Good thing I'm at home

who cares

hey i think ive heard of this guy before, pretty cool fella

Its broken :<

Yeah, about 10 minutes after I posted it, they took it down.

=\

I read this interview 3, 4, maybe 5 days before it was published.

i haven't read it even now that it's published

you are both awesome and I want your babies!!!

Nonono I want your babies!

cartman's mom is still a dirty slut.

back to draft?

did sk take the iview down?

Looks like it, trying to contact them and see what happened.

nter

back up!

changed posting date so its back on top

halleluja

i think rapha's a pretty cool guy, eh gets interviewed and doesn't afraid of anything

he's 5 steps ahead that's why.

i tried setting cg_prediction 5 and nothing happened for me =/

I believe it's cg_stepsAhead

yeh that's the one.

I set it to 10 once, but it sucked. I started to do conversion kills when my opponent was fully stacked and ran when he was low. :(

You obviously forgot to set r_bible to 1.

oh snap, forgot about it. Thank you.

Btw. is sv_holycrusade still cheat protected?

.

cg_atheist 1
=/

seems when it's about women he's 5 steps away :-|

Good interview.

"Im a Christian because my parents are. I'll stay a virgin until marriage because im cool enough".

Morons.

"Im a Geek because my parents are. I'll stay a virgin until ever because im way Geek enough".

I use Unix, so I get laid as often as I need to restart.

You are a eunuch!

=x

"Butthurt christfag"

ITT, narrow-minded moron flames a monotheist for having the human characteristic of having faith in something or someone.

Learn humbleness. It comes in handy.

*humility. Not "humbleness".

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/humble

They're both the same.

"The less declared one makes their statements, the less likely they are to look foolish in retrospect."

eats crow

Having "faith" in something or someone isn't the same has having "faith" in Christianity, living your life under these doctrines. I don't care, but I find it sad, because in its core, it doesnt make any sense.

lol, it makes perfect sense in its core... its just set of rules for the people, like: "don't fuck your brothers wife", or: "wash your hands before eating" + examples what happened when sb broke them. Was probably very useful for people 2000 yrs ago.

Most people today, theist or not, follow the same morals that Christianity preaches, including many of the Ten Commandments. The way people were viewed and treated by society around Jesus's timeline was, respectively, belittling and barbaric compared to today, too, and the Byzantine Empire didn't even make Christianity their official religion until the late 4th century. With that in mind, you sound pretty stupid there, bud.

you have to distinguish between three things.

What jesus presumably said.
What was written in the bible.
And what the church read into it.

Because i doubt the person named jesus would have been in faovr of crusades or the inquisition. Among many other things.

These are all the same, really. Jesus's stories were pretty straightforward. Jesus presumably exorcised a possessed man at some point, ended up having this acknowledged and the story retold in the bible, and the church said, "hey, Jesus can pwn demons!"

did jesus also burn red-haired women?

None of Jesus's stories or preachings were ever misinterpreted by the church or the state, especially to that extent since Jesus never showed any prejudice towards anyone whatsoever and that was made crystal clear. Rather, other preachings in both the Old Testament (writings made before Jesus was born, for those who don't know) and New Testament (writings made after) were.

He never showed prejudice? Damn boy, read the Gospels. In Mark 3 Jesus gets all up and angry because people don't jump right at what he thinks he "right". In Matthew he rants against people for their beliefs

You snakes, you brood of vipers! How can you escape being sentenced to hell?

Jesus is portrayed as judgmental, divisive. (In the synoptic gospels) He refuses to help people who don't quite believe in him because he doesn't want to give them signs. In the stories of him and the temple... at what point is walking in and starting a fight (throwing around people's tables) because he doesn't like what the do not considered "prejudice"?

What about when he says that in order to follow him you need to all-but-forsake your family and life?

With most other people I'd be sre they are just trolling now. But you might actually listen to your preacher too much.

tell me why is their a celibacy for monks when on the other hand there was a pope that was followed by his own son?

why were there popes that waged war and had people assasinated.

