ESR - EG.Ecstacy Interviewed On SK-Gaming.com

<< Comment #198 @ 18:26 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Venim - Reply to #1

clearly a fap fap article =0

<< Comment #199 @ 18:30 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

theking_ - Reply to #198

haha, you missed the original picture.

<< Comment #201 @ 18:36 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Venim - Reply to #199

link =D

<< Comment #202 @ 18:41 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

theking_ - Reply to #201

sorry it took me a while. but i found it.

http://a97.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/...9b1a40.jpg

<< Comment #458 @ 12:03 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Venim - Reply to #202

=)

<< Comment #3 @ 02:35 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xero- '

"Annie revealed [...] the fact that she was a cheerleader in high school"

lol so was ppb

Edited by xerosawyer at 02:36 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #19 @ 03:47 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

.syL - Reply to #3

Push was waterboy for the cheerleaders

<< Comment #4 @ 02:44 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sonic

i wonder if she includes that picture with job applications

<< Comment #5 @ 02:47 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #4

hehe

<< Comment #69 @ 07:24 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sonic - Reply to #5

i personally find that cross more offensive than the pseudo spunk-receptacle pose :/

<< Comment #470 @ 06:43 CST, 10 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

randomness666 - Reply to #69

:D

<< Comment #6 @ 03:07 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

link

she's full of bs. ofc she takes the cock from every member of that team

<< Comment #7 @ 03:12 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

hypno!

Isn't this EG female member thing getting too much attention? I mean.. :/

<< Comment #37 @ 04:54 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danny - Reply to #7

that's the whole point she's on the team!

<< Comment #8 @ 03:19 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy

They obviously left out the only important question: spit or swallow?

<< Comment #11 @ 03:27 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

anal justice - Reply to #8

the latter ofc. doh, what is wrong with you? its 2008 now

<< Comment #21 @ 04:00 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy - Reply to #11

She did say she has 'conservative' values.

<< Comment #34 @ 04:40 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

tzz - Reply to #21

That only means she doesn't tell.

15%

<< Comment #40 @ 05:19 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy - Reply to #34

I think there is some potential here. What do people think about a UT3/bukkake tournament?

<< Comment #128 @ 09:14 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

anal justice - Reply to #40

great idea and huge prize money potential

<< Comment #181 @ 13:55 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

cbkkk_ - Reply to #128

You mean moneyshots?

<< Comment #189 @ 15:31 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

spring-afk - Reply to #34

:DD

<< Comment #9 @ 03:20 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

[DOA]XiLLy

I love how they're simultaneously trying to make out her being a female isn't a big deal, and posting hot pictures....like, three times.

<< Comment #15 @ 03:30 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #9

#13

<< Comment #10 @ 03:21 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funkeh

"I'm just one of the guys"
"I think the focus should be more on the results of female gamers rather than their looks"
"I want people to consider me because of my skills, not because i'm good looking".

Yeah, because you clearly see stryfe posing on a picture with a sexy dress every time he gets interviewed... get a clue;

<< Comment #13 @ 03:28 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #10

Exactly.. another marketing and hypocrite bullshit. All of this kind is really getting annoying.

<< Comment #41 @ 05:25 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

dunnisdone - Reply to #13

Who said she took this picture for the interview? It's been up on her MySpace page since before she joined EG (along with the other "sexy" pictures you've seen), she must have been planning ahead quite well. Do you go around and check every male picture to make sure he's not posing too much or looking too sexy (too be fair, you'll have to be a bisexual)? Sure she's not afraid to show off her looks, neither are many of the more attractive male gamers, but when did she ever try to use her looks specifically to get attention in the gaming community?

And a hypocrite? She said several times in the interview that she's not afraid to use her looks, she just doesn't want that to be the main focus. I guess what you're saying is that she underestimated the fact that (some of) the community could skip the whole interview and focus their opinions off of a few pictures.

Just face the facts... When a team is trying to win over new kinds of fans and attract mainstream sponsors, skill alone won't cut it. It takes personality and marketability (often measured by looks) as well. If you're upset with that then, well, you're upset with society because everything is driven by money these days. If you go look at the new Team EG ad at the top of http://www.intel.com/personal/gaming/index.htm you'll see them doing poses as well. I doubt you'll find it to be so "sexy" since you're probably not into other guys, but I think your opinion was already headed towards the same false conclusions before you even read this post (or any others about her).

<< Comment #42 @ 05:36 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ix - Reply to #41

"Just face the facts... When a team is trying to win over new kinds of fans and attract mainstream sponsors, skill alone won't cut it. It takes personality and marketability (often measured by looks) as well. If you're upset with that then, well, you're upset with society because everything is driven by money these days."

This crap is why 'Esports' is made of fail. It is the Emperor's new clothes.

<< Comment #43 @ 05:36 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy - Reply to #41

You're aboslutely fucking right. Even Shakespeare showed off his body for ratings.

<< Comment #45 @ 05:51 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #41

I didn't say she was hypocrite, maybe she is talking sincerly, that is not my point and I honestly don't care

Do you actually think she has been recruited for her UT3 skills ? Come on, don't be naive, This is where it's so hypocrite. This is the very same simple concept (product+asses=sell) of the publicities you see on TV, so yes I have a problem with that in general when they come to appear on medias with no reasons.

<< Comment #186 @ 15:11 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

erok - Reply to #45

she is pretty damn good from what i hear, but i don't follow the ut community too closely

<< Comment #421 @ 17:49 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Oh_Snaps! - Reply to #186

she fucking sucks, horrible, walks in straight line n stuff, and leaves if shes getting to badly...shes horrible. Not the same ecstasy that played in some tournament, somebody ringed in for her (stryfe)

<< Comment #49 @ 06:03 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

timmah - Reply to #41

If she does not want looks to be the main focus then she would do something about the picture selection. And if she doesn't, she either doesn't care or, like you say, does not mind using her looks, which probably works well in a predominantly male gaming-community. .

However, in return, she then cannot expect people _NOT_ to focus on her looks. A picture tells more than a thousand words. With picture selection like that, she won't convince many that looks are not her main focus. And yes, most gamers will not just take "your word for it".

Also quite interesting that most of the pictures are like nice smiles or in a sexy dress. None of them involving her sitting in front of a PC or the likes. Good marketing for mainstream appeal I guess.

Edited by timmah at 06:05 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #54 @ 06:13 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funkeh - Reply to #49

exactly my thought, 80% of the interview about not wanting to be considered for he looks (only or at all, whatever) but spammed with pics of her looking sexy?

Maybe she should've tried to choose pictures more related to the article to have at least some minor form of credibility? Or maybe she's just lying, or plain stupid?

Well at least it's working, wether you're drewling over the pics, bashing her comments or whatever, it makes people talk.

Oh but wait, what team is she in again?

Edited by funkeh at 06:16 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #94 @ 08:13 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #54

a va?

<< Comment #236 @ 03:03 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funkeh - Reply to #94

Plus beaucoup le temps de jouer, sinon la forme. Et toi?

<< Comment #257 @ 07:13 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #236

Je connardise sur WoW entre mes 3 heures de cours hebdomadaires. :) Quand c'est que tu ramène ta gueule à Strasbourg ?

<< Comment #335 @ 12:58 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funkeh - Reply to #257

Ben dis-moi quand je peux venir et je m'arrange pour prendre un long w-e. On chope le sun et on se fait un w-e de déglingo?

<< Comment #355 @ 18:46 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #335

need too !

<< Comment #369 @ 03:46 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funkeh - Reply to #355

bah go chauffer le chauve, moi il répond même plus quand je l'appelle ;)

<< Comment #73 @ 07:29 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #49

have you ever seen photos that fatal1ty published?

the only difference is that the majority of people here is male so they always jump to attention when it's about girls.
Almost nobody wants to evaluate how sexy the male gamers might look on their pics.

<< Comment #114 @ 08:54 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #73

Sexy gamer ? Looks more like they want to be taken as tough.

Edited by Nicky at 09:10 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #117 @ 08:59 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #114

yes, and in my opinion the reason why guy want to appear tough on pictures is because they figure it's attractive to women.

<< Comment #118 @ 08:59 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #117

Wait for my image to be approven and edit your post ahaha.

<< Comment #130 @ 09:16 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #118

"they figure" ;D

<< Comment #125 @ 09:11 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #117

i would rather see a man semi naked and wet from a shower ty :P

<< Comment #133 @ 09:17 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #125

I'll see if i can find a 150kg hairy 50 year old for you :)

<< Comment #136 @ 09:22 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #133

ewww no thats gross

<< Comment #138 @ 09:27 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #136

suit yourself

<< Comment #157 @ 10:53 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

tewic - Reply to #125

Makes me sad to see you havn't gotten any offers yet, unloyal users here on ESR.

I'd do it, but people would think that you were a pedo then, and we can't have that *cough* ;P

<< Comment #160 @ 11:02 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #157

i am past it now :(

<< Comment #163 @ 11:24 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

tewic - Reply to #160

Past what? :P

Young meat or just being horny after some wet dude..

you're so dirty Nicky!

<< Comment #164 @ 11:29 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #163

past thinking about anything remotely to do with sex :P

<< Comment #169 @ 12:02 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #164

right...

I remember quite a few ambigious comments

<< Comment #170 @ 12:02 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #169

ha :D

<< Comment #183 @ 14:20 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

tewic - Reply to #164

I would've believed you, but then I realised that you're only human.

<< Comment #184 @ 14:33 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #183

wow i normally get called a bot :P

<< Comment #194 @ 16:43 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

tewic - Reply to #184

Anna?? Is it really you? *me looks closer*

Edited by tewic at 16:43 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #126 @ 09:14 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #114

who's the guy on the right?

<< Comment #131 @ 09:16 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

TUMULT - Reply to #114

Hey,. check his picture @ myspace.

Edited by freak_ at 09:19 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #147 @ 09:58 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

KING KEV - Reply to #131

He must be really cool/tough, he's got leather jacket, ear phones and gel in his hair.

Bet he makes the fonz cry at night :(

<< Comment #165 @ 11:49 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

CLains - Reply to #131

funny how people think and consider themselves in the coolest pose when everyone else thinks it's really overdone and silly x)

<< Comment #180 @ 13:42 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

A_Spec - Reply to #131

The Fonz returns!

<< Comment #191 @ 15:51 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

zmongo - Reply to #131

?

<< Comment #438 @ 20:58 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

TUMULT - Reply to #131

I found a better one :d

Edited by freak_ at 20:58 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #56 @ 06:22 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

KitesAreFun - Reply to #13

Agreed.

<< Comment #78 @ 07:42 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Putton - Reply to #13

sorry bro but i want rather see thousand of her pictures than one of yours.

<< Comment #80 @ 07:47 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #78

you are missing the point and just free insulting, what exactly should I reply to that?

<< Comment #81 @ 07:50 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Putton - Reply to #80

nothin so you lost

<< Comment #87 @ 08:05 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #81

actually, I still repplied, see? so it's a draw?

<< Comment #207 @ 19:37 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

kAi^ - Reply to #87

ahah gg man

<< Comment #265 @ 08:06 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Putton - Reply to #87

forfeit win

<< Comment #24 @ 04:14 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #10

If only stryfe could do it, I wouldn't need to download all those porn films all day long...

By the way, good job stryfe with that new recruit, UT3 is probably boring as hell but you found a way to make it more exciting. It could even make me stop playing WoW ! Nah kidding, can't get enough of rolesex with winz.

<< Comment #29 @ 04:27 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

dàC! - Reply to #10

The one and only thing that struck me while reading it aswell, then the question is - is it her or SK who are the attention whore(s) here with the surplus of needless pictures.. ?

<< Comment #33 @ 04:37 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #29

Both, obviously.

<< Comment #44 @ 05:43 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

dàC! - Reply to #33

Ye, i tend to agree.

<< Comment #254 @ 06:54 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #29

I'll just repeat my original statement and say that if all she/they want is attention, and she's just a bimbo who will play "anything", then picking UT3 in stead of, say.. WoW or DoTA, is a pretty fucking bad idea :p

<< Comment #12 @ 03:28 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Aaron

girls playing games is so 1984

<< Comment #14 @ 03:30 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold

Looks as if she is being hammered in that pic?

<< Comment #16 @ 03:35 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MaJunior - Reply to #14

now it's like she's waiting for the 'finishing' blow if you know what i' m sayin'

<< Comment #18 @ 03:39 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #16

Where spiderman will cast his web all over her face :D

<< Comment #25 @ 04:16 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Aquashark - Reply to #18

looks more like she's gurgling already ^_^

<< Comment #32 @ 04:34 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Lethe - Reply to #25

you guys r pathetic.

5%

<< Comment #35 @ 04:44 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Aquashark - Reply to #32

ur inner woman is offended

<< Comment #36 @ 04:51 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Lethe - Reply to #35

your inner brain is missing.

<< Comment #46 @ 05:52 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funnyb - Reply to #36

lmao@homosexuals

<< Comment #51 @ 06:08 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Lethe - Reply to #46

selfcriticism?

<< Comment #148 @ 10:14 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funnyb - Reply to #51

i wouldn't mind being homosexual, us men are way easier to deal with than women

<< Comment #151 @ 10:20 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #148

truth always comes out in the end

5%

<< Comment #166 @ 11:51 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

CLains - Reply to #151

truth

<< Comment #190 @ 15:50 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funnyb - Reply to #151

now now, you wouldn't mind me exploring your pleasure cave either!

