Well q3 did win already. Almost 80% to 20% in favor of q3. However I still can see CPL continuing q4. However my question is why so many of you say, I want q3 but with cpma. It just makes us seem to be more divided.
My main question though is why you want CPMA over OSP. Don't get me wrong, I like playing CPMA from time to to time. If there is a tournament I will hop on GTV and really enjoy watching games from the top players.
My reason for osp is that I don't want to see strategy breaking speed over and over again, in a major tournament. The maps are too small and a well placed rj or 2, or a good runner can counter any viable strat at any time. I love watching the chess match of OSP. And the bastardization of rl knockback is... ya.
Not trying to start an argument, but I would like to hear peoples opinions on why CPL should use cpma over osp. I have seen Why promode quite a few times, so if you can avoid using those reasons it would better help me to understand your points. Thanks.
My main question though is why you want CPMA over OSP. Don't get me wrong, I like playing CPMA from time to to time. If there is a tournament I will hop on GTV and really enjoy watching games from the top players.
My reason for osp is that I don't want to see strategy breaking speed over and over again, in a major tournament. The maps are too small and a well placed rj or 2, or a good runner can counter any viable strat at any time. I love watching the chess match of OSP. And the bastardization of rl knockback is... ya.
Not trying to start an argument, but I would like to hear peoples opinions on why CPL should use cpma over osp. I have seen Why promode quite a few times, so if you can avoid using those reasons it would better help me to understand your points. Thanks.
Edited by Levi240 at 13:04 CDT, 16 July 2006 - 52260 Hits