cool blue page

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484

sorry, I don't understand, it was working:( /FIXED

what is this

if that is not some sort of systematic error then, then its ... well its crazy ;)

yea, I wonder what Einstein would say:)

Ever heard of quantum entanglement?

yes, although that was years ago in university and i dont remember that much :D
but this is a whole different thing here anyway

Yea, it's just very crazy as well.

it certainly is
love the term "spukhafte fernwirkung"

Unfortunately, there is no material object or any kind of real information that travels faster than light in quantum entanglement.
A good analogy on what happens in QE is like this: suppose you have two balls, one black and one white, and two boxes. You blindfold yourself and put each ball in a box (not knowing which goes where). These two boxes will be your "entangled" system. Then you carry one box to the edge of the Universe, billions of light years away, while leaving another one at your home. Then you open box at your home and find black ball inside - and immediately with that fact you obtain information about far edge of the Universe that the box there will contain white ball, even though actual experimental test result there would take billions of years to reach you.

Yeah, I've seen lots of contradictory statements about QE so it's not quite clear to me how it actually works.

For example, this explanation appears to be wrong:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jh8uZUzuRhk

One question though, I've ready that If you collapse the state of one particle, the other will collapse instantly as well, so, isn't something happening that is actually faster than light?

It is somewhat different to that though in that when you open your box you could find either ball in it and until it's opened it potentially contains both. The information is not predetermined as it is in your analogy, there is no analogy that really makes sense.

.

No, it has been demonstrated as something real.

Cubert Farnsworth: That's impossible. You can't go faster than the speed of light.
Professor Farnsworth: Of course not. That's why scientists increased the speed of light in 2208.

Looks like Futurama was right.

Yes I was thinking the same, that somehow, vacuum is not as pure nothingness as they thought when they measured the speed of light (dark matter of wtf else), so it would be a little bit faster in real wacuum. But this would still mean huge implications all over physics if it's true.

hmm, i just read that CERN used sand as a medium for the neutrinos, so my low-energy wacuum theory just went out of the window:), ohhh and I was already packing for my nobel prize ceremony:D

I bet the pondlife that use facebook are still more stoked about the the fucking TICKER upgrade!!!

It's part of the story that it was "only" 0.0025 percent faster (-/+0.0004 error threshold) but still, it would turn most of the current physics studies upside down.

no matter how small the difference, if it is faster it pretty much destroys all the work of some big names of the century :D

heck we might as well start anew on the whole matter then.

It doesn't destroy anyone's work, relativistic theories will continue to work almost perfectly as they did before (just like Newton's mechanics still works in its area). It only means that it's not a complete theory and there will be a substantially new theory that will encompass relativity and classical mechanics.
It will destroy only fundamentality of principles used to build relativistic mechanics, i.e. they will become just nice approximations instead of primary laws of physics.

I see, it is a seperation of theories with new knowledge then. Didn't see it in that way but you are right!

.

Hmm i know ive read somewhere about cherenkov effect or sth..which basicly is light that occurs when "charged particles" goes faster than light in a medium like water...similiar to the sonicboom.

Don't know if it has something to do with this as i havent read the whole article yet and it's too late anyway but that's just sth that came to mind when i read the topic :P!

well when you say faster than the speed of light you mean faster than light in vacuum. the cherenkov thing is something being faster than light in a certain medium

My favourite thing about this is reading all the comments from random people saying shit like "It sounds to me like they haven't accounted for the change in the direction of wind" or something retarded as if some scientist is going to read it and go "oh fuck shit yeah we forgot about that fundamental unrelated principle you just hammered out there cheers m8 case closed"

Well in the defence of the trivial error argument I think the difference is about 12 metres between how far light and the neutrinos would have traveled in that time, which does seem to suggest a measurement error.