<< Comment #28 @ 04:22 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

pizz - Reply to #16

jizz'ed

<< Comment #57 @ 06:26 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

KitesAreFun - Reply to #14

lol

Funny shit, but they changed it.

A lot of criticism is a bit overboard for her personally, but I happen to agree with winz on the "general" issue.

<< Comment #63 @ 06:50 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #57

ye y ruin :<
I agree, I don't think liefje, missy, ms x, barbie etc had this amount of flak, simply because they played the games and worked their way up the ladder through hard work. I have much respect for them and won't say such things to them. Dunno, maybe she can upload a couple of demo's of her playing in a tournament, then we speak again. Right now shes nothing but a pretty face.

<< Comment #82 @ 07:54 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

GoiracH - Reply to #63

i think there's a ut2004 movie of her, dunno for sure though.

<< Comment #103 @ 08:28 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #63

"Ecstasy: I actually use to go by a different username, Barbi3. Most of the people in the UT community know me as that name but I felt it did not really suit my personality, plus the name has been used by other gamers."

<< Comment #127 @ 09:14 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #103

Was referring too c58-Barbie
Demo

<< Comment #143 @ 09:42 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #127

ohhhh oki

<< Comment #203 @ 19:07 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Liefje - Reply to #127

barbie is a member of g0d and is not the same girl :)

<< Comment #217 @ 00:21 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #203

Yeah, I just could not remember what your clan was called ><

<< Comment #91 @ 08:12 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Bob - Reply to #57

.

Edited by Bob at 18:12 CDT, 26 June 2024

<< Comment #144 @ 09:46 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #91

Here - snow effects.

Edit:
Found it on her website. xD

Edited by Wolscooter at 09:49 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #17 @ 03:38 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

qtip

Not bad for a guy, id hit him.

<< Comment #20 @ 03:51 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ix

I wonder which team they'll shuffle her to now that UT3 has tanked? Look out for Annie 'Sensuality' Leung in their SC2 lineup, she'll be a natural, she's azn after all.

<< Comment #22 @ 04:01 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

exp!

another attention whore... gtfo.

<< Comment #158 @ 10:58 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

tewic - Reply to #22

Somehow I don't think she actually asked for it. She plays the game and (from what I can understand from her and the eg guys) is pretty good at it, she even says herself that females should only get attention for their skill.

If you were offered an interview, would you say no? Atleast if you're in some big clan it's always nice with as much publicity as possible, she'd be stupid to say no to the oppotunity for some free advertising.

<< Comment #255 @ 06:57 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #158

Yeah I agree completely, this whole attention whore theory is just bullshit. If she wants attention, play WoW or something. She obviously likes UT.

She should've posed in normal clothes and made it more subtle though.

<< Comment #23 @ 04:13 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Aquashark

never thought the porn industry will get suprasaturated.. although recession and unemployment should make it flourish.

lmao @ comments on SK site
apparently this is working.. can someone tell them there's free porn on the internets? stupid nerds.

Edited by Aquashark at 10:32 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #26 @ 04:19 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

pizz

call me

<< Comment #27 @ 04:21 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xou

ZZzZzZzz

<< Comment #30 @ 04:31 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Lethe

cmon, without hair she'd look like an asian dude.

<< Comment #31 @ 04:34 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy

Annie, there are no magazine covers here. Be straight with us - whatever you want to say, say it. Anyone gets offended... it's their problem. Lay it out.

I've said it time and time again... if there are any lonely girls out there... in need of love (who are not too fat, too ugly, or too diseased), i'm here for you.

So uh... do you like the esreality community? I bet even if I had 15,000 ping, i'd beat you at UT.

Edited by Jonesy at 04:35 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #38 @ 05:06 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

doped - Reply to #31

now, THATS pathetic ;P

<< Comment #39 @ 05:18 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy - Reply to #38

Too bad, I was trying to be insulting. I think it's getting harder and harder to insult people. You pretty much have to resort to stereotypical, cliche'd sexist/racist/religious remarks. It's a sad state of affairs.

<< Comment #52 @ 06:09 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

timmah - Reply to #39

Those are fun though. Because the person on the receiving end is more likely to actually understand what you're talking about and will fall for the bait more easily.

<< Comment #55 @ 06:16 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy - Reply to #52

Exactly. Girls can be very shrewd though. Tougher than guys, usually.

<< Comment #79 @ 07:43 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #52

only really works on poles nowadays :(

<< Comment #53 @ 06:12 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy - Reply to #39

Which isn't to say, if there aren't suicidally depressed girls out there who fit the description (not too young, fat, ugly, or diseased), they shouldn't let me know. Although, i'm afraid the rest of you will just have to die.

Edited by Jonesy at 06:14 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #140 @ 09:33 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

anal justice - Reply to #39

I think it's getting harder and harder to insult people.

hah get a [+]

<< Comment #47 @ 05:56 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funnyb

so why major this attentionwhoring article? nobody cares, everybody knows WHY she's a "pro gamer", and that her logics fail, unmajor thanks

<< Comment #50 @ 06:04 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

h3i - Reply to #47

[12:02] <h3i> i agree

<< Comment #66 @ 07:22 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

zerox - Reply to #47

why was it again that u went running at 3-4 in the night last summer?
ekse and i just had to think of it again and couldnt figure out the reason

<< Comment #75 @ 07:36 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funnyb - Reply to #66

due to epic fail

and it wasnt last summer, it was the summer before that

<< Comment #83 @ 07:57 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

zerox - Reply to #75

jaja
time passes by...

<< Comment #110 @ 08:38 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MassMan - Reply to #66

Knowing fb's libido i think his 3am running was due to sexual frustration

<< Comment #74 @ 07:32 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

OvO - Reply to #47

agree, unmajor and make a section for girlygamerz if anyone cares

<< Comment #59 @ 06:35 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Ecstacy

K, stop taking my comment too seriously.

Edited by Ecstacy at 09:32 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #61 @ 06:47 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy - Reply to #59

You goofy gal, nobody hates you. Don't take things so seriously. There's a whole universe out there... billions of years behind us... an eternity in front; and who knows what's beyond this universe.

As a playa', you should know better than to put yourself in the line of fire. I'd wager it is all a ploy. You lure people into thinking you've put yourself in this line of fire, only to take advantage of their misconception. But I know better... while you think i've taken the bait, in fact i've hired someone to deceive you while I engage in a stealthy flank maneuver. This is why I win and you lose.

<< Comment #95 @ 08:16 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Bob - Reply to #61

i know your kind

<< Comment #145 @ 09:49 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

anal justice - Reply to #61

watch and learn guys, he is one step closer to her panties now

<< Comment #62 @ 06:48 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ix - Reply to #59

What reaction were you expecting? You've done nothing to justify the level of attention you've been receiving so it's only an attempt by EG to use your looks to get themselves coverage.

Edited by ix at 06:48 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #269 @ 08:23 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Anima - Reply to #62

stop being mean to the hot chick you nerd ! :p

<< Comment #64 @ 06:56 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xou - Reply to #59

/ignore won't help, you'd better /quit : ]

<< Comment #65 @ 07:01 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

nemecel - Reply to #59

When you win a Q3 tournament, then you'll have respect. Play a game that requires skill first.

<< Comment #212 @ 23:14 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xero- ' - Reply to #65

shut up you dumb vq3 nerd.

7%

<< Comment #342 @ 14:02 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Burn the Priest - Reply to #212

Why would people [+] a useless flame post?

<< Comment #347 @ 14:18 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #342

Because this is ESR BABY!

<< Comment #354 @ 18:21 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Burn the Priest - Reply to #347

Fair enough.

<< Comment #67 @ 07:22 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sonic - Reply to #59

yeah way to go proving everyones (lighthearted) point.

the internet: where attention seeking little brats get to convince themselves they're awesome.

Edited by sonic at 07:27 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #72 @ 07:27 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

graumull - Reply to #59

FPA all over again? :D

<< Comment #104 @ 08:33 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #72

oh god no please, just NO

<< Comment #173 @ 12:30 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By $\0/$ V-DecK - Reply to #104

Everytime I read your post I have a vision of SyncError being beaten.......

<< Comment #174 @ 12:32 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #173

lol

<< Comment #84 @ 07:57 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #59

Ye behave like this.
Care only about people who like you and don't listen to people who say bad things about you, they're a bunch of morons.

Or,
Think 2 minutes about the reason why there are so many people "against" you. They could have a good reason for some of them.

My point of view,
You're the perfect exemple why feminists have still work to do. Girls should be taken in gaming teams for their skill and only for their skill. We should look at you like "hey damn she aims well... oh and she's cute at the top of it !", but at the moment this is more like "who the hell is she? oh damn she's hot ! does she even know what a rocket is ?". I hope there will be more girls in gaming soon but girls who actually play the game well.

Now show off some good results and some skill in the game, we'll discuss later if you're worth a major article or not. Believe it or not, there are people who don't give shit if you're a girl or not.

To ESR pimps, make major a article about Kayane the french Soul Calibur champion, she's the kind of girls we need in gaming. Firstly, we speak about her skill and then about her cuteness.

[edit] Even your nick is explicit, that's really funny :D. Did I call myself "BigCock" or "IMakeHerHappyForFree" ? [/edit]

Edited by th0r^ at 08:05 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #98 @ 08:17 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #84

nah you called yourself thor, who is said to be stronger than gods, which in the end results at the same conclusion: you are auto-masturbating =]

<< Comment #100 @ 08:21 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #98

I'm stronger than gods since gods are bullshit, that's all my nick means but you watch too much TF1 to understand it xD.

<< Comment #101 @ 08:22 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

f0cus - Reply to #84

I'd written this big long thing but then decided it was too much effort.
All it said was that you're an idiot. That's the short version.

<< Comment #106 @ 08:36 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #101

If you say so.

<< Comment #238 @ 03:08 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funkeh - Reply to #84

Oh she knows what a rocket is... BING!

<< Comment #92 @ 08:12 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #59

You fail at understanding, bravo.

There are the comments with the guys that are thinking only with their penises (which you shouldn't care about) and the others, like mine, who have actually nothing to do with you personally.

But hey, whatever afterall, won't bother explaining to someone reacting like this. (you boys are rude!!:( /ignore)

<< Comment #182 @ 13:59 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

cbkkk_ - Reply to #59

its esr.. esr is nothing but serious. dead fucking serious.

<< Comment #58 @ 06:34 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

A_Spec

The reason for majoring this is the shitload of trolling and activity we get from these articles. Why do you think CPL stuff gets majored?

Besides, long interviews that have proper content always get majored. Why? Because we don't get enough of them.

Edited by A_Spec at 06:37 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #60 @ 06:37 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold

This is bs, this new pic ruined my posts! Now she looks like shes on her way to church, HA!

Edit:

There is also the stereotype that women aren’t good at games. Hence in game taunts like “you shoot like a girl.

Correction:
I will control you like a girl

Edited by Wolscooter at 07:11 CST, 6 February 2008

5%

<< Comment #68 @ 07:23 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gSTRUCTOR '

Romero will make you his bitch!

<< Comment #142 @ 09:42 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

anal justice - Reply to #68

since its ut3 we are talking about, that would be cliffyb

<< Comment #70 @ 07:25 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

dickobrazz

I wonder that there is always so much "hallo", when someone introduces a girl to the progamers.. ^^

those pictures could be sexy... but i always wonder what wakes up next to me in the morning after i first time slept with her.. ;P

f*ck this guys.. cause ur doing bad for yourselfs.. bad advertisment is also advertisment for her.. or EG..

Edited by dickobrazz at 07:26 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #71 @ 07:26 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

OvO

yes very interesting

she cant play a god damn game

<< Comment #77 @ 07:41 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #71

I honestly have no idea how good or bad she is but you don't seem to have a clue either.

At least I remember that she did beat gellehsak in ut so that's a sing that she at least knows which button does the shooting.

<< Comment #85 @ 08:01 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #77

Who's Gellehsak ?

<< Comment #93 @ 08:13 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #85

pk and quake.

I only said she knows where the fire button is ;)

<< Comment #96 @ 08:16 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #93

Yeh ok, so does my 3 years old nephew ;)

<< Comment #102 @ 08:25 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #96

so he can play a goddamn game

<< Comment #105 @ 08:34 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #102

What were we talking about again ?

Edited by th0r^ at 08:37 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #107 @ 08:36 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #105

usually a discussion statrts with the first post in the chain ;)

<< Comment #97 @ 08:16 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

KING KEV - Reply to #93

pk+cpm

<< Comment #134 @ 09:21 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

TUMULT - Reply to #97

+qw

<< Comment #137 @ 09:22 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

KING KEV - Reply to #134

idd

<< Comment #204 @ 19:10 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Liefje - Reply to #77

is that a big deal? Gelleh doesnt even have a UT background afaik. How many quake players have i beaten in UT? lol.. counts for ABSOLOUTLY nothing.

Edited by Liefje at 19:11 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #208 @ 20:01 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

KING KEV - Reply to #204

Time for a bitch fight I think

<< Comment #215 @ 23:34 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Liefje - Reply to #208

I don't mean it in a degrading way, im sure she is pretty skilled and i've heard a lot about her from stryfe and I trust him :) But all i'm saying is, its not a big deal she beat gelleh and i don't know why people make it to be.

I'm always for more girls playing UT. Now nicky and I can have a UTthree-way ;) (HAHA see what i did there?) :p

<< Comment #211 @ 21:45 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

mnz! - Reply to #204

time for a liefje interview if you ask me.

