not again =/

C'mon, new players come on ESR every day, they might miss this funny topic.

summary

no difference between sexes
girls just dont put in as much practice, and thats if they even get involved in the first place
female tournaments are great for publicising female gaming, and great for some really bitchy, gritty tournaments, but crap for everything else
Vanessa (doa player) is great at the game and can play on a top level.. pretty much every other game girls are very weak in comparison

this has been done to death :(

There're significant differences between the sexes in gaming. Men have better reaction times on average and superior 3D awareness.

ok, i should have phrased it better
countless times its been proven and that is a given

i should have said that with those differences being so minor, why is it that most female gamers cant even touch mid skilled males? and are a million miles away from the pros?

purely down to practice, and the chances of finding a gem amongst thousands is far greater than finding one against tens :)

"i should have said that with those differences being so minor"
Minor? It's not just the reaction time either, it's the hand-eye coordination, too.
You'll also find a great deal more male surgeons than female.

but reaction time etc isnt the whole story.

success in gaming requires far more than hand eye coord and reaction times... :x

Don't get me wrong, my girlfriend is a gamer, and tbh she's not half bad. She went with me last year to Quakecon and is really excited that she'll get to bring a computer this year. But overall, while I fully support girl gaming, and know that they're not automatically horrible players, I don't think they in general will have the same type of hormonal, base level competitive spirit.
I'm not saying that I believe it's physically impossible for a female to game as well as a male in an FPS, but I can say with complete confidence that it's highly improbable.

I find that strange since other researches has proven that females have better fine motor control than males. That should be one of the explainations to why girls' handwriting often look way better than guys'.

As of that the girls should have an advantage on that point in gaming aimwise.

I believe it to be a matter of matter of numbers. As jaffeh points out so well its way more likely to find a guy with talent in gaming than to find a girl with the same kinda talent, since the guys outnumber girls with 1000 to 1 or something within esport.

Its the same reason why small countries with small populations are pretty much chanceless to produce sport talents to match larger countries.

really ? all the female quakers ive known seem to have awesome rail, but yes guys minds are built for doign a single task while women are better at multitasking(better at team games them duels?)

tbh if there was as many girls playing games as guys id think they'd be a at least 5 girls in the top 20

there is differnece
men are better physically also ind small fine sports (dart, billard)
and i a dont know how its said thinkinmg in 3rd dimenson?

.

like this?
http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii190/Starff/wife.png

can i reply now esr please??
ok..seems i'm allowed finally..

Well still u can see there're many different opinions like yours : "Girls are good as men" or "Girls belongs to kitchen and are no use for anything else" or just simply "men > women" :-)

no difference between sexes

What a stupid thing to say, that's like suggesting there's absolutely no difference between white people and black people in terms of basketball aptitude. Genetics accounts to a large degree for what anyone is capable of, none of us are equal or without difference. There will always be certain white guys who are good, perhaps great at basketball just as there may be girls who become good or great gamers.

Don't use shitty excuses to ignore the fact other people just aren't as good though. Lumping entire genders of people together as though simple reasons could explain away the vast complexity and difference in the world is incorrect and sexist.

That race stuff is pretty much a myth. Remember when they said the same thing about black boxers, how they're genetically superior blah blah.. and look what you have nowdays - 80% of top fighters are white russians.

Also in case you forgot the NBA stars you write about, they got their butts kicked in last two world championships by all-white teams and they had Lebron, Garnet, Duncan, Wade ie the best of the best. When it comes to gender differences tho, those are clear and well documented.

Actually in the last two championships firstly they didn't have Kobe Bryant who is the best individual player and secondly for a number of years a lot of the top tier players snubbed playing for the USA team because they wanted to rest over the Summer. The World Championship for basketball isn't like the World cup is for football, the best competition is hands down the NBA. North American sports don't place the same level of importance on the world competitions, as you can see by the way in ice hockey you don't get all the cream of the crop in their world championships either. Team USA has lost the world championships for a couple of easily identifiable reasons:

* The rest of the world is no longer intimidated by them and their style, no doubt a product of all the South American/European players who have played in the NBA and become accustomed to them.
* The NBA with its salary cap limitations is basically setup now so that every team has at least one big star and so they are used to getting their shots first and foremost as a priority on the team. When you take all of those stars and throw them on the same team shots have to be shared and people are playing roles they don't play for their team during the season.
* The best not putting themselves forwards as before. Take a look at the disparity between the number of top tier allstars in the 1992 dream team and the number in the 2000 world championships team. Goes without saying without your best players you won't play to the maximum of your potential.

