ESR - List All

ESReality - Where Gaming Meets Reality

About | Contact | Guide | Filters
Users | Preferences | Search | FAQ

News | Forums | Columns
Journals | Articles | Polls | Wiki

Files | Galleries | Demos
Events | Coverage | Movies

ESR Shop | Betting Fixtures

Not Logged In | Login | Register

12:58 CST - 1440 users online

ESR Discord Channel

no live streams found

Scheduled Listings

Latest Threads

Latest Comments

News HoQ TDM 4v4 Winter Season 2025 (1)
News Cooler Interview 9.8.24 (1)
News World's Greatest Gamer Event - QC - Punk vs Leffen (1)
News 250 FPS QL League (6)
Movie COOLLER 2010/2011 - Quake Live Movie (205)

Latest Forum Threads

QC =]<o~~~ Possible Scenarios for Quake 5! =]<o~~~ (23)
OT Donald "Trump" Trump wins Elections 2016 (581)
Q4 all pk4 files collected so far (2)
GG Need maps for q4 (0)
Q3 Why cant id learn from Valve's CS2 and give us an updated Q3 (55)

Latest Journals

2z faye (22) by stpbozin
Why this game sucks to hard? (28) by The_Sh33p
Mars died as his temple burned. No new gods of war exist. (57) by ShadyVoltaire
TEnEP ETO PYCCKu CAuT (2) by stpbozin
How to sporadically play multiplayer games? (7) by cx

Hot Topics

News HoQ TDM 4v4 Winter Season 2025 (1)

ESR Virtual Betting

Lamur
E$ 238,131

E$ 176,304 omek
E$ 129,238 fazz
E$ 61,723 lithz
E$ 58,635 nsx0r
E$ 57,658 nk121

All Posts

HoQ TDM 4v4 Winter Season 2025 (1 comment)

( Major News: QL)

Posted by doz3r @ 10:16 CST, 15 November 2024 - iMsg

The sign-ups for

Quake Live TDM 4v4 Winter Season 2025 will be open from Sunday 1st December until Sunday 22nd of December 2024.

The Tournament start will be Monday 13th of January 2025, when hopefully all are back from their holidays.

The donated prizemoney so far is 1200€ donations which will be payed out over top3 placements. Donations will be possible until the end of the tournament.

Check below for all needed informations and sign-up! If you already have player and clan account on House of Quake, feel free to sign-up right away. Otherwise make sure to register yourselves and your clan first.

Important

Tournament Details

Maps 4v4

Streams:

???
Links: Rules 4v4, Signups 4v4, HoQ Discord

Edited by doz3r at 10:16 CST, 15 November 2024 - 231 Hits

2%

Need maps for q4 (No comments)

( Forum: Gaming)

Posted by WhiteMagicRaven @ 11:19 CST, 7 November 2024 - iMsg

Please upload those maps if someone have them:

OSPDM8 Remix beta
https://web.archive.org/web/20071105174338/ht...p;forum=22

map_hunterstrailbeta2.pk4
https://web.archive.org/web/20060228183617/ht...id=1009797

map_electrobopolisalfa.pk4
map_thebadplacebeta.pk4
https://web.archive.org/web/20060213141249/ht...;id=998151

q4dmseven
https://web.archive.org/web/20071204075159/ht...id=1447524

Q4 DM Map - Cold War beta1
https://web.archive.org/web/20080105050116/ht...p;forum=22
http://www.justiningels.com/ld/quake4.html

dm_stoned
https://web.archive.org/web/20060615005820if_...yer.de:80/

91 Hits

World's Greatest Gamer Event - QC - Punk vs Leffen (1 comment)

( News: Gaming)

