ESR - UT3 system requirements released

ESReality - Where Gaming Meets Reality

About | Contact | Guide | Filters
Users | Preferences | Search | FAQ

News | Forums | Columns
Journals | Articles | Polls | Wiki

Files | Galleries | Demos
Events | Coverage | Movies

ESR Shop | Betting Fixtures

Not Logged In | Login | Register

23:32 CST - 1338 users online

ESR Discord Channel

no live streams found

Scheduled Listings

CSQL Autumn league Finals day (4)
Frazer "Fraze" Hockley has passed away (32)
HoQ TDM 4v4 Winter Season 2025 (3)
World's Greatest Gamer Event - QC - Punk vs Leffen (1)
Cooller Interview 9.8.24 (3)
250 FPS QL League (7)
Take The Crown: Horde Edition… and MDF! (0)
QL CTF Autumn 4v4 League (16)
HoQ CTF League (8)
project velocity is officialy dead, blaming DoS attacks (24)

Latest Threads

Latest Comments

News Frazer "Fraze" Hockley has passed away (32)
News Cooller Interview 9.8.24 (3)
News 250 FPS QL League (7)
News CSQL Autumn league Finals day (4)
News czm: "my focus was really poor" (78)

Latest Forum Threads

Latest Journals

2z faye (24) by stpbozin
Why this game sucks to hard? (28) by The_Sh33p
Mars died as his temple burned. No new gods of war exist. (57) by ShadyVoltaire
TEnEP ETO PYCCKu CAuT (2) by stpbozin
How to sporadically play multiplayer games? (7) by cx

Hot Topics

ESR Virtual Betting

Lamur
E$ 238,131

E$ 176,304 omek
E$ 129,238 fazz
E$ 61,723 lithz
E$ 58,635 nsx0r
E$ 57,658 nk121

News

UT3 system requirements released (128 comments)

( Major News: UT3)

Posted by Nicky @ 01:14 CDT, 4 October 2007 - iMsg

Midway and Epic have announced the minimum and recommended system requirements for the PC version of

Unreal Tournament 3, the highly anticipated first-person shooter scheduled for release in November 2007. Please see below for all information regarding these requirements along with newly released screenshots from the PC version of Unreal Tournament 3.

Minimum System Requirements
Windows XP SP2 or Windows Vista
2.0+ GHZ Single Core Processor
512 Mbytes of System RAM
NVIDIA 6200+ or ATI Radeon 9600+ Video Card
8 GB of Free Hard Drive Space

Recommended System Requirements
2.4+ GHZ Dual Core Processor
1 GBytes of System RAM
NVIDIA 7800GTX+ or ATI x1300+ Video Card
8 GB of Free Hard Drive Space

Edited by Nicky at 01:16 CDT, 4 October 2007 - 53574 Hits

3%

<< Comment #1 @ 01:18 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Grumx

Minimum System Requirements
Windows XP SP2 or Windows Vista
2.0+ GHZ Single Core Processor
512 Mbytes of System RAM
NVIDIA 6200+ or ATI Radeon 9600+ Video Card
8 GB of Free Hard Drive Space
....
funny stuff ;X , sure 9600+ ;d:DD:D:d;D

<< Comment #3 @ 02:04 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Cloud - Reply to #1

yea recommended is probably hyped too.

<< Comment #59 @ 10:48 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

xaus - Reply to #1

what? what about my gf2? >_<

<< Comment #78 @ 13:23 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

dàC! - Reply to #59

Like a snowball in hell ;D

<< Comment #96 @ 05:29 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

xaus - Reply to #78

oh noes :(

<< Comment #104 @ 09:10 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

dàC! - Reply to #96

Or did you mean girlfriend no2? If so, she will have to accept to be no3 ^^

<< Comment #110 @ 20:31 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

xaus - Reply to #104

take a ticket and stand in line like the rest bitch !

