I was just looking through the MS website, checking out if they had any new mice, and came across this thing of beauty:
http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/en-us/p/int...3#overview
I was instantly reminded of its perfect sensor.
Truth be told, although the deathadder beats it on many fronts, the sensor is not as smooth as the ms3.0 (Although it is acceptable).
I use my ms3.0 at work and the deathadder at home so I see the difference.
What I don't understand is why these companies can't get it right.
- WMO/ms3.0 sensor
- 500hz/1000hz
- no prediction
- 400/800dpi
Everything else doesn't matter, they can make millions and billions of shapes, who really cares.
It's staggeringly shocking that these modern mice aren't as smooth (well the ones without prediction). It's been 10 years!
I was actually looking for WMO's / Salmosa's in SA, as I want to frankenmouse my Abyssus. Couldn't find any :(
http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/en-us/p/int...3#overview
I was instantly reminded of its perfect sensor.
Truth be told, although the deathadder beats it on many fronts, the sensor is not as smooth as the ms3.0 (Although it is acceptable).
I use my ms3.0 at work and the deathadder at home so I see the difference.
What I don't understand is why these companies can't get it right.
- WMO/ms3.0 sensor
- 500hz/1000hz
- no prediction
- 400/800dpi
Everything else doesn't matter, they can make millions and billions of shapes, who really cares.
It's staggeringly shocking that these modern mice aren't as smooth (well the ones without prediction). It's been 10 years!
I was actually looking for WMO's / Salmosa's in SA, as I want to frankenmouse my Abyssus. Couldn't find any :(
Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
1 | ||||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 |
4302 Hits
I'm wondering if there's any truth to this. I've always known the wheel and buttons to be crap. Sensor is all right for somewhat low sens and higher.