The basketball point is absolutely solid actually, we're talking about overall trends from gender or race here. The trend is pretty obvious that black people are better at basketball overall, aside from Dirk Nowitzki who is basically a freak of nature (a big guy who can shoot from all ranges) all the big white guys in the NBA are nowhere close to the finesse or power of the big black guys. The only time the NBA was overrun with white guys doing well was when blacks weren't allowed to play in it, hence why the globetrotters became so famous.

There will always be individual cases which go against the grain but that is exactly what my original post said, the fact those anomalies exist and go against any kind of grain shows that overwhelmingly they are not the norm.

Even if equal numbers of males and females played video games and with equivalent desire and dedication it seems unlikely to me girls would ever be better in general at the current video games/esports we have right now, men seem in general to be better suited to abilities required to succeed. Even if it were the case that as Jaffeh says girls are only worse because they don't practice as much that is more evidence for them not being as good, they are not predisposed to have the same desire and dedication to become good at a video game apparently. Practice has a lot to do with expressing one's potential, hence why people like Tiger and Jordan have/had legendary practice schedules.

wall of fail ^

it's well known that basketball is important in the ghetto/black culture

by your flawed reasoning someone could ask why there's no blacks in tennis, if they're so fit for sports in general? because tennis isn't strongly present in black culture

The people who play in the ghetto don't get to the NBA, the end up playing street ball their whole lives and appearing in garbage like the and1 video series because they don't know how to play in a disciplined fashion and insist on trying to shoot all the time or do playground moves. The people who get to the NBA start out playing with a hoop on their garage wall and then join teams, all colours have an equal opportunity in this respect.

Congrats talking a bunch of bullshit when you know nothing about basketball.

if they're so fit for sports in general

lol way to invent something and then ask a question of it to me as though I said it.

k, still fail
see #46

oh wow they didn't have Kobe.. though shit. I guess Lebron, Duncan and Garnett are 2nd class throwaways, right? Also I totally owned your argument with the black boxers remark which you failed to adress. Honestly doesn't it ever occur to you that maybe black people thrive at sports in the U.S. (and the world) generally because they're underprivileged and their only way out of poverty is trough sports?

I never said black people thrive in sports

I never said the only reason they lost was not having Kobe, that's what you essentially implied by just ignoring all the other sound points I made.

the black boxers remark which you failed to adress.

I didn't address your black boxers example because I know nothing about boxing and have not referenced it once, my original post said black people are more apt at basketball, what does that have to do with boxing idiot?

maybe black people thrive at sports in the U.S. (and the world) generally because they're underprivileged and their only way out of poverty is trough sports?

Yeah that sounds logical: white people don't "thrive" in sports because they have full price orange juice instead of orange kool-aid. As a result they prefer to sit behind desks pushing pencils instead of being world famous rich sports stars.

I guess Lebron, Duncan and Garnett are 2nd class throwaways, right?

Your basketball knowledge is next to zero, The 2006 world championship team didn't have Tim Duncan or Kevin Garnett. They also had next to no veterans, the only good players they had were players who only came into the NBA 2-3 years before the event itself like Lebron, Wade, Paul, Carmelo and Bosh. You don't win the world championship playing the likes of Hinrich and Brad Miller.

Keep embarrassing yourself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_at...Basketball

look at that roster and tell me those are throwaways. oh and btw, what exactly IS your argument here? that black people are overly gifted for basketball but not other sports? how so? please elaborate with some scientific proof, ty.