"who have you beaten?"
"oh, there is this pro from quake and this guy from blablub..."

would be a nice discussion to follow. UT+girls+pros in one post=esr-comment-armageddon! :D

<< Comment #216 @ 23:35 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Liefje - Reply to #211

how about someone just pastes some porn and there would be a lot less whine :)

<< Comment #219 @ 00:23 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #216

:D Finally someone gets it ^^

<< Comment #227 @ 02:25 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #204

no it isn't a big deal, and I never said it is.

Just shows that she at least knows how to play the game, nothing more nothing less. But I'm at least willing to give the benefit of doubt as opposed to others.

<< Comment #241 @ 03:41 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Liefje - Reply to #227

oh ok :-)

<< Comment #76 @ 07:36 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

H1ghTecM@N^

Like "what ?". The picture has changed ? Hum...

<< Comment #86 @ 08:03 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

s.a.y

does she have any UT3 results to back it up ?

<< Comment #89 @ 08:08 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #86

She beat Mike666 on a Free For All server once, that's all we've been told yet, but stay tuned !

<< Comment #88 @ 08:07 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^

Fatal1ty is gonna pwn her so hard...

<< Comment #129 @ 09:15 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

TUMULT - Reply to #88

With one hand!

Um.. I didn't mean that :[

<< Comment #109 @ 08:37 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Anonymous (20-20.sfcc.edu)

I blame the site for being an enabler, I blame her for putting herself in the line of fire

All women like attention, some more so than others.

Don't pretend for a second her "aww shucks didn't know" attitude is truthful

<< Comment #90 @ 08:12 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^

By the way, did you guyz figure out how quakers and uters all felt united in that fight against sexism ? I fell proud of our communities !

13%

<< Comment #155 @ 10:39 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Aquashark - Reply to #90

UT still sucks don't worry

<< Comment #167 @ 11:52 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #155

Yep but not as much as sexism and all UTers feel happy for it ! Thanks you Quakers for setting us at a such high rank !

<< Comment #256 @ 07:01 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sansai - Reply to #167

Yea, you're better than AIDS too !

<< Comment #99 @ 08:17 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

KING KEV

goth

<< Comment #108 @ 08:37 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky

nice to see the quakers and uters fighting on the same side for once ;)

<< Comment #111 @ 08:46 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #108

I thought she was supposed to be a uter?

<< Comment #113 @ 08:51 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #108

can't you [+] the post 2 lines over yours instead of repeating my words ?! xD

<< Comment #120 @ 09:06 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #113

damn [+] beggars :P

<< Comment #359 @ 21:38 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

baron Railgun ' - Reply to #120

you are not in the mood today, huh ? or did not tell you sujoy to plus people so the impression esreality forum is very active is maintained ?

<< Comment #112 @ 08:48 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^

Malystryx: What in your opinion is stopping female gaming from progressing? Do you think the “sex sells marketing” of some companies is hindering its development?

"I don’t think that marketing sex is hindering its development. A female gamer can be attractive and good at gaming, except the emphasis shouldn’t be on her looks but rather her skills and accomplishments."

I can barely see a line about her skill or her accomplishments in this interview.

Thanks for not proving it, girl.

/dance

Edited by th0r^ at 08:49 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #116 @ 08:58 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xou - Reply to #112

You're VERY talkative today

<< Comment #121 @ 09:07 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #116

cet abruti était sensé partir bosser, c'est moche.

<< Comment #123 @ 09:09 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xou - Reply to #121

Tu fais une pause wow? : ]

<< Comment #124 @ 09:11 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #123

pour faire quoi? pour jouer à quake4? xD

<< Comment #132 @ 09:16 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sonic - Reply to #124

je suis

<< Comment #135 @ 09:21 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #132

donc tu es !

<< Comment #297 @ 09:50 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sonic - Reply to #135

you took the words straight from my mouth man

<< Comment #141 @ 09:35 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xou - Reply to #124

Pour relire ca: http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1281205

<< Comment #146 @ 09:56 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #141

j'ai pas trop saisi le rapport :o

<< Comment #149 @ 10:15 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xou - Reply to #146

ça parle de filles et d'esports!

<< Comment #153 @ 10:27 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #149

ouais mais j'ai pas saisi le rapport avec ma question qui était "pour faire quoi?" :)

<< Comment #159 @ 11:00 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Jazzy - Reply to #153

Voulez-vous coucher avec moi, ce soir ?

<< Comment #162 @ 11:16 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

[mash] - Reply to #159

bliblablu blaeh

<< Comment #195 @ 17:50 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

feTzu - Reply to #159

without the comma it makes much more sense..

<< Comment #206 @ 19:29 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Jazzy - Reply to #195

was thinking that :p

dunno why but it bothered me on the bus earlier...

<< Comment #251 @ 05:48 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

feTzu - Reply to #206

take the subway then...

<< Comment #267 @ 08:07 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Jazzy - Reply to #251

u think Dublin has a subway ?

<< Comment #336 @ 13:00 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funkeh - Reply to #267

No but mssrs mguire & le bruxelles are teh pwn

<< Comment #343 @ 14:06 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Jazzy - Reply to #336

messrs is alright but bruxelles smells like urine

<< Comment #466 @ 21:27 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

feTzu - Reply to #267

do you really think I should give a fuck?

<< Comment #161 @ 11:02 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xou - Reply to #153

lapin compris le rat mort :[

<< Comment #222 @ 01:48 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

H1ghTecM@N^ - Reply to #161

mais stop it :| !

<< Comment #122 @ 09:07 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #116

he is on a rolllll

<< Comment #213 @ 23:18 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xero- ' - Reply to #112

Are you retarded? You should be bitching at the interviewer for not asking the questions. What kinda backwards logic are you working on?

<< Comment #226 @ 02:25 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #213

Because it's not the fault of the interviewer if she doesn't have any accomplishment. Why would he ask "What did you win in the past ?" if he knows the answer will be "Huh well did I show you my last pictures ?".

<< Comment #229 @ 02:29 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #226

because that's what good inteviewers would do?

The point should be that people get to know the interviewed person, both the positive and negative parts. Not just the positive and let everyone assume the negative.

<< Comment #115 @ 08:55 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Jazzy

she seems nice enough from that interview

i have a friend out in berkley atm studying ancient greek so \o/ for berkley.

i wouldnt mind seeing some demo's of her matches. was it gelleshak that was saying she was beating him in practice?

<< Comment #119 @ 09:01 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xou

Andy (gellehsak) came to me and told me about this girl that was beating him in practice

World must not forget she beats Andy!

<< Comment #139 @ 09:27 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #119

and it didn't!

#77 ;)

<< Comment #150 @ 10:17 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

wata

(unintentional, or not) esr bashing whore, actually

<< Comment #152 @ 10:21 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold

btw

"According to Team EG manager Alex Garfield's she is " the first girl in eSports history to start for an otherwise all-male team at the top of its respective game."

c58 girls?

I want to give EG and its sponsors (Intel, Razer, Stoked Energy, and Killer NIC) props for being the first organization to have a mixed-gender team and setting an example for the gaming community.

Really? Even my/our clan had mixed team a couple of years ago.

Edited by Wolscooter at 10:25 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #168 @ 11:54 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #152

Yep but you had ugly lesbian geeks so that doesn't count.

<< Comment #171 @ 12:11 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #168

Actually I played on a team with a girl a while back.
She wouldn't give anyone her picture, so being male we all assumed she had something to hide.

Well, I meant her on a lan and she was quite good looking. Just didn't want all the "will you marry me" attention.

<< Comment #176 @ 12:57 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #171

That girl is the kind of girls we need ! Gimme his email plz. xD

<< Comment #177 @ 13:08 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #176

his? :P

Not who you'd need tho. She wasn't high skilled, but that was ok cause neither was the rest of the team :)

<< Comment #154 @ 10:32 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

tom

hey look its a picture of a girl on the internet

<< Comment #156 @ 10:45 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xfoo

Pure marketing gimmick until she actually wins something.

<< Comment #172 @ 12:23 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #156

I would say Top 15 of a big international event would be acceptable.

<< Comment #175 @ 12:57 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #172

come on.. there are more than 15 ut3 players in the world ! :D

Edited by *aAa*winz at 10:29 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #178 @ 13:10 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #175

Well I figured she could beat that "BYE" fellow, he's not as strong as he used to be.

<< Comment #185 @ 14:50 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xfoo - Reply to #172

Your right, I should have said "results" and not "winning".

Although winning WOULD be more impressive :)

<< Comment #179 @ 13:12 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gastfreund

most ppls argumentation here is retarded

how often has somebody published interviews about persons here not because of their hefty highskill but because of others attributes that made them sort of stand out?

i find it outstanding enough that there´s someone actually playing ut3 so this interview is fully justified to be majored

9%

<< Comment #187 @ 15:21 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

cYmoZz - Reply to #179

hehe

Edited by cYmoZz at 15:21 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #188 @ 15:23 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

erok - Reply to #179

hahaha

<< Comment #192 @ 16:01 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xero- '

my dick is tingling!!!!

<< Comment #193 @ 16:42 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

pizz - Reply to #192

u have a dick?

<< Comment #196 @ 18:02 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xero- ' - Reply to #193

ask your mum.

<< Comment #348 @ 14:29 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

pizz - Reply to #196

she said no and she showed me a pic of u

Edited by pizzette at 14:29 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #205 @ 19:11 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Bob - Reply to #192

.

Edited by Bob at 18:13 CDT, 26 June 2024

<< Comment #209 @ 20:14 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xero- ' - Reply to #205

warts are growing on it now... what kinda fucked up aids is this nigga

<< Comment #239 @ 03:22 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Bob - Reply to #209

.

Edited by Bob at 18:13 CDT, 26 June 2024

<< Comment #242 @ 03:46 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #239

how did you know that...

<< Comment #197 @ 18:11 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vicek

random i-view and 200 comments

geeks

<< Comment #200 @ 18:34 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Venim - Reply to #197

lots of fap fap fapping

<< Comment #230 @ 02:30 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #197

and look who actually counted to number of comments :D

<< Comment #234 @ 02:41 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #230

you dont have to count them they it says it at the top :P

<< Comment #235 @ 02:43 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #234

oh, i never noticed :(

<< Comment #243 @ 03:51 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vicek - Reply to #235

EPIC FAIL :D

<< Comment #245 @ 03:55 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #243

Actually the point was that you were lurking to get post No. 200 to tell everyone how geeky they are ;)

<< Comment #246 @ 04:00 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vicek - Reply to #245

my comment was 199!:D

btw.

EVIL EVIL EVIL

<< Comment #247 @ 04:11 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #246

that's weird, I was so sure you had 200 :/

maybe someone deleted his post, or it was just too early in the morning.

<< Comment #210 @ 20:40 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

FTY

That's more interesting as that pedo who victimized his clan, least those are not endangered, they just got someone whos cooking on LANs.

Edited by FTY at 20:42 CST, 6 February 2008

<< Comment #218 @ 00:23 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

timmah - Reply to #210

Just depends how bad the cooking is.

<< Comment #360 @ 21:43 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

baron Railgun ' - Reply to #218

chinese food with aspartame, pure poison

<< Comment #214 @ 23:24 CST, 6 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xero- '

I find it funny that all these nerds are bitching about "oh she's getting too much attention" failing to realize that she's had two interviews and why should he say no to them? If anything you should be complaining at the Organizations/Editors/Interviewers who are the heart of the situation, not a lone player who had nothing to do with coming up with the questions. lol a bitch is still a bitch though $$$

<< Comment #220 @ 00:25 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #214

I agree, the interviewers are absolutely shit.

<< Comment #223 @ 01:56 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Slasher - Reply to #220

excuse me, but I did three interviews (her, stryfe and manager alex) surrounding the announcement of the team, and I think I did a pretty good job of asking her good non spoon fed bullshit questions

<< Comment #225 @ 02:23 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #223

he was still calling you shit :P hehe

<< Comment #233 @ 02:40 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

FTY - Reply to #225

He got a + from Ecstacy, that healed the wound, or was it salt as it shows that there is certainly something more as objective interviews he was doing, because a + is not so easy to get over here without certain services being offered.

<< Comment #264 @ 08:06 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xero- ' - Reply to #233

shut up

<< Comment #231 @ 02:32 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #223

You interview wasn't bad, you could have asked for past accomplishments though. Cause that seems to e what most people are most interested in at the moment. Besides pics o/c

<< Comment #249 @ 04:49 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #223

What becks said. I mean really, in any other credible sport a female representative would not just be interviewed for the sake of just having tits. We don't care about her tits(ok maybe just a little bit), but most of the times they are interviewed because they actually acheived more than being a promotional peon for a team.

<< Comment #314 @ 10:20 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Bob - Reply to #223

.

Edited by Bob at 18:13 CDT, 26 June 2024

<< Comment #332 @ 11:51 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #314

Or if she is a real of fake asian xD

<< Comment #224 @ 02:14 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

timmah - Reply to #214

Haven't read everything here, but I don't see many comments who complain about the attention, but rather the motives behind it.
I don't have a major gripe with the questions either. And what do you mean by lone player? If I were to think someone would try to sack me with a bunch of wanker questions, I'd tell him off.

<< Comment #228 @ 02:27 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #224

Agree !

<< Comment #266 @ 08:07 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xero- ' - Reply to #224

lol? How is it HER fault that she was picked to be interviewed by SK?

