Confirmed.

What's wrong with it?

You jealous again cos you never really did anything with your life and this is your attempt at trying to feel good about it by denying mine.

That's cool, but it don't change yours and just makes me smugger.

It was also BMX and Motocross. 20 years id a long time.

it says 8 years.

and the other stuff you say: no, not at all

I raced mx and bmx as a kid from a very early age at a time when rules were much less laxed on age and cc, I did then go on to say I included BMX in that number as I only did it becuase the course was up the road and it was esay after racing bikes.

After checking the age was also 10 not 8. You need to recall these are casual recollections from my life from over 20 years ago.

Think back to something you did 20 years when you were a child and how sure would you be of the EXACT dates of those events without checking it exactly?

I forget that some of you lead shall we say shelterd, depressed lives and try to feel ok about themselves by denying the lives of others and are therfore always on hand to scrutinise these things that perhaps make you feel like a bit of waste in comparion.

So you were jumping into sandpits while I was jumping 20-30 feet on a bike. Its ok.

So you were playing games while I was making games. Its ok!!!!

But trying to feel ok about your life by tricking yourself into thinking that other people are lying is always going to fascilliate that loser mentality.

EXACT dates, yeaaaaaah right Jamie, but we're going to have to let you go..

sure a normal person couldn't remember something happening 20+ years ago.

but by now, everyone on this site would know about your superb intellect and expect only the sharpest of observations, the cleverest of arguments and the highest of memory-skills from your side.

hence you must understand why some here might be baffled by the inaccuracy in your original post.

Motorcross is such a focused motorsport that when you are racing, your mind is tuned into the race and nothing else as you have to keep track of so many things or you crash and break bones or lose races!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWNtzCAbsVY

As a result of this, much of my early racing days were a blur as it revolved around a very similar mindset for the entirety of the time which does not lend itself to anything else.

In the words of Dom Torreto...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P2b_ygxIRY

Except its a LOT longer. But that's the principle/mindset I'm talking about. its another zone.

isn't it called motocross?

I write it both ways since the miniMOTO craze some people tend to confuse it with those little lawnmower engined bikes.

Now the fad is over I'm left with the bad habbit of alternating them!

I forget that some of you lead shall we say shelterd, depressed lives and try to feel ok about themselves by denying the lives of others and are therfore always on hand to scrutinise these things that perhaps make you feel like a bit of waste in comparion.

Lol, you seriously defending your post?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrjwaqZfjIY&feature=related

Confirmed.

I don't confirm the awesomeness. I just don't see it.

Confirmed. that one's a classic, right up there with his renault5 that could outrun a ferrari.

Actually I said..

"One of my cars. at 18 and out of choice. And that thing did a 1/4 mile quicker than a ferrari 355:)" Comment #38 @ 20:56 GMT, 13 December 2010

Notice how I defined the model number of the ferrari, whereas you said "ferrari" hoping to bolster your point that you already lost when you scoffed at me for saying the 5 turbo could be faster than a ferrari and you got screwed here too.

http://www.esreality.com/index.php?a=post&...pid2004044 (Scroll down)

The 355 Spyder does the 1/4 mile in 13.4 seconds, at santa pod the guy managed a 13.8 vs my sub 13.5. Not bad for 1.4 hot hatch in the 1990's.

Happy raging losers and remember, whining at me all day isn't goign to.

A) Get you a job.
B) Put money in your bank.
C) Take you out of that rut you find yourself in because of A+B.

This is too easy.

ok you got me champ. so you had all those fly cars, 3000 rims etc, and STILL no pussy?

A gentlemen never tells.

Also no computer until 2004.

That's because I had a silicon graphics work station at the biggest unix network in the UK outside of the military and access to a gaming room of top spec pc's. Combine that with working 10 hr days and not being into pc gaming at that time and its why this was the case.

I do enjoy the small time criteria you have set out for yourself for somehow convincing yourself you're a somebody>

Despite this, I was still reg'd here 3 years before you. Magic!

