do u want some sort of award now? should we also give one to anybody capable of outquaking tim willits?
doesn't change the point at all, never seen a competitive game being ruled by its programmer yet. law is quite a capable player. no need to be the best and trashtalked cause some1 some1 beat him. maybe if he spent the time praccing instead of dev'ing he'd have wrecked u :O
I guess my general opinion would be like that except that I just can't put Q3 above QW the same as I'd not put it below either, I'd make it "=" like V!ct!M did.
If I had a cfg/hudthing/whatever for cpm that looks and behaves _EXACTLY_ the same as osp (which I can't find or create), I wouldn't care overly much for putting one above the other either. But I don't have any problems with osp so no reason to change...
q3 > qw Tick
q3 > q2 Tick
q3 > ut bullshit Tick
q3 > that stupid warsow shit Warsow is v0.3. q3 is tested/patched/moded to death, invalid comparision.
vq3 > cpm Tick
osp > cpma What? k you lost all credibility get back to the cave, hater!
Because I know that the ones that work at id, at least, are ones whose primary goal is to make money and not for the love of the game.
edit: That alone is not necessarily a bad thing. After all, if gaming companies made no money, our options would be rather spartan, at best. However, one can not look what has been done to duel in QC and tell me that love of the game is anywhere near their top 10 list of priorities, where gameplay decisions are concerned. =(