<< Comment #274 @ 08:50 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #266

Yes because she was forced to make that interview right?

<< Comment #280 @ 09:15 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

xero- ' - Reply to #274

So it means she has to say no? lol? when was the last time you saw a good gamer interview? LOL.

<< Comment #295 @ 09:47 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #280

No, I didn't mean that, with such pictures and such an interview you can't expect anything but this, she had the choice.

<< Comment #315 @ 10:22 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Bob - Reply to #295

.

Edited by Bob at 18:13 CDT, 26 June 2024

<< Comment #317 @ 10:26 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #315

lol, I don't care being interviewed or not, actually it would even bothers me than anything else.. my friend ;)

<< Comment #337 @ 13:05 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funkeh - Reply to #317

Actually, i would be pretty interested to read an interview about you with pictures of this kind and more tending towards your sexual life, and how you were accepted as a shemale in our beloved clan.

But nevermind, this would be a thousand times more funny on team-aaa.com with all the french haters commenting there :)

Edited by funkeh at 13:06 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #338 @ 13:10 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #337

hahahaha <3

I believe we can find *at least* the same amount of haters here ;p

<< Comment #221 @ 01:02 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

mrkram

i love this website

<< Comment #232 @ 02:35 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

FTY - Reply to #221

me tooooo, altho I should be VIP by now.

<< Comment #237 @ 03:06 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Anima

i ve done extasy a couple of times and i d do it again

<< Comment #240 @ 03:40 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Aquashark - Reply to #237

i see what u did there ^_^

<< Comment #244 @ 03:52 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

FTY

http://kid.kibla.org/~fty/victimized.jpg

10%

<< Comment #252 @ 06:37 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

shqdow - Reply to #244

haha..........sry :(

<< Comment #248 @ 04:19 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

trinion

smart move by sk ... i bet this generated a LOT of page hits ...

<< Comment #250 @ 05:28 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

karizma

why isn't there "[+] all" button? can't decide who to + first :/ .. =)

<< Comment #253 @ 06:45 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD

What the hell.. ESR is fucked up.

Oh my, people care about female appearance, yes it's a lame strategy, but it got 254 comments and lots of clicks. Owned? Look at just about every magazine cover in the world using the same strategy.

A girl who looks nice and plays UT - an actual original FPS, not Halo or WoW some crap like that which would give her a LOT more attention if that's what she wanted, retards.

I think her game of choice is interesting in itself, nobody said she's going to pwn Toxic. It's absolutely NO reason to start some childish shitstorm of comments when all you really want to say is that it sucks being a slave to the appearance of healthy women. If you have testestorone in your body, you should get the fuck used to that shit right now.

Edited by danseko.dD at 06:51 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #258 @ 07:32 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #253

Yep you're right, let's use naked women to sell burgers ?
Just because it's like that everywhere, it has to remain the same forever ?
I'm glad there were people thinking different than you all around the world otherwise black people would be still slaves or raping would still be allowed.

Of course, our posts won't change anything to the problem, we're just bitching at that poor girl who didn't see that coming at all. But still, the system is fucked up and that's a shame in 2008, we still need sexy girls to sell anything. So yes, we all have testosterone in our bodies but that doesn't mean we have to think with our penis.

I like to see a sexy girl in my bed (tho last ones were far from sexy xD) but I don't need to see sexy girls to buy a video game or whatever, that's not a decent way.

Oh and there are tons of girls in WoW or Halo so they're basically too many of them to look special. On the other hand, as she's said, there is not any single girl playing UT more than 1 hour per month so she's unique. Being the queen of 2000 people (if UT3 community reachs that number) is far more entertaining than being one of the 100.000 queens in WoW.

Edited by th0r^ at 07:35 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #259 @ 07:44 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #258

What the hell, we can't rape our slaves anymore? When did this happen? o_O Damn Amnesty International..

If you're saying they should've used a more subtle pic, I agree. But it would still have had an attention grabbing effect even though she wore a sweater and no makeup. Why? Because men like women, and obviously a lot of people here haven't been getting any in a loong looong time.

If people wanna be politically correct and into feminism, I would think it's far more relevant to discuss why women are having such a hard time getting into eSports. I hope you are all aware that in 10 years, when neo-neo-feminists try to find out why women had such a hard time getting into eSports, they will (falsely) point to harassing, sex-focused threads like this.

Edited by danseko.dD at 07:45 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #262 @ 07:50 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #259

If they don't want threads like this, then refuse the interview and make results first, that's how it works for men afaik.

<< Comment #268 @ 08:16 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #262

The way it works for men is we pick male heroes / idols, and we decide to become what they are. In other words, motivation starts by identifying with someone who is better than you.

It might just be that women aren't as motivated by becoming a Lauke or GitzZz as we are, and need different front figures.

That aside, the world of gaming and the thinking of sponsors are taking different routes than we want. We know this already. In the future, any sort of connection with the sponsored, public face of gaming, and the "grass root concept" of gaming will be a happy coincidence. Beautiful, posing women and characteristic front figures is a small price to pay to get "the right stuff" in the limelight.

<< Comment #277 @ 09:05 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #268

Why would I take GitzZz or lauke as an idol ? Because they play the game so damn good. I'd like to play as good as them.

Why would a girl take Ecstazia as an idol ? Because she's pretty. She'd like to be as pretty as her. That is because she has proven nothing in the game. So she's just a booth babe for her team and since then we don't need any major new about her. Why hasn't stryfe interview been made major ?

<< Comment #281 @ 09:16 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #277

It gets majored because she represents a statistic anomaly as a female gamer playing a classic FPS, thus making (perhaps) an interesting story.

It's not as if you HAVE to read every single major anyway. ;p

<< Comment #284 @ 09:29 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #281

So there we are, that's an article about a pretty girl playing FPS. There are tons of girls playing FPS, check germany, I can remember there were at least 15 girls playing UT2k4 at Summit, why don't we major their life ? Perhaps because they don't fit to "prettyness standard" ? I don't think with my dick so I won't claim "hey cool this pretty girl plays UT, more pics plz", I'll just express why I feel ashamed about such kind of marketing action.

<< Comment #289 @ 09:40 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #284

If you're going to claim that this woman gets attention based on looks rather than skill, you have to show me replays of the other girls beating her. Or replays of her actually playing so bad that she doesn't belong in that crowd of players.

Until you do, this is just an article with a pretty picture, giving attention to UT3 and later maybe on a bigger scale as well. A lot of fuss about very little if you ask me.

<< Comment #322 @ 10:47 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #289

It's little but it's another brick to the wall. The wall that stands too high and bothers me a lot. She's just the only brick we can bitch at and I'm happy I can express myself.

<< Comment #326 @ 10:53 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #322

agreed

<< Comment #272 @ 08:46 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #259

If people wanna be politically correct and into feminism, I would think it's far more relevant to discuss why women are having such a hard time getting into eSports. I hope you are all aware that in 10 years, when neo-neo-feminists try to find out why women had such a hard time getting into eSports, they will (falsely) point to harassing, sex-focused threads like this.

The real problem is with the 'esport organizations' and media that allow this kind of crap, where girls are used and selected for teams, not based on merit, but on their looks(promotional skills eh?). Sharapova is $$$, but no one gave a shit before she was well known, well known because of her skill, hard work and achievements in TENNIS. She was not just given a tennis racket to go and pose for Nike next to a tennis court, because of her looks. She made her way to the top and got signed because she is good at what she does. Now she can go and pose for whoever she likes. But no e'sports' is different, we need excuses and pussyfooting to get anywhere. I guess this says a lot about the credibility of our 'sport'.

<< Comment #279 @ 09:14 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #272

In the big picture, these 15 minutes of focus on this nice looking woman is INCREDIBLY insignificant to the current state of eSports. There are far more problematic aspects to address.

<< Comment #308 @ 10:09 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #279

Yep I agree.

<< Comment #423 @ 18:05 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Trinelin - Reply to #258

I know for sure that there are several other girls out there that plays UT more than 1 hours per month, just because people haven´t heard of us doesn´t mean we don´t exist.

<< Comment #440 @ 21:30 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ix - Reply to #423

You play therefore you are?

<< Comment #260 @ 07:45 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #253

Fact is, we don't care about what she wants, that is again, not the point.

<< Comment #261 @ 07:47 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #260

But what is the point? I'm not trying to flame you or Th0r or anyone here, just trying to find out - if there was something wrong with this article or her as a gamer - why is this article not:

a) ignored, which is the normal response to something irrelevant
but in stead
b) kicking up a shitstorm of angry/harassing replies that will lead to no good what so ever

Edited by danseko.dD at 07:49 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #263 @ 08:03 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #261

The concept of it is pretty disgusting and unfair (to men) in general, this is what I've been basically saying in this thread and it has nothing to do with her.

<< Comment #270 @ 08:24 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #263

Lots of things are unfair and dubious in sponsored gaming today. Q3 getting the ESWC contract, for one.

It's also "unfair" that in society, women make at least 10x the amount as models, hookers and porn stars (without having any talent but their bodies) as men do, but that's life.

But even despite her good looks, which, like I said, is generally an advantage for women age 20-30, I don't see what kind of unfair advantage she gets over male gamers in this case?

Edited by danseko.dD at 08:30 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #271 @ 08:43 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #270

The fact that there is a lot of unfair things don't make them right or acceptable. That one right here is, to me, not ok and in my sense shouldn't be to anyone.

"I don't see what kind of unfair advantage she gets over male gamers in this case? "
Attention, Interviews, sponsorship and why is that ? Because she is a good looking women (I might be sexist, but I don't think she is actually that good at UT3) and all this is pretty unfair.

Edited by *aAa*winz at 08:44 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #273 @ 08:49 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Putton - Reply to #271

mimimimimi

<< Comment #275 @ 08:51 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #273

I must agree with you here.

<< Comment #283 @ 09:28 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #271

The interview, the majoring, the attention, how is that good for her exactly? Getting flamed? :p Do you see her getting, for instance, undeserved respect for her skills in this thread?

Show me some actual advantage that she has gotten from this and I might be able to agree more with you. As for money, I don't know how much a sponsorship pays, but I feel pretty confident modelling pays better.

<< Comment #288 @ 09:33 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #283

She didn't get advantage because ESR are not testosteroned people. And since she /ignore people who's not nice with her, she only got more testosteroned boys licking her ass.

But again, she's probably not even aware of it so no reason to blame her, she's just an attention whore afterall xD.

Edited by th0r^ at 09:34 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #293 @ 09:43 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #288

"She didn't get advantage because ESR are not testosteroned people"

ESR not testosteroned? eh.. are you using some comment filter that I'm not using? ^^

it's not her making these articles by the way. she's just playing the game, and I feel pretty confident she wants to end up playing it well rather than show her cleavage to a bunch of people who surf 4chan and wank off to hentai pr0n.

<< Comment #299 @ 09:53 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #283

I just think they didn't expect such a "flame", that's it. And it does not change the fact EG gains visibility here and this is what they were looking for through her good looking. They did successful, see? Fuck this, really.

"but I feel pretty confident modelling pays better."
err? your point?

Edited by *aAa*winz at 09:53 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #305 @ 10:05 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #299

"I just think they didn't expect such a "flame", that's it."

why wouldn't they? The other thread with her picture derailed in the EXACT same way.

My point was that you stated her appearance gave her unfair advantages, but in fact she could most probably make more money off her appearance by for instance modelling.

EG gains visibility here? What will they make out of the attention they get here? That they are some kinda model team? I don't see any sponsor banners?

Again I don't get what sort of advantages she or her associates so far have gotten over other known players here. I really don't. You have to point me in the right direction.

Btw I'm winning this discussion, just FYI.

<< Comment #309 @ 10:10 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #305

"EG gains visibility here? What will they make out of the attention they get here? That they are some kinda model team? I don't see any sponsor banners?"

yes they do gain visibility, on a market plan, no matter how bad we can talk about you if we still talk about you and no matter either what they are using to get it.

stop trying to make me point out what are the direct advantages to their team, visibility is not a direct one.

Edited by *aAa*winz at 10:12 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #319 @ 10:30 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #309

I respect you and I was very happy for you when you won ESWC '06. And I'm not saying her appearance isn't a factor here.

That said, I consider it completely ridicoulus to think that anyone would go to this length to make a "cynical" marketing ploy around the underdog part of gaming that UT3 so far is.

If one wants to be cynical to make money, there are about a GADZILLION other and better ways of doing that. So I have a very, very hard time of seeing that as a main motivation for neither Annie Leung or Team EG.

Edited by danseko.dD at 10:35 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #324 @ 10:51 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #319

The first phrase is very much appreciated thank you.

"That said, I cannot see why anyone would go to this length to make a cynical marketing ploy around the underdog part of gaming that UT3 so far is."

I don't, once again, agree with you here. Like I said above, the support doesn't matter, I believe they could have taken a girl on any other game, it would have had the very same impact.
I agree with you when you say it's probably not Ecstasy's motivation for joining this organisation but I'm just not so sure about this concerning the EG team. I just hope for her I'm not right and she will be able to prove us wrong but I doubt it.

