Edited by xero- at 10:09 CDT, 2 September 2025 - 2735 Hits
All Posts
The Contenders 1: https://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1600463
The Contenders 2: https://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1893342
By making cheats for profit he already showed that he has no moral reservations to begin with.
I don't doubt his skill as a programmer for anti cheat, but i'm pretty sure there are other experts on that area that don't have a broken moral kompas.
One could argue that the same thing would then go for making home made bombs/drugs or merely creating plans for it as it's just an idea that shouldn't be punished?
Also i wouldn't touch an anticheat made by the same guy that made and sold QL bots and wallhacks just 2 years ago.Why not? Can you give some examples of issues that can arise from that?
Can you really trust a person like that?I don't think you can trust anybody. You just have to weight the possible outcomes and decide based on that.
I'm pretty sure no one wants an ex-cheater.. let's say Jaz to return and be admin for some random CTF league.
So why should this be any different?
And yes it could be worse.. not sure he would ban his own customers now would he :)What I meant was: would there be more cheats than there are now?
In fact he basically has the power to fabricate a false proof if he really wanted to (techincally speaking).I think that would be quite hard to do. Still, yes, it would be nice for somebody else to screen the source code.
I personally can't make myself to be a part of that and would rather part ways with community that wants to.Well, I try to stray from such moral absolutism. What you have to keep in mind is that there always will be hack makers and supporting a person who did that once doesn't make you part of the problem.
What I meant was: would there be more cheats than there are now?
I think that would be quite hard to do. Still, yes, it would be nice for somebody else to screen the source code
What you have to keep in mind is that there always will be hack makers and supporting a person who did that once doesn't make you part of the problem.
No guarantee for getting a quality product (regular updates, no false positives, no lags..), no guarantee that he wont mess with my pc, no guarantee that he wont take money to not detect certain hacks, no linux support, most likely no support by id.
I'd get an esl premium account if they made esl wire to work with QL, but that doesn't seem to ever happen.
coders usually don't make cheats to cheat with them, they make it to show how easily they can exploit or bypass software.
http://www.r1ch.net/stuff/r1q2/