Well yeah it probably is an error but still the shit people come out with is hilarious

quit creating your own vacuum and maybe there wouldnt be any stupid errors

in 20 years we can play with australians :D whoohooo! ( if verified )

:O

http://vixra.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/tachyons.jpg

I have a strong feeling this is some kind of experimental error, but if its not I would tend to think there are more than 4 dimensions, and these neutrinos are taking a wormhole through these extra dimensions to cut short their trip.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484

The team measured the travel times of neutrino bunches some 15,000 times, and have reached a level of statistical significance that in scientific circles would count as a formal discovery.

If there is a mechanical failure, the number of times they check it does not matter. If not, this is certainly a big enough sample to be relatively sure.

like stated in the article, another test at another location by another team giving the same result will be the only way to be 99% certain.

I love this though, this is so... science fiction!

Apparently, this isn't the first time it has been observed.

http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110922/full/news.2011.554.html

At least one other experiment has seen a similar effect before, albeit with a much lower confidence level. In 2007, the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) experiment in Minnesota saw neutrinos from the particle-physics facility Fermilab in Illinois arriving slightly ahead of schedule. At the time, the MINOS team downplayed the result, in part because there was too much uncertainty in the detector's exact position to be sure of its significance, says Jenny Thomas, a spokeswoman for the experiment.

Still, can't wait for this to be confirmed. If true, this could be huge.

einstein bigger genius in the world? Your culture is poor then.

Dear Le Anonymous!

Did I offended you or your culture in any way?

Lets just list some(!) hungarian inventions here, this is just a small sample compared to the whole list (random order). Please read it if you have a minute.

- Noiseless match.
- Thermonuclear fusion
- Electric motor
- Airship (sold the idea to Graf Zeppelin)
- Carburetor.
- Transformer
- Vitamin C and the first artificial vitamin
- Turbogenerator and Wattmeter.
- Three-phase Alternating Current Electric locomotive.
- Telephone Exchange.
- Rotating Capacitor
- Ford T-Model T (and the assembly line)
- Tungsten electric bulb & krypton electric bulb.
- Weak equivalence principle and surface tension
- Electronic Television and camera-tube & and Plasma TV
- Volkswagen Beetle design & the passive safety in automobiles.
- modern diesel engine.
- non-Euclidian geometry
- Supersonic Flight & the math behind it
- Ramjet propulsion & Turboprop propulsion
- laser therapy
- Translucent Concrete building material.
- holography
- ballpoint pen
- 3D monitor and scanner & microscopes
- the digital computer

and the rubik-cube ofc:D

There are some very serious things there what you are probably using on a daily basis, just you don't give a single fuck about it;)

I'm not saying my country is superior to yours, but it's not a poor culture regarding to science for sure!

U also collaborated with Hitler, enough said

Our politicians in the last century went to war on the side of Germany because they wanted to correct the stupid, immature and fucktard peace treaties of the first world war, when Austria brought us into the a war and we paid the price for pretty much everything (another proof we had the most stupid politicians ever existed on this planet).

But we also did many great thing in the last 1000+ years for Europe, I'm not here to say that we have a merit or not, but on the other hand what did you do? Seriously, what the fuck did you do?

We gave the world (wrongly named french) fries and great beers and chocolate :P

Also bakelite, the saxophone, modern road asphalt, modern medicine ( the first human anatomy book)

All i can think of from the top of my head

Lets just list some(!) hungarian inventions here
...
- the digital computer

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/163...l-computer

rest of your list looks funny too, but you're trolling right?

I know it's sound really stupid to say such thing about the EB, but that's wrong (in my opinion) because those things were electronic computers "only".
The first true programmable digital computer (what we are still somewhat "using" up to date) was designed and built by this hungarian fellow (with the help of others ofc, but he was the leader mind behind it):

Neumann János (there was an austrien law forced on our country about jews must use german surnames.. that's why we have so many german names in our history)

"described a computer architecture in which the data and the program are both stored in the computer's memory in the same address space. This architecture is to this day the basis of modern computer design, unlike the earliest computers that were 'programmed' by altering the electronic circuitry."

what else looks funny? I'm not trolling!

I wont deny that Hungarian researches had a notable impact on all the items on your list, but they didn't invent the airship nor the diesel engine nor the electric motor for example. Contributions to science - yes, inventions - no (ok I don't know about all items on this list).