Just the fact that you so badly need to brag about all these ‘accomplishments’ tells me that none of them are real. In fact no one believes you and I’m sure you know this aswell but still you try so hard. It amazes me how you haven’t gotten tired of it yet :D.

Btw didn’t you get any attention as child?

I love the way you are prepared to overlook the sarcasm and negative replies I respond to and focus on my reply to that, and then pretend like I say all this stuff for nothing.

That takes a certain amount of delusion and bias to publically demonstrate that.

The only delusional here (as usual) are you Mr. funny-hat.

You obviously start to fall into a megalomania of incredible extends. The last one who had something like this was Napoleon, and we all know (well you probably don't because you were busy earning your 3 Million of Monopoly cash rather than going to school) where it all ended.

Luckily for us you neither have the charisma nor the education to become even 1/10000000000000 of what Napoleon were.

"You obviously start to fall into a megalomania of incredible extends."

***Why wouldn't I act like a megalomanic when you're acting like stpuid retards and denying every aspect of my life because you obviously think its impressive enough to deny or lie about.***

You have zero concept of your behaviour which invokes the reactions you then go on to say are unjustified.

Face the facts, you are an emotional mess who is out of his depth and making a fool of himself in public which is only fascilliated by your equally bitter and retarded gaming mongs who you pretend to be friend with cos of your equal contempt.

I'm laughing at you on an individual and social level.

You have zero concept of your behaviour which invokes the reactions you then go on to say are unjustified.

right back atcha

But you're the one making a thread and accusing me of lying.
There's nothing to throw back other than the responses you've gotten.

Your broken logic is clear for anyone to see.

nah, i just said your post is awesome... as in funny, no accusation really.

but most people here are probably thinking alike about your post, something you seem to be well aware of.

I don't know why i get involved in this but how about this reply where you link to the end credits of Perfect Dark where you claim to be Jamie 'evo' Williams who is clearly this guy and currently works at Blue Sky...
I really dislike when someone tries to take credit for someone ells work... so hows that for lying?
is it really that important to 'prove' how successful you are on a gaming forum to a bunch of strangers?

well, i guess that settles that.

not funny tho.

next time I'll try to be funnier.

not your fault, wasn't meant as criticism.

All those websites are casual fan collected content which means its more than possible for mistakes to be made.

Especailly when the fields they work with are.

NAME
INDUSTRY TYPE

You should also note that before I used them as casual sources on ESR (Jamerio 2005) Both pages were correct for me. (tech role in the cgi industry with no prior related logs? I don't think so)

(Copy+paste)
www.wayback.archive.org/web/20050801000000*/http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1844015/

www.wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://www.mobygames.com/developer/sheet/view/developerId,61249/

I would not be surporised if someone here tried to alter the sources, thre are some pretty pathetic people here you know who will lie http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2187185#pid2187185 just to save their ego.

You really should know better than to falsely accuse people while at the same time not having any credible sources.
~I'm not bragging, I could prove it in seconds if I was bragging, but if you think a bunch of deluded gamers are going to beat me on this, you're mistaken.

Look how confident I am, this will only ever go my way :)
These people are simply outmatched, they just don't know it yet.

i know tons of people(mostly work-related) who are very confident in their claims, never makes anyone right tho.

But they are not airing their opinions on a public forum.
Its a much bigger deal when you put yourself out there for anyone to see.

lmao no its not. i can write down anything here with any amount of fake decisiveness, cause noones here to talk back to me.

the difference between you and the rest of the forum members (including me) is that noone is so full of shit as you are.

face to face you would be so small because compared to most people here, you have no education at all. you're like the village idiot who keeps hating on people who have invested time in their education and spouts about how students are lazy and have no idea what real hard work is...

you failure.

now please go on to respond about how you must've struck a nerve because i've written more then 2 lines in my reply.
i rest my case.

Why am I full of shit again, you're doing that one sided thing where you get to claim I am something While I am unable to respond to it. Which is usualy the sign of someone who is full of shit. What am I full of shit about?

