playing online on consoles just isnt the same though... i played 2k4 on xbox online and omg the lag was aweful

aweful you say? :)

yeah, i definitely agree, but that's due to a lack of dedicated servers, one of the biggest weaknesses consoles have right now. on the other hand it's very easy to set up lan play compared to having to hook a bunch of computers up, i dunno about you euros but most american families have 2 or 3 tvs in their house, hell, we have 4 tvs, and 2 of them (1 of which is hd) are used for nothing but consoles

ye we have 4 , only 1 downstairs though and all have consoles

I have 2 monitors for my computer and only one tv )which my mom occupies way to much...) =/
tv sucks. 125fps/hz please

imo thats cause you are living in the us ;(

The irony of it is, console FPS WILL BE THE "REAL-START" of the future pro-gaming. (assuming we are talking FPS) And not the end.
you only see it as the end, but what you really mean is the END for what you want.
Think back a few decades and imagine how all those old school Unix geeks must have felt. 20+ years on and a simplified version has eclipsed their ideals in the name of windows. It's the same for pc pro-gaming.

This whole business with PC gaming is just the beginning IMO.
It's what started pro-gaming, but it won't have the legs to finish the race.
You can't not honestly not see the appeal (sponsors) of something like X-box live with several million halo 2 players (and Halo 3 soon) is going to be more appealing that something like Q4 with about 200 players who found each other at the end of some obscure chat client?

I honestly believe PC pro-gaming is doomed, that is until maybe consoles turn into PC's.
The good thing is all the top players on a pc will have a very easy time should they drop down into console land as they are light years ahead.

The Samurai are proof that numbers will always prevail, regardless of skill.

Also what is a pc compared to console?
if a console has a mouse and keyboard, the differences between the two are minimal.

Stop destroying our dream. We hate you now. =(

Also what is a pc compared to console?
if a console has a mouse and keyboard, the differences between the two are minimal.

so blind, input functionality at most... how can you not see the rest?

The Samurai are proof that numbers will always prevail, regardless of skill.

Please, the Samurai were too caught up in their codes and stuff to realise they were fighting a war with people with far superior skills, just the skills were in a different area. They got out skilled when it came down to the crunch.

Far superor skills?

LOL???

they lost because they were too wrapped up in honour and fighting using weapons from the dark ages.

On a one on one basis with no fancy weapons they eclipsed their rivals in terms of skill and commitment.

Yeah but it wasn't a 1vs1 no weapons fight was it?

So the guys with the most skill in making weapons, THE ONES WITH THE GUNS won.

If Bruce Lee was alive and I shot him dead with a gun while he came charging towards me, I seriously doubt anyone would congratulate me on a deserved and skillfull victory.
Any idiot can win a war against people without guns (by using them) just as much as any idiot can nuke a country with the press of a button. There is no skill or honour in that.

it's the same with the Samurai, they lost the battle, but they get gained an eternal reputation as "true warriors".
And seeing as memories are the only thing that truly lasts then it's arguable on whether they really lost the war.

Honour, no. Skill, yes. Mind vs Matter, Mind won. Samurai suck and lost.

yeah such a simple thing to see. It's why humans are top of the food chain.

PROOF! that gun vs sword is even and there for samurai are noops.

lmao@samurai

cThem@lan

Little obscure mate but nice try.

right click view image to see all.

+ for showing me something new on internet!!!

obscure? it's one of the most famous anime ever created dumbass

I was talking about the picture not fitting on screen.
I don't watch anime anyway. Never appealed to me.

using a 14" 640*480?

god damm then noops.

I'm a fucking noop, had to edit :/

And seeing as memories are the only thing that truly lasts then it's arguable on whether they really lost the war.

lol wtf are you babbling about? At least half of the "memories" you refer to seem to come directly out of that Tom Cruise movie, not reality.

There's nothing honorable about dying to a bullet because you stubbornly refuse to use a gun instead favouring a sword in an era when it clearly has no place in group battles. Doesn't matter how many times you watch Ghost Dog that's the reality you pretentious twat.

You got pwned in another thread and now you're trolling my posts in the hope of gaining some redemption.

Get a job and do something with your life you depressed bum.

Too depressed m8, better play some poker instead. It helps take my mind off all those Fs I got in school.

ROFL you provoked him into creating a fantasy scenario where he kills bruce lee with a gun, I think I love this site.