Where's Kobe Bryant, Shaquielle O'Neal, Kevin Garnett, Jason Kidd, Chris Webber, Rasheed Wallace, Chauncey Billups, Jermaine O'Neal, Ben Wallace, Ron Artest, Michael Redd, Paul Pierce, Ray Allen, Gilbert Arenas or Tracy McGrady on that roster list? Oh yeah that's right they didn't bother signing up to play.

Instead you've got:
Jefferson (came into the NBA in 01-02 season)
Stoudemire (came into the NBA in 02-03 season)
Boozer (came into the NBA in 02-03 season)
Wade (came into the NBA in 03-04 season)
Lebron (came into the NBA in 03-04 season)
Carmello (came into the NBA in 03-04 season)
Okafor (came into the NBA in 04-05 season!)

That's 7/11 with less than 4 seasons of NBA experience, in fact Okafor wasn't even IN the NBA yet.

Meanwhile the All-NBA first team for 2004 was:

* F - Kevin Garnett, Minnesota Timberwolves
* F - Tim Duncan, San Antonio Spurs
* C - Shaquille O'Neal, Los Angeles Lakers
* G - Kobe Bryant, Los Angeles Lakers
* G - Jason Kidd, New Jersey Nets

and the All-NBA defensive first team was:

* F - Ron Artest, Indiana Pacers
* F - Kevin Garnett, Minnesota Timberwolves
* C - Ben Wallace, Detroit Pistons
* G - Bruce Bowen, San Antonio Spurs
* G - Kobe Bryant, Los Angeles Lakers

Let's count how many of them were on that 2004 team USA team...oh that's right, one.

In case that's not embarassing enough for you, here's the All-NBA second and third teams for that year:

2nd

* F - Jermaine O'Neal, Indiana Pacers
* F - Peja Stojakovic, Sacramento Kings
* C - Ben Wallace, Detroit Pistons
* G - Sam Cassell, Minnesota Timberwolves
* G - Tracy McGrady, Orlando Magic

3rd

* F - Ron Artest, Indiana Pacers
* F - Dirk Nowitzki, Dallas Mavericks
* C - Yao Ming, Houston Rockets
* G - Baron Davis, New Orleans Hornets
* G - Michael Redd, Milwaukee Bucks

How many of them were on team USA? ZERO

Like I said, you know nothing about basketball.

calm down bubba. I can still dunk over you. You know, us white niggaz from europe can do that too...

more on topic and LOL: http://youtube.com/watch?v=acL5v12lVho

jesus dood i hate to agree with tourist but stfu, you aren't always right and you look like a wannabe know it all dickface

owned

.

haye is shit you moron

.

no cops in kenya

no but there are lions

"Don't use shitty excuses to ignore the fact other people just aren't as good though. Lumping entire genders of people together as though simple reasons could explain away the vast complexity and difference in the world is incorrect and sexist"

Which is exactly what im saying...

ROFL!

:D:D

Not a sport

esports is for men, not women.

just like barbie is for women and not for men.

the end.

This sounds like a job for Dick Masterson

Monkey Business aproves of this thread.

Because women spend more time in the kitchen and if she is not shed better be in the bedroom working on the shaft!

xerp only for women.

Acording to this, they should be equal, but something's just not right...

No, they shouldn't. Ok, well, they should if you're a brainwashed college student who's had "equality" hammered into his head since grade school and now walks about like a bumbling retard spewing "POLITICALLY CORRECT THATS H8 SP@@CHINGS" drivel.

On the other hand, to someone who actually has had a thought in his life, it might occur that the differences between male and female aren't only in strength.

yeah, we males sure have the overconfident prick gene :P

Why the rage man? I hope some woman will kick your ass in your favourite PC game someday :p

someone should make a game about making sandwiches. women would excel at that.

Cooking mama

Men would make a better sandwich in the end. They could also probably make them faster, more of them and eat them all faster and make less of a mess.

"and make less of a mess."

You were doing well until this.

I don't know any girls who don't make a mess :(

I now await....

Well, women are better at cleaning it up.