Are these the same people that think I'm full of shit cos I wroked with games or said I rode bikes and won a few trophies?

Who are these people aswell? Your reply seems to imply everything but defines nothing :)

i don't get it. why are you defending yourself? you're jamie williams, part of the fantastic design crew who gave the world perfect dark and surely that's all that matters. through no fault of anything thing else but your own determination to right the wrongs of a load of nobodies on a forum you even lead randoms such as myself, without bias, to become suspicious of your claims. ignore them, it's a complete waste of time and you'll be better off in the longrun.

I'm going to make an example of them :)

But had I not you would never even have known I existed.
So IF it were my objectivce to use it for some small time fame (on a small traffic website) then having you on the fence, would be more than you not knowing nothing at all.

ofc that is not my point, but you catch my drift using your black and white logic.

Remember, I am just replying, if you want to lecture people, lecture the people whose ego cannot let it lie.

P.S.
If I wanted to prove it I would have done already, so I am essentially ignoring it, I'm just giving them rope to hang themselves.

ok but it seems to be your power to keep the fire burning or let it die down. you could take much greater control of the situation by ignorance. small time fame, nah i wouldn't have thought that anyway. my guess is you enjoy developing or finding holes in arguments and then proceeding to exploit them for personal gain. in other words it appears mainly ego based. in simpler terms, it's just a bit of fun, right?

Its not really my power because I had not said anything in this or most of the other threads. Sure I could not respons, but a response is just that. A response. A reply to something else someone else wrote.

If you check google for (site:www.esreality.com jamerio bafta) you will seen you will see the first 7 entries from google are OTHER people talking about it. http://www.esreality.com/files/placeimages/20...-bafta.JPG

So the problem is not mine, the concept of me seems to have planted a major seed of insecurity in a few others who aspired and failed to do more in the world of gaming than they did.

And they keep regressing to this inner insecurity of them.

I don't see any point in allowing these people to find other people to fascilliate their delusions.

we clearly deal with things in different ways. these people wouldn't be worth my time. keep defending yourself by all means but it seems so utterly pointless reading through these comments. there's a wall of intolerance you're banging your head against. from creating perfect dark (which any gamer would be interested to find out about should you be who you say you are) to defending your honour on a forum like this is actually quite sad to see. anyway, i'm done.

so you say you have to build up some kind of barrier of arrogance if you do something that others arent capable of? i'm sure alot of people do that and think that communicating with them is kind of inappropriate, aswell as looking for entertainment or "lower satisfaction". but actually that's much more sad.
there are tons of skilled, established people who just want to take part of something. a forum like gearslutz.com comes to my mind, where established musicians etc talk to, troll, educate other people and are part of the community, actually it's the same with esr and the pros.

good question. i wouldn't say it's a barrier of arrogance though, it's more satisfaction that you personally know what you're capable of and nothing will change that. arrogance implies that it's unjustified. yes comminication from people with experience is a very nice thing. this isn't the case here though as the discussion isn't based on anything positive at all with everyone at a standoff for god knows how long. it's paranoia, prejudice and ego trips from both sides leading to personal attacks and the truth is that no one is going to come out of situation like that looking good.

i really agree that it's pointless, but it seems either jamerio or the others get some kind of entertainment which goes fluent into butthurting sometimes. i think jamerio (god forbid) somehow mastered the pain of beeing butthurt at some point, so it builds a nice little circle for getting entertainment on a regular base without much negative effects.
not sure about the arrogance part, since a beautiful girl doesnt turn arrogant without a reason or delusional. tuning this down with education or intelligence might be an important social skill. just my thoughts

well the one postive may be the entertainment. so i guess while we all don't take it too seriously then no harm is done. like you said jamerio has probably developed diamond coated skin after all the abuse which makes getting to the bottom of things all but impossible. i'll choose to believe what he says because quite frankly the alternative is too sad to even consider. i just hope that the mentality of attack-defend displayed in this thread doesn't carry through to their real life interactions, for their own sake.

i'm not sure about that :P but taking the issue as loose and maybe a little bit naive as "we" do should be the healthiest way to go, if any.

