is a good middle-ground.
<< Comment #20 @ 05:39 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>
By United Kingdom Six16 
Tell him to change his graphics too, it makes the stream look blurred! picmip 3 < 1 for viewing QL
<< Comment #22 @ 08:04 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>
By Quake 3 (black) ddk  - Reply to #20
yeah, if they used fox' video settings i think it would be an absolutely massive improvement to visibility.
<< Comment #23 @ 08:18 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>
By United Kingdom Six16  - Reply to #22
ye, the well theres a picmip poll too, so hopefully get things changed by Thursday!
<< Comment #24 @ 10:36 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>
By 2k2_2 Nukm  - Reply to #23
yeah, hopefully to 16 :p
<< Comment #25 @ 01:55 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By Smiley :) stripy 
considering there are non quake players watching, i think a lower value is better.
<< Comment #29 @ 10:09 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By Denmark light  - Reply to #25
why? then the newbies can't see the items that the player playing can see in his view, and actually see less of whats going on around them.
<< Comment #31 @ 10:29 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By Smiley :) stripy  - Reply to #29
my opinion is that the distortion of the pov will confuse them more then not having the benefits of a fish eye view
<< Comment #32 @ 14:46 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By Germany cYmoZz  - Reply to #29
1.) most of these players play with fov 90-100
2.) with higher fov, everythings gets smaller and harder to recognize
<< Comment #33 @ 15:31 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
voted for 100, but I have nothing against 90 though
more like cYmoZz said here, with higher fov it becomes difficult to see
<< Comment #34 @ 15:39 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
higher fov might make individual objects harder to see, but it makes having a general clue what's going on, what the level looks like, and where the player's running easier to figure out, especially if you haven't seen the map or game much before.
<< Comment #40 @ 20:04 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>
By United States of America erok 
play with 90, voted 110 for the stream
<< Comment #41 @ 02:04 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>
By Finland juM8o 
please go back to 100, imo 110 was terrible
<< Comment #42 @ 04:59 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>
By B2L - Barrysworld th0r^ 
110 is a bit too high.

100 or 105 is fine.
<< Comment #44 @ 07:54 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>
By Spain OmeN_ 
r_lodbias -2
<< Comment #45 @ 10:13 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>
By 004 bsk 
It's perfect how it is. Stop putting important things to ESR votes!
<< Comment #50 @ 08:27 CDT, 2 August 2009 >>
By United States of America StywoO 
100 is a good balance between the highly popular 110, and a lower value like 90 which is preferred by a lot of players plus anyone new to Quake that may not of made any changes to their fov yet.
<< Comment #52 @ 15:41 CDT, 3 August 2009 >>
Why does anyone think people who don't play Quake would prefer 90? It's just an a made up value that used to be default in some games. Having a zoomed in view can be really disorienting if you haven't seen the level (or game) much... and the votes are averaging around 105.
<< Comment #51 @ 11:24 CDT, 3 August 2009 >>
By hearpts rockz 
90
<< Comment #53 @ 12:06 CDT, 4 August 2009 >>
for myself 100, but for stream i'd like 110
<< Comment #54 @ 02:48 CDT, 5 August 2009 >>
By United States of America erok 
judging from the poll i'd say 105 is the choice here!
<< Comment #55 @ 06:17 CDT, 5 August 2009 >>
By Dird's Xmas tree ;o Bob 
.
Edited by Bob at 21:55 CDT, 27 June 2024
<< Comment #56 @ 12:48 CDT, 5 August 2009 >>
By Pink Smiley Melachi dansen 
110 very bad..
use 100 plz
<< Comment #58 @ 12:38 CDT, 11 August 2009 >>
By Quake 3 (black) crea* 
Yes, the setting yesterday (I guess it was 110) was not very spectator friendly, everything around the crosshair was microscopic, bad for spectating over stream.
<< Comment #59 @ 06:39 CDT, 16 August 2010 >>
By Quake 3 ischju 
103 imho ;) 120 is way too big. i can tolerate 110 but thats about it.
<< Comment #60 @ 08:46 CST, 21 February 2011 >>
By Poland therm 
for me it should be max details

we picmip it out for playing but it would be great to spec it with gfx sets maxed out

fov 110 is ok for spec
<< Comment #61 @ 09:34 CST, 21 February 2011 >>
By US-Kentucky ggnore 
110

It's nice to see everything but not too much without looking major distorted you know?

Or if you already have an account:
 
Read the Posting Guidelines

Non-HTML tags: [b]bold[/b], [i]italics[/i], [u]underlined[/u]
[small]small[/small], [q]quoted[/q], [s]strikethrough[/s]
[url=www.url.com]link[/url] or type www.url.com
[flag=country] (list), [avatar=name] (list)
[map=mapname gamename] (list)
Conceived and created by Sujoy Roy (Legal Notices)
RSS Feed Information, Link Buttons and Banners