There are many questionable inventions what some hungarians like to claim to our nation (like the helicopter), historians still argue about these claims but I paid great attention not to list any of them.

Jedlik Ányos - the wolrd's first electric motor - 1827 (still works perfectly btw:D)
Schwarz Dávid First airship (not the first balloon!) - 1896 (Zeppelin bought the rights after he died)
Anisits Ferenc - modern(!) diesel engine - 1983

You can't say things like "only contributions to science" about real fundamental inventions just because they are not something new, with that kind of logic you could recall all the nobel prizes in mathematics just because they didn't invent numbers. (after all, I guess you are using a ballpoint-pen every day too, just like the rest of the world does)

And I didn't even list people like Semmelweis Ignác the pioneer of antiseptic procedures, the "savior of mothers" by no doubt, before him, 10%–35% (!!!) of the people were died in hospitals, and the fatality was especially high among mothers giving birth.

You can't say things like "only contributions to science" about real fundamental inventions just because they are not something new

First, I didn't say "only" contributions. Second, if real fundamental inventions aren't something new, what is? And back to the start, how is this an indicator for culture at all? Schwarz had to build his airship in Russia because he was lacking support in his country, Ferenc did most of his important work outside of Hungary and Einstein was forced out of Germany by a population full of nationalistic scum. Its about great individuals, not about culture in many cases.

First, I didn't say "only"
Yes the addition of the "only" was a translation/grammar thing, sorry about my English, but I think it didn't change the meaning of your words.


"how is this an indicator for culture at all"
It was a reply to a bad troll attempt at #32, and I would generally agree with you but not this time. There was something about the hungarian language reform and the reform of the education system in the XIX-XX century, what produced an insane amount of geniuses in our country, (it's a real phenomena accepted by scientist around the world and there are many books about this), so it was a cultural thing indeed and not some lucky gifted individuals. (just like how Germany produced an insane amount of awesome philosophers once -my favorite subject/interest field btw - but Germany was always super-great in all sciences anyways:]).


"if real fundamental inventions aren't something new, what is?"
Again, Laszlo Biro didn't invet the ink or the pen itself, but the whole world using the ballpoint-pen every day. That's an awesome invention imo, but still just something what's based upon/refined other inventions.


But you are sadly right, we have a bad tradition to drive away and hate out everybody from this country who was considered a valuable person later in history. The great and smart "real" hungarians of the present are always convince the rest of the country about who are right and who should be considered as a good person and who should be exiled because he is the enemy of the state and a stupid fuck also.
I think only Szentgyorgyi Albert got his Nobel prize because of his work done in Hungary and all the others are did their research somewhere else in emigration. And more to this there are some who awarded with a nobel pize but especially requested not to be considered as a hungarian ever (and they are listed as romanians or americans indeed), because of the hatred what they received here.
There is a saying here that if you want to achieve something in life, you must grow up here and leave for good, because you won't achieve anything in this country ever (I hope it's not true, but according to history it is:/).

Being proud of achievements of some random compatriots is really really stupid...

who said anything about pride?

I don't think Transformers come from Hungry

Yea what a silly trolling attempt they come from the planet Cybetron innit.

occitocentrism / occidentalo centrisme

btw culture doesn t mean shity 20s century inventions, you r so ridiculous

look at some coutry that have over 8 000 years of written history, look at where mathematics geometry and philosophy come from,

now look at ur shity post

log in please, so I can ignore you:)

you got trolled by an arab imigrant who can barely speak english. congratulations.

typical

you r so stupid


btw i m not arab u fag, better be a jew

ok habib

mathematics??? algebra is arabic word guess.... like astronomy.
geometrie the greeks claim it but well they stolei it from the old sumers so aswell in the area where arabs now live. :p

in case you planned to claim these for france, oh and on philosophy i teach you lessons my brother :p

" non-Euclidian geometry"

Gauss did it first!
8)

Around 1830, the Hungarian mathematician János Bolyai and the Russian mathematician Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky separately published treatises on hyperbolic geometry. Consequently, hyperbolic geometry is called Bolyai-Lobachevskian geometry, as both mathematicians, independent of each other, are the basic authors of non-Euclidean geometry. Gauss mentioned to Bolyai's father, when shown the younger Bolyai's work, that he had developed such a geometry about 20 years before, though he did not publish

Bolyai's version was the most complette compared to Lobachevsky's version what only contained hyperbolic geometry, and because of the lack of proving documents, there is an argument about if Gauss actually did work out the full math required or not.