Or fun stuff like indulgences where rich people could get by with murder by bribing the church. I'm sure Jesus said that's fine.

And the holy crusades were based on a lot of prejudices. Even though Jesus is actually a prophet of the Koran.


And last but not least:

If they were no misinterpretations how come there are sooo many different Christian groups with differing interpretations?



For all that you also need to remember that the bible was not written by Jesus himself or even at his time. And that the book was translated a couple of times. (Ever used babelfish?)

tell me why is their a celibacy for monks when on the other hand there was a pope that was followed by his own son?

Although that reminds me that Christianity does preach (although, nowadays, does not necessarily require) celibacy amongst pastors and priests, that's a really bad example. You're essentially comparing Buddhism to Christianity, which is really an apples-to-oranges comparison.

Or fun stuff like indulgences where rich people could get by with murder by bribing the church. I'm sure Jesus said that's fine.

why were there popes that waged war and had people assasinated.

Exploitation. The church misused their so-called religion because people genuinely believe in God and the people on the inside were/are malicious in nature. They may represent Catholicism, but they aren't Catholicism itself.

If they were no misinterpretations how come there are sooo many different Christian groups with differing interpretations?

Learn context. I was referring to Jesus's stories, not the bible as a whole, which has been grossly misinterpreted for centuries.

For all that you also need to remember that the bible was not written by Jesus himself or even at his time.

Just like how many historians do the same in many instances, his stories are second-hand accounts.

All in all, you completely missed my point anyways, which was that monotheism (and polytheism) is only stupid because you (or at least nemecel) think it is and that Christians only really know as little about the answers to "the great questions" as you do -- they're just being offered a hypothesis, to which they believe in for a very diverse set of reasons. So open up your thick, narrow head and agree to disagree.

they're just being offered a hypothesis, to which they believe in for a very diverse set of reasons.

A hypothesis is what you have when you can't make a theory.

Witty.

Agnosticism is a hypothesis as well, in that we should simply await the answers to the questions that religion provides a possible solution to. With that said, no one here, except for myself I guess, is agnostic in the absolute sense because you're trying to convince people that Christianity is a sham.

Not to mention you're all using nothing but what are ultimately irrelevant points as examples to essentially prove that Christianity, as a religious teaching (<-- read this part carefully, because I know you guys have sacks of rocks for brains so you're bound to misinterpret it and flame me under false pretenses just like those Christian followers you look down on. I bolded, italicized, and underlined it just to make sure you notice it), deserves to be mocked. Morons.

Agnosticism is a hypothesis as well, in that we should simply await the answers to the questions that religion provides a possible solution to. With that said, no one here, except for myself I guess, is agnostic in the absolute sense because you're trying to convince people that Christianity is a sham.

I didn't defend agnostics - they're just as bad as theists.

Not to mention you're all using nothing but what are ultimately irrelevant points as examples to essentially prove that Christianity, as a religious teaching (<-- read this part carefully, because I know you guys have sacks of rocks for brains so you're bound to misinterpret it and flame me under false pretenses just like those Christian followers you look down on. I bolded, italicized, and underlined it just to make sure you notice it), deserves to be mocked. Morons.

Faith in general deserves to be mocked. Christianity only deserves it the most because of it's popularity. You tried to defend the meanings of the rules and stories that Christianity promotes, but these teachings have been around for thousands of years before Christianity was ever even made up. Christianity has brought nothing new to the table, it was just lucky enough to be adopted by fear-driven warmongers who managed to spread it by force.

I didn't defend agnostics - they're just as bad as theists.

