life's a bitch when you live in a cage, innit?

On behalf of the internet I'm glad you don't have more bandwidth.

me too. otherwise he might write 400.000 posts on a gaming forum.

Jonesy's posts are worth more than both yours and Jamerio's. c:

that is very true.

How is it a waste of bandwidth if you recall what I used it for?
Its exactly the point I was making. They sent me a banned message, I sent them 400,000 mocking their security in front of thier readers, plus they patched their site on mybehalf, though I still see someone can't configure a htaccess file to save their life.

Didn't I tell you before that if you were capable of talking on my behalf you wouldn't be where you are IRL?

The point you were making was to show everyone that you are a raging child throwing a tantrum.

You were very sucessful.

I responded in a way which mirrored thier level of maturity shown towards me. Which is why it appeared that way.

What kind of forum bans members for moaning about aspects of a videogame its setup to discuss?

One that's turned into a marketing tool for capcom that's what.
Imagine if ESR started banning people for moaning about quakelive, or moaning that a certain player like if22 played in a boring fashion? yes those were my ban worthy crimes!!!!

I doubt this site would have a member left, fortunately, unlike SRK ESR isn't in bed with capcom and using the site as promotional tool for their business, which is why you can say pretty much what you want about a game here.

So spare me your opportunitistic snipes, the things I got banned for there you and many others are guilty of on ESR.
Imagine you got a warning if you slagged off a map on ESR, or said id are shit cos they didn't include a feature. Would it be something worth being a part of? I don't think so.

Its just ESR isn't taking benefits from idsoftware and SRK is from Capcom, so it has no motivation to ban when the topic of conversation borders on flawed game design, or scrubby matchups, becuase that's all I said in the thread.

I responded in a way which mirrored thier level of maturity shown towards me. Which is why it appeared that way.

even if I were to believe that (and I don't since I read your "objective posts" on that forum).

The point is still the same, you threw a tantrum like a raging child.
Noone forced you to do it, you could have left the forums alone like a mature person. You decided on your own that spamming them would be the right thing to do.

Little kids also think that crying really loud is the best way to get what they want.

Haha, I love how you pretend to act all mature, while forgetting you'll argue about about the size of a bottle top on ESR until dawn.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

Its too bad you're too stupid and bitter to put your problems with me to aside, you base your discussions based on the person, not the values. Now that's mature!

You don't believe anything I say about anything (at least that's what you want me to believe), you'll just believe the bit that gives you the best opportunity/chance to reply in a negative fashion because deep down that's all you care about and that's all you have left.

Do you realise how easy you are to pick apart?

nice move to delete your post, twice.

Oh right, so now I can't use features coded into the site?

If there was a reply to the post it could not have been deleted.
If I had not fixed the typos you would have used that as the next point of "attack" because I already exposed where you were going.

Well done on steering the direction of the thread into such interesting areas. You're such an inspiration.

Man, your ways to justify yourself even exceed Cartman's skills.

Justify myself?

What I said was simple and legitimate.

If you setup a community to discuss a game, banning people based on the conversation around that game is just stupid and what most people here would agree with.

Do keep trying to elevate me to false levels. Your south park comparisons due to spending your 20's downloading torrents of cartoons to pass the time of day is really impressing me.

Better than getting raged and spam some forum with a billion posts.

Yeah, that script took me about 3 minutes to write.

You've spent more time replying to me in this thread than I dedicated to that task. Do keep trying. Its quite intersting to see how many steps you are behind the situation.

Cos you're so slow, or just so bitter?

when I look at them times of the deleted posts, it because quite obvious who spend the most time here. And it's not jonesy ;)

You have approx 17785 posts since March 2006.

I have approx 12690 since March 2005. (to put that into perspective if you joined the same time you have nearly DBL<<< my post count) and here you are implying post count is related to something bad?

You are BY FAR, the most common poster in the enttire history of this site and one of the most deluded people I have come across on the internet, for reasons like above.

