I think there is a big chance you won't be seeing cypher in the eu finals without sounding like a douche. Even if he'd move his shit to nl to play he's gonna have a hard time. Both me, dem0n and calipt can take him down if it's online and serak is also strong on high pings cuz he's from where they have gotten used to uber pings. His lan strength is insane tho since he's more confident and shitscreens doesn't seem to bother him. If cypher fails to qualify im curious to see if esl brings out a 'last last last last we love cypher chance game' to help him get in anyway ^^. I might aswell be wrong tho and he opens up a can of rape - who knows? :(/. This eu qualifier will be interesting to say the least.

That statement looks more like "OMG!!11 I beat cypher once in my life, now for sure I will go through groups instead of him!"

You sound really arrogant in regard to cypher in that comment. You managed to beat him in a couple of games he probably didn't even care about, and then think that it somehow allows you to consider him as some kind of mediocre player that can't even pass group stage.
One thing is saying "omg, I beat cypher, I must be super-cool", which is just funny and harmless, and another thing is saying "omg, I beat cypher, he must be total shit player and lose to everyone in group, lol noob", which is unmanner shit-talk.
And it doesn't matter that you added stuff about "or maybe he will pwn everyone". It's as if I say: "madix is fucking stupid moron, he is completely retard asshole that world has never seen before. Or maybe not, but whatever." It doesn't make it less arrogant.

Cooller himself said that it was "just ping". And he is best player ever, he knows this game inside out and can actually properly analyze the reasons that led to his loss better than anyone else like some random french noobs.

He cared to share his knowledge and deep analysis of the match with everyone, so that we all can become better players, and what you see? You see just whine... it's pathetic.

I'm not saying he's definition of correctness, but who's opinion and analysis of the game do you value more, one of that who's multiple times world champion in quake series, or just some commenter on ESR? First of all, he has much more insight of the game than probably all people who commented in this thread combined, and second, it was game he actually played himself, so he by definition knows much more about it than any of us, who are mere spectators (i.e. he may have noticed a little details that have occurred to him that you just can't at all see when spectating, like peculiarities of mouse feel or weapon firing response), and it's just improbable that someone here has enough in-game experience or knowledge to watch stream and provide a more reasonable and calculated review of that game than cooller who experienced the game himself.