That ignores my point that all religious beliefs, whether theist or athiest or monotheist or polytheist, are hypotheses. Where does that put you anyways? You're an atheist, I'm guessing?

fyi, I've mentioned before that I'm Agnostic, although I was born Catholic, switched my beliefs to Atheism at the age of 12, and then switched to Agnosticism soon after. And I'm not defending Christianity so much as I'm defending the right to believe in Christianity as it is plausible. All I've really been doing by arguing is correcting people on their view of Christianity and how incidents amongst its followers reflects on its teachings. Their misconception is that the people who have exploited this with malicious intents or waged war over it reflects the teachings of the religion, which I've hopelessly tried to tell them is wrong.

these teachings have been around for thousands of years before Christianity was ever even made up.

So? That doesn't disprove the credibility of said teachings. And I demonstrated that credibility by comparing them to how we live our lives today. Is this really so hard to comprehend?

Faith in general deserves to be mocked.

No, it doesn't. It's only human nature to compensate for uncertainty one way or another. You see people doing it every single day. You do it yourself quite often without even thinking about it, I'm sure.

That ignores my point that all religious beliefs, whether theist or athiest or monotheist or polytheist, are hypotheses. Where does that put you anyways? You're an atheist, I'm guessing?

Existentialist, actually. Any atheist who doesn't embrace existentialism is as cowardly as a theist/agnostic.

And I'm not defending Christianity so much as I'm defending the right to believe in Christianity as it is plausible.

Before, you correctly used the word "hypothetical," but no religion is plausible.

All I've really been doing by arguing is correcting people on their view of Christianity and how incidents amongst its followers reflects on its teachings. Their misconception is that the people who have exploited this with malicious intents or waged war over it reflects the teachings of the religion, which I've hopelessly tried to tell them is wrong.

Faith created the fear in them that caused bad things to happen.

So? That doesn't disprove the credibility of said teachings. And I demonstrated that credibility by comparing them to how we live our lives today. Is this really so hard to comprehend?

So you're giving credit to Christianity that should be given to other theistic beliefs. You're not defending Christianity, you're attempting to defend theism by using positive beliefs that some theistic religions have adopted. Even still, you can't really defend theism with that since it's not exclusive.

No, it doesn't. It's only human nature to compensate for uncertainty one way or another. You see people doing it every single day. You do it yourself quite often without even thinking about it, I'm sure.

This is irrational. If your mind is so weak that you couldn't live day to day without the protective knowledge of an afterlife, you're the type that would have been a part of the crusades. If you're looking for answers, we have some. Accepting a lie as a means to console your fears is just plain wrong.

In the developing human species, faith came from beliefs. Now in a dangerous world way back before religions and shit when we were living in the wild. Having "in-groups and out-groups" the only way you can (trust) that the people in your group is by sharing common beliefs. Then as our mind developed more and communication developed we started questioning our existence. Well as you can see we already had developed a belief system and faith for those who are "in" and "out" of our group for survival reasons. Now, I think when you start questioning existence, especially when much is not known about the world as today, you can come to believe in incredible things. So, I think with this theory I laid out, I don't think its fair to say having a belief is weak minded. As you can see, beliefs are hardwired into the human psyche.

Simple theory. dunno =D

Oh and really no use in arguing these subjects. We always think "I" is right because, "I'm a normal,smart, and sensible person," so anyone who would argue against me must be unreasonable, dumb and just plain old ignorant.
LOVE HOW THE MIND WORKS!!!

In the developing human species, faith came from beliefs. Now in a dangerous world way back before religions and shit when we were living in the wild.

We don't have written records dating that far back.

Having "in-groups and out-groups" the only way you can (trust) that the people in your group is by sharing common beliefs. Then as our mind developed more and communication developed we started questioning our existence. Well as you can see we already had developed a belief system and faith for those who are "in" and "out" of our group for survival reasons.

Likely more like early science that didn't know enough about anything, and simply ran wild with imagination.

Now, I think when you start questioning existence, especially when much is not known about the world as today, you can come to believe in incredible things. So, I think with this theory I laid out, I don't think its fair to say having a belief is weak minded. As you can see, beliefs are hardwired into the human psyche.