-

Bolyai János a true mastermind tbh.

Gauss, on reading the Appendix, wrote to a friend saying "I regard this young geometer Bolyai as a genius of the first order".

The appendix he published to his fathers's textbook of mathematics solved 2000 years old math problems and recent findings shows he pretty much wrote down the relativity hundred years before Einstein, just physics was way behind that time to back up his math (btw, Einstein were studying the Appendix a lot before he published his work on relativity, but I would never say anything like Bolyai came up with the theory of course! Einstein was the genius who had the mind to visualize and assemble the whole thing like no one else could)

I was being facetious. It's kind of a running joke in maths that Gauss did everything first.

I think what he did in math actually gives him the rights for that:)

Croatia = Nikola Tesla

More than enough.

yea, Tesla owns big time:D He was a true genius indeed, (and btw, he didn't like Edison and politics, two more serious reasons to like him:])

I found this quote: Altough not precisely depicted, attributed qoute was dated in 1936, and is said to be an response to birthday telegrame of an Yougoslav politician from Croatia... Full quote supossedly says: "As many as I'm proud of my Croatian homeland and Serbian origin, the way you politicians act in (Kingdom of) Yougoslavia I'll have nothing to return to..."

Well as far as i know, this could probably happened becouse the neutrino had no information inside.

Only elements, and i say elements, with no information contained can travel faster than the speed of light.

Word.

[img1]

CANNOT BE UNSEEN

until they check those neutrinos for anabolics I will remain unconvinced about the legitimacy of their success

also they must check their reaction times to make sure that none of them cheat started

Einstein himself never said there can't be anything faster than light, just that things can't accelerate towards a speed faster than light .

And no this can not lower your ping

If we could get packets to travel faster than the light we could lower our ping.

But packets don't even travel at 100% of the light speed in fiber optic (it's about 200 million meters per sec) so I guess we're really far from that.

first scientist actually have to figure out a way to fix the fucked up world internet routing system so we can even achieve real direct light speed communication between 2 locations.

yes yes its fucked because of economical and (ironically) logistic reasons but still...

what's your status with your routing problems? Did you fix it?

its better, mainly because isp and/or turkish international routing fixed its issues a bit.

its jumpy from day to day with some days in 70-80 range and other days 60-70 range but I can deal with that.

VPN turned out to be not useful for me as my ping depends entirely on the route it takes in exiting the country with little issues in germany (the servers I play on) itself.

Of course I was implying here that in theory I could ping MUCH better considering the speed of light and distance, that's another issue that wont get fixed in my lifetime though :D

Yea, just as I told you, VPN won't help much in your case sadly, but I'm happy it's "somewhat" fixed now:)

bah I'm still playing at anywhere between 119-300 from Kuwait depending on the day,
but once my routing was magically perfect and I got 65ms for like 20mins seemed like they
rerouted to fix something ( shit ISP ) but this has shown me that <65ms is possible from
Kuwait and Arabian Gulf countries.

yes it is, it must have been an extremely direct rout with only a few hops. That happens very rarely

Hope all goes well with your net man and you don't get as much crap as I do.

its bearable right now, 70-80 or 60-70 on some days, also depends on the server ( I can get 75 on one de server and 66 on another de server, speaking about ql)

so yeah, playable. Hard to compete though but I guess thats reason for me to finally play smarter instead of aimwhoring :D

less aimwhore, more dodgewhoring :DD

With my previous net I had 80ms on Riyadh (from Paris) and 65ms on Istanbul, so things could definitely be better for both of you :/

yeah and I actually think it's the ISP's faults for being absolute cunts with every single
aspect of their services.

