Rofl our country is a fucking joke.

.

25 years old? Wow.

First trolling about cheaters in QL, now this..

moved to wow forum, where this thread truly belongs

Nope, this thread actually sums up ESR and the whole idea of trolling.

people on esr never troll. i dont like ur attitude.

are you saying quakelive is dead?

looks like jamerio

not fat enough..

he really looks like a internet troll in that picture.

lets just hope he drops the soap

what is this i dont even

what a cock.

but then again most of esr didnt have a problem disrespecting amy whinehouse.

I guess if this girl was famous it'd be ok.

sad world we live in.

if amy wasn't famous it would be ok too.

admittedly amy was a bit of a bacon, but thats not my point :)

I despise talentless crackheads, especially if they have their act / business made for them and they ruin the whole thing. But im not saying names, nor trolling in news posts about such incidents, there are manners, but there are opinnions aswell

ps: you forgot about the capital letters, when you wrote her name, something about disrespect ;E

I do apologise kazan.

people should respect crackhead heroin addicts? sure you can respect her talent, but respecting the person she was is a whole different story

You say that like she stole cars and raped people. All she did was take the most addictive and potent drug that can be found on the streets. How this warrants ridicule, I fail to understand -- but then again, unlike most people here, I'm not a hypocrite/douchebag.

Many drug addicts do such things you speak of, having some of my childhood friends and family grow into this I am well aware of the consequences of heroin and crack. I'm not bashing her musical career in any way, but just because she could sing jazz in no way warrants any respect for what she did outside of her career, and I don't see why you think her actions speak otherwise.

despise evil and ungodliness, but not men of ungodliness or evil. these understand.

I don't despise anyone, especially drug addicts. I'm just saying I don't respect their life choices, but it's their life to lead. In no way shape or form do I ever bash anyone for what they do, unless it directly affects me personally.

well, not having respect for drug addicts is different than disrespecting drugs user's death. i don't think sk1nz meant that she should be respected. just that her death shouldn't be disrespected just because she used drugs.

Where is the ridiculous opinion that everybody deserves respect from?

yeah i don't know. nobody made that statement and yet erok still asks "people should respect crackhead heroin addicts?"

The difference is this guy went to the persons facebook tribute page that the family had set up. So it was guarenteed that the family would read his crap and making those videos was is just sick really. I seriously doubt amy whinehouse's family will ever read esr.

im her mom

Well done, trolled to death.

He also posted a video on YouTube, entitled Tasha the Tank Engine, showing the children's character Thomas the Tank Engine with Miss MacBryde's face.

wtf

successful troll is successful:(

If we locked up everyone who was/is a cunt in this country there would hardly be anyone left to watch football or start riots. Where would they all go anyway? Is there any more room in Australia?

Plenty of space in Australia, if not I hear Antarctica is nice this time of year.

The vacuum of space is pretty.. spacious.

Trajectory towards the sun should do pretty well.

jamerio?

Lol, as if I would be seen dead playing wow.

No point in trolling dead people, jobless gaming bums in their 20's high in frustration from sexual, social, financial deprivation are much more fun to entice.

Watch out jam they gonna get you and do that thing where they plus each other cos its you to buy the perception that they got one over yoooooz!

thanks for sharing your inner dialogue.

06:50 BST 14 Sep 2011 jamalz 36%
Judged post: Re: Guy gets jailed for trolling dead gi (8%) by tourist
22:35 BST 13 Sep 2011 mat- 5%

was just predicting the future. [+]

any reply to you pretty much gets a plus because you're so easy to make fun of.

It sounds a lot more convincing when don't need to keep telling me that's what you're doing.

banning him from using social networking sites for five years
how will he survive

he will be back as a level 94 trollmage masta

But can he play militia?

I guess INCubus tier slummed her to death, with the help of SyncError. Right ray?

Stop getting [ + ] you asshole!

lmfao

i don't want to live on this world anymore

jump under a train lollll

her make up and hair reminds me of those creepy child beauty pageants

Never fails to make me laugh

Aren't you Lukrek?