It's called an analogy, it's something that some people use to explain concepts to fools like yourself.

But it's such an incredibly inane analogy that it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

That's because you're not intelligent enough to understand it and you're also too pathalogical and biased to want to understand it.

No it's that everyone with a half brain knows how war works and comparing it to some honor contest against Bruce Lee is incredibly retarded and downright stupid to say the least.

No.
The Samurai lost due to not adopting a more modern approach to the way they fought their battles. That and their numbers dwindled during the Edo period.

The question here was skill.
Anyone with half a brain knows on a man to man basis the Samurai were probably the most dedicated, honourable and skilled fighters.

That is why I compared them to Bruce becasue he is also widely regarded as the best martial artist of all time and had raw talent and skill.

I pointed out that a totally unskilled fighter like myself could take down the world best (Bruce Lee) if I used a weapon such as a pistol, because the introduction of "cannons" and "guns" effectively rendered the Samurai useless against the advances in combat.
But it would still not make me a more skilled fighter.
There is no honour in killing someone with insufficient arsenal, which is how the Samurai were defeated.

They lost to technology, not skill.

But they are warriors. So if they lose they can't be more skilled.

That's becasue you have no honour.

Now excuse me while I apply your logic, use my Q4 bot, beat everyone online and marvel in my immense skill.

Well you beating someone online would be a first. Enjoy

Also if it wasn't in the rules you would be free to use it. There were no rules against using guns in warfare at the time so the samurai were just stupid and stubborn. If they were banned like say chemical weapons were in WW2 it would be a different matter altogether.

His analogies are all air tight, you can't beat him!

wahahaha ur so stupid ahahahaha

HONOUR DUEL

'meta style

kinda obvious that ini meant technology skill, but whatever.

Yeah because all skill is mele combat....


Your average person couldn't grab a gun and go 1on1 with a trained marksman.

Technology + Ability to use Technology = Skill

Melee combat is a lot more skillfull than pointing a gun and pressing fire.

Any idiot can fire a gun just as any idiot can press a nuclear button and laucnh a nuke and wipe out millions.

Yeah but point is, as warriors losing a war means they got out skilled in all areas.

You can only get outskilled if the combat is fair in the first palce.

If putin orders a nuclear strike on the UK tomorrow and blows the entire country up does that make them more skilled?

How was it not fair?

They had lots of chances to change, not fight, etc.

Melee combat is a lot more skillfull than pointing a gun and pressing fire.

haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

'any idiot can poke someone with a stick'

this shits so funny.

ahh nice one =)

then why do you play quake instead of street fighter

I don't really play quake anymore.
The only reasons I stopped playing streetfighter is because the arcade industry died. And 3d beat em ups were just clunky and horrible, especialyl tekken series.

I can really picture yuo playing Q3 with gauntlet only and then claim you are way more skillful even though you lost miserably.

.

you couldnt

Nah they'd block the bullets with their swords and then run up shouting "SHINROOOOOOOOOOOKEN" or something and decapitate you it would be soooooooooo awesome omg

haha ok

UT3 looks like shite to me but ok, have fun playing your ps3

i say this because gears of war not only has surpassed the popularity of halo but is going to be their highest selling game ever, and they are definitely going to keep touting this as the marketing campaign goes on

"FROM THE STUDIO THAT BROUGHT YOU GEARS OF WAR"

and it's well deserved. gears of war is by far the best and most skillful console shooter created so far, a fast paced mix of clan arena and deathmatch and the best part is there's only one hitscan weapon and it's actually balanced quite well O_O

the hitscan weapon is balanced ..... because you have to play with a controller ? (or is there maus/keyboard avail for xbox ?)

no, the hitscan weapon is balanced because it is

it only kills with a headshot and you can't move while you use it, the other weapons you can run and gun with, though

interesting sidenote: people suck with every weapon but the rail in quake 4 on 360, with every other gun their accuracies will be like sub 10% and then you look at the rail and it's like 70-100% every game...makes me wonder

autoaim ?

there's no apparent autoaim in q4 for 360. i think it has to do with how you can't dodge well, and you can't strafe jump at all. most kids seem to spend most of the game walking sideways

hehe k :)

u can strafejump in quake4 for xbox...

theres even a 'trickjump' vid out there with tricks performed on xbox...

i've messed around with it, you have to play with such a high sensitivity that you can't aim