<< Comment #2 @ 02:03 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Cloud

i pass everything recommended, except video card. which marginally passes required

<< Comment #4 @ 02:19 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Six16

i might actually buy this! rather than get a copy off the interweb!

<< Comment #10 @ 03:04 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

fugie - Reply to #4

Same here. The only thing im afraid of is that minimum requirements means 30 fps max most of the time :P

<< Comment #46 @ 08:37 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

GoiracH - Reply to #10

prolly less :)

<< Comment #52 @ 09:33 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

fugie - Reply to #46

Don't be so negative ;-]

<< Comment #69 @ 11:45 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

GoiracH - Reply to #52

:( sowwy

<< Comment #126 @ 12:40 CDT, 12 October 2007 >>

By

Anonymous (d150-200-167.home.cgocable.net) - Reply to #46

I highly doubt you really need dual core for reccomended...I played Time Shift Demo last night and it too reccomended dual core but I ran it with everything maxed on my AMD 64 Fx-57 and ran like a dream. Besides I'm waiting on the new AM3 Mobos next year or I kust might wait for the Quad Cores to drop in price. They only say reccomened so that Intel And AMD can make more sales.

<< Comment #5 @ 02:37 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

link

8 GB of Free Hard Drive Space

almost as bad as wow init

<< Comment #17 @ 04:03 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Larvi - Reply to #5

wow had 5
no wait, the original standalone wow had 3,4gb required iirc

Edited by Larvi at 04:04 CDT, 4 October 2007

<< Comment #32 @ 06:20 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

hkrep - Reply to #17

8,07 GB atm.

<< Comment #40 @ 08:07 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Larvi - Reply to #32

yes, ATM.
But the original WoW (without BC, any addons etc) should only be around 3,4 GB

<< Comment #48 @ 08:50 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

hkrep - Reply to #40

yes, ATM.

<< Comment #80 @ 13:44 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Larvi - Reply to #48

well the UT folder will grow aswell to.... 30GB lol

<< Comment #50 @ 08:59 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

link - Reply to #17

i guess i was wrong then

<< Comment #6 @ 02:38 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

wch

woo, my system beats the recommended! :>

<< Comment #7 @ 02:39 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Zeatrix

Who cares TF2, final, in just a couple of days!

Edited by Zeatrix at 02:45 CDT, 4 October 2007

<< Comment #8 @ 02:52 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

randomness666 - Reply to #7

tf2 is fun but i like more duelling and tdm in ut3 prolly :D

<< Comment #11 @ 03:06 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

link - Reply to #7

whats your steam profile? maybe we can play a gather or something :) quite alot of quaker swedes playing

<< Comment #66 @ 11:29 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Zeatrix - Reply to #11

It's really hard to guess: Zeatrix =)
But be warned, I don't have that much time playing, at least until I upgrade my computer, my 5 year old graphics card ain't what it used to :p

I had almost stopped playing games at all before TF2, but man, I've been waiting for this for 10 years :)

Edited by Zeatrix at 11:30 CDT, 4 October 2007

<< Comment #81 @ 15:39 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

link - Reply to #66

haha ye xddd

<< Comment #82 @ 15:40 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

link - Reply to #66

unable to find zeatrix btw

<< Comment #92 @ 03:32 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

Zeatrix - Reply to #82

:-/

Try zeatrix(at)gamingeye.com then, that's the e-mail that I used to create the account.

<< Comment #47 @ 08:48 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

f0cus - Reply to #7

i thought it was final. i've been playing the hell out of it, thinking it was the full version. At least, Judge told me it was teh full version.. but what does he know. =P

farfigneugan42 is my steam id.

<< Comment #65 @ 11:28 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Zeatrix - Reply to #47

Well I guess it's full, but it's beta...

<< Comment #9 @ 03:04 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Frozenik

Damn, I need to buy new graphic card ^_^

<< Comment #12 @ 03:07 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

link

oh i just saw, they dont recommend any OS :D

<< Comment #13 @ 03:22 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Veritas_

Yes..It seems like a joke.

