ESR - Motivations of Online Gamers

<< Comment #1 @ 16:43 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

By

wasent able to get passed the 2nd page :( filled everything out put it did not let me pass. *edit: there is no plural of information*

Edited by ischju at 16:44 CDT, 17 September 2011

<< Comment #2 @ 16:46 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts

gonna change this error, thx for noticing it.

Concerning the problem of loading, it may happen when you forgot to answer an item. Which browser do you use ? Heard it's fucked up with IE.. but works fine with FireFox

Edited by gribouts at 17:00 CDT, 17 September 2011

<< Comment #31 @ 05:23 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ischju - Reply to #2

I use opera!

<< Comment #36 @ 05:47 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #31

might be the reason why

<< Comment #3 @ 17:12 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

palatka

who wrote these questions and why are they so bad

<< Comment #4 @ 17:41 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ins '

no portuguese nationality? pft.

<< Comment #7 @ 17:54 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #4

sry, adding it asap.

Edited by gribouts at 17:58 CDT, 17 September 2011

<< Comment #5 @ 17:45 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Raist

filled it but it was a bit vague considering the topic, its asking if we are motivated and how we behave towards others but it doesnt ask questions about why we are motivated.

<< Comment #6 @ 17:49 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts

hm, agree with you about some of the questions. The thing is that we dont invent questions running this type of stuff, had to adapt the original ones in order to keep their first meaning as well as to be coherent from a gaming's point of view.

<< Comment #29 @ 05:19 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

scowl - Reply to #6

mhh, I see.
But maybe fix stuff like "Will your clan play in next Clanbase as a dueller ?" :)

I'd be interested in any theoretical or empirical papers or questionnaires you've taken as a foundation for this, as I'm studying psychology myself. PM would be appreciated.

Also, why didn't you inverse some of your questions for each scale? That's always a good idea imo.

<< Comment #35 @ 05:46 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #29

if you are interested about research about video games, check the researches of Brad Bushman. He is the one who reported that violent video games increase violence..

If you are interested about the other aspects of the survey, you'd rather pm me ye. The answer could be quite a long one ! thanks for your interest :)

<< Comment #41 @ 06:34 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

scowl - Reply to #35

Bushman's recent papers seem interesting, I might take a look.

So are you trying to transfer theories/models from sport psychology to the field of online gaming? And the best tool availabe was this questionnaire? :/

Edited by scowl at 06:35 CDT, 18 September 2011

<< Comment #43 @ 07:24 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #41

hm rather speak about this in pm plz

<< Comment #48 @ 08:15 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

scowl - Reply to #43

Then write me one, if you're interested in sharing and discussing your aims.

<< Comment #8 @ 17:54 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

r1ddler

rather yes

dont know if the questioner was submitted cause i get a blank page after i click submit

also, no slovenian nationality :(

<< Comment #9 @ 17:57 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #8

yes, normally it is submitted when submit has been clicked.
Feeling bad about the lack of countries.. I'll try to add the forgotten ones asap. Sry about this.

Thanks for filling it !

<< Comment #10 @ 18:28 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

amOKchen

filled in mine

2%

<< Comment #11 @ 18:40 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #10

thanks a lot

<< Comment #12 @ 18:48 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funnyb

done

<< Comment #17 @ 19:54 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #12

thanks

<< Comment #13 @ 18:50 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

crv

done

<< Comment #18 @ 19:55 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #13

thank you

<< Comment #14 @ 19:02 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

fragv

done, filled in that dutch nationality is lacking.. gl with the research =)

<< Comment #15 @ 19:26 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

karizma

are you doing this for your bsc. thesis or something? or what for? ;)

<< Comment #16 @ 19:54 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #15

currently doing a PhD idd, but this wont be included in. As I've said, little is known about the links between online gaming and motivation to perform, and even less when it's about teamplaying. Always felt like doing this as I've spent a great deal of my life playing personnally.. Feel free to pm me if u want to know more or if you have some other questions.

<< Comment #50 @ 18:18 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

karizma - Reply to #16

just been asking out of curiosity. filled in =)

<< Comment #51 @ 19:06 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #50

thx

<< Comment #19 @ 20:37 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

zoot

Filled in - some of it is a bit repetitive although it is nice and easy to fill in.

<< Comment #20 @ 23:55 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Anonymous (83.204.210.165) - Reply to #19

yes idd but the repetitions is to force people to say the truth, can't explain it better with my low lvl english mate

<< Comment #32 @ 05:26 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

scowl - Reply to #20

No, it doesn't at all force them to tell the truth. Actually, if anything, it makes it easier for them to lie and they are less inclined to _think_ about what they respond.

<< Comment #37 @ 05:49 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #32

the idea is not to prevent from lying or not. The idea is to be sure that the measured concept, defined prior to the survey, holds from a players point of view. Better to have several questions than one from a researcher's POV, even if it thus may be a bit boring from a participant's POV..

<< Comment #40 @ 06:19 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

scowl - Reply to #37

the idea is not to prevent from lying or not.

Of course it is. And it's about making sure they spend some effort into their answers.

How do you know that "the measured concept holds" when you urge players to respond with the same reaction to 4-5 questions that are pretty much identical and not even reversed?

It's probably not your fault that the questionnaire you had to adapt sucks, but it sucks nonetheless.

