Oh not, again! :P
So there they are:
Money should be just an options. People should have the right to decide what kind of society and life they wanna have, based on a much higher variety of government and social relations forms, than we have today. Practically, the social/political shit men deal with, is a small variation orbiting around fixed forms, usually two: democracy and dictatorship, both spinning in their turn around money
If there all the countries tend to unite in unions, there people should have different social forms to take part in, by choice. Let's say we have the UEAS euro-asian union, which have 6 forms of society, plus 20 growing new forms, starting with people which go to work for money and listen to some guys they vote for in democracy, other people working just by conventions for natural resources, other driven by just economics, which have a single occupation, to spread the products all over the world, in exchange for other products, some living their lives on the same territories, some in special zones chosen by them. It's kinda we already have at a smaller extend regarding real liberty, with the difference that govermnent institutions should not have bigger power than a factories syndicate form, for example, and money, cash or electronic with the way of valorifying human time should just have much lower circulation and proportion on people. Consider it as a projection in the future, when robots will do most of the cash measurable work, I am saying about brute force work here, and men will do more of the intellectual work, which don't pretty have a best way to measure its value by money, already.
As side note, I wonder if human societies don't go already in that direction, without realising it.
So call me crazy and to go to hell, whatever. Discuss, logical explanations expected, etc :P
So there they are:
Money should be just an options. People should have the right to decide what kind of society and life they wanna have, based on a much higher variety of government and social relations forms, than we have today. Practically, the social/political shit men deal with, is a small variation orbiting around fixed forms, usually two: democracy and dictatorship, both spinning in their turn around money
If there all the countries tend to unite in unions, there people should have different social forms to take part in, by choice. Let's say we have the UEAS euro-asian union, which have 6 forms of society, plus 20 growing new forms, starting with people which go to work for money and listen to some guys they vote for in democracy, other people working just by conventions for natural resources, other driven by just economics, which have a single occupation, to spread the products all over the world, in exchange for other products, some living their lives on the same territories, some in special zones chosen by them. It's kinda we already have at a smaller extend regarding real liberty, with the difference that govermnent institutions should not have bigger power than a factories syndicate form, for example, and money, cash or electronic with the way of valorifying human time should just have much lower circulation and proportion on people. Consider it as a projection in the future, when robots will do most of the cash measurable work, I am saying about brute force work here, and men will do more of the intellectual work, which don't pretty have a best way to measure its value by money, already.
As side note, I wonder if human societies don't go already in that direction, without realising it.
So call me crazy and to go to hell, whatever. Discuss, logical explanations expected, etc :P
Edited by Nicky at 23:21 CST, 27 January 2009 - 7124 Hits