<< Comment #15 @ 03:48 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Aquashark ' - Reply to #13

Avatar: ut3

you seem more of a joke, m8!
now that you're bandwagoning to UT3 with all the n00bs that started gaming with Q4..

<< Comment #20 @ 04:15 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Veritas_ - Reply to #15

Did you notice it? Great! : ) Plus hunter :))

<< Comment #14 @ 03:25 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Nicky

i must admit im surprised my pc passes minimum spec... really should install that new hd :|

<< Comment #16 @ 03:49 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Aquashark '

i'll give this shit a try seeing how i pass the minimum specs.
can't wait to trash the n00bs around here who've been hyping this for so much time..

<< Comment #18 @ 04:07 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

OrangeChef - Reply to #16

Ofcourse its gonna suck to you.

Its not QuakeWorld.

Just relise some people find different things fun to you.

<< Comment #22 @ 04:32 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Aquashark ' - Reply to #18

i play a lot more games than QW
and UT3 might not suck

i'm just fed up with the hype and the trailers aren't very convincing

<< Comment #85 @ 17:46 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

OrangeChef - Reply to #22

The point I was trying to make, is if you haven't enjoyed game play from previous UT's, then UT3 probably wont appeal.

Doesn't mean its crap, its just a different form of game play.

Persoanly, I'm just gonna wait, for the game to be released, try it, and if I enjoy it more than Q3, then I'll play it.
If not (the most likly), I'll stick to Q3.

<< Comment #94 @ 04:35 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #85

"if I enjoy it more than Q3"

I don't want to be an asshole or anything, but my personal experience after having enjoyed a previous game for years, is that it is very difficult to enjoy a similar game afterwards. Especially if you consciously compare it to "the original", that's a lost cause imo. =P

It takes a lot of time to build up the addiction or attraction to a game.. and if that time is spent compared to something that already has that advantage, it's close to hopeless. Any game has to be enjoyed on its own merits with no expectations.

<< Comment #98 @ 06:53 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

jal - Reply to #94

Agreed. And I'd add, you have better chances to enjoy a game with very different rules than a similar one. I wasn't able to recover the enjoyment I had with Q2 at Q3 at any point, and it wasn't until I played ET that I could feel at home again, cause there weren't common points to compare them so I wasn't missing stuff all the time.

<< Comment #112 @ 04:53 CDT, 6 October 2007 >>

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #98

This is a good point. There's something about the similarity that makes it more difficult, especially sequels, that are consciously made to be "improvements" of the previous games..

I tried UT2 after playing UT for years, it didn't "stick" at all, so the last years I turned to RTSing (!). Meaning I should be about ready for another FPS now ^^

<< Comment #99 @ 07:41 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

OrangeChef - Reply to #94

I guess I was being a bit hypocritical.

The point I was trying to make was, that if the UT style of gameplay hasn't appealed to him in the past, it probably wont now.

<< Comment #111 @ 04:52 CDT, 6 October 2007 >>

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #99

Yeh, hehe. I was just trying to elaborate your statement "if you haven't enjoyed game play from previous UT's, then UT3 probably wont appeal."..

Maybe the reason UT or UT3 won't appeal to him or you, is because you have your minds stuck "in love with" another, similar game. (I had the same problem with enjoying Q3, coming from an UT point of view)

<< Comment #118 @ 17:42 CDT, 7 October 2007 >>

By

OrangeChef - Reply to #111

I play UT2k4 alot tho, and absolutely love playing TacOps on UT99.

I actualy like the gameplay of the UT series.
I've just been stuck on Quake for the past 18 months.

But yeh.

<< Comment #26 @ 05:18 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Aquashark ' - Reply to #18

hahaha.. plussed by Veritas
what a joke that kid is ffs

before it was q4, now we have to put up with his ut3 fanboyism ;(

<< Comment #27 @ 05:44 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Pushpabon - Reply to #18

And not everything should be QW but if it's gonna be some shitstorm gfx is gameplay game I'd rather pass.

