http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article/0,,1889311,00.html
I just find this disgraceful, that someone can be put in jail for 3 years over something which surely constitutes free speech. The fact that the charges for trafficing child pornography are significantly lower, just serves to increase the comical value.
I understand that the family, relatives, etc, would be hurt by the comments, but since when did the law serve to protect the "feelings" of it's people; property, liberty, life, yes, but feelings? I guess I'll be spending the next 30 years of my life in jail for insulting emotional retards on the internet, Hi Jamerio!
I just find this disgraceful, that someone can be put in jail for 3 years over something which surely constitutes free speech. The fact that the charges for trafficing child pornography are significantly lower, just serves to increase the comical value.
I understand that the family, relatives, etc, would be hurt by the comments, but since when did the law serve to protect the "feelings" of it's people; property, liberty, life, yes, but feelings? I guess I'll be spending the next 30 years of my life in jail for insulting emotional retards on the internet, Hi Jamerio!
Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
31 |
8657 Hits