It gets sadder trust me:)
http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2188082#pid2188082

You have a point based on normal social conduct, but there are opportuinties to win fans and admirers too :)

end of the day whatever demographic you enter you have to act accordingly, whether it over friends, or a job interview, this site is pretty cut throat, so to me its like wearing wellies to go out in the mud, or using an umbrella to go out in the rain.

It should not define me as a whole, if someone can't recognise that then I don't really care for their opinon on me anyway as who cares about appeasing to those with bad judgment? (In real life)

You might of had that impression of me replying to certain others, but I doubt you've had that impression of me based on what i said to you.

Which IMO proves my point.

fair enough. generally the ideal is to treat others how you would like yourself to be treated but this site's motto is more an eye for an eye. i prefer to keep my personality consistent rather than moderate or enhance it depending on where i am or who i'm speaking to but i guess everyone's different. you've not been disrespectful to me so i see no reason to attack you per say. what drew me into this conversation was the possibility of you impersonating a game designer credited with one of the best console shooters ever. it's not of vital importance though yet it did peak my interest. que sera sera.

no no, he is 'evo' Williams, the succesful game designer. honestly.

lol who cares.

you apparently.

and my interest was sustained for barely an afternoon where as some of you guys have found this fascinating for what would appear to be years. moving on.

that is true, 6 years and he still makes me laugh.

You know that when we first asked you for proof, YOU linked to imdb, right? I don't know why you would think that it would be evidence to begin with, but you turn around and say that it's wrong just as soon as it doesn't match up with your delusions.

IMDB was never a proof, it was just another casual source on top of mobygames. Very few things on the net are 100% proof, the point is, not everyone in the world is a paranoid nut who needs empirical proof of anything he does not want to hear in the one place he was comfy in life.

I told you I didn't want to post proof because I don't live in a world where I have to post proof of every single thing I did because the person who heard it can't comprehend that I was jetting off to E3 while he was buying mountain dew on the way to high school.

There is still time for you to do something in your life and not live in your sad little eworld where you get by with your own short comings by denying other peoples achievements.

Its not really something you want archived for life online, but here you are....

Very few things on the net are 100% proof

In this case, this wasn't proof of anything. Regardless, for what you were using it for, it contradicted your own statements.

I told you I didn't want to post proof because I don't live in a world where I have to post proof of every single thing

You have said that you would multiple times in the past, so the only thing that has changed is the fact that you know that we'll want solid proof at this point, and you can't offer it.

"In this case, this wasn't proof of anything. Regardless, for what you were using it for, it contradicted your own statements."

READ CAREFULLY. I never said it was proof, I SAID it was a decent reference, shortly after became contaminated, but the original version is archived on webarchive.

"You have said that you would multiple times in the past, so the only thing that has changed is the fact that you know that we'll want solid proof at this point, and you can't offer it. "

That's the thing, I don't care if you belive me, if I did I would have posted proof years ago. You people are more fun for me the way you are, and I get more and more efame for it so its all good.

I'm happy to stoke the fire fuelled from battered ego's and allow you to cement your stupidity for the net to archive.

READ CAREFULLY. I never said it was proof, I SAID it was a decent reference, shortly after became contaminated, but the original version is archived on webarchive.

... the information was there when you pointed to it.

That's the thing, I don't care if you belive me, if I did I would have posted proof years ago. You people are more fun for me the way you are, and I get more and more efame for it so its all good.

You would have posted proof years ago if you had it. You don't.

I choose not to post becuase...

I enjoy the speculation.
You guys made me infamous. (Game TV+RADIO RAGE)
I'm making an example of people like you for the world to see.

It's that simple :)

I'm making an example of people like you for the world to see.

You're making an example of why you're a perfect candidate for religion.

So... you have solid proof of all your amazing accomplishments, and yet never post it, but instead just keep saying you have proof?

And the killer bit is that you seem surprised that people don't believe you. Like it isn't to be expected or something.