<< Comment #328 @ 11:09 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #319

In my opinion, EG's main motivation is very simple. They'd like to have a pretty girl playing UT decent enough not to look ridiculous in a male tournament. They found a girl who seems to like the game enough to train it quite hard. So they offer her a contract to motivate her. If they manage to bring her at a top32 level in male tournament, job will be done. Journalists ( real ones ) who come to an event where she does well will speak about her like "look at this beautiful pwnzer", so their sponsors will be shown on a great body : EG win. They win but personnally (and I guess a lot will think like me) that will be (as Ecstazia says herself) a pretty girl performing well for a girl (unless she performs top3 but I doubt any girl can yet).

The right story should be like this (it almost ran like this for me): Ecstazia likes the game. She trains a lot and manages to defeat a few well-known guyz in training. She decides to go to a few tournament to prove others her skill. Then she does well there (top3 at a national tourney for exemple). Then EG contacts her and they agree on a contract. And at that point, she could deserve to get interviewed. See we totally miss the first part of the story there.

<< Comment #367 @ 03:02 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

graumull - Reply to #270

AHAHAHA get over it already q3>ut3 :D

<< Comment #459 @ 12:27 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #367

hmmm well that is a pretty good argument :(

Edited by danseko.dD at 12:28 CST, 9 February 2008

<< Comment #352 @ 16:50 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Khorney - Reply to #253

Does she play vs boys?

<< Comment #460 @ 12:33 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #352

Ya that is supposed to be the point anyway.. but you can say that aspect has somehow disappeared in the noise :p

Edited by danseko.dD at 12:43 CST, 9 February 2008

<< Comment #465 @ 17:05 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Khorney - Reply to #460

You seem to be correct :)

<< Comment #276 @ 08:57 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak

I promised myself not to comment no matter the extent of "bashing" Annie gets for getting interviewed, however I can't sit here and read all of this any longer without clarifying some things.

Annie is NOT on EG solely for the purpose of showing her off and saying "look she has the clan tag". We don't contract players simply for the purpose of being able to look good. As people have mentioned, if we really wanted to run that path we'd find an attractive female WoW player to add to the roster. And trust me, it wouldn't be that hard with the millions of WoW players out there.

Everyone is trying to find a reason as to why such a pretty girl is playing UT3, and how she got sponsored. I can answer those both.

She loves the game, rather she loves UT. She loves to game in general in fact. And why did she get sponsored? Not only did I see potential in her, but she acted professional in person, and presented the ethic of what a REAL professional gamer should showcase. She demonstrated the willingness to learn, for hours a day to better herself. She is a good player, and an even better person who does not deserve the kind of lude and destructive comments on here, or any other site for that matter.

She also has the backing of EVERY SINGLE TEAMMATE ON EG. Players such as Stryfe and CombatCarl, America's most achieved UT players (pardon the thought of bias, I feel this statement is 100% true.) They are with her all the way on helping her play her best. And it's not because they think she's a pretty face. It is because they respect her as a player, a good player, just as the rest of us on EG do.

Part of me thinks this may get through to some of you, another part makes me believe it's just going to add fuel to the fire. But I'd rather step in and take some flak in this direction than see a great individual get pushed around in such an unfair way.

12%

<< Comment #282 @ 09:20 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #276

Yep there are tons of players who have potential. There are girls in FPS games. But there is only one girl who've got contracted by one of the biggest team in NA, guess why ?

Again, she probably didn't plan the whole thing. I'm not bitching 100% at her but more at marketing bastards behind the whole shit. But I hope she's aware about the fact she's part of what bring sexism in esport tho. Why ? Because she's contracted despite the fact she didn't achieve anything, she uses her prettyness and takes profits out of it. She didn't prove (yet) that her statut in EG has nothing to do with her look. Sexism will disapear when gallantry won't exist anymore, and here that's kind of gallantry ( a ugly and shamefull gallantry).

When Manchester finds a talented player, they don't come with a 20 million $ contract directly. They take him in their training center, test him in a secondary team, etc, ...

That's so fucking ridiculous to come with "Ecstazya has been contracted for the only reason she's talented and professional". You gotta find something else to excuse this marketing joke.

Edited by th0r^ at 09:25 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #294 @ 09:47 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #282

Of course she'll have more responsibility than just playing. I'm not denying that fact.

What I'm trying to say is that she is being treated as a professional player based on criteria that she's a great individual and a great player. Her looks are an asset as well.

Just like anyone else, if she doesn't perform to our liking, she won't be sent to events. She knows just as well that same fact that she has to keep on par or else face the consequences.

If she doesn't do as good as we would like, then we made a mistake. No question about it.

However I'd like to point out that if Fnatic hadn't taken a chance on me, I would have never achieved what I have done. They could have ignored my request to be apart of the team on such short notice before CPL Winter and I wouldn't be here. They saw potential in my abilities and signed me based on that.

I'm not saying you'll see Annie win events left and right. But we are still hoping to see some results from her, just as Fnatic had expected results from me.

<< Comment #302 @ 10:02 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #294

yep, I'm pretty sure she can perform pretty well in UT3 events that do not even exist.. I'm sorry but I don't believe she got contracted for her professionalism.

Edited by *aAa*winz at 10:05 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #307 @ 10:08 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #302

As far as I'm concerned, I wouldn't be sponsoring you for your "professionalism" either.

As far as UT3 events, we have a few on the west coast of North America coming up, and i33 is hosting a UT3 tournament last time I had checked.

Please take your ignorance elsewhere.

<< Comment #311 @ 10:17 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #307

Link to those events in NA, please? I could actually be interested in following the results.

<< Comment #330 @ 11:39 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #311

I don't have the links on me right now, the events that should be running UT3 tournaments are VanLan and PDXLan. There is mention of a few more but they aren't confirmed from what I know.

<< Comment #334 @ 12:50 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #330

okay, thanks anyway

<< Comment #316 @ 10:26 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Bob - Reply to #307

.

Edited by Bob at 18:13 CDT, 26 June 2024

<< Comment #331 @ 11:41 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #316

Not confirmed, but a possibility.

<< Comment #285 @ 09:31 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

timmah - Reply to #276

Personally, I don't have a problem with or any girl playing a game, hot or not. But my gripe was much more with how she was presented and how she presented herself with some of the answers.

There are some well-founded concerns in the comments, you just have to find them between the "I'd do her" and "whore to the money" comments from the peanut gallery. I think it would be foolish to ignore that.

Edited by timmah at 09:32 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #300 @ 09:55 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #285

She has no bearing on what questions are asked in an interview. As far as her answers, is there anything specific you can elaborate on?

Edit: I'd also like to note that I have read all of the comments, good, bad, and ugly. I responded with the intent of clarification.

Edited by gellehsak at 09:57 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #318 @ 10:30 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

timmah - Reply to #300

The section on female gaming was very hypocritical. She claims the focus should be on skill rather than looks. However, at this stage, all she can present are looks and the author of this article - sadly enough - lets us know that with the pictures. Perhaps it is not her fault for the pictures, but maybe don't wave around with pictures in hot dresses. If you truly care about your your image as a professional gamer, which she claims, she should try control it rather than "whore herself out" (sorry for the terminology).

Yes, gaming isn't exactly a multi-million sponsor business for gamers and one probably has to take every possible opportunity to make it anywhere. But especially in the gaming community and on sites like ESR people will rip you apart for every mistake you make and will not just take your word for it.

I think some people also believe this "Sex marketing" (if it's true or not) is trying to take that away this "exotic" and "genuine" attribute of gaming. This community is very raw, but I believe there genuine concerns in this thread which transcend the general sexism approach.

I will leave it at that, because if I continue it will just end up being some 3000 word essay on gender equally, sexism etc which is not worth my time right now.

7%

<< Comment #333 @ 11:56 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #318

I understand your concern over the hypocritical nature of what she answered and the pictures that were used in her interview.

As I've stated in a previous comment, I personally will not prevent her from taking down pictures of that nature. They aren't bad, and far from sexually orientated. She's an attractive girl which everyone seems to agree with. I don't see a problem with her having pictures of herself up like that, whether it is to pursue let's say, modeling or another medium to which her looks ARE what gets her paid or not.

I again will state that I somewhat agree with the fact that the pictures used aren't exactly tied into her professional status as a gamer. However just glancing over picture galleries on ESR and other various websites will show plenty of professional gamers involved in acts which are much worse than Annie looking good in front of a camera.

A [+] for you for a well-written response.

<< Comment #341 @ 13:45 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

timmah - Reply to #333

Well, I am inclined to disagree partly, but I more or less got my message across. So I hope she will avoid the proverbial land-mine in the future.

<< Comment #349 @ 15:24 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Jazzy - Reply to #333

i once saw a pic of forever sucking a fake plastic cock on some guys head.
i think that may help prove your point

its a silly debacle and ppl seem to be writing off ecstacy even before shes played her first event.
if her results turn out to be crap and she loses a few events by very wide margins then i would understand ppls concerns on here, but the fact is she has yet to play in any event (from what i can see) so everyone is just pre-emptively saying shes crap so if she does fail they will be able to go "i told you so" on some forum somewhere hunting for a + that gives a graphical representation of an orange + sign.

and ppl wonder why epsorts has yet to really go mainstream....

<< Comment #286 @ 09:32 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #276

"She loves the game, rather she loves UT. She loves to game in general in fact."

Let's hope she doesn't get fed up by the attention around her derailing completely based on her gender. I wish her good luck and ignore the haters.

Although I agree the next article on her should reflect her gaming performance and not contain hawt pics.

<< Comment #296 @ 09:49 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #286

As far as I know we, nor Annie had any say on what pictures of her got posted, or how many.

<< Comment #306 @ 10:06 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #296

Imo try to control it next time, either by copyrighting the images or making alternative ones. Right now there's nothing I'd like to see more than her shutting people up by playing good.

<< Comment #310 @ 10:13 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #306

In terms of the images themselves, I'm not really an advocate of limiting her right to freedom, especially over the internet. She can post whatever pictures she wants on her MySpace, Facebook, etc.

I do agree, in a sense, that we should have had more control over what pictures did get used for the interview which directly relates to the team. However let's be honest here. The same comments would be generated with ANY picture of her attached to the interview.

<< Comment #325 @ 10:52 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

f0cus - Reply to #310

"The same comments would be generated with ANY picture of her attached to the interview."

sad but true.

<< Comment #329 @ 11:33 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #325

Right....

<< Comment #301 @ 09:56 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Anonymous (c-98-194-96-192.hsd1.tx.comcast.net) - Reply to #276

It's easy to lie to yourself and to the ignorant masses...

Convincing the people who know better would be more impressive.

<< Comment #303 @ 10:04 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #301

I can only say that I'm saying the truth in the matter. I've already stated that if she doesn't perform she will have a hard time retaining her sponsorship.

<< Comment #290 @ 09:41 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sonic - Reply to #276

the shining night rides into town to save damsel in distress

how about re-writing that so it isn't a freakin press release? :>

<< Comment #298 @ 09:51 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #290

I'm sorry I didn't convert what I had to say to the level of the average ESR user.

<< Comment #304 @ 10:04 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

f0cus - Reply to #276

Way to man up on it Gelleh. I'm glad to see someone step up and help out with this nonsense. Angry gamer virgins pissed off because an attractive girl made it pro before they did.
Girl gamers have it tough. You have no idea the kind of shit my girlfriend has to put up with in and out of servers. Funny thing though, everyone's incredibly nice to her in person (when we went to Quakecon together last year), but in server it's just vicious sometimes.

Ahhh, the anonymity of the internet.
All those bitching about her pictures ought to post their own pics and we'll compare.
Not to mention the fact that half these losers would get their asses handed to them in UT by her, (aside from winz I assume), and yet they'll keep talking.

-fin

<< Comment #312 @ 10:19 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #304

Yep. I have been together with a female gamer myself (RTS-player), and I recognize this omnipresent sexual attention, as well as the pressure on them proving their skill and being judged by gender when they lose.

If girls come to gaming, they better have a high tolerance for sleazy befriending, far more pressure on skill than any male gamer gets, not to mention in this case, spunk-related comments.

<< Comment #323 @ 10:48 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

f0cus - Reply to #312

tbh, she wins more of 'em than she loses. ;) no kidding. She's got quite a screenshot collection of pissed off guys.
:D

Edited by eXg. f0cus at 10:48 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #313 @ 10:19 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #304

Once again, nothing I've said had something to do with her personally.

<< Comment #320 @ 10:33 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #304

I agree with him that neither she or Eg can control the interviews and pictures they post of her. However I did try and find pics of her behind a pc playing a game, but found nope. But thats besides the point.
The point is she is not being used based on merit, which in my opinion does more damage than good.
I am not upset about her, I am upset because others allow this kind of attitude towards gamers, female gamers and esports in general too take root. I don't for one second think that if she has transparent achievement or potential she/interviewers/eg would not have received this amount of flak, unless off course she is utter shit, but that we do not know.
If Eg want to present her as a gamer and not a marketing tool, they can make an effort to show her potential, upload a demo or take a couple of pics when they practise, make a short video clip of her playing UT, this way you present her as a 'cyber athlete', not just an ordinary girl.

<< Comment #357 @ 20:40 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

FTY - Reply to #304

Stop preaching, look, replace web2.0 with your nick. Oh and that girl, right next to me, is a gamer.

<< Comment #358 @ 20:51 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

f0cus - Reply to #357

You think "photoshop a picture of myself in a chair with a naked chick standing behind me" of me?
How odd.

Edited by eXg. f0cus at 20:52 CST, 7 February 2008

<< Comment #361 @ 22:01 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

FTY - Reply to #358

ofc it's photoshoped, I don't want you to see her nippies, i'm polite. now get of the internets.

