reddit isn't exactly pretty. but i like the interface and the usability. it's kinda like esr in the way it presents the comments.
i guess i was talking more about usability than the actual design, which is much more important for sites that are heavily based on user generated content.
seriously... just went to reddit.com (frontpage) and scrolled a bit and none - really not one - of the post sparked any interest in me. what am i doing wrong? should i specify one of the sub pages like news / gaming?
hmm, reddit is a bit weird tbh, many community news and so on... the comments are usually golden though ;)
i would recommend digg but since digg v4 was released the sites content has been really bad :(
honestly, we might have a different understanding of "the most interesting stuff in a compact matter" then. what's the upside of using this compared to rss feeds, just the comments?
are digg and reddit more leaning towards wasting away work hours? that's fine with me but not really something i need help with :p
i have feedly set up with bbc/times/reuters/sciencedaily/f-secure/2-3 blogs and it seems to me to be the much more "compact" way to get what i want. not hating... just saying :>
thanks, but if i want porn i know where to find it.
r/science & programming is interesting but there are other places (and feeds) which present me the 1/4 of reddit posts that are interesting in the first place and none of the nerd clutter that makes up the other 3/4 of the posts there.