"I have the cure for cancer, but I'm not going to cure anyone of cancer because I like that people don't believe that I have the cure". Something like that...

must've pressed a wrong button, didn't mean to plus this :D

To me Imdb is a credible source even though i do know its mostly user content.
the links doesn't work for me, what you say is maybe true maybe it isn't, i don't actually care so good luck whit your mission =)

Keep trying! :-*

That's because I had a silicon graphics work station at the biggest unix network in the UK outside of the military and access to a gaming room of top spec pc's. Combine that with working 10 hr days and not being into pc gaming at that time and its why this was the case.

I see, so you decided to register on a PC gaming site, that specifically focuses on ONE PC game, which only focuses on the minority of those players who play competitively, and that you pretty much had to SEEK OUT in order to find... several years before you ever owned a computer. All while not being into PC games. Would you believe such a silly story?

im also guessing a silicon graphics machine from around 1999 wasn't the kind of thing you plugged into the internet to check your emails

Lol, so you don't think a UNIX machine was able to connect to the internet and receive email. HAHAHA.

I also stated that there were gaming pc's too which had net access.

Some of you people are so funny :). I only bother becuase I think it makes good public reading.

thats not what i said. i said you wouldn't use it for that.

a machine like looks like a fridge and checking your emails on it is usually a waste of resources(not that it couldn't handle it easily, it just has more important stuff to do)

Yes. I was always into competive one v one games and quake 3 was the main game at that time.

The main PC game, that you weren't interested in...

Lol, just becasue something is my main interest on the PC, it doesn't mean its enough to go out and buy one as my interest in pc's and quake at that time were very casual. When that interest grew, I bought a decent gaming pc. That's why i said main interest on the pc, and not main interest in my life.

never browsed a magazine in a shop but not bought it?
Yes?

And that's just something that costs a few dollars, so why is it so hard to comprehend that I would not spend a £1000 on something until I was sure it was not a fad?

You're so easy to dispell.

So now date of ownership does mean something but only when it suits you?

"I'm not sure why you think this needs to be something to argue over, as if I "win" if I was around for longer than you. It's really silly." -Vedic

http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2185994#pid2185994

God damn I wish I had the full pleasure of expereincing my own posts stemming from your typical gaming forum user.

It would almost be worth retarding my pedigree.

... By your own admission, you didn't own a PC until 2004. You continue to claim that you have played/mastered all sorts of games, and managed to use the internet, without a computer. It's not a matter of when you bought it, it's a matter of when your other stories don't add up.

The specific comment was in relation to the response by tourist, pointing out how silly your lies get. You claim to have all this money, but couldn't buy a simple computer until 2004? The comedy here is that you make up things about your life that are so hilariously exaggerated, and you seem to think that it's a passable lie probably due to very little social interaction in the real world.

You're so deluded, I didn't claim to have all this money, I said when working with games I earned some good money from royalities then it struck a nastty chord with a bunch of failed gamers like you.

And the fact that you PUBLICALLY state that just becuase I could of of afforded a computer but didn't means I am lying is even more hilarious and insight into your paranoid and delusioned mind.

I used the computers from work to use the net and the odd lan cafe to play quake as I was a very casual player of Quake 3.

Your theories which you hold on to so tightly are so easily dispersed with basic reasoning and logic it really does make you wonder what is going on.

I would like an ipad, doesn't mean I'm going to go out and spend 500 quid on for the novelty.

I would like a top of the range SLR, I can afford one, it doesn't mean I am going to go out and buy one.

A good pc from that time was around 1000 pound, given I had access to top of the range pc's and work and fast connection, why would I blow a grand on dialup and computer for a game at the time I had a casual interest.

When I got more into the game, I bought a pc.

Honestly, you are so easy to dispell with basic common sense.

You're so deluded, I didn't claim to have all this money, I said when working with games I earned some good money from royalities then it struck a nastty chord with a bunch of failed gamers like you.