You sure cherish that picture of ours

wait wait, so he trolled her AFTER she offed herself? what a fucking loser.

wonder how the people bullied her to death in the first place got away.

nomatter atleast the troll is busted, thats zhe big deal

joink

So he got punished for trolling her after she died?

Nice country you got there.

"Reading magistrates heard how the alcoholic, who suffers from Asperger’s Syndrome – a form of autism in which sufferers have difficulties with communication and social interaction – trawled the internet looking for tribute sites."

Wowie

From:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-20369...ds-newsxml

Whatever happened to "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" ...

Yeah, exactly.

This isn't political speech or anything of the kind though, it's just harassment for its own sake. AFAIK the right to free speech has never been completely unconditional, even in the USA where people take it very seriously.

When free speech laws were made the world was much a much better place. Since then society has pretty much regressed, mostly due to capatilism/immigration/internet/benefits system.

Doesn't matter what the nature of the speech is. Let him run his mouth, and if he's posting on your mourning blog post or whatever, simply ban the account or close the comments or have a whitelist. Its really not that much work, and it is infinitely more sensible than taking a loony seriously.

Allowing retards to exercise their speech is the best way to make sure people know they are retards. This is the case with astrology, religion, fred phelps, etc.

Most countries have exceptions to their freedom of speech. Usually defamation, hate speech and harassment of various kinds. Most people are fine with it so I doubt they'll see this as raping their liberties.

Most people need to stop being babies

They need to stop being idiots too. But that's never going to happen.

Sean 'Jamerio' Duffy

I love how muslims in this country can stand on our streets and troll dead soliders/families at their memorial parades and get police protection to do so, but some wow retard gets locked up for posting less offensive stuff online.

Both cases should be free to say what they like. We've got this pussy society that wants people saying things they disagree with to be punished.

I would agree with what you say if people were able to lawfully react in accordance to the feelings those words invoke.

The reality is they are not, so if there are laws on how you are able to react physically then there should be laws on what is allowed to be said.

If such laws existed, how would you survive?

By being smarter than them.

You mean keeping your mouth shut?

he has a Juggernaut look to him

I've no idea who Amy Winehouse is, but in general and on principle it wouldn't seem very ethical to go about saying such ridiculous things about a human being. for some reason, it isn't legal in most areas to do so if it can be shown that what you put forth is untrue. as you might guess by the "liberty or honor" thread, I don't even agree with those laws. yet there remains something unconscionable about this. it is an ethical and social matter; it is not something that should be the domain of government, but it would still be hopefully frowned upon by reasonable actors.

that said, there is a remarkable difference between admonishing someone for their beliefs, positions, or ideas and belittling or degrading them as a person. to my mind, I don't see any justification for that even in some of the more extreme circumstances. rather, I find it unfortunate there are those of who us do bad or questionable things. you think if you were given a choice who you wanted to be before you came out of the womb, you'd pick Hitler? I find that as despicable as religious explanations for morality.

ideas are bad; humans are not. actions are bad; humans are not. I wouldn't say it's unacceptable to despise and publicly loathe a bloodthirsty tyrant, either, though in my personal case it wouldn't be something I'd be terribly wont to do. others are more than free to, as I think they ought be to say anything, and moreover they are perhaps justified, depending upon the severity of what's being called into question. I wouldn't argue with someone who wanted to call Hitler an awful waste of space, nor would I argue with discussions of the actions some celebrity may make in the public sphere. the public nature of such things may tip the scales even further in the direction of it being rational to do so.

that said, I would find it unfortunate if they were perhaps unable to see the greater value in pursuing matters of redress more in terms of rehabilitation than punitively.

that said, there is a remarkable difference between admonishing someone for their beliefs, positions, or ideas and belittling or degrading them as a person. to my mind, I don't see any justification for that even in some of the more extreme circumstances.

The difference is rather arbitrary. Both are speech.

ideas are bad; humans are not. actions are bad; humans are not. I wouldn't say it's unacceptable to despise and publicly loathe a bloodthirsty tyrant, either, though in my personal case it wouldn't be something I'd be terribly wont to do.

What makes ideas good or bad?

uh? the difference is not arbitrary. there is a qualitative difference.

what makes ideas good or bad? who cares? are you retarded?