<< Comment #123 @ 07:26 CDT, 9 October 2007 >>

By

OvO - Reply to #27

then again you pass it anyway cause you're not really a player LMAO

<< Comment #19 @ 04:09 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

kautzy

same minimum hardware requirements for vista and xp ...

... looks like they "seriously" considered those specs! ;)

<< Comment #25 @ 05:05 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

mammon - Reply to #19

yeah, Vista can eat those 512 MB RAM before UT3 even starts =]

<< Comment #21 @ 04:30 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

s.a.y

this is great. at least i can try it before upgrading.

<< Comment #23 @ 04:41 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

svr

Minimum specs will always be a bullshit story.

I think if you wanna play everything like they show in the screenshots / videos you probably need a Quadcore and SLI GF 8800GTX with 2 GB high speed ram and some SB XFI and Agea physics card.

Overall i think this game will be pretty solid though :)

<< Comment #122 @ 00:10 CDT, 9 October 2007 >>

By

wocK_ - Reply to #23

cool :)

i only need a whole new processor, mobo, ram, graphics card, case , psu

oh the joys of being a slave to the mass corporations that rule the computer game industries with there graphics over game play approach. Once you get over the initial eye candy it'll be like playing a tweaked ut2003/4. I could be wrong thought.... oh vehicles? fuck off.

but with enough noobers playing on there shitty consoles and parents pc's it ain't going to change

maybe it's time to grow up!

<< Comment #24 @ 05:03 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

_agu

haha nice nice

<< Comment #28 @ 05:50 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

i played q3 with 166mhz :) voodoo 3 pci, if I delete a couple of shit I have exactly the min requirements \o/

<< Comment #29 @ 05:50 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

filo

hmm ... kinda low specs for this kind a game? ...well anyways hats of if they nailed it.

<< Comment #34 @ 06:39 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Vajra - Reply to #29

yeah.

On another note, I've never played the ut series, how scalable/tweakable have the games been?

<< Comment #56 @ 10:05 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Brahl - Reply to #34

ut2k4 had a very scaleable graphics options menu.

<< Comment #93 @ 04:22 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

viaIImaximus - Reply to #56

and that's what makes it ace.

<< Comment #68 @ 11:43 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

tewic - Reply to #34

very scaleable. In terms of tweakability, there's not much to gain by haxing the config, atleast in ut2k4 it's minimal what you gain, all the settings that make an impact are in the menus.

<< Comment #30 @ 05:55 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

PuX

I think the real requirements are MUCH higher

<< Comment #57 @ 10:17 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Nicky - Reply to #30

coz these are just fake ones?

<< Comment #62 @ 11:10 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

noctis - Reply to #57

system requirements for games are always for max 20-30 fps. and thats not really playable for ppl on esr i guess ;)

<< Comment #64 @ 11:20 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

PuX - Reply to #62

with 1GB of RAM and ATI x1300 you can barely run Quake4 at solid 90 fps. also note that 2.4+ GHZ Dual Core Processor means nothing. Core 2 Duo at that frequency is much faster than an Athlon X2.

<< Comment #67 @ 11:30 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Aquashark ' - Reply to #64

i have P4 3.0 GHz, 512 MB, GF6600 GT and i can run Q4 barely @ 90fps (in duels works almost perfect)

<< Comment #105 @ 11:51 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

PuX - Reply to #67

my second PC is almost the same: P4 3000, FX5900 512RAM so I know what it's able to do. in 640*480 everything low you can't run Q4 at SOLID 90fps... but well, it's playable, definitely.

<< Comment #31 @ 06:14 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Torzelan '

Easy weasy, question is though; what difference will DX10 do? I am so not keen on Vista (neither paying for or using, other than for the dx10 deal :/)...

<< Comment #33 @ 06:31 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

hemostick - Reply to #31

I think I read in an interview it'll allow higher resolution textures and hdr+antialiasing.