None of us cared about it, until you tried to use it as justification as to why you were right in conversations. "OH YEAH, WELL I KNOW BETTER BECAUSE I USED TO WORK AT RARE!" Since you couldn't hold a proper discussion, I simply decided to attack what you were trying to use as a logical fallacy. As it turned out, none of your stories even add up.

And the fact that you PUBLICALLY state that just becuase I could of of afforded a computer but didn't means I am lying is even more hilarious and insight into your paranoid and delusioned mind.

For someone who claims to have been around the PC scene for several years before he owned a computer, when he apparently had enough money to own a computer, what am I supposed to think? Either A) you're lying about how long you've been around, or B) you're lying about how much money you have. As it turns out, the positions you claim to have had at Rare were all very minor positions, and would have paid you nearly minimum wage.

I would like an ipad, doesn't mean I'm going to go out and spend 500 quid on for the novelty.

If I want an ipad, I just go buy an ipad. I'm not rich.

A good pc from that time was around 1000 pound, given I had access to top of the range pc's and work and fast connection, why would I blow a grand on dialup and computer for a game at the time I had a casual interest.

You didn't need a good PC to post on a forum, which is pretty much your entire life.

When I got more into the game, I bought a pc.

So you bought a game for Quake, practiced it, and never managed to do more with that investment than losing hardcore at an ESR meetup?

I would say a professional game designer is likely to know more when arguing on game design related topic than a random gamer yes. That goes for pretty much anyone in any profession.
You just can't deal with it becuase most gamers think they know everything, but you have NOTHING to show for your expertise other than a few thousand comments and a few level 70 characters.

I have already shown how stupid your logic is for accusing me of lying about a pc, you can't comprehnd that becuase I had a casual interest in a game on a pc I did not buy one so I must be lying.
You're quite clearly and nuts and I'm glad you've dumped that logic so everyone can see.

"You didn't need a good PC to post on a forum, which is pretty much your entire life."

Why would I buy pc just to post online when I can post from work?
if you check my account from 2002 you will see it only has around 200 posts. Like I said, CASUAL INTEREST does not warrant buying a peice of equipment, especially when I can use the equipment provided at work.

So once again, every point you have said has been successful destroyed and turned into dust.

I would say a professional game designer is likely to know more when arguing on game design related topic than a random gamer yes.

This is an appeal to authority argument, and has no place in a real discussion. You don't even follow your own argument, since you don't respect the CPM team.

You just can't deal with it becuase most gamers think they know everything, but you have NOTHING to show for your expertise other than a few thousand comments and a few level 70 characters.

So argue the point, don't just say "NO UR WRONG, I KNO, I WAS AT TEH >>> RARE!" You ended all your arguments with this, and upon inspecting the invalid claim, it turned out that it was a lie anyway.

I have already shown how stupid your logic is for accusing me of lying about a pc, you can't comprehnd that becuase I had a casual interest in a game on a pc I did not buy one so I must be lying.

I didn't say that you lied about a PC, I said that you lied about your job. Your timeline and justification for using ESR is also either confused, or a lie.

Why would I buy pc just to post online when I can post from work?

Why would you use a work PC to post online for a topic that you had no interest? You were a game tester, anyway.

if you check my account from 2002 you will see it only has around 200 posts.

Try 1000, not counting your various other accounts - at least 1 post per day.

I did bad at the event as my keyboard broke in transit and as it ws a custom job, it was impossible to replace, I had no warmup and my first game was against the #1 seed.

You mean the keyboard with a few broken buttons near the arrow keys? There was nothing about that keyboard that would stop you from playing, especially if you just used a new keyboard. You lost, and that's all there is to it. Knowing you, the damage was on purpose in order to avoid playing.

B) Was invited off the backbone of taking a dutch national quake 3 player into sudden death in quake 4 several weeks earlier, with little more than a years worth of play on Doom 3.

http://www.esreality.com/index.php?a=post&id=924213

You mean that game? Both of you were bad, but you lost both games. 9-8 one game, and 19-5 the other. Despite putting all that effort into Doom 3 and Quake 4, you have nothing to show for it. You never attended a tournament, and you never even played in any online tournaments.