Edited by scowl at 06:30 CDT, 18 September 2011

<< Comment #42 @ 07:08 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

eh - Reply to #40

Well you can't really prevent intentional lying in questionnaires. You can measure the extreme voters (all yes or all no) as well as the social desirability to keep that kind of bias out. But if someone is being an ass and purposely trolls your questionnaire you can't do much about that.

And of course more questions are better to measure a concept but then, they actually should be different.

...I sometimes help opponents who are beginners at the game.

...I sometimes give advice and assist beginners although they are opponents.

bleh..

<< Comment #47 @ 08:13 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

scowl - Reply to #42

Yeah, I kinda meant anwering in a socially desirable way when I was talking about lying. His quesionnaire imo checks neither for extreme voting nor for social desirability.

Of course you can't prevent people from answering with random nonsense. But it's not trivial to manipulate items that check for social desirability if they are done decently.

Edited by scowl at 08:20 CDT, 18 September 2011

<< Comment #44 @ 07:25 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #40

we can check this statistically by calculating the internal correlations between the questions as a function of the participant (factorial analysis)

Edited by gribouts at 07:25 CDT, 18 September 2011

<< Comment #46 @ 08:09 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

scowl - Reply to #44

I'm familiar with the concept of factorial analysis and its drawbacks.

You will be able to see whether the person answered simliarly to similiar questions but you can't check at all whether your way of questioning them MADE them answer that way, can you? Having inversed questions for each scale is one well-established way to reduce this problem.

<< Comment #49 @ 08:42 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #46

I adapted validated questionnaires and trusted the one who set them up previously, however you're right in what you say. Always tough to decide between staying close from what's been done and how we would personally do..

<< Comment #21 @ 23:56 CDT, 17 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Anonymous (205.250.155.71)

Get out of my head.

1%

<< Comment #38 @ 05:49 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #21

:)

<< Comment #22 @ 01:39 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

eh

Bad questionnaire but filled in nevertheless..
What exactly do you want to measure? Is there an underlying theory or is it just a shot in the dark?

Edited by asyyy at 01:40 CDT, 18 September 2011

<< Comment #23 @ 03:06 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

doz3r

done

<< Comment #24 @ 03:56 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

kK_Storm

Done.

<< Comment #26 @ 04:33 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

melechesh ' - Reply to #24

lolwut? no flaming?

<< Comment #25 @ 04:23 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

burgonya

done

<< Comment #27 @ 05:09 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

hydra

Some questions are not asked in a good way. For example:

"...when playing, I get angry quickly but get over it quickly."

What if you get a NO answer to this question?

It could be that the player never gets angry.
It could be that the player gets angry very frequently but only slowly.
It could be that the player gets angry really quickly but gets over it slowly.

and "...I wonder why sometimes I feel so nervous about playing" seems a bit vague too. Sometimes I'm nervous but I've never put any thought in this. So my answer is no.

<< Comment #34 @ 05:42 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #27

yes, dislike the double idea of this one. I agree with you.
This said and as discussed previously, we don't invent the questions running this type of surveys. Had no choice but to keep this lame one ..

<< Comment #28 @ 05:14 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

limity

one question would be good
Will u play in nations cup if u would have premium or smth like that

<< Comment #30 @ 05:20 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

G.I. Jonesy - Reply to #28

Definitely. The one question should be: "Does Quake need more cowbell?", and the only answer should be 'yes'.

<< Comment #33 @ 05:40 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #28

lol

<< Comment #39 @ 06:18 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

PopeJo

you shouldn't be collecting the data + nickname and clan. that makes the data linked to personal information.
do you want to do some kind of scientific survey or just collect personal data on gamers?

<< Comment #45 @ 07:27 CDT, 18 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #39

I agree with you but I'm not interested in seeing who said what individually, what matters is the trends and means. The clan names will be coded as numbers anyway afterwards.

<< Comment #53 @ 05:42 CDT, 19 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

cha0z_ - Reply to #45

Surveys are anonymous. Why in the world you want nicknames? That way you can link the questions answers to persons.

<< Comment #54 @ 09:41 CDT, 19 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #53

the idea is to be able to identify double fill and delete the previous answers when this is the case. For example, it can happen that the survey crashes or does not work properly and the individual reloads it. Feel free to write a number if u dont want to write ur ingame name. However, as Ive said, I'm interested in global means and not in any case in identifying who said what.

<< Comment #52 @ 05:14 CDT, 19 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

BloodRave

Hmm.. maybe add Romanian nationality :)

<< Comment #55 @ 09:42 CDT, 19 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts - Reply to #52

y, sry about that.

<< Comment #57 @ 07:09 CDT, 23 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

BloodRave - Reply to #55

Well, we have almost no known players in the quake live scene, I have tried to change this > didn't succeed, but maybe one day I or someone else will...

<< Comment #56 @ 02:14 CDT, 23 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Po0dle

I like these interesting questions about clans:
"We want to perform better than other clans", "We want to rank better than other clans", "We don't want to do worse than other clans", "We want to perform well against other clans". Same thing with the personal questions.

<< Comment #58 @ 15:28 CDT, 28 September 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Susta1nz

I've finished the survey and I think you have quite a good idea doing this. I hope it goes further and more people help out :)

<< Comment #59 @ 12:49 CDT, 2 October 2011 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

gribouts

wanted to thank you all for your help, participation or comments. Had a lot of answers and definitely enough to test some cool stuff out ! I will post what was observed in here to let you know more about it.

Feel free to pm / ask anytime if there's still unclear things around this questionnaire. Regards, Grib.