it's a "take you by the hand sp", if you like that it could feel like an ok game
but if you don't give a fuck about gameplay's rythm developpers are trying to impose, and play as you wish :
-if you rush, you end up falling on a 5 or more respawning npc (sometime I felt like waking them. "ho hi guys sorry") and you're dead.
-if you camp a bit, enemies keep respawning forever and your actions are useless
enemy respawn, the new shitty next gen feature after auto healing by breathing 3 seconds
way to kill gameplay
then it makes me think crysis wasn't that bad (and then I wake up : crysis was mediocre)
yeah, I played the demo and found it awfull, treating you like a 5 years old kid; if games are to be rated, when they rate a game as M, then GAMEPLAY should be adjusted to age too, not just special effects, gore and other crappy shit (things which in fact are just meant to win the curiosity of kids, instead keeping them away from it)
best war game was Operation Flashpoint (the first one), imo
same thing. i played it really long and realized it was utter crap. CoD 1 & 2 was something that was really fun to play and even watch. 4 was just .... crap. :)
They are all based off Q3, just the renderer is totally new. You can still wall-run and circle-jump in COD4--most players even have a few easy trickjumps to get into good spots.
is it just a multiplayer decision?
cause cod4 sp is just awesome. the mp part is hard to decide, both tf2 and cod are great games, but dont appeal to every one