Posted by an1me @ 04:36 CST, 4 November 2024 - iMsg

https://www.youtube.com/live/ONksnc4X2g8?si=5bBBY1BrB83WB8RT

Youtuber Ludwig holds the Worlds Greatest Gamer event where Quake Champions is one of the game. This match was pretty exciting actually, at about 7 hours 47 minutes, two Evo champs going at it, Punk vs Ledden. What do you think of their level for first time players? Apparently they both thought the game was fun

257 Hits

Cooler Interview 9.8.24 (1 comment)

( News: Q3)

Posted by rockz @ 12:57 CST, 3 November 2024 - iMsg

unfortunately in russian tongue

309 Hits

3%

<< Comment #1 @ 12:47 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By $\0/$ fragerr

using 85 but voted 105 :P

<< Comment #2 @ 12:48 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

Nukm

going for 105 because thats how i play :D
100 (current?) and 110 are also fine i guess, the rest isnt really suited for a stream imho

<< Comment #3 @ 13:14 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

rexobb

i think 110 is a bit too high for stream.. 105 is perfect.

<< Comment #4 @ 13:40 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

Po0dle

somewhere between the lines of 110-115

<< Comment #5 @ 14:20 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

juM8o

its fine as it is, if stream would be wide-screen then i would vote for 105 or 110

<< Comment #37 @ 16:36 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

f0cus - Reply to #5

agreed here. It makes a big difference.

4:3 aspect ratio should use 100 imo.
16:10/16:9 should use 110+

<< Comment #6 @ 14:43 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

ddk

i play with 90, but 100 is the best to go with for the stream. makes it look a bit faster paced, without sacrificing visibility or making it look arcadish and shit.

something else about the stream, try to tone down the banter out of the game. it gets pretty cringe worthy tbh.

Edited by ddk at 14:47 CDT, 28 July 2009

<< Comment #8 @ 16:54 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

Badb0y - Reply to #6

i agree it looks that way faster.

what is banter?

<< Comment #10 @ 16:57 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

Nukm - Reply to #8

banter - das Wortgeplänkel

Edited by Nukm at 16:57 CDT, 28 July 2009

<< Comment #21 @ 08:03 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>

By

ddk - Reply to #8

the random stuff they talk about that isn't related to the game, either during, after or before the game.

<< Comment #26 @ 06:26 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

fur*q - Reply to #6

It's 2good's fault imo. Joe actually knows what he's doing, but 2good only just muddles his way through most of the time. Can get very boring, confusing and tedious at times, and ultimately brings the quality down. But on the other hand 2good does speak from a players point of view, commenting on strategic pro's and cons and calls the item timing. This is a real benefit to the viewers.

<< Comment #27 @ 09:43 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

unihumi - Reply to #26

In general, they both do a great job!

<< Comment #30 @ 10:11 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

fur*q - Reply to #27

In your opinion

<< Comment #39 @ 19:26 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

hnns - Reply to #30

In your opinion

<< Comment #43 @ 05:07 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>

By $\0/$ fragerr - Reply to #39

In your opinion

<< Comment #47 @ 10:43 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>

By

bsk - Reply to #43

In my opinion, your opinion on this opinion is just your opinion.

<< Comment #35 @ 16:26 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #26

Erm, it's Joe who constantly brings up random topics/stories which are long winded and end up being little more than "I saw a fox once".

Anyway, I like it like this.

<< Comment #36 @ 16:34 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

fur*q - Reply to #35

That's him being polite. What do you want him to say, "stfu infecting me with your banal sense of humour" ? Man, 2good reminds me of Halfwit from big brother, dribbling on nonsense bs due to nerves in social situations.

<< Comment #46 @ 10:42 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>

By

bsk - Reply to #6

Each to his own - that's one of the things I love about this stream.

What I find far more cringeworthy is the usual commentary: "He picked up red. Okay, now he picked up mega. Oh, there's a fight. Okay, he killed him. Now he's picking up red."

Either you like the OT banter or you don't. But having Jay on board to time the items for us, talk about the angles of attack and generally offer the player's perspective just sets this stream above everything else I've seen before.

