I have an FK and a G100, i'm tempted to grab an FK1 for long term use, so looking for some opinions.

The G100 feels rock solidly stable when aiming, while the FK... i don't know, it has a tendency to feel unreliable and dare i say it, a little laggy. Not sure why i feel this way, it could be the shape, button lag, sensor - i'd just be guessing really. All i can say is, for me, the G100 is ahead in terms of sensor/mouse control when trying to be precise.

Don't get me wrong, i don't hate my FK and have been using it for a year now, it's just after buying a g100 on the cheap just to test it out, I'm amazed at how much more planted and stable it feels when aiming, especially with pistols, so now just a bit "meh" with my FK. I tend to use low DPI, so 400/450 - 2.0 in game (csgo).

Anyone have experience with these two, plus the newer FK1? Is the FK1 a good step up from the FK?

I'm using 900dpi on the 3.5g and 1150dpi on the FK. Just wondering if either of these mice aren't 100% correct at these dpis. By this i mean, some steelseries mice say 450dpi when in actual fact people have reported they are closer to 500dpi.

So does anyone know if either of the above are slightly off, and if so, what are they? It would help me a lot for dialling in 100% accurate sensitivity settings for my new FK, as i want identical mouse movement to the DA3.5.

After reading the other LB thread here, I'm really worried that some don't realise that Lightboost can easily be enabled on AMD cards, too.

http://www.monitortests.com/forum/Thread-Stro...and-NVIDIA

This app works 100% for AMD cards.

Hope this helps.

Currently i have a razer exact mat and don't really have any complaints other than i've had it years and it's not in the best condition and is a little on the small side.

Which ones should i be looking at in 2013 to get the best out of this mouse?