While your at it, apply your logic to me not owning a Pc and you should come to the conclusion using your own logic that you were not good to work with games becuase if you put all that time and effort into it then it must mean that you wanted to work with them.

I never "worked with games".

Please contain your rage replies to one post.

LOL, the CPM team, that's exactly the same as a professional development team!

That kinda encapsualtes your reasoning power and outlook on everything.

Let's see... they developed a game, and you haven't. Your own logical fallacy is that their word is worth more than yours.

The appeal to authority argument IS invalid, so you're right to disagree with it. If you're going to disagree with it, stop using it.

I did bad at the event as my keyboard broke in transit and as it ws a custom job, it was impossible to replace, I had no warmup and my first game was against the #1 seed.

You forget that I was..

A) Invited

B) Was invited off the backbone of taking a dutch national quake 3 player into sudden death in quake 4 several weeks earlier, with little more than a years worth of play on Doom 3.

If you want to talk about waste, why don't you add up all those hours you put into playing and talking about games, then tell the world how you've done nothing.

While your at it, apply your logic to me not owning a Pc and you should come to the conclusion using your own logic that you were not good to work with games becuase if you put all that time and effort into it then it must mean that you wanted to work with them.

:) That's the problem with using broken logic, you either get pulled apart or it gets used against you.

insert more brains to continue....

Hold on a second, let's just do a test?

Go and find a quote where I said I masterd all sorts of games and then we can see what games and system they are on?

"The specific comment was in relation to the response by tourist, pointing out how silly your lies get"

And the comment tourist made was a sarcastic exxageration on what I actually said, you actually took his words as mine you plank.

its like me saying oh you have a private jet and yacht, then someone else seriously trying to condem YOU for saything those things that I said in a sarcastic fashion about you.

Oh man, what a disaster you are and then you're talking to me about social interaction. HAHA.

No, I didn't take his words as yours. I took your words as yours. We were just pointing out how silly all of your comments are.

No, he like you are part of a damaged cult of gamers online who try to make their own reality when they hear things they do not like which they find easy to do from all the time they spend playing games and finding people just like them to fascililitate their deluded existence.

/FIXED.

Until evidence is provided for a claim, that claim is not reality.

But neither is it a lie either :)

So by your logic, nothing should be said that unless it can be proven, and that simply is not normal social conduct.

You only doubt what I say because you're insecure that it gives me an unspoken rank over you, in every other demographic a professional in anything would be more credible than someone like you who is nothing more than a casual observer.

You simply can't handle that because you invested so much time in this world, the only people who live in a world where they doubt everything are paranoid little gamers like you.

So by your logic, nothing should be said that unless it can be proven, and that simply is not normal social conduct.

It's only 'not normal social conduct' for the religious.

You only doubt what I say because you're insecure that it gives me an unspoken rank over you,

No, I doubt what you say because you use it as a logical fallacy, and because your story doesn't even add up for your logical fallacy. The only reason I even decided to check your claim was because you refuse to have a real conversation, and not surprisingly, your claim didn't even check out.

You're mad because you can't use it as your 'get out of conversation free' card anymore. It might have worked on lesser sites, or on idiots in real life, but you're out of options here.

Oh so you checked me out and proved I was lying, haha, so now I know you know you're lying to yourself, and everyone here and you're a stalker too. :)

If I'm out of options then why are you now the one that needs to prove something to me and everyone else?

So if my claim did not check out then what proof do you have that my claim did not check out?

Or did you just do that thing you do when you lie to people about one of your beliefs and try and mask a good old disagreement as a lie, as you did with the John Romero thread?

http://www.esreality.com/files/misc/2011/8203...d-liar.swf

Time to avoid the main issue and move the goalposts again?

Oh so you checked me out and proved I was lying, haha, so now I know you know you're lying to yourself, and everyone here and you're a stalker too. :)

I checked you out to prove your logical fallacy wrong, so that you would stop using it. You didn't, though - because it's all you have. You are simply incapable of real conversation.

