duel? qzca2?

hi, ca2, awesome! :D

* House of Decay (qztourney9)
* Trinity (qzca2)

=(

seriously hope we get a 0 0 game on ca2 followed by pummy fight in suddendeath.

oh, still no ql for os x news?

Both OSX and Linux are in testing atm. If you could help with testing either, pm me your ql account name.

good to know! thanks.

Glad there wont be any T6 this time.

AW FUCK I DIDN'T EVEN SEE THAT

Fucking christ. =(

qzctf9 over qzctf3?

That's a bummer :o(

Yeah I thought that was interesting. I guess they are both open to lockdowns, but at least its something different as ctf3 has had all the play it probably deserves. I'm at least interested in seeing what happens when two really good clans fight for control in center on ctf9.

0-0 with 50 minute overtimes =)

Actually no, we'll (most likely) have new overtime rules that should make things more interesting and not as drawn out.

so you are fixing overtime instead of adding good maps?

Sigh @ ca2.. prepare to see a bunch of 1-0 scores after 30 minutes of overtime :(

It would be a good map list if CA2 and T9 weren't on there.

.

"House of Decay (qztourney9)"

is that serious?

I take that back... The map could be decent I guess. Just a bit too small :/

CA2 and T9 are in, but T6 isn't? That's a pretty gay maplist, i'm fairly sure DaHang made it himself.




no u

"Map selection will be handled in a new way this year where each player or team will have the opportunity to select a map within the first two rounds of play"

well done on this rule, we have missed out on so many classic matches of players playing on their best maps because of the shit drop a map rule that vq3/cpm tournies seem to insist on

but swap qzca2 for tourney6 fe christs sakes

ctf9 has no place there, terrible map for competitive play.
Barely tolerable for pub play.
CTF3 is way more entertaining then CTF9 due to layout, flow, and the fact that it can be a very fast paced game if both teams are fighting over powerups constantly.
WTVR, bring it on.

i wonder how many european players canceled their tickets now

they add t9 and ca2, but remove t6? rofl idiots...

ca2 and no t6 = baaaaaad :(

I prefer the leaked list with ca3.

qzctf9 could be good 4v4, or atleast better than 5v5, but I'd still be resistant to playing it. It has serious design flaws imo. Travel time from flag to midfield is way too long, allowing for easy intercepts. Coupled with that there are two choke points in base with no easy way to change between high/low - further making intercepts very easy.

Also, siberia/courtyard conundrums could do with more midfield spawns. At the moment there are too many respawners in base making them very, very defensive.

t9... nice! =)

Just remove ca2....
Noone wanna play that map :S

that maplist would be tolerable if each player could remove 2 maps before picking one, t9 and ca2 (and t6) are not good enough maps for competitive play, imo

Also there are rumors that some Americans practiced these maps quite a lot, so it might be a little unfair that european players have to catch up in less than a month

Also there are rumors that some Americans practiced these maps quite a lot, so it might be a little unfair that european players have to catch up in less than a month

The europeans had just as much time to practice these maps as the americans did. Your statement is both stupid and pointless.

with the difference that these maps weren't played in any tournaments or similar in europe, whereas they were in america.

thats the punishment the europeans get for being so ignorant - well deserved

ye, europeans sure are quite ignorant for not playing tourney1/tourney3/ca1/ca3 etc. for duel either....

zZzZzZzZzZzZz

just remove t9 and ca2 and you have the perfect mappool.... (and don't even think about adding t6)

never let americans decide on a mappool, its bound to fail.

Actually, I begged, bitched, pleaded with SyncError not to have a CA map in the pool.

who are you

Your worst nightmare

ur nobody sry

the irony.

I'm surprised there is no qztourney6.

glad t6 is out.

what do the us player who actually played the map in competitions think about t9? it looks so boring. and adding it definitely is a disadvantage for the european players...

although im a big fan of new maps i dont think that adding ca2 is good idea. i was all for trying it out in the online duel tournaments when it was new. but the map doesnt work in duel, so why force it on the players now? or is it actualy played in the us? rather make a new map that designed for duel.

p.s.: sync why did you use 2 inline images? looks weird

ESR admins added the inlines.

haha okay, in that case i can take the second one out

Picking maps instead of dropping them in the selection process increases the randomness factor of the tournament. It also favours one map wonder players.