You've not met my housemate :)

lets face it men>women besides having tits and ass

i used to live in a place with five girls. it is still the messiest house i've ever seen.

http://ve3d.ign.com/videos/28461/Wii/Order-Up

depends on what you want, I for once cba with all veggie sandwich crap. meat & ham etc all the way, baby! :d

Don't let me answer that, please, let Dick Masterson do it for you.

www.menarebetterthanwomen.com

Holy crap I've never seen that before, but he has to be the greatest troll I've ever seen make it on TV. Inspiring.

Lol you rly didn't dissappoint especially with this kitchen and ironing stuff :-)) No wonder there're almost no girls on ESR, they might feel offended. This is almost like : "Throw away your mouse and pick up cloth and spoon :-)".

clothpads own, but what's with the spoon?

tbh they're generally worse humans

yea they are. mostly because of the fact that there are 389352 times more guys playing video games than girls. but if the same amount of girls played video games they'd still be worse just because males are better at everything

noobs with boobs ?

rape rape? :)~~~

ofcourse they are ( lukrek included 2). their place is in the kitchen.

This is retarded because I'm absolutely certain you could make a game that requires traits that women are found to excel at more than men, it pretty much depends on the game doesn't it? For the games that are out there, I'll go with the general belief (I don't know for certain) that men are genetically more likely to be good at them but most of those games emulate what male species do in nature (hunting, general killing, strategy type things) so it's not exactly fair.

Most gamers are retarded anyway though so who cares, I've seen about 5 examples overall of a "progamer" that isn't an absolute moron.

I totally hope they make a game that features cooking, cleaning and breastfeeding so women can excel at something.

Aren't the 'best' chefs male generally?

Yes and girls are hardly cleaner than men really.

well at least they own us at breastfeeding.

oh shit..

if there will be some sort of controller to have to put your fingers in it instead grabbind, womens would win easily

HAHAHA the terrible English makes it much funnier.

it's called foreign poetry

teeeheee :D

I think females are superior to males, think about it, they have half of the money and all of the pussy.

HIOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

that's why there's nothing left 4 you;
shame shame! (PK) :p

If your girlfriend sits at the computer, you've made her leash too long.

It is a widely accepted, yet never outspoken fact among males that we are generally the stronger sex.

if I'd organise these contests, I'd bring a lot of womens to the tournaments...for massage purpose

women are worse at everything except at being a woman

lukrek.

I think the only reason why men excel do better at some things is that they subconsciously try to impress women with their success.
However, whoever came up with the idea that excelling at a computer game is the way to get laid might not be the smartest person around :)

want to take a ride on my magic fatpad?

sure, why not

women have a slower reactiontime than men (on average)

well' I guess men aren't that good at reading comprehension, cause you could have noticed the 'some'.

Anyway.
There obviously are differences as in men are on average taller or have wider shoulders etc.

But with the reaction times that is just a test result. As long as noone gives proven reason why men have better reaction times on average it doesn't mean anything. Could be that men just subconsciously train their reaction constantly to impress women...

you have a point

"But with the reaction times that is just a test result."

Yeah, screw those factinista bastards.

exactly, screw them! And they better take all the people trying to interpret statistics with them when they leave!

women are worse at everything except cleaning and cooking

they are better at skipping waiting lines, causing driving accidents, advancing in work using questionable means

OMG SCRUB MY FEET ALREADY!

http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/

they cant play as good cuz they have anatomic limitations...wich disrupts their ability to make circle like moves with thier arms
... for example: boobs

<xrg> callvote nospecvote 1/0
<xrg> plz
<shlt> something like that would be nice
<Reptile> ironic to have that a votable setting don't you think
<sianko> i cant recall a situation when specs votes are needed
<@MassMan> i think it's an excellent situation when there are 6/8 player votes, but 4 specs that are either afk or dont want to influence the vote (afk votes=no) so the vote fails
<sianko> yes
<sianko> that's why specs shouldnt have a right to vote
<Reptile> atleast women specs should not be able to

http://egd.noobs-anonymous.net/quote/345

the funnies joke was the @ infront of massman's nick LOl