Yes we get the part where you CLAIM to have checked me out, what we don't get is why you're not posting the proof of that claim?

What claim are you talking about aswell?

Vedic, where is your proof, are you doing that thing again where you think you're right, and so you assume the other person is lying, and that person is supposed to be scared of your hilarious, open ended implications?

you said....

"your claim didn't even check out"

So what claim and where is your proof that it did not check out?

Yes we get the part where you CLAIM to have checked me out, what we don't get is why you're not posting the proof of that claim?

What proof? There was NO EVIDENCE to be found to support your claims. None. The little that we have found about Jamie Williams seems to contradict almost everything that you have said.

So what claim and where is your proof that it did not check out?

Not my claims, your claims. Evidence thus far does not support your claims in any way, shape, or form.

"You are simply incapable of real conversation."

http://www.esreality.com/files/misc/2011/8203...d-liar.swf (Clickable)

Didn't you' start talking in different languages, binary and morse code in this thread when I asked for nothing more than your apparent source to your claim when I found romero said the opposite of what I said.

Which part of those actions was a real conversation?

But let's keep it to one ownage at a time?

Vedic, where is this new found proof you claim?
And what is this claim? Sound exciting...

Vedic, where is this new found proof you claim?

It is your claim, not mine. You have yet to provide any evidence to support the fact that you are, in fact, the same Jamie Williams from Rare - or even that you are named Jamie Williams. Furthermore, Jamie Williams is credited to many things that you claim are wrong, or that are simply impossible due to your age. You have provided no evidence that any of the sources with this information are wrong. Finally, we can tell by the positions that Jamie Williams has been in that he was making very little money, despite your claims that you made 6 figures.

Feel free to actually provide any evidence for... well, anything.

By your own words...

"Until evidence is provided for a claim, that claim is not reality. " -Vedic

And what have you provided? Nothing, so on the one hand you wish to use the priciple of no proof = no reallity for me.

But when it comes to you no proof = reality for you.

As for the sources like IMDB/MOBYGAMES, it was only AFTER I posted those casual sources on ESREALITY did they become contaminated even going against chronological order, where a game entry from 1987 was added in 2008.

You must have really wanted to do something with games :)

And what have you provided? Nothing, so on the one hand you wish to use the priciple of no proof = no reallity for me.

You are the one making the claim. I don't provide evidence for your claims, you do.

As for the sources like IMDB/MOBYGAMES, it was only AFTER I posted those casual sources on ESREALITY did they become contaminated even going against chronological order, where a game entry from 1987 was added in 2008.

None of them are evidence of any claim that you have made. They are information on Jamie Williams, who you may or may not be. The only thing we can get from them is that your stories do not add up with any of the publicly available information on Jamie Williams.

All of this is ignoring the fact that you have provided no evidence for even having the same name as Jamie Williams, let alone being the same one from Rare.

Are you ready to provide evidence yet, or just more excuses why you don't want to?

Let me break it down for you as you're obviously a victim of the videogame world.

If someone talks about their life its not a claim, its perceived a claim to you becuae those claims make you feel insecure about your own life or achievments or lackof. To everyone else I talk to (not a deluded bunch of wasters who live in their own little digital world) they see oh cool, well done. These are normal people who unlike you are not bound by paranoia or childish speculation stemmed from spending your life interacting with people just like you in some far away server.

This is not a murder trial, I don't have to prove anything, I will continue to talk about my life as I see fit, if you choose to try throw a spanner in the works, that's up to you, becuae its you that's making a fool of himself and the demographic and site you choose to talk on.

You may continue to dump your broken logic for the world to see.
I'm making universal sense in what I say, you're not.
your logic casts potential doubt on nearly everyone. Mine doesn't.

If someone talks about their life its not a claim, its perceived a claim to you becuae those claims make you feel insecure about your own life or achievments or lackof.

You didn't just speak about your life, you used it as an arguing point. You are incapable of arguing your side, so you use the appeal