I disagree - it only seems it due to how ingrained it is in modern society due to force-feeding from birth. A weak mind would accept any reason (especially one that takes the responsibility of their actions out of their own hands) for existence, whereas a strong mind would want to know the truth, no matter how ugly it may be.

Oh and really no use in arguing these subjects. We always think "I" is right because, "I'm a normal,smart, and sensible person," so anyone who would argue against me must be unreasonable, dumb and just plain old ignorant.
LOVE HOW THE MIND WORKS!!!

That's where you are wrong. Religion is the only place you will find that being wrong is bad. Science embraces failure, as we understand that progress only comes from understanding how little you know. I don't claim to have all the answers, but I can at least say that the answers we have are legitimate.

Science has proven self-confirmation bias. It happens to the best of us. Why? because we are totally unaware of it, it's subconscious.

Even science and scientist fall to is. There has been plenty of work done by scientist who didn't go through all the scientific procedures and just wanted to get their theories published. Especially these days, those working for major corporations who want to do real scientific work may skew and DO skew results to keep receiving money. So, science doesn't always embrace failure - sometimes they leave something out of the results.

Science isn't perfect either. Neither is religion.

US vs THEM.

Science has proven self-confirmation bias. It happens to the best of us. Why? because we are totally unaware of it, it's subconscious.

No, humans have. The scientific method is perfectly sound.

Even science and scientist fall to is. There has been plenty of work done by scientist who didn't go through all the scientific procedures and just wanted to get their theories published. Especially these days, those working for major corporations who want to do real scientific work may skew and DO skew results to keep receiving money. So, science doesn't always embrace failure - sometimes they leave something out of the results.

Again, this is a human issue, not a science issue. It is this bad science which is likely the entire reason religion came to exist in the first place. Science isn't about blindly believing all results posted - the best part about it is that ANYONE can test what has been done and either confirm or deny the validity of said findings.

Science isn't perfect either. Neither is religion.

Nope, just religion. If this is the only argument you have against science, you don't understand enough about how science works.

mmhmmm.. Your mind is trapped and will secure your comfort zone - allowing for no other views.

Humans beings are flawed.

It wasn't comfort that I was seeking with science.

oh it does desever to be mocked, because after 2000 years that have so many different variations of their teachings, It's impossible to tell which one is the will of god.

Oh and when you are comparing jesus' stories to the bible could you please provide a link to a eyewitness account?

Cause all I manage to find are the accounts that are actually in the bible...


Oh and I loled a little when you said we are stubborn, because one you too might realise that faith is nothing else than stubborn optimism.

Your point? Even if some Christian values are respectable, that doesn't make all the magic bullshit religions talk about true. You can have morality without religion.

...my point is RIGHT there, in that post you just replied to. Good lord, you're dumb.

Your point promotes ignorance, enjoy.

More like your idiocy promotes your own ignorance.

I agree that people should not be dependent on a deity that may or may not exist for answers to life, but you're ignoring my point that, in other words, Christianity among other religions has historically influenced, albeit indirectly of course, how you or me or your parents or your neighbour react to seeing a dead body, a starving child roaming the streets, or men hunting a fox. So to look at monotheism as you do is actually quite fallacious.

And my point was that people should not be dependent on a deity that may or may not exist for answers to life.

Conclusion: you missed my point.

You may have sucked on CS Lewis cock, so im not going to bother, enjoy.

But you're berating them for being Christian. I'm saying you shouldn't. The right thing to do here is agree to disagree.

In what way has Christianity influenced these views?

I guess he wants to say that in history Christianity was often responsible for dead bodies lying in the streets and are today responsible for starvation because of the "no condom" message the pope sends out.

Not to mentions that countless Indian and African cultures that were lost because of missionaries and with them quite a lot of knowledge about healing herbs and roots. While doing that they also burned woman who happened to know the effects of plants that grow here.
But hey instead they gave us expert advice on how to perform the most spectecular exorcisms.