<< Comment #48 @ 18:06 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #46

Play by play is so utterly pointless usually because it's of the POV you are watching. Seriously what's the point of play by play casting of what you can see?

It would be much better if that part of the casting was of the stuff you can't see.

<< Comment #49 @ 05:43 CDT, 1 August 2009 >>

By

bsk - Reply to #48

Your opinions are relevant to my interests.

<< Comment #7 @ 14:52 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

surely it depends on widescreen or 4:3?

<< Comment #9 @ 16:54 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

pface

playing and watching are 2 different things. i think its best watching demos or live under 100 (95) when watching because its easier to see the opponent player at far distance.

btw the picmip should be 10 and fullbright set to 1...

<< Comment #11 @ 17:15 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

105-110 fov best for 16:9/10 widescreen

100 fov for 4:3 screen

cg_forceenemymodel tankrj/bright

dont y' all agree?

<< Comment #19 @ 05:15 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>

By

duumed - Reply to #11

keel/bright

<< Comment #28 @ 10:07 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

light - Reply to #11

keel/bright indeed :> tankjr makes it all look weird.

<< Comment #38 @ 16:38 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

f0cus - Reply to #11

yes, but keel instead of tank.

On the FOV based on Aspect Ratio, yes definitely agree there.

<< Comment #57 @ 16:35 CDT, 5 August 2009 >>

By

deafquaker - Reply to #11

make it to keel/bright, y' all ... -_^

cheers

<< Comment #12 @ 17:26 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

exp!

just turn off the fucking music lol

<< Comment #13 @ 17:31 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

pface - Reply to #12

hehe, gg

<< Comment #14 @ 19:46 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #12

No ;'(

<< Comment #15 @ 21:07 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

ia

Instead of taking the fov that gets the most votes, I think you should average the fov by votes for each value, so that the total user base is happier. (though if everyone votes dishonestly there'll just be a lot of 120's and 90's picked.)

Right now the average fov is...

105.3 = [ 120*2 + 115*3 + 110*36 + 105*24 + 100*32 + 95*2 + 90*2 ] / 101

woot

i voted 110, so i'm shooting myself in the foot by advocating this, but it's democratic

Edited by ia_ at 21:16 CDT, 28 July 2009

<< Comment #17 @ 23:24 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

efassd - Reply to #15

Different kinds of Democracy... Doing what you suggested makes sense, but means that no one is "completely" happy, whereas taking the option with the most votes means a smaller portion of people are in complete support, even though the majority get shafted.

...doesn't mean much for a FOV poll, but it's a semi-interesting topic.

<< Comment #16 @ 22:56 CDT, 28 July 2009 >>

By

Torzelan

100!

<< Comment #18 @ 05:08 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>

By

stafu

105 imo. 110/100 seem to be the most common, so 105 is a good middle-ground.

<< Comment #20 @ 05:39 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>

By

Six16

Tell him to change his graphics too, it makes the stream look blurred! picmip 3 < 1 for viewing QL

<< Comment #22 @ 08:04 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>

By

ddk - Reply to #20

yeah, if they used fox' video settings i think it would be an absolutely massive improvement to visibility.

<< Comment #23 @ 08:18 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>

By

Six16 - Reply to #22

ye, the well theres a picmip poll too, so hopefully get things changed by Thursday!

<< Comment #24 @ 10:36 CDT, 29 July 2009 >>

By

Nukm - Reply to #23

yeah, hopefully to 16 :p

<< Comment #25 @ 01:55 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

stripy '

considering there are non quake players watching, i think a lower value is better.

<< Comment #29 @ 10:09 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

light - Reply to #25

why? then the newbies can't see the items that the player playing can see in his view, and actually see less of whats going on around them.

