I actually quite like the second track its quite mellow and does not sound like you need to be on drugs to listen to it and some interesting, if not basic graphics minus the fractals.
As for the google maps, my implementation of geographic data is far far superior to that of googles and i could put a 100ft black rubber dong in there if I wanted. So forgive me for not being impressed by that. I'm also with the brother below when it comes to simple people and their perceptions of all things UFO.
geometrically. the emphasis is more on the sky here, but googles height data for their mapping is very poor. Which is why its mostly a top down service.
Well it means that you could fly around google maps and see everything from every conceivable angle and height as there would be sufficent geometry to support this.
As it stands, google is superb from a top down view because geometric data is less import from a birds eye view, but as you move down to a more isometric level you see how utterly unconvincing the service is.
Bing has attempted to address by capturing multiple points of view which is actually nice, but all it does is water down the same fundamental problem that google has.
google earth is satelite images then photos taken from a plane is why its a top down service, and dont see the point in google adding the dark spaceship instead of the cleché wack little flying saucer to try to fool everyone
Yes and people are things that know google are doing this and purposely doctorthe real world in anticipation that google will snapshot their jokes and millions of dorks will speculate about them while they laugh among themselves.
so someone went into the desert of austrailia and done some massive black triangle with some 100kw flood lights, and satelite images are 1m sq per pixel, then photos from a plane is used when you zoom in on google earth
You have no idea if the source image was doctored. Google often buys its data from third party sources, so putting in odd little things seems like a good way to bring attention to an area, when you know nerds will look for it on google. Look what the Lochness monster did for scottish tourism.
People do it in videogames, people do it in advertising, people do it on crop circles, and they do it on google too.
But if that is your only conceivable reasoning as to how it got there revovles around man made lights or ufos, then its clear you're one of those people he is talking about.
That's ok, you are what you are. But you're wrong and I'm right.
I would bet my life on what I say and not have a single doubt I would be proven wrong. That's the difference.
The prospect of whether ufo's exists is valid, its the retarded logic that they would be stupid enough to be seen and heard when they clearly choose not be is what is amusing and worrying.
except no1 cares about ufo`s, they come and they are gone, its just americans that will think they will return for no actual reason, if they were there in the first place, even if they are just passing by, americans think they will return and set up cafe and motels
if it was a goggle earth easter egg, google should give the person who found it $100
if this planet wasnt full of worthless wankers, 30years of technology and today we could easily have fusion propulsion and go to mars day in day out and be a bore of a job