It's no secret that the Christian believe was the most powerful during the medieval times, which also happens to be the time where science and specifically medicine, arts and the education of the masses were in a really bad shape.

In comparison: Roman and Greek polytheism >> monotheism.

:D

All religions are bad because of the aspect of faith, not because of the messages of "be nice to people." If it were possible to reason with a man of faith, there would be no such thing.

Even still, many religions predate Christianity with the same, if not BETTER message. Why bother giving credit to the one religion that has caused more death and sadness than any other?

and personal beliefs

Nobody gives a fucking crap.

Kudos for being the only top Quaker to openly admit being a virgin.
Here's a good representation of the Quake demographics.

Not sure about you guys but there's something pretty Hollywoodish about having a crazy railing pastor in the neighborhood.

Similar to a Blind Ninja or Autist Mathematician.

Quaker Pastor for the win !

Hey hey, most of the top quake guys I know in SA are definitely not virgins, even if they are gay.

And you wonder why you all have aids.

The bum sex was worth it.

did you shower afterwards?

SA shower

Perhaps finally we can have a moral authority to discuss the quake issues that matter...

Is stealing quad from your stacked team mate a sin?
Is it wrong to whore overpowered weapons?
Should we forgive sombra?

if he's catholic he will most likely declare using a firewall to be a sin.

He can only openly admit it without being ridiculed because he's openly Christian, and Christians are expected to practice abstinence before marriage. I can imagine he'll eventually get shit for it in this thread anyways.

Anyone else would definitely never hear the end of it.

are you christian too, or just a regular virgin like jamerio?

hahha

Does anyone care if he is a virgin or the reasons why?

The reason nobody is ridiculing him is because nobody actually cares if he has had sex or not. He can openly admit to it is because he has confidence in himself and his choices, not because he's expected to practice abstinence.

In fact doing something because you're expected to do it is a pretty moronic thing to do.

oh I'm sure he wouldn't fuck until marriage if he wasn't christian.

Not sure about you guys but there's something pretty Hollywoodish about having a crazy railing pastor in the neighborhood.

I highlighted your spelling mistake for you

Can you please also suggest corrections, like the real spell checkers?

Thanks in advance !

Yes the right word starts with ra and ends with ing but I forgot the rest

The interview was down because SK just released interview and news about changing their SK-female CS squad. So it was on hold for another day.

"As a young kid say 8 or 9 year kids have those dreams of becoming a professional at some sport or, becoming an astronaut or something"

What you gonna do now, rocket jump to the moon?

NASA is still beta testing Haste, so now we wait.

I just dislike how almost every single interview asks the same background questions. Especially fatal1ty interviews. Every fucking one has the same "what'd your parents think of gaming" ... "i slapped a 5k check on the table and said 'what is this world coming to!' ". Makes interviews really predictable and boring. I'm criticizing the interviewers really, not the interviewee. NJ Rapha.

However I still don't understand how people honestly think THEY know who created everything and their rules and practices are right and everyone else is wrong (religion).

"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?"
Epicurus

that was EPIC.............

............





............



.........urus

yeah the questions are always the same, pretty funny tbh

Probably has to do with the fact that there are only 3-4 people doing those interviews and they constantly do it with the same 4-5 players ?

As for religious people, the funniest ones are definately those who constantly carry their Bible, Kuran, Torah....and give lectures...

do you often see people walking around with instruction manuals for their TV ? Stereo ? Quake games ? ( besides Stermy who tried to re-write the entire fucking thing on his website )

I'm going to bluntly call them noobs who can't interpret life as it comes and need written guidelines :)

FLAME ON

I dislike how the interviewer just said "fuck it" when he had the chance to spend no more than 15 minutes proofreading and correcting rapha's responses, which ended up making this whole article look quite unprofessional. I mean, fuck, I already found three instances of Engrish in the first three responses:

I played almost everywhere year

As a young kid say 8 or 9 year kids have those dreams

As a young kid a basketball player or a race car driver, I love all types of racing.