<< Comment #31 @ 10:29 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

stripy ' - Reply to #29

my opinion is that the distortion of the pov will confuse them more then not having the benefits of a fish eye view

<< Comment #32 @ 14:46 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

cYmoZz - Reply to #29

1.) most of these players play with fov 90-100
2.) with higher fov, everythings gets smaller and harder to recognize

<< Comment #33 @ 15:31 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

baron Railgun '

voted for 100, but I have nothing against 90 though
more like cYmoZz said here, with higher fov it becomes difficult to see

<< Comment #34 @ 15:39 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

Anonymous (nsc64.90.24-250.newsouth.net)

higher fov might make individual objects harder to see, but it makes having a general clue what's going on, what the level looks like, and where the player's running easier to figure out, especially if you haven't seen the map or game much before.

<< Comment #40 @ 20:04 CDT, 30 July 2009 >>

By

erok

play with 90, voted 110 for the stream

<< Comment #41 @ 02:04 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>

By

juM8o

please go back to 100, imo 110 was terrible

<< Comment #42 @ 04:59 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>

By

th0r^

110 is a bit too high.

100 or 105 is fine.

<< Comment #44 @ 07:54 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>

By

OmeN_

r_lodbias -2

<< Comment #45 @ 10:13 CDT, 31 July 2009 >>

By

bsk

It's perfect how it is. Stop putting important things to ESR votes!

<< Comment #50 @ 08:27 CDT, 2 August 2009 >>

By

StywoO

100 is a good balance between the highly popular 110, and a lower value like 90 which is preferred by a lot of players plus anyone new to Quake that may not of made any changes to their fov yet.

<< Comment #52 @ 15:41 CDT, 3 August 2009 >>

By

Anonymous (ip70-181-61-72.ri.ri.cox.net) - Reply to #50

Why does anyone think people who don't play Quake would prefer 90? It's just an a made up value that used to be default in some games. Having a zoomed in view can be really disorienting if you haven't seen the level (or game) much... and the votes are averaging around 105.

<< Comment #51 @ 11:24 CDT, 3 August 2009 >>

By

rockz

90

<< Comment #53 @ 12:06 CDT, 4 August 2009 >>

By

Anonymous (host-92-3-189-24.as43234.net)

for myself 100, but for stream i'd like 110

<< Comment #54 @ 02:48 CDT, 5 August 2009 >>

By

erok

judging from the poll i'd say 105 is the choice here!

<< Comment #55 @ 06:17 CDT, 5 August 2009 >>

By

Bob

.

Edited by Bob at 21:55 CDT, 27 June 2024

<< Comment #56 @ 12:48 CDT, 5 August 2009 >>

By

dansen

110 very bad..
use 100 plz

<< Comment #58 @ 12:38 CDT, 11 August 2009 >>

By

crea* '

Yes, the setting yesterday (I guess it was 110) was not very spectator friendly, everything around the crosshair was microscopic, bad for spectating over stream.

<< Comment #59 @ 06:39 CDT, 16 August 2010 >>

By

ischju

103 imho ;) 120 is way too big. i can tolerate 110 but thats about it.

<< Comment #60 @ 08:46 CST, 21 February 2011 >>

By

therm

for me it should be max details

we picmip it out for playing but it would be great to spec it with gfx sets maxed out

fov 110 is ok for spec

<< Comment #61 @ 09:34 CST, 21 February 2011 >>

By

ggnore

110

It's nice to see everything but not too much without looking major distorted you know?

Reply to:
[Reset]

Formatting:

Content:

Enter Text:

Or if you already have an account:

Username:

Password:

Read the Posting Guidelines

Non-HTML tags: [b]bold[/b], [i]italics[/i], [u]underlined[/u]
[small]small[/small], [q]quoted[/q], [s]~~strikethrough~~[/s]
[url=www.url.com]link[/url] or type www.url.com
[flag=country] (list), [avatar=name] (list)
[map=mapname gamename] (list)

Conceived and created by Sujoy Roy (Legal Notices)
RSS Feed Information, Link Buttons and Banners