<< Comment #45 @ 08:35 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Torzelan ' - Reply to #33

Oh, if that's "it" I'm not getting worked up about it (yet) then. Was more thinking like, if there are any cool effects that wouldn't be shown at all or something. 'cause from the vids shown so far, cool effects there are :)

<< Comment #35 @ 07:25 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

andysak

had the oppertunity to try the beta at digital life this past weekend... for the most part, the base movement seems very quick for running speed in most games, even faster than quake. the dodging isn't as floaty as ut2k4, and somewhat feels like you have weight unlike ut2k4 where you're on the moon.

the weapons are very quake-ish... rockets seem faster, the link feels like a shaft, and the overall feel of the weapons is pretty solid. the only downside is that they're very powerful, so forget about a tiered weapon system.

other then that, with high details the game looks amazing visually, so itll put some good use to those with high-end systems.

<< Comment #37 @ 07:47 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

ramled - Reply to #35

Go here instead.

Edited by ramled at 12:32 CDT, 6 October 2007

<< Comment #43 @ 08:27 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #37

Thanks, nice to finally see a report on this, beats carmac's "omgz vehicles and graphics, save your money for TF2"-drivel any day. :P

I am kinda happy with what I see here, I don't like the doublejump and walljump, but shit happens. As long as it is fast and furious, it's good. The weapons sound excellent.

*crosses fingers for teh UT3*

<< Comment #87 @ 18:23 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Anonymous (dsl254-073-144.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net) - Reply to #37

"GFX were all at max, and as a result their "monstrous" cards ran it at a cool sub 30 FPS....so it was hard to do much of anything."

i'm totally against the new wave of games that all seem to aim for a max 30fps as a perfect gameplay experience

i guess the people publishing the games are not gamers, because most of the gamers i know love their fps. I mean if you set the max fps to 30 in q3 its just not the same experience at all.

<< Comment #89 @ 23:37 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Antigen07 - Reply to #87

Wrong it ran at shitty FPS because the map was made by Ageia to pimp a failed product and it had this horribly demanding tornado blowing shit around and destroying both structures in the environment and the framerate...

The normal game is running really well. Epic said they saw the framerate go over 300fps at one point with an overkill 8800GTX and C2D system. I don't think anyone with a decent computer from the last two years should have any trouble getting the game to run at any reasonably high level of FPS they think they need.

<< Comment #36 @ 07:46 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

vedic

What would an equal minimum nvidia be? I've still only got a geforce 6150se.

<< Comment #51 @ 09:04 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

f0cus - Reply to #36

it says nVidia and ATi's minimum specs. minimum for nvidia is 6200.

<< Comment #73 @ 12:40 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

vedic - Reply to #51

Swear to god it didn't have the minimum nvidia this morning. =/

Edited by Vedic at 12:41 CDT, 4 October 2007

<< Comment #58 @ 10:41 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

gSTRUCTOR ' - Reply to #36

6200 - 6150 = 50 extra hardwarez needed :p

<< Comment #38 @ 08:01 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

judge717

Right off the bat you will feel the movement is "heavy".

sounds like d3

<< Comment #116 @ 17:16 CDT, 7 October 2007 >>

By

Levi215 - Reply to #38

Sounds like the original UT

<< Comment #39 @ 08:01 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

oX

besides the 8GB this all sounds great!

<< Comment #70 @ 11:48 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

tewic - Reply to #39

I gotta admit I was surprised they made it below 10gb, I mean, 8gb is nothing (if you compare the amount of content there's planned to be in this game, compared with other games coming out these days)

<< Comment #41 @ 08:09 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

jonte

will there be an mp demo?