It is and sometimes you can fix it by phoning them (rarely) but let's not forget that there are often cables/routers etc that need to be fixed or replaced or w/e so they do have a valid excuse (sometimes).

I still feel that they're really not making a big effort most of the time though.

You have no idea how bad the ISPs we have here are, and if I phone them they don't do shit, and I've heard of people being mocked by the arseholes who take their calls in my country for saying something is wrong.

That's bad:( , perhaps you can get other gamers with the same ISP to phone them as well about the broken route to this and this servers.
It's usually takes a certain amount of complaints before they stop circle-jerking each other and focus on some problems.

It's been done, and to no avail they're just rude and really really bad, in fact they haven't even upgraded the connections here and the prices are still through the roof 80~ euros for 2 mb

Add up some money and hire a gorgeous bitch who would "convince" the ISP admin?
There must be a way:D

edit: I just read that there are no international fiber-optic backbone going through your country, if that's the case, it all comes down to money, because high-speed p2p exchange with the best providers costs more for your ISP than the shitty cheaper routes. Perhaps there is a different provider with a better routing?

The money is there and everything they need to make it happen is there , they're just milking it.

:( hope it will get better for you.

And I hope it gets better for everyone else with internet issues to quite honest.

thanks:)

Routing is one thing that could realistically be improved in many cases (at least a bit). Guess gaming isn't big enough yet for anyone to consider working on that though.

Ya I just worked out that it would be around 50 ping between australia and europe if 100% of the speed of light was used. That would be so awesome. We can then be like starcraft and have bearable games overseas then.

:>

*100ms

A ping is a round way trip.

only the test.....

Ya I thought so! thanks lol.

obv, but reaching light speed first might be a more realistic goal (which will never happen with current tech due to routers / switches/repeaters having a slight delay

Yes that's what I was getting at in my second sentence - fiber optic itself isn't good enough to travel at 300 million km per sec and there are also routers/switches/repeaters everywhere these days.

Can't rly complain about that anyway, current bb speeds and pings are good enough for nearly all intents and purposes

I can...

not so out of europe for ping. Heck even greece pings bad to germany and there is no good reason for it to do so.

download speeds are fine of course, bandwidth being something else entirely

also the signal doesn't travel in a straight line inside the cable.. it bounces on the walls

eh?

http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/06/01/theoretic...t-of-ping/

A beam of light bounces around like a pinball when it travels along the thin (admittedly extremely thin) fiber, and that will of course make the distance traveled even longer.

Oh yeah, didn't know that.
Nice link btw, a good summary.

I don't know who historically said it first, but from invariance of interval it follows that there is maximum speed at which signals (including matter) can travel. So it's a necessary law in Einstein's theory.

surely he didint need to though?

e=mc2 already means an infinite amount of energy to reach the speed of light therefore an impossibility right?

There is a theoretical particle for that called tachyons, which could travel faster than light while not breaking the laws of special relativity.

The problem is that scientist never detected such particle, perhaps they will some day, and we can play on server in Sydney with 42 ping;)

why 42 ping of all pings. You know something that we don't mister.. who are you working for? give us your prototype FTL adsl modems right now.

"The impossible often has a kind of integrity which the merely improbable lacks" :p

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQh5Cz1H83M

How is e infinite in that equation, it's just very very large

I phrased it kinda wrong, I meant it cant reach infinity which it would require to do

it doesnt need to reach infinity per se to break the law if m is very very small like witn a neutrino.

But yeah for all intents and purposes (like an actual spaceship ) it would approximate it

ah I see what you mean, I am kinda bad with the whole particle theories side of the science, I can grasp what this article is trying to say and kinda how it works but I lack the knowledge to combine everything in my mind :D

It does open some loopholes since theoretically things do move backwards in time when going faster than light.