Map dropping and no classics? I suppose if you had watched ESWC Athens, you would not have mentioned that. Athens had a ton of amazing matches.

All roundedness > one sidedness.

Since QL duels are 10minutes they can just be played best of 5 and have picking instead of dropping.

if its at least bo3 you can't win matches by being a 1 map wonder

the players might probably love the drop map rule, but from a spectator pov it sucks. Its much more interesting to see players on their best maps, I just want to see the highest level play possible. If a player is a genius on a particular map then I want to see them work their magic on that map. Also it can be extremely exciting if a player not known for being so good on a map manages to beat the map specialist

and with the map drop rule what about the situation where the two players are both very strong on one particular map and one of the players gets nervy and drops the map and we miss out on the best possible map matchup of the tie

It is NOT TRUE that players don't get to play their best map in a map drop system. When someone agrees to play Jibo on ZTN, THEN you will get an exciting game. Not when Jibo picks ZTN vs. someone that doesn't want to play it.

Map drop system = more exciting games. But I guess you would actually have to have followed Quake 3 last year to know that.

if last year is anything to go by, there's nothing wrong with the pool...

man noone plays ca2 for duel..lol

dahang and chance play it....

is that true? does the us scene in general play these maps or did the info about ca2 being in the mappool somehow leak and some players already train it?

no, dahang and chance have played it since the day its out, and are probably also the main reason it got added.

hmm, interesting
would be great to see a demo of them playing

I actually think CA1 is a better map for duels than CA2.

I didn't speak with any admin regarding the map pool since like March when I was just checking out the maps for the first time. So I like t9 and ca2...this means [chance and] I were the main reason these maps were added?

As far as I know ID wanted to show off a ton of maps, hence the 7 map pool. Since they run the show, what they want is what they do. If these two were not added, then which ones should be?

My main focus for the Qcon this year is CTF, I don't particularly care what the duel tourney map pool is.

Oh, and of course. God Bless America.

Ugh, when will people stop pushing t9?

Edit: I'm kind of neutral on tourney9 after playing it for a bit more. It's too hard to break control, and the map geometry is too simple, however I like the additional momentum feel to the map. By any means, though, it's not a great map.

When Americans stop being morons I guess.

What do u 1v1 players thing about "House of Decay (qztourney9)" is it or could it be a good 1v1 map? looks fun with 3 teleports

small, flat and doesnt allow much interesting moves / plays thus rather boring

But hey, it's not like Americans ever had good taste in duel maps!

Great map, can devastate and plow if opponents make a mistake. Punishment. Punish that opponent. Punish.

Who the fuck plays t9 and ca2 in duel? No American I know, bar chance and dahang, actually play/like either of those

people will learn to love ca2

but always hate t9 :)

Remove ca2, replace t9 with t6, replace ctf9 with ctf3.

why replace a crap one with another crap one :(

Well okay, maybe just get rid of ca2 and t9... But for the love of God replace ctf9 with ctf3.

Doesnt the name qz_CA_2 tell u guys anything? :(
might just add qzCTF2 in the duel mappool aswell

YEH so let's remove the dm maps as well, since they were made for deathmatches not tourneys.

not like tourney is deathmatch with 2 players...

demos from T9 and CA2 ?

T9 is garbage but CA2 might not be that bad and I'm interested to see how it plays (I highly doubt every game on it will be low scoring/defensive, but I'd rather see that than the boring rush fest maps like T9 offer).

tbh seriously... most ppl here should not whine and actualy play t9 and ca2 a few times. The maps are not bad.
CA2 has a very interresting and fresh kind of gameplay which tbh has a few elements in it from most other maps. It's not half as bad as most think, you can pressure the opponent from offensive and defensive possitions on the map, and one rail can turn the whole game around.
And tbh t9 is fun as hell? it's like... the replacement of hub but without the rail rape, you can pressure the opponent so much when you have control it's insane :D + the tables can turn really fast on the map.

and to all whining ****: if you can't handle a changing maplist, you're not good at quake, but you just have too much spare time.