tox1c cause i have never heard of toxjc

like Australia.

toxicity would win.

toxjq

Toxicity's toxic will win.
Just like Lava always wins on dm13.

lol lava doesnt decide games that often and toxicity toxic is weaker than dm13 lava

dumb argument

The Void on T2 laughs at DM13's lava though.

it was more of a joke, by adding another toxic into the equation but if you took it serious that's cool.

he knew it was a joke, but he just wanted fuck it up since he didnt like it at all

cooller

this

beat me to it. KURWA

Johan Cuick would for sure

Quick*

Thick^

slick

Dick

C-C-C-Combo Breaker

detlew would win

SyncError would win

Shut the fuck up would win.

ESWC would win

Toxjq would win over toxjc and tox1c on Toxicity even if he fell in the toxic waste a couple times. Certainly toxjq > tox1c , and tox1c > toxjc as he is unknown. Obviously then toxjq > toxjc and this is not just on Toxicity.

Now we need a highly Toxic two on two team game on Toxicity between toxjq, toxjc, tox1c, and toxic if he's ever found.

You took it a little too far imo.

> ist not an equivalence relation, and in QL its not transitive either.

Technically no, but in practice it often goes that way!

thats what he said

thats what he said

Jean-Claude Van Damme

QL would go down before game ends

QL would go downdie before game ends

there