My interest in gaming got me a bafta, around half a million dollars and a career for life. that's how I can justify my time here :)

here you are implying post count is related to something bad?

time to take a nap, you are imagining things again.

"when I look at them times of the deleted posts, it because quite obvious who spend the most time here. And it's not jonesy ;) "

no need for a nap, it all there. No point in YOU making digs at anyone based on time spent on the site. Especially to me :)

NN.

you to mash:

You've spent more time replying to me in this thread

me to you:

when I look at the times of the deleted posts, it becomes quite obvious who spend the most time here

you to me:

here you are implying post count is related to something bad

gg.

I said that to mash because of...

"Better than getting raged and spam some forum with a billion posts. "

Secondly, I can say post count ON MY BEHLAF means nothing because I have done something within the demographics of the site.

So when idiots like you on a gaming forum imply something negative about a post count or time spent on a forum it don't work for me becuase I can justify it with money, accolades and a future based within the demographics :)

You're what I like to call a victim of gaming. I got into gaming and the community out of a genuine interest, you got into it because it just suited your socially dysfunctional personality.

Its very clear. Though a touchy subject for someone like you.

lol.

OK, I will explain it to you again, with words schoolkid should be able to understand:


You say I talk about post count.
But I only talk about time.

So you are big dumbo.

I don't think either of you are in positions to talk about time or post count.

You both spend a hideous of time and post loads and neither of you have anything to show for it, other than convincing me you've just regressed to where you are for "other" reasons.

I understand perfectly, I'm just not entertaining it with the response you want because I see past it. Can't troll till this evening. Bye!

I'm going outside into the sunshine!!!!!!!!
ARGH!!!!!!!

at least you finally understood your mistake.

good job, you really deserve your break from all that "not thinking".

Do you measure peoples worth entirely on their careers? You talk about your money and your status so much that you come off sounding really insecure.

no only on careers in the gaming world

in wales 400.000 posts are considered a conversation.

Have fun being poor and unemployable :)

This insult is getting a bit stale, don't you think?

I think it started getting stale when poor little Jamerio was unemployed for nearly a year.

The Federal Reserve is committed to enticing Americans into doing once again what worked out so badly in the last decade: spending the phony paper gains engineered by overly loose monetary policy.

That, at least, is the very strong impression given by a speech by Brian Sack, the markets chief of the New York Federal Reserve, a man whose job it will be to implement the second round of large-scale quantitative easing coming after the elections in November.

A round of speeches from key Fed officials has given the clear view that, faced with deteriorating conditions and trapped by the lower bound of zero in its monetary policy, the Fed is preparing to once again buy up large amounts of Treasuries, perhaps even more than the government is issuing on an ongoing basis, in an attempt to drive down market interest rates and stimulate the economy.

Will that do any good, given that people generally do not want to borrow and the banking system is impaired?

“Balance sheet policy can still lower longer-term borrowing costs for many households and businesses, and it adds to household wealth by keeping asset prices higher than they otherwise would be,” Sack said in a speech in Newport Beach, California on Monday.

“It seems highly unlikely that the economy is completely insensitive to borrowing costs and wealth, or to other changes in broad financial conditions.”

So, there you have it: pump up asset prices and hope that people spend some of the ephemeral gains. The idea that people will spend more if their houses and other assets rise in value is called the wealth effect, but this policy creates only pretend wealth.

In fact, many people in the U.S. now face diminished retirements and generally straitened circumstances precisely because they mistook the rising prices of their house and Internet stocks for wealth and spent or borrowed against it. Is the U.S. actually so desperate for economic activity that this is the best it can do? Apparently so.

If I were responsible for these things in your region I would not give you any sort of internet even if you lived on the main street or in the middle of the city.

turkeylaw fuckyeh

becks and jamerio... get a room!!!

and a big tub of lube ...

and a camera !














oh wait :/