But i've never doubted things like wormholes ah la star trek do exist

Indeed, the theory of relativity forbids any object with a mass (moving with a subluminal velocity)to reach c, but the theory allows an object to exist which always moves faster than light.

yes and no, god ppl, why u didnt pay attention on physics lessons


Einstain said nothing that have a mass, cant reach the speed of light

think you just have topped einstein congrats.

If we learn more about entangled particles and quantum computing, we could theoretically obtain 0 ping across the solar system.

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2871

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

If being the key word :P

Schrodinger was cute and all but were still a looong way away from all that

agreed

you can't really know if there is an overall limit if you conclude it inside a system

im not amused by this stuff....

One step closer to the Time Machine

Really, this would be a step back.

?

Time travel is still purely hypothetical, but even the most advanced speculation is based around current mechanics of relativity - mechanics that would be invalidated if this turned out to be true.

but how is that a step backwards? If the CERN discovery turns out to be valid then maybe we would never have progressed until we discovered it, even though it appears as a step back?

It's a step back because it destroys what little there was in time travel speculation, and gives nothing back.

It's already 'happened' a few times with photons, only to be later proved wrong. Even though the current model of Physics is most probably wrong, or at least needs some serious tweaking, this experiment isn't all that.

They measured over a 730km distance with a 2.2 millisecond error; making it only 0.00025% 'faster than the speed of light' which isn't too much.

My guess is that they've measured the wrong part of the neutrino. They've already been shown to have wave behavior in the MINOS experiments, if the initial detector measures the 'tail' of a wave and the end detector measures the head, it could explain the difference.

However if it is right, it could solve the problem of neutrinos disappearing mid-flight which would be decent.

inb4 teleportation, neural implants, holodecks, hovercrafts, terraforming, guns that fire tiny collapsars, temporal distortion drives, field trips to higher planes of existence and another season of Firefly.

its obvious there are no unbreakable barriers

The speed of light is not a barrier. If you turn you monitor ON, you just can't turn it ON more anymore, it's already as ON as it's possible:)

i understand your logic but its not quite correct as we discuss a light speed here

Light speed is kinda the same, it's not a barrier, it's a limit, there is nothing beyond it to reach (from current theory's POV)

there is allways something beyond

einstein just assumed its a sorta limit as his theory is a RELATIVITY theory so he had to have this one single thing thats constans and its working till a certain "scale"

as we lurk deeper, we need new theories and refute the old ones thats how it goes

we evolve, out knowledge evolve, the universe is evolving and so on

even our wrong economics going to evolve soon as we go into massive crisis (thanks to usa and their debt-dependent money)

As I said - from point of view of current theories.
And relativity is extremely sensitive to that principle of constant speed of light (which eventually implies inability to exceed speed of light). You can't just slightly modify relativity to allow for faster than light speeds, you have to completely break it and introduce entirely new principles. So that "speed of light" limit makes sense only in relativity, and if it turns out to be untrue, then there will simply be no such thing as "breaking speed of light barrier" because theory will be formulated in terms that are not including concept of speed of light at all.

"Speed" is equals to the distance divided by the time. The units of the distance and the untis of the time are both different for differently moving observers, but the speed of the light are always the same for everybody.
This maximum speed is not there because scientist defined it, but because there are no possible transformations what could change the norm of the four velocities defining spacetime (X,Y,Z and time). When the photon is moving in our universe the vector on the Time axis is zero, so it can "maximize out" on the X,Y,Z axises all the way, ergo it moves through space as fast as possible.

I think it's quite correct:p

Jameiro proved that long ago when it comes to stupidity

Yet I'm the one with the bafta, own businesses while you're the one whining like a little bitch and trying to free his ego at the expense of the person who quite clearly knocked it for six to begin with with whatever unescapable truth you resent me for.

Do you have a script that scans the entire site for every occurence of your name or do you really actually check every single thread every damn day

So how exactly does this bafta (in what?) and own business disapprove his point?

Keep in mind success doesn't necessarily equal intelligence.

He said stupid.

That's slightly more binary than you questioning the merits of intelligence. Of which is progressive and subjective anyway.

The fact that you're actually taking such a conventionally inane statement seriously and questioning me for not disproving it only goes to show you're probably pretty stupid too.