It's my fault I even considered you would be able to answer simple questions.

err, am I supposed to answer every question every posed to me? has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? the whole point in my response is that your question misses the point by a long shot.

Good! Fortunately for him he probably won't be in a 'very bad' prison, although if he is well.. good luck to him ;)

"Trolls" their need to feel superior somehow - a place of anonymity seems perfect, would their "peers" or people they knew IRL approve of such pathetic behaviour?

This was stalking and harassment; someone who actually dedicated his time to disrespect a dead person, all he knew was she couldn't cope with being bullied, think about it, how severe her form of suicide was, this can't have been minor bullying; yet after death her family and friends are being bullied, how can anyone seriously try and justify that?

But what can we really do? If I am to 'judge by a cover' I'd assume he was at some point in his life bullied severely also, it tends to be a cycle, most bullies were bullied, I'd also assume most trolls/" controversial" internet personalities were bullied also, but to continue that theory becomes too remote from this topic.

TBH the word "troll" itself has lost its original meaning, it used to be silly internet pranks, mainly harmless, but now anything no matter how pathetic, rude, disrespectful, "stupid" (you get the point) can simply be dismissed as "trolling" and it seems people find that justifiable, this is why I despise 4chan, hacking peoples youtube/email/myspace accounts, posting their address, phone number, real name etc online and saying "trolled". We even see in our own community that people that are "trolls" make a full time habit of it ONLINE. Hmm..

TL DR: 1) Glad he is being punished, although his punishment wasn't enough --> step in the right direction.
2) Most bullies were bullied their selves, but it is not really justifiable to make others feel just as bad.
3) Trolling is no longer trolling, just a word to try justify subhuman behaviour.

America... fuck yeah. Free speech, bitches. That's why Albert Frankenstein, the 18th century scientologist, gave us the nuclear bomb.

He has Asperger's syndrome which im pretty sure those who have it have a lack a empathy for others so surely he shouldnt of been jailed?

So maybe a diminished sentence (which might actually be a possibility) or to serve it in an 'alternative' prison is better..

But if XYZ murdered someone and had mental health issues would you say the same?

http://www.theonion.com/video/autistic-report...opl,18983/

Ever since Gary McKinnon was threatened with extradition to the USA for hacking NASA anyone who does naughty shit online has aspergers and is not responsible for their actions.

Its almost as bad as people claiming thier human rights are being abused.

Gypsies now claim their human rights are being abused, AFTER they moved onto illegal sites.

Squatters break into houses in london, setup home there and claim to the courts its against their human rights to be moved cos they have a right to a home.

Its reasons like this why the world is turning to shit.

its all obi-wans fault

He the guy that darth vader killed and said some shit about if you kill me I come back stronger?

never seen a star wars film from start to finish :(. I hear he's a popular figure among nerds though.

i wont spoil it for you, friend

Is the movie funny?

Moron. Will teach him to not be a dickhead in future.

his head is enormous. i mean like, really really big.













































huge.

There he is!
http://www.esreality.com/?a=users&user_id=17768

uk first country to illegalize trolling

Yes the UK is desperate to kill free speech. Cases like this help immensely as the public is stupid enough to support it.

The free speech law was made at a time when there was no internet which is a major factor in allowing people to say things they would not otherwise say in person and could not be seen/heard by millions of others.

The person who made these remarks would not have made them face to face. So its pretty clear that with new protocols for communication should come new laws.

Its illegal to walk around naked, why pretend you live in a free world and thank fuck I don't because most people are retards.

You're not allowed to react how you might to to certain words in a physical fashion, so its only fair that this is balanced out by placing a tab on what can be said.

Freedom of speech was limited to the point when serious harm to a person was caused, long ago before every idiot had access to the internet.
There is no need for new laws but they may need to be redefined (e.g. define what is "serious harm" in the internet).

7 steps ahead.

looks like jamerio

UK = failing police state!1!!!!1

doesn't have much in common with pure trolling
there is good trolling and there is bad trolling like there is good driving and bad driving
this 1 guy was stupid beyond belief

“Ultimately everybody has to be nicer to each other”