Even if rapha is to blame for these, isn't SK supposed to be one of the core representatives of e-sports in Europe? C'mon...

.

SK.rapha: Right now I'm just working and trying to save up money for college, really not a fan of the whole debt thing

College loan is the best kind of debt you can get into. Don't waste your time on savings, invest in yourself now while you are still motivated to learn things. Especially nowadays - best time to be in debt. College loans is what majority people in US live with without a single problem. Sooner you start - sooner you finish and make $$$ to pay it off.

I'll be honest though, the loan makes you feel like shit during the process.

Not really. I'm 10k in debt and it doesn't bother me :p

Well I'm more, so...

hell yeah. I have to start paying on my 22k worth of college debt in a few months. I'm not worried about it though. It's basically a car payment. I'll have it paid off in a couple years np.

Edit: Could have been worse though. W/o my parents help it would have been like 60-70k ! Ouch. Definitely starting a college fund for my first kid as soon as they pop out.

Fuck me, I am suddenly super-glad we have free education here.

best time to be in debt

You say that as if the economy will definitely get better soon enough. GM filed for bankruptcy recently, even after they got a $14-billion emergency loan from Uncle Sam. The US government is buying them out, and this has apparently resulted in said loan being written off completely. In other words, American taxpayers contributed towards a sum of $14 billion that has now been wasted while trying to save a corporation that died anyways. Although I'm not implying that this is the time to be pessimistic, it's not the time to be optimistic, either.

I think he meant 'The best time to be in debt is in school'.

If that's what he meant, then he's right. I rather be in debt going to school, knowing I'll have an education going out of it to land a good job and pay it off.

Especially nowadays - best time to be in debt.

Pretty sure that means what I think it means. Could be wrong, I'm beyond tired right now.

chrysler filed chapter 11, not GM. but i guess they'll follow soon...

"And I also want to get something to deal with ministry as a pastor"

what a moronfine young man

Why do people continue to flame shanes "5 steps ahead" comment? I'm sure every top dueler feels that they are steps ahead of their enemy because thats simply the only way to win.

Think about it. You are dueling someone on a map that you have played hundreds if not thousands of times. You know what item routes to run, and more importantly what your enemy is capable of. Saying that you're "steps ahead" is completely the right way to put it because you are countering what you think your opponent will do even before they do it. It is that ability that determines why the top 8 players are always the top 8 and no one comes out of nowhere and rapes them.

Anyways, good answers but bad interview. No one interviews the players on the game, what it takes to play, or any of the infinitely more interesting things that could be asked. This isn't to say that Shanes background isn't interesting, but why are you asking someone who went from being a mid tier dueler to one of the best in the world in such a short time span, about their religion and basketball? IT IS A FUCKIN VIDEO GAME SITE ISNT IT?

Carmac needs to open up a school where he teaches people how to get good interviews, because there hasn't been any worth mentioning since he stopped conducting them.

i tend to agree
carmac was the only one that gave good 'actual' interviews

who's flaming?

God I miss Carmac.

About the "Steps Ahead" comment, I have no idea why that was overblown in the first place. I find it somewhat reasonable for that comment to be said, but apparently everyone else doesn't. Even the shoutcasters at Quakecon and ESWC USA Qualifiers were making fun of him for it (While they did seem to be joking, seemed pretty unprofessional).

Carmac, if you're reading this, please open up that school :)

I blame walter TBH, he kinda made it difficult to take the US Quake 3 scene seriously at that time with his relentless crusade.

He made that comment before he even entered a tourney, so most people just thought yeah yeah, but he was right.

so the comment is actually in good faith now, at least that's my take on it.

"I have no idea why that was overblown in the first place"

Arrogance!!

I have no idea why that was overblown in the first place.