<< Comment #54 @ 09:46 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

dàC! - Reply to #41

As with all previous UT installments, yes :)

<< Comment #55 @ 09:47 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

jonte - Reply to #54

great :>

<< Comment #42 @ 08:22 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Anonymous (53-64-ftth.onsneteindhoven.nl)

to sleipnir:

The UT engine has unfortunately never been very tweakable. In UT-1 there were quite some config settings improving the visibilty et cetera. But there were hardly any with effect on the FPS. Also in UT2k4 there was not much more to do than just deacreasing the standard settings. And even if you had a decent system it wouldnt even increase the FPS that much to use a lower spec.

<< Comment #44 @ 08:29 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #42

UT1 had a ton of "must fix" tweaks. I'll agree they didn't scale as well as Q3s options, but it got you a long way. Anyway, this is a completely new engine, so it's very hard to say.

<< Comment #53 @ 09:34 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

GoiracH - Reply to #44

ye al those tweaks got banned :)

<< Comment #49 @ 08:53 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

f0cus

I wouldn't be surprised in the least if it runs well on the listed requirements.
Bioshock is built on this engine, and it runs surprisingly smooth on a non-Dx10 system (as in, mine.)

<< Comment #119 @ 07:23 CDT, 8 October 2007 >>

By

kesaale - Reply to #49

I heard Bioshock is built on some pre build of the ut3 engine or smth?

<< Comment #120 @ 12:29 CDT, 8 October 2007 >>

By

f0cus - Reply to #119

yeah, basically. But wouldn't that mean that a later version would run smoother still?

<< Comment #121 @ 21:23 CDT, 8 October 2007 >>

By

kesaale - Reply to #120

Not necessarely. Might be that they left out some eyecandy or smth. Hell, I don't know!

<< Comment #60 @ 10:58 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

qahdrk

well i got a amd 64 X2 6000+
2 GB DDR2 800 mhz
7800GTX and im playing stranglehold and bioshock, which are running also on the respective ut3 engine. its not running bad but not that i can say i got 60+ fps. so i dont think this is gonna be smooth for me, even tho crysis runs alot better than these games

<< Comment #71 @ 11:59 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Erk - Reply to #60

bioshock runs at a steady 40-50fps on a slightly overclocked X1950pro in 1280x960 with everything dx9 maxed out. There are ocasional dips to around 35fps and in some areas it goes up to 60+fps, but 90% of the time it's between 40 and 50 fps. It does seem to be a very shader heavy engine though.

Edited by Erk at 11:59 CDT, 4 October 2007

<< Comment #61 @ 11:07 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

T-B0N3

arg .. i hope this game sucks so i wont have to upgrade pc for it :/

<< Comment #101 @ 08:32 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

H1ghTecM@N^ - Reply to #61

You can't say that man !

<< Comment #63 @ 11:16 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Shock R.

hell yeah, fits everything, can't w8 for it to come out :-)

<< Comment #77 @ 13:02 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Anonymous (83.138.223.17.dyn.user.ono.com)

> NVIDIA 7800GTX+ or ATI x1300+ Video Card

This *MUST* be wrong. The 7800 is an high-end monster (24 pixel and 8 vertex pipes, 430 MHz core), the x1300 is an entry-level card with just 4 pixel and 2 vertex pipes at 450 MHz. The 7800 should be like, at lest, 5 times faster.

<< Comment #83 @ 16:07 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Antigen07 - Reply to #77

thought the same thing.

<< Comment #91 @ 02:13 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

Geert^ - Reply to #77

the x1300 must be x1900 for sure

<< Comment #72 @ 12:10 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

dadS

games are expensive these days, needing to buy this and that just to play the fuckers.

<< Comment #75 @ 12:51 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Erk - Reply to #72

Games for PC are getting cheaper and cheaper tbh, since money gets less worth and price has stayed the same for 15 years.

<< Comment #74 @ 12:41 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

OMRomero

If they have failed to implement lag compensation yet again, you can count me out from playing.

<< Comment #76 @ 12:57 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

vedic

Despite how much I've disliked the series before, I'll give it a try. Figured the requirements would be higher.

<< Comment #79 @ 13:26 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

dàC! - Reply to #76

That`s the way to see it and not just disregard it :)

<< Comment #84 @ 16:55 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

zkyp

http://www.ut2341.com/UT3SystemScore/

! ;d

<< Comment #88 @ 23:13 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Nicky - Reply to #84

high/med (although it didnt list my cpu)

<< Comment #90 @ 23:42 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Antigen07 - Reply to #84

Highest.

But I wont be playing on those settings for more than a few weeks after I get the game. Even sooner when I start deciding parts of the eye candy are annoying, hurting visibility or FPS killers.

Edited by Antigen07 at 23:43 CDT, 4 October 2007

<< Comment #97 @ 06:17 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

shqdow - Reply to #84

uhm low/med :Y
but hell, ill play with lowest settings anyway :P

<< Comment #100 @ 08:08 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

f0cus - Reply to #84

20.47616861472

thanks for the link !

<< Comment #102 @ 08:40 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

Tree_ - Reply to #84

Crank that res, f'er.

AND SO I SHALL!

On another note, my old computer only gets 0.2025185403125. Look's like theres no UT for the old sucker.

Edited by Tree_ at 08:43 CDT, 5 October 2007

<< Comment #107 @ 15:51 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

zkyp - Reply to #84

22.7 with my new pc ;d

<< Comment #117 @ 17:20 CDT, 7 October 2007 >>

By

Levi215 - Reply to #84

15.19 :/ upgrade required

<< Comment #124 @ 15:29 CDT, 9 October 2007 >>

By

f0cus - Reply to #117

i'd hardly say that qualifies as "update required"

<< Comment #86 @ 17:47 CDT, 4 October 2007 >>

By

Should be ok :) !

<< Comment #95 @ 05:18 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

karizma

just turn down eyecandy .. everything will be fine =D

<< Comment #103 @ 08:56 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

This will probably be the best game in the world.

<< Comment #106 @ 15:05 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

fragmaster_ - Reply to #103

i smell sarcasm

<< Comment #108 @ 16:02 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

perez™

stop wanking, it's ut. will have more fun with windows pinball.

<< Comment #109 @ 20:11 CDT, 5 October 2007 >>

By

veal

> 8 GB of Free Hard Drive Space
this is getting ridiculous

<< Comment #125 @ 03:16 CDT, 10 October 2007 >>

By

frank_garrett - Reply to #109

what

<< Comment #113 @ 06:17 CDT, 6 October 2007 >>

By

> NVIDIA 6200+ or ATI Radeon 9600+ Video Card
> I Like Turtles
> 8 GB of Free Hard Drive Space

WTF? turtles?? where did that come from? Fuck this, I'm gonna stay with Q3.

Edited by danseko.dD at 06:17 CDT, 6 October 2007

<< Comment #114 @ 07:22 CDT, 6 October 2007 >>

By

Anonymous (p549D5E02.dip.t-dialin.net) - Reply to #113

turtles > jumping eyeballs with plasma guns

<< Comment #115 @ 11:34 CDT, 6 October 2007 >>

By

f0cus - Reply to #113

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMNry4PE93Y

<< Comment #127 @ 15:31 CDT, 10 April 2009 >>

By

Anonymous (210.211.130.114.bb.vsnl.net.in)

I have NVIDIA Geforce 9400 GT 1gb will it work

<< Comment #128 @ 16:07 CDT, 10 April 2009 >>

By

vedic - Reply to #127

http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest

Reply to:
[Reset]

Formatting:

Content:

Enter Text:

Or if you already have an account:

Username:

Password:

Read the Posting Guidelines

Non-HTML tags: [b]bold[/b], [i]italics[/i], [u]underlined[/u]
[small]small[/small], [q]quoted[/q], [s]~~strikethrough~~[/s]
[url=www.url.com]link[/url] or type www.url.com
[flag=country] (list), [avatar=name] (list)
[map=mapname gamename] (list)

Conceived and created by Sujoy Roy (Legal Notices)
RSS Feed Information, Link Buttons and Banners