<< Comment #339 @ 13:16 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #276

She loves the game, rather she loves UT. She loves to game in general in fact. And why did she get sponsored? Not only did I see potential in her, but she acted professional in person, and presented the ethic of what a REAL professional gamer should showcase. She demonstrated the willingness to learn, for hours a day to better herself. She is a good player

This is what should have been written in the newsposts / interviews and not the part about being a cheerleader.
Sure, it shouldbe ok about everything but someone in EG really messed up in the pr department. The first time I saw that interview I knew that it would start a shitstorm. And probalby many others thought the same. It is possible to deny questions in an interview and only talk about certain topics instead of gaming.
Also if someone in EG had spend some time to think about it he would have come to the conclusion that one or two photos would have been more than enough. Instead we get bombarded and guess where that leads, too.

On the other hand, if for example some unknown guy would be drafted for SK.UT there would be lots of people bitching asking for his accomplishments and why he was picked.
Why can't the same happen when it's girl?

Now, I don't know anything about her nor how well she plays nor whether she deserved that opportunity.
But complaining about the reactions in this post is pointless in my opinon. Of course it would be great if everybody was nice around here and was happy for anyone who achieved something good.
But it's hardly a surprise that the internet is not like that.
And with that in mind those newsposts could have helped to shut the flamers up instead of giving them fuel.

tl;dr: It was obvious that interview would lead to this, so why was it released.

<< Comment #340 @ 13:45 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funkeh - Reply to #339

The PR department of EG did a great job imho :)

<< Comment #344 @ 14:08 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #339

We really don't have all the control in the world when it comes to what goes up on another organization's website. And the questions to me don't seem out of line. Honestly I don't believe there should be a set standard on what an interviewer should ask, or we would get some pretty repetitive interviews.

As another note I too predicted she would get SOME negative comments, but when I read ~200 comments with about 80% of them being unjustified, I will come to defend a player on my team and at least try to shed some light on the situation at hand.

<< Comment #350 @ 16:19 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #344

I agree that there shouldn't be a set standard. As a matter of fact I do prefer non standard interviews, as do most people I guess.

But then, I don't think most people resonsible for the worst comments didn't even bother to read the complete interview or chose to ignore the more sensible answers.

And for that reason, imho, a short interview with a focus on gaming and less about her would have been a better choice. And then after she produces some good results in tournament it's time fore an interview like this.
As for controlling the media, it should be possible to talk to the interviewer, explain the situation and ask him to keep it short and to the point. If he doesn't understand then there are other sites.

As I think about it in fact a "standard" interview, which is geared toward gamers regardless of sex might actually have been the best choice.

In the end, please understand I didn't want to criticise you for helping a teammate, which is almost always a good thing. But I think it was simply too late now.

<< Comment #345 @ 14:09 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #339

exactimo
you win this thread.

<< Comment #364 @ 22:42 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #276

So professional she has to have someone else defend her? Part of "professionalism" is not putting yourself in a position which would make you, or your company, look bad. Don't throw words around until you understand them.

<< Comment #378 @ 07:52 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #364

She never made EG or herself look bad. She acted in a professional matter the entire way.

As far as me coming to defend her? You're damn right I will come to the defense of one of my players when they're being treated unfairly.

<< Comment #393 @ 11:54 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #378

This looks bad. Very bad. To agree to a such an interview is part of not being professional. She's being recruited for skills nobody has seen, and for a game we may never get to see her play. Now, people call her out and instead of defending her position or showing what she's got, she has YOU out here making yourself look like the defensive boyfriend.

Would you recruit someone like Walter for the skill he has displayed? All he has are online demos and a reputation for being a cheater... but at least he HAS a reputation. All we see is a team recruiting a noname with a pretty face. Even if she is good, you took preference because she was a girl. If I found out that a manager under me hired a less qualified person because they were "pretty," I wouldn't say "GOOD JOB SON, THAT'LL GET SOME MEDIA ATTENTION", I would say "Have fun in line for unemployment."

You can't change the rules for professionalism. I can't just go into a job and say "Let me show you what I can do, even though I don't have any qualifications." They'll laugh at you. Part of showing your professionalism is to show that you worked your way up the ladder to get where you are and you put in the hard work that needs to be done. You'd know this if you ever had a real job. Stop trying to justify your team decision and man up.

<< Comment #405 @ 12:38 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #393

1. We are sending her to events to play. You can count on it.

2. As far as the "defensive boyfriend" bit, good job understanding that it is my position to support my team in whatever they face.

3. I would not take walter in, I've never met him. Everyone I have suggested join EG I have met personally and have at least played with for some bit before fully endorsing them.

You and everyone here seem to think that having Annie on our team without any major achievements means we have another agenda. What are we going to do, release an EG calendar with her posing in a bikini? Get real.

Remember DaHanG? He was at risk of not being able to attend more events based on not having enough sponsorship because he had never proven himself to the masses. A lot of good that did us I suppose. As well, Fnatic made a mistake picking me up when they did too, because my achievements were minimal at best.

<< Comment #409 @ 13:16 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #405

What events? When? What happens when the UT3 events get cancelled due to lack of players?

You try to come off as a teammate, but really you're just coming off as pussy whipped. Let the girl fight her own battles.

Walter at least has demos and has taken part in online tournaments. Accusations of cheating or not, at least he has the demos.

You're making empty comments that don't address the fact that you picked someone with no experience over someone who had some. Worse yet, you parade her all around the internet and say "HEY GUYS, SHE'S GOOD, TRUST ME" which is laughable at best. "LOL GUISE I KAN BEAT TOXIK, I JUST HAVEN'T DONE IT YET" You don't get props for saying you're good, you get it for showing it. Even if the girl has some skill in UT3 - which I'm beginning to doubt more and more as you vehemently try to defend her with words instead of actions - it won't matter if there is nobody for her to play in UT3. People aren't giving her a hard time because she's a girl - that's a cop out. Girls have to earn respect just like everybody else.

By the way, would this be her? It's the only Ecstacy there is.
http://www.enemydown.co.uk/ut3stats.php?id=113076717

In her interview, she says she is known as barbi3 by her UT friends, but I can't seem to find anyone by that name in the search. Closest I can find it barb1e and I really hope that isn't her.

Edit: Found a barbi3 in UT2004 and several ecstacy, but they all sucked...
http://ut2004stats.epicgames.com/playerstats.php?player=728569

Edited by Vedic at 13:25 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #410 @ 14:00 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #409

http://ut3tournament.50calibre.net/single.htm
http://ut3tournament.50calibre.net/double.htm

One example of what she has the ability to do, since I don't think anything else will convince people otherwise.

My main point is that she was able to take out, in single elim, WCG Champ for UT2k3: ForresT

If this isn't credible enough that she has some game, I give up here.

She lost to two strong players with a ping disadvantage (she lives in Cali, the players she played are east coast, and I believe the games were played on Chi servers if memory serves me correct) in very close games. I'll try to get screenshots, but at the time this tournament was taking place I believe demoing was impossible.

Edit: Online stat tracking is NOT a good way to determine a player's true skill. You should know this by noticing the person to hold the first position on Enemydown has a frag ratio of 1.1.

Edited by gellehsak at 14:02 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #413 @ 14:26 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #410

Again, are those her accounts? She's piss poor at UT2k4 and ranked 700+ in UT3. So she can beat some guy who used to play UT2k3. The UT3 scene isn't doing so well as it is. Other players who are clearly better than her could have been picked and given a much better opprotunity to have their skill shine and develop. There are tons of gamers in plenty of games that never get anywhere because they don't have sponsorship. However, picking someone based on the media attention you can draw instead of the 700+ better ranked players that are out there, is poor form. That's minimum wage material - not professional.

Also, I remember hearing that she was beating you in UT3. I see that you use an alias to play, so I can't see just how low of a rank you have. This same crap goes on in WoW. Some of the best players won't attend tournaments because of either a lack of sponsorship opprotunity or distaste for the randomness of the game. The result is a tournament of lesser skilled players who have sponsorship.

People like YOU are to blame for the decline of esports. In fact, it will be YOU to blame when this poor girl gets the short end of the stick in a few months. A girl trying to exploit her looks is only as bad as a guy exploiting a girl for it. Pros before hoes.

Edit: As for stat tracking, it's using the elo rating. Are you saying that chess is poorly ranked as well? Elo is based on the rank of the players you play against, not some average of stats.

Oh, and west coast should ping about 50 to CHI servers.

Edited by Vedic at 14:33 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #416 @ 16:22 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

telly - Reply to #413

The stats really are meaningless. ELO in chess only uses the results from tournament matches to calculate the rankings and then only the final result, win lose or draw counts. In UT3 on the otherhand (I'm assuming this is how it works anyway) every game you play on a public server counts and your ranking changes not on the result of the game but with each frag you score. It's easy to cheat. You can just get a to alias and then frag them repeatedly to pad your score, you can alias and go and kill higher ranked players to lower their scores without risking your own, or you can just avoid good opponents and only play on servers with newbies.

<< Comment #417 @ 17:00 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #416

Elo is a great rating system and can't really be abused like you're saying. You can alias and try specifically to pick on people to get kills for rating in FFA, but it won't get you very far. Even if it were possible to cheat ratings, do you really think that 700 UT3 players were out there doing it? From a hypothetical standpoint, I could see how you could come to the conclusion if she was maybe in the top 100 or so, but being that the system can't be abused as such and the fact that she can't even break top 500 just completely nullifies any such point.

If you look at the UT2004 stats I posted, there were about 3 or 4 players who used names like "barbi3" and I picked the LEAST bad one. She's only got 66 hours clocked under that name so she either doesn't play UT much or she aliases. Judging by how much she uses her same UT3 account, one would assume that is her only UT2k4 name.

This is a stupid thing to be arguing in the first place - we shouldn't have to hunt down stats when she should have had the nuts to back it up to begin with. All these stats show is that she doesn't have barely any UT2k4 experience, and the little she does have is horrible. Her UT3 stats are average at best.. Clearly all that Razer gear in her EG profile isn't giving her an "unfair advantage."

<< Comment #420 @ 17:45 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

telly - Reply to #417

Maybe they play on lan or on private servers have you thought of this?
The built in rankings in just about every game I've ever played have been hopelessly broken and most players completely ignore them. The people who are top succeed by playing the system (avoiding good opponents, padding their score, playing conservatively to avoid deaths rather than even trying to win maps, aliasing, etc etc).

for example
purerhythem won the 50calibre tournament and he's ranked it says 18006th! wow!

http://www.enemydown.co.uk/ut3stats.php?id=116856111

maybe this account is his too:
http://www.enemydown.co.uk/ut3stats.php?id=116856111
which is ok, 605th which still isn't very high?

Mik3d who beat ecstasy in double elimination too it says he's ranked 10667 wow again!

Edited by telly at 17:49 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #426 @ 18:25 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #420

So what? There are good players in plenty of games who don't take part in tournaments. If you paid attention to what I had said, I told you to ignore the elo rating and look specifically at her other stats. She's average. That's it.

I didn't know that names were tied to ID numbers in UT2k4 and I did a search for any other names that were used by her ID. It's her only one. That means she doesn't alias, has a grand total of 66 hours played, about 6x more losses than wins, and almost as many deaths as kills.

"Ecstasy: The abuse comes mostly in the form of sexism. A lot of players have egos, and when they get beaten by a girl, their attitudes and behaviour changes into hostility and resentment."

She talks about how she's so SEXUALLY OPPRESSED when she's been playing the game for a month, on and off, at most. She has only won 53 times (out of 384) and I'm pretty sure "deathmatch" is the category used for both FFA and 1v1 in UT2k4. That would explain why she has 7k kills in 384 games. She has no CTF or TDM experience at all and those stats don't show for UT3.

<< Comment #478 @ 10:47 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #413

if you call ForresT "some guy who played Ut2K3" you might wanna stop talking about the ut scene...

<< Comment #484 @ 11:08 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #478

Let go of his cock.

<< Comment #486 @ 11:15 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #484

nice comeback...

<< Comment #488 @ 11:22 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #486

Nice obvious post.

<< Comment #490 @ 11:25 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #488

let me ask you something:

If everyone who knows more than you about something is gay, what does that make you?

<< Comment #493 @ 11:32 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #490

Jesus, I can't even get done replying to your posts and you have more. Stop refreshing the page ffs.

Troll harder without reading all the comments.

<< Comment #496 @ 11:37 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #493

you reply to almost every single reply from me. Which is, let me get my calculator, about as bad as me....

<< Comment #455 @ 10:36 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

juxx - Reply to #410

those are some awesome results that would surely get you into a professional organisation if you were a ~~guy~~

<< Comment #385 @ 10:10 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Godsmurf - Reply to #276

That's all fine, but the one thing that matters is: would you also have recruited her if she were ugly?

If not, then don't get upset when people flame you for introducing this girl as a player when her real function is to get attention. By doing so, you've belittled the sport and deserve all the flaming you are getting here from a community that values gaming as a sport and doesn't like to see it being reduced to fake entertainment.

10%

<< Comment #390 @ 11:18 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #385

Everyone that we consider on the team goes through a process of whether they would fit the team or not.

In the case of Annie, she acted professional when I had met her personally at Digital Life (mind you which she went to with her OWN money just to get a glimpse of the UT3 BETA.) As well in what little competition that was there aside from the event being hosted by GGL, she was easily the next best player there aside from Stryfe in UT2k4 play. She could also play some mean Guitar Hero too, which goes back to my point of if we really wanted to just show her off, we'd pick a more mainstream game for her to play in to represent us, wouldn't you think?