You obviously have never been to 4chan. Because, if you did, you'd realize that ESR is just like 4chan for Quakers (except almost everybody's a tripfag). And, if you realized that, you'd realize that ESR just loves memes (ie, Liam's fat).

this one time, liam ate on vent and everyone could hear it.

people also like making fun of actually fat nerds like you too.

Fine by me. I laugh at those same people when it becomes obvious that they can't think beyond one level and even have a hard time maintaining a simple train of thought. And unlike those people and their lack of logical prowess, I'm aware that I'm fat and that I can do something about it.

That meme I mentioned was just off the top of my head anyways. Sorry for nerdraging you.

oh shut the fuck up the fat sack of cunt

irony..........

fat


























nerd

You shouldn't be proud of your ability to think to a cretain level, it is not something you achieved by your own efforts. Maybe be proud of a lack of ignorance?

omg, yes, I'm so proud of myself. Your exposure of my pride, in fact, hurts my pride so much, I can't bear it! ; ;

Seriously, though, where the fuck did you get that impression from? I expect people to see past the ignorant point of view, although my expectations may be a bit high when it comes to here. Nonetheless, I don't treat such a feat as something that should generally be challenging. I mean, it's not hard to do so long as you aren't too stupid.

Ok I read something into your post that wasn't there. You said you laugh about those people, I misinterpret that for pride.

Omg, why breach the fourth wall???? :(:(

haha [+]

though /b/ loves to think they invented the idea of memes, they really didn't.
The term "running gag" run a bell?

Man I just read this again, what the fuck is a tripfag? Do you have any idea what kind of a queer you sound like?

Everybody who visits 4chan is basically you. All fat pathetic nerds.

Well, Sabian, if I really wanted to, I would. Not to boast, but I consider myself pretty creative, and I have journalistic experience. I'm just busy with tons of other hobbies/school.

My point is that it's hard to find people who fit the job and want to do it. Anyways, you've got a good point yourself, and hopefully, Quake players won't have to be interviewed by unoriginal and incompetent CS journalists.

.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaker_history

...growing up being a religious fag...
haven't bothered reading

Pretty shit, immature and repetitive questions, and appallingly transcripted - full of typos and broken English.
Under the circumstances Rapha's answers were pretty good.
Sloppy and amateurish work.

thank GOD you came for rescue.

You had to read it to know that?

Rapha is clearly better than Cypher. Everyone knows that.

you mean a better Christian

.

what's going on with the gamer girls anyway. haven't heard any weird stories in a while.

.

The journalists are probably too afraid to ask the girl quakers for an interview.

for god sake, as soon as i saw rapha in this post i knew the religious baffle would start

Just reminded me why I don't bother with other forums
SK:

"I admire ur dad bro"
"nice interview gl"
"OMG, We love you Rapha, Your are the best"

versus

ESR:

"The bum sex was worth it. "
"Pretty shit, immature and repetitive questions, and appallingly transcripted - full of typos and broken English."
"should have asked if hes sprayed his sins over missy before marriage"

God forbid people be respectful on the internet.

Nah, I prefer when people call a spade a spade, a crap interview a crap interview, stupid beliefs, stupid beliefs. The bum sex is just bonus though.

True, bum sex is always a bonus.

You've got potential, kid.

Keep at it and one day you could be in my position, or at least the position I'd be in if it wasn't for those 3 fags posting gay shit and getting pluses.

=)

say names

lying down because his legs can't hold his weight?

esr has the most realistic opinions ever, if you get loved here the world will love you lol

so true

I do not understand why people even give a shit about Rapha's personal decisions. The only thing that offends me here is the poor quality of questions and apparent difficulties with the English language - without sounding conceited, I was not aware you could get into journalism without a decent grasp of the language you are writing in =/. As someone else also pointed out and I want to reiterate; you would expect higher quality/more professionalism from SK-Gaming. =/ =/

troll

SK bias noob! I bet german manager #33 told you to post that.

if you want to troll, fooki sucks at quake live!

religion lol