Stupid people can have success as well, what word i used as opposite is not really that relevant. I did in fact realise i hadn't chosen very wisely right after i posted it, but i didn't want to edit tbh.
But if i should also be so nitpicky.. binary has only two states meaning there is no such thing as "slightly more binary".


I wasn't taking it seriously. I just found it curious as to what exactly was the point of listing form of success to his reply. I was guessing that was your attempt at disapproving his point.

"I was guessing that was your attempt at disapproving his point. "

That was me simply pulling at his strings on two aspects of my life which gave birth to his contempt :)

Indeed, i was afraid to say to up till now but you've made me see the light

I wish to be healed , teach me how to win a bafta and post videos of cash on the interwebs, only then will i be truly ready to face my creator in heaven

Or not

loser

Having an immediate gene pool stemming from two failed world war attempts I don't doubt your inner need to project what you really feel about yourself.

dude, you're such a loser, had we met in highschool, you wouldn't have had a single fun day at school, believe you me.

yeah 20 years after losing a world war it takes the two biggest superpowers to defeat them again

what losers

diaf

oh look, a comment. I think I'm going to plus it.

Wise move. It has to be cheaper than raiding your benefits.

you realize what you just wrote makes no sense right?

I was doing that thing you sometimes do when you make sarcastic and arbitrary refereces that only you get becuase no one else is that butt hurt to understand.

It was kinda fun. But nice to see it has the same effect on you as it does me.

how was your saturday night? fuck anything?

:D

YOU MUST WISH C TO BE BROKEN

either the whole universe functions fundamentally different than we thought or there could be an error in one of the 10000000000^62344 equipment parts. I wonder...

wow to think for even one second that scientists truly understand anything about the universe is so full of hubris it hurts my stomach to read the fucking words your ignorant redneck ass types

einstein was a fuckin loon and came up with his theories on a half-shattered mind. it won't be long until someone can either complete his theories or prove them wrong - and this is the first step towards that.

good sir, I couldn't help but to notice that you come from the great country of united states of america. that of all things you could object to, you choose to object to science and theory of relativity is, to put it mildly, interesting.

can't they just run tests with expected results to verify their equipment for such distortions?

fuck if I know. particle physics is one of those things I won't even try to pretend to understand.

considering they take plate tectonic movements in account for their results.. i guess they have a everything covered that's obvious :D

and yeah, wtf do we know?

I suspect both.

http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1384486

ive only read the bbcnews article.

does anyone know more on this stuff? im drunk atm, but something that spontaneously comes to mind is: are these neutrinos mass-less?

According to the standard model of particle physics, they don't but experiments suggest some type has some mass (but it's less than 50eV)

"All of my investigations seem to point to the conclusion that they are small particles, each carrying so small a charge that we are justified in calling them neutrons. They move with great velocity, exceeding that of light."

- Nikola Tesla

Jamerio can you mail me some money

That's it... you all play it like a boss/troll/angry kids, but actually you are fucking scientists! :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRsPheErBj8

"can lower your ping'' well the particle arrived a billion of a second faster than expected ofc its a huge time at that speed,but does it really affect ur ping? xD

Your packet would arrive before you sent it:D

Thats how Cooller plays :D

:DD

Special relativity is not 100% correct.

Obviously, or do you think that some day it will be possible to 100% perfectly describe entire universe with a theory?

i hope that one day we can, yes

such hubris is the curse of being human, no?

It will approaches perfection more and more as our science advances, but I don't think we will ever have the holy grail of physics in our hands, there will be always new problems to solve, new phenomena to understand, and new discoveries to refine our theories. Even in December 5, 304054.... if we survive that long:)

they know nothing...

It's so annoying that all the threads are growing and I have to log out every time when I'm interested enough to read them, because nothing will show up when I'm logged in:((

First we need worldwide fiber optic networks, and decent routing. Like is it now almost everything bounces to USA then it's distributed to the rest of the world

Well, that's just because South America doesn't have enough underwater cables atm.