But no, we decided to pick her up for a game that has a minimal player base, with arguably a more competitive field. A game she loves in fact, that she is also good in. That she now has to prove her self even more so, thanks to the barrage of negativity.

Now as far as "what if she was ugly?" and her getting sponsorship with us?

We promote a healthy self-image. If Annie didn't present a healthy self-image to me at Digital Life, or for that matter did not act professionally, she wouldn't be signed with EG. This means she doesn't necessarily have to be the most attractive person in the world, but why should it matter if she happens to be? Fact is she can play games better than any female I have ever encountered, especially in DeathMatch and she looks good doing it. The only other player I consider near or at her level is Liefje. I had watched Annie play, and played her myself online to get a feel for whether or not she could truly play. And to my amazement, she was better than other girls who do have sponsorship as well, and quite a number of guys too.

That isn't to say there aren't players out there deserving of sponsorship that haven't picked it up yet. However she put herself out there, put in the effort to say "look I can actually play", demonstrated that she could to the people she should have, and it benefit her. Sponsors won't goto players except in extreme scenarios. Do you really think Fatal1ty got to where he's at by just sitting there all day waiting for someone to notice? Of course not. He put himself out there and said "I have what it takes to represent you. Now watch me prove it."

Just as Annie did.

Edited by gellehsak at 11:34 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #394 @ 12:03 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #390

Dunno, but I think fatality got noticed because of his skill and achievements 0o.
But why not make us all go to rest, like I said upload a demo or 2, make a video of her awesomeness. Back her up with evidence :) Thats what we really want to see.

<< Comment #479 @ 10:50 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #394

there is a huge difference between getting noticed and getting big bucks out of it by knowing how to present yourself.

<< Comment #396 @ 12:06 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sonic - Reply to #390

trimming that down a bit, no you wouldn't have recruited her if she was ugly :/

<< Comment #399 @ 12:15 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #396

Totally missed my point.

If she was wearing ratty clothes, didn't do her hair, etc. Then she isn't presenting herself the way an EMPLOYER would want to see her.

Ever been to a job interview?

If Annie had a crooked nose or a chin the size of Jay Leno's, that wouldn't have prevented her from being on the team.

You can't define who's ugly and who isn't. Some people have their own definition of what ugliness and beauty is. But you can tell who keeps their own self-image up and who decides they'll just forget about their representation to others.

<< Comment #414 @ 15:02 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #399

An employer wouldn't care how nice you are dressed if you didn't go to college first. They don't give you the chance to just "show what you've got." Why do all the young people I talk to think that the world works like that? Appearances only get you minimum wage jobs or work in porn. If you want a career, you have to work for it. I'm surprised your sponsors let you kids run around and pull this stuff. Do you have to ask your sponsors before you recruit someone for the team? How would they feel if they were reading all of this?

<< Comment #480 @ 10:51 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #414

wrong.

to clarify: I meant the job part.

"Why do all the young people I talk to think that the world works like that?"
Good question, why do all young people think like YOU?

Of course, it's important to meet certain minimum requirements, but after that it's all about presenting yourself.

Edited by becks at 10:55 CST, 12 February 2008

<< Comment #483 @ 11:07 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #480

Minimum requirements are a lot of work for anything that isn't flipping burgers. Presentation means absolutely nothing if you haven't got the papers to back it up.

<< Comment #487 @ 11:22 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #483

oh really?

I informally apllied at a smaller company to write my final paper in engineering there. On the phone I was told to drop by, what I did yesterday.

Depending on if we find a topic that my university accepts I'm pretty much hired there, even though they haven't seen a single grade from me yet...

I also had a job tutoring teenagers up to 13th grade in English and Mathematics. The boss hired me first and told me to hand in my grades from high school in the following weeks.

<< Comment #489 @ 11:23 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #487

So you've got some low level jobs. Great.

<< Comment #492 @ 11:28 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #489

Sure tutoring is low paying, but $20/h is still better than flipping burgers. And it certainly is a job where you should meet certain minimum requirements.

Also, I'm not quite sure if you know what engineers actually get payed.

<< Comment #494 @ 11:33 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #492

$20/hour? =DDDDD

That's a job, not a career. Next.

<< Comment #495 @ 11:36 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #494

can you please try reading complete posts?

<< Comment #278 @ 09:10 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

fag with no name

fucking attention whore... i'd still do her though. LONG TIME!

<< Comment #287 @ 09:32 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

danseko.dD - Reply to #278

redundant comment is redundant

<< Comment #291 @ 09:42 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

fag with no name - Reply to #287

redundant reply is redundant

<< Comment #292 @ 09:42 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sonic

reply button is banned

<< Comment #321 @ 10:39 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

deotrip

awesome interview

<< Comment #327 @ 10:55 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy

If you were a 'pro-gaming girl', how would you do things?

I think i'd be like a muslim woman.

<< Comment #346 @ 14:14 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

AHXNXA

more uglier = more time spent playing computer games = better player

and girls can't play video games

<< Comment #351 @ 16:20 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #346

stermy didn't do too bad, and even though I'm neither emo nor gay I don't think he looks like a dickbutt ;)

<< Comment #356 @ 18:58 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #351

omg you gay !

+ his logic does not fail.

<< Comment #368 @ 03:23 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #356

I have yet to hear of a 17 year old with an intelligent opinion about womenz

<< Comment #353 @ 17:42 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

crono

Cool, I went to CAL too.

<< Comment #362 @ 22:08 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

baron Railgun '

I looked on the link because the picture I guess
but nobody forced me to do that

<< Comment #363 @ 22:16 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy

These threads always prove the same thing: The community needs more legitimate female participation. Every time there's something legitimate (not girls ho'ing around their images), it's hugely popular. While popular isn't always good, in this case, it seems great.

<< Comment #365 @ 23:02 CST, 7 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

stryfe`

This is the most UT3 has been talked about on ESR. All of a sudden a new patch and CustomUT come out today. THE PLAN WORKED.

<< Comment #370 @ 03:52 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #365

SPIK TO DA HAND

<< Comment #371 @ 04:12 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

stryfe` - Reply to #370

THOR>AMERICA ONCE AGAIN

www.stryfeonline.com/lol.wmv

??????????????

Edited by eg|stryfe at 04:13 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #377 @ 07:20 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #371

LOL how the fuck I've never been told about this video before ?!

RIP Infinite. xD

<< Comment #366 @ 01:26 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy

I'm just bullshitting you. It's all a cat-dog thing. Dogs are insanely fascinated by new cats (violently so). But after the introduction phase, the dog gets insanely bored and pretty much never pays attention to the cat ever again. Unless the cat tries to take its food.

<< Comment #372 @ 04:38 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sypher

"Leave Annie alone!!" Dont make me create a youtube vid.

<< Comment #375 @ 04:55 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy - Reply to #372

Yeah... good job, your hide can stop a bear attack. Your speed can catch a gazelle. Your claws can slice a turtle.

Humans are not any more advanced than the rest... it is nothing more than a more advantageous motion of strengths (which likely came about because all the other survival sets were taken - which means, humans are probably one of the most primitive rather than advanced).

Edited by Jonesy at 04:56 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #386 @ 10:12 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ix - Reply to #375

"which means, humans are probably one of the most primitive rather than advanced"

?

<< Comment #379 @ 08:53 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #372

Would be 100x times more instersting if Annie was also taking drugs... According to her christ cross on the picture, she probably only gets high with chocolate or with limo-beer.

<< Comment #481 @ 10:59 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #379

watch "cruel intentions"for interesting insights about crosses :P

<< Comment #373 @ 04:47 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

oneroomdisco

Wow, can't say I'm surprised at the comments.

First off, I think any girls that play video games should be respected if they are GOOD at them. All these poster girls who just 'play' video games are ridiculous, and need to be slaughtered.

Anyway, there's girls like Ecstacy who should be respected, because she's very good at what she plays, and is competitive.

But alas, she is a female, so as male instinct goes, she must be treated differently! Remember seeing interviews by Toxic or Av3k, two different ones, posted one after the other? Did those threads reach 300 comments on how they're attention whores?

I say this is the perfect test in all honesty. Get a lot of hype for her, then put her to the test. If she does well, there /shouldn't/ be a problem, but probably will. If she flops, which she probably won't, then it will probably be twice as worse.

I just think people need to grow up or something. Sure, if Ecstacy was some random girl who just PLAYED games, and was some barbie doll, then I would be happy to see 300+ negative comments, but she isn't.

So now it's just a waiting game, I guess.

<< Comment #374 @ 04:53 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy - Reply to #373

Whatever. Humans are retarded. They consolidate their strengths in their brains, and then they don't even use their brains because doing so is 'uncool'.

Eat shit, dog mother-fucker (I mean this to everyone it applies to, not necessarily to the person i'm replying to).

<< Comment #383 @ 09:17 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #373

Ive not seen anything about how good she apparently is.

<< Comment #376 @ 05:41 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Raist

Scanned through the interview quickly and went straight to the comments after.

As I expected, it is pure win and filled with bunnies.

<< Comment #381 @ 09:09 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

hailstorm

I didn't want to post first, but felt that there is lack of girls' voice here.

In my opinion this article is unfair to all girls who play e-sport games or follow them as specs. Do you know how ridiculous it feels to other girls when an ordinary girl is admired on an e-sports page just because she is a girl? I'm sure that it feels ridiculous when you're a boy, too, but not so much, because you feel attracted. If you're a girl, though, you have an unobstructed view, so to speak, and it looks truly ridiculous.
There's nothing special about this one that has any relevance to esports, and there can be no cop-outs: not a top-player, hasn't won any tournament or placed well. Her sole achievement is that she plays a competitive FPS game like other girls I know.

I want to say to whoever came up with an idea to make somebody stand out for being a girl, you suck and you're disrespectful to all other girls. You create bad image for us, too, it's no surprise that boys keep repeating "attention whores" and "girls can't play". Esports is about winning tournaments, and that only a handful of people can do, which is why they're admired. Apparently you chose to forget that players earn respect and admiration the hard way and decided to create free hype for EG.

31%

<< Comment #382 @ 09:10 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Demiurge ' - Reply to #381

Thanks for commenting :D

<< Comment #384 @ 09:23 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #381

You are made of win.

<< Comment #388 @ 10:25 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Janedoe - Reply to #381

And who are you?

No one cares about your opinion. Maybe if girls wouldn't whore themselves at events, they would get a little more respect.

You sit there and babble about how shes nothing special and hasn't placed in a tournament. Well tell me, what fucking girl has? Don't even include the god girls, because there main accomplishments are female quakecon tournaments. Seriously? Your obviously an ordinary girl as well, who wasn't been given an opportunity.

Go cry about it somewhere else.

<< Comment #389 @ 10:33 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Nicky - Reply to #388

some people obviously care about her opinion as she has been [+]'d :P

she is just as welcome to post here as you are so why should she go elsewhere

<< Comment #397 @ 12:09 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #388

Put down your crack pipe.

<< Comment #387 @ 10:13 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ix - Reply to #381

[+]

<< Comment #391 @ 11:37 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #381

read this first please, as it argues some of your points.

Moving on however, I honestly feel insulted that you discredit Annie, EG, and her skill without even proper knowledge of how we went through signing her or proper knowledge of how well she can even play.

To be quite fair, I think it's insulting that people discredit her based on her looks. As we signed her for more reasons, and actually went through a process rather than just "she's a girl, lets sign her".

Who truly looks disrespectful, one who actually runs through a process, or one who judges based on her looks. Because to me, many of the people here are judging Annie based on her looks, and simply stating she cannot play games.

Edited by gellehsak at 11:38 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #395 @ 12:06 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #391

SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!!!!!

<< Comment #402 @ 12:18 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

technics - Reply to #391

nicely put miss ryder!

Edited by technics at 12:19 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #406 @ 12:41 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

paincakes - Reply to #402

;p

<< Comment #443 @ 04:30 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

technics - Reply to #406

didnt actually mean you but andy :(

<< Comment #452 @ 10:02 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

paincakes - Reply to #443

ssssuuuurrreee! ;o

<< Comment #407 @ 12:45 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #391

I'm sorry but without any achievements (yet), such an interview with provocating pictures (the one with her opening the mouth was very provocating) discredits her, not us.

<< Comment #411 @ 14:06 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ix - Reply to #391

No, people are judging based on the laughably OTT orgasmo image that was originally used in the post here. It's about the way she's being presented, not really about her.

<< Comment #412 @ 14:22 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

andysak - Reply to #411

I'm glad to see a double standard exists...

When Carmac would post unbelievably embarrassing and at some points even questionable images of players around the community for his interviews, it would get laughs and a giant thumbs up.

People seem to forget that we (EG and Annie) had no influence at what pictures were posted to fit the structure of SK-Gaming, yet are taking a huge hit of criticism. And as the issue of the picture in question you mention is solved, the rest seem to be perfectly fine to me.

<< Comment #415 @ 15:10 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ix - Reply to #412

BS, Carmac's pics are chosen for amusement, dunnisdone, I'd guess a member of EG by his email, chose the orgasmo pic as the way to present the article. It was too late once that was done.

If EG were so professional you'd have asked to check the SK article before it was released so you have only yourselves to blame.

Edited by ix at 03:02 CST, 9 February 2008

<< Comment #482 @ 11:05 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #391

wouldn't you agree that the earlier newspost and this interview would have been good opportunities to actually talk about the process you mentioned?

<< Comment #380 @ 09:09 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

XeroxHands

ESR is so awesome. Plain and simple.

<< Comment #392 @ 11:50 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Janedoe

Because shes a fucking hypocrite.

<< Comment #398 @ 12:12 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #392

You fail at logic, now look top right of each post is the reply button, use it.

<< Comment #400 @ 12:16 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

paincakes - Reply to #398

Not everyone is as smart as you. ;)

<< Comment #403 @ 12:20 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #400

I try at least :P

<< Comment #401 @ 12:16 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

technics

winz would tap that

<< Comment #404 @ 12:35 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #401

drunk as always? :D

<< Comment #408 @ 12:55 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

MarzenGold - Reply to #404

technics (20:14:46): she's HOTTTTT

<< Comment #418 @ 17:23 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

stryfe`

I wasn't going to post anything either. With this being ESR and all, there is absolutely no way to influence so many hard heads at the same time. But what the hell -

Throwing the word hypocrite around in this situation IS the most hypocritical thing I've seen so far. Everyone here would never pass up an interview asked of them, don't even try to deny that you would. Her answers were nothing but truthful and honest. The only problem here was a single picture that made it's way to the cover sheet, that she had NO say in choosing. It was picked by the guy who posted it, who yes, does work for EG. Seriously, would you be happier if she was 5 feet tall with a mustache and a 1UP mushroom in her hand?

Marketing is marketing on EG's side, but that is completely beside the fact that she is an actual player. She isn't just sitting on the bench being spoon fed all this opportunity and exposure because she gives you guys a hard on you can't finish off. I wouldn't have allowed that, and I never would have given her the option of EG if that was the case.

This thread is half jealousy and half bashing due to it. She's professional, cute and she won't have sex with you. Sorry? Winz seems to be the most upset from the whole thing, and I'm sorry but we can't all have French biased tournaments to catapult our e-career's. And the on interview I've seen of you, you look terrified of the camera and interviewer. Can you even deal with the exposure if given to you? You of all people who have taken plenty of flak over the years shouldn't be commenting in such a way.

As far as her skill level goes and her not "proving" anything, there really is no way to prove it with barely anything to play for in UT3. However, having trained her myself online, and on LAN I can tell you that she is a contender. She's not going to beat me or CC in a tournament, I'll be honest but she can place top 5 here without a doubt. She also listens well and does her job in TDM which is more important right now for us. She's already placed 9th in both online tournaments run over here, having lost to the winner of one of them. You show me another girl that can do that and then I'll shut up. I will get demos up if need be.

Trust me, I know that ESR is cut throat and demands skill before show. Even after I've won things you people have shit all over me for absolutely no reason. Also, as said before, if it's not Quake it doesn't belong on ESR because that's what this community is. That's fine and I'm not bitching about that but you guys completely overlook the important thing here:

In a time where console games, and leagues like MLG are completely destroying the world that we together have built, you are once again causing conflict within what's left of PC FPS DM. There is absolutely no room for this. Every one of the talentless PMS and FragDoll girls get massive amounts of exposure, 10 times more then this and more then Annie ever will yet you choose to attack within your own community. She is playing a skillful game, and competing along side us with the right attitude. If you can't see the problem with attacking her then maybe you should zip up and take a closer look.

Edited by eg|stryfe at 17:32 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #419 @ 17:38 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

paincakes - Reply to #418

"She's professional, cute and she won't have sex with you."

Hahaha well put. ;p

<< Comment #422 @ 18:00 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Oh_Snaps! - Reply to #419

id like to see those demos stryfe, because you ringed in for in those tournaments because you were "training" her at lan, when she came back to the west coast and played online she was horrible, she walks in straight lines and cant play for shit thats why I never ever see her play in pugs or any servers...somebody might find out that she actually sucks and not good at all. Yes i'm calling you and ecstasy out...you ringed for her when she was on the east coast, and when shes back in cali server she got her ass handed to her. So have fun posting break.com videos and talking on irc with her because thats all she does.

<< Comment #425 @ 18:18 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

stryfe` - Reply to #422

What the hell are you talking about ringed for her on the east coast? Ringed for her in WHAT? She was IN California when those tournaments were going on. Rofl? Ive never rung, for anybody, ever. She posts for 1v1s everyday, she plays constantly. Your argument weighs as much as a gagdolls credibility.

Edited by eg|stryfe at 18:25 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #424 @ 18:08 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #418

First, ix said it best about the interview crap
http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1507518

"This thread is half jealousy and half bashing due to it. "

Cop out.

"As far as her skill level goes and her not "proving" anything, there really is no way to prove it with barely anything to play for in UT3."

She's obviously actively playing since her stats are changing on the UT3 stats page. They are, however, not very good. Also, UT2k4 stats show that she's a total newbie, with almost no time played. Based on her stats, I'd have to worry about demos being uploaded from online play that are not someone else aliased. All she would have had to do is prove herself at ONE lan and everything here could have been avoided.

Recruiting players based on looks or other reasons than skill goes against everything the sport stands for. This is a game that can be played by handicapped people, ugly people, the french, fat people, skinny people, and beautiful people - all on the same playing field. Even if she IS good, she should have the same hardships that everyone else does in finding a sponsor. Right now, you picked her over someone else that is more qualified. You should have taken someone else and waited until she got some momentum after a few LAN and online events. It's even more silly since she plays a game that may never even see a tournament.

You talk bad about PMS and Fragdolls when you're no better. If I was your sponsor and I knew this crap was going on, I'd drop you in a second. It's a good thing I already hate intel and razer.

<< Comment #427 @ 18:25 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

stryfe` - Reply to #424

The truth is a cop out? Ok.

She was a CTF player in 2k4, no CTF player has good rankings. I doubt those stats even tracked the entire time to begin with. And then again, why the hell are you using those sites as a standard? You could look up Lauke and find shit rankings there. Did you just install the game today? Or are you that desperate to use EPIC stats as a credible source? All of us are 500-1000+ enemy down......

No one is going to go through the trouble of aliasing as her, playing games, and uploading demos, so don't get your speedos in a knot. Yes she can prove herself on LAN, but a LAN hasn't happened yet.

Yes I agree on the hardships of finding a sponsor. I went through all of 2k3 and 2k4, traveling absolutely everywhere out of my own pocket, with minimal money. I know the struggle, trust me. And I've had more then one argument about it with her as far as her being exposed THIS much with no accolades. But, it's not my doing, nor is it hers. The person you need to bitch at are the ones conducting/posting the articles.

I'm no better then PMS/Fragdolls? I've done more then all of them combined....in my bathroom, after a taco bell eat-a-thon. Drop me for what? Defending a teammate? Oh that's right, honor/respect isn't in your vocabulary.

<< Comment #428 @ 18:38 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #427

Being that there are NO sources to judge her skill by, you have to look at the only thing we have to go on.

http://ut2004stats.epicgames.com/playerstats.php?player=728569

This is the best barbi3 in all of the stats pages. The other ones were so bad, that if this is the wrong one, it's really sad. Since you can search by ID, you can see she has only used the one name... ever. Looking over the multiple IDs Lauke is under, he has the goods.

If this isn't her ID, please show me the correct one for UT2k4. She has no CTF/TDM experience at ALL according to that list. Just what CTF did she take part in and under what name that isn't showing up? As for UT3, there is only the one Ecstacy account and the numbers are high enough to show that it's active. Even if you dismiss elo, her accuracy and other stats are nowhere near good enough for a professional team. She hasn't done CTF at all in UT3, though it doesn't show TDM.

You're not defending your team, you're defending a business investment. Don't talk to me about honor until you back up what you're claiming here.

<< Comment #429 @ 18:46 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sypher - Reply to #428

Who the hell uses stats? :p no one.

Just because she is a girl does not mean she has to place #1 and become the new gitz. You would not expect that from any unknown player male or female.

If it raises the profile of UT3 doesnt that help us all? We are after all fighting a slow death.

<< Comment #430 @ 18:50 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #429

She probably couldn't beat bots.

<< Comment #431 @ 18:53 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sypher - Reply to #430

Hey those bots are tough :)

Your located in the US? Why dont you just play her and find out?

<< Comment #432 @ 19:00 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #431

If she'd play on webcam and in UT2k4, sure. I don't have the graphics card for UT3. =(

<< Comment #433 @ 19:21 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sypher - Reply to #432

Poor guy :p

<< Comment #435 @ 19:27 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #433

I can't justify getting an 8800 for UT3 and crysis. Geforce 6150 plays SC just fine. =(

<< Comment #434 @ 19:27 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

paincakes - Reply to #432

Nice cop out.

<< Comment #436 @ 19:30 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #434

Cop out how? I don't even own UT3 or UT2k4 right now, but I wouldn't buy an 8800 just to beat some bimbo who doesn't play the game in a 1v1. If you get it hooked up on webcam and agree to pay for my 8800 if I win, I'll buy it up front. Savvy?

<< Comment #441 @ 22:59 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

stryfe` - Reply to #436

Are you reading anything in this thread or just upset that a girl is probably better then you? She has placed T-9 in 2 online tournaments, and plays 1v1 daily. Buy the card, if you win I'll pay for it.

<< Comment #444 @ 04:31 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #441

"you mad because you know she is not gonna have sex with you"
"you mad because you know she is a better player than you"

ok whatever, I just give up, that sillyness is not worth a response, I guess you win.

<< Comment #447 @ 04:40 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

stryfe` - Reply to #444

The sex thing was a joke, humor is lost on you. The better then you thing was started by him, why don't you read above. Christ o mighty.

<< Comment #457 @ 11:58 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #441

You can't keep your word not to post in a thread and you don't show results - your words have no value. It wouldn't matter if she was better than me at UT3 since I don't even play the game. If you would bet $300 down on a video card for a game against her, why not just have her play against some people online and record the matches? Why is it that you're going out of your way so much to avoid just giving us some proof? Any other player would just say "Sure, let me hop in game."

Again, if you had just waited until after she competed in a LAN in ANY game, there would be no question as to why you would bring her on the team. From what we can see, she was a total newbie that you are teaching. Sure, she might be above average when you get done, but that's not fair to someone who already had the skill. Why is it that your team is so opposed to just showing some results? The both of you are just going in word loops. It's not like we're asking you to donate your lefticle, we just want to know why you would recruit her.

<< Comment #461 @ 14:08 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Bort - Reply to #457

rofl, so in other words you are a fag who is scared to lose against a girl.
gg, keep posting stats

<< Comment #462 @ 14:33 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #461

Like I said, her UT3 stats are average at best. She's clearly trying to learn the game, but she's not pro material. I don't play the game at all, and I couldn't expect him to pay up even if I did. The only thing I'm afraid of is the esports community dying like the american economy.

<< Comment #442 @ 02:18 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

th0r^ - Reply to #424

This is a game that can be played by handicapped people, ugly people, the french, fat people, skinny people, and beautiful people - all on the same playing field.

I suggest you to write it like this:

This is a game that can be played by handicapped people, ugly people, fat people, skinny people, beautiful people and the french - all on the same playing field.

So your exemples are sorted from the worst to the best and we all get the right idea: even french people who have plenty much other things to do can play the game.

<< Comment #456 @ 11:36 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #442

It was either france or canada. =/

<< Comment #485 @ 11:11 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #424

I think it would be interesting to consider the following about the stats you are so obsessed with:
She is in a team with stryfe and CC and trains with them.

I wonder how your quake stats would be if you trained with e.g. Fox and Toxic.

<< Comment #491 @ 11:26 CST, 12 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

vedic - Reply to #485

Granted, I'm sure the girl is improving with training from better players. The fact is, she shouldn't have needed it to begin with. All these stats show is that she's HORRIBLE at UT - but it's all we have to go on. I'm sure she's about average or maybe a bit better by now, but that's just a media stunt. Nobody will take her seriously. Even still, she's playing a game that they know doesn't have lasting power in the industry.

One way or another, she won't be around for more than a few months.

<< Comment #437 @ 20:29 CST, 8 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

winz - Reply to #418

"and I'm sorry but we can't all have French biased tournaments to catapult our e-career's."

Mentioning jealousy then saying this made my day.
Seriously, have you ever played against me? Have you ever attended a eswc event? Then please, don't talk about what you have no clue.
I don't even get what you are saying such things.. was it the only argument you could thought of ?

"You of all people who have taken plenty of flak over the years shouldn't be commenting in such a way."

Basically: "people did trashtalk about you, so you have no rights to talk"
Excuse me? What is the world you are living in? I can't give my opinion because of my name ? What would you reply if that was another guy who said what I've said ? How isn't this so fucking retarded ?

I had some respect for you for your achivements without really knowing you, and I still have but your comment here is full of shit

Edited by *aAa*winz at 20:35 CST, 8 February 2008

<< Comment #445 @ 04:35 CST, 9 February 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sonic - Reply to #437

He's resorting to personal attacks because he really hasn't got anything else at this point - if they admitted they recruited this girl to smile simply to promote their clan or whatever it is (look at 90% of magazine covers, I even remember when PC Format used to have a girl on the cover each month) then all this would have faded away days ago.

Really, cmon people - we know why you recruited her, and thats fine (if amusing obviously) the more long winded nonsense you're trying to justify your decision with it just makes you look worse.

*waits for some kind of unfounded personal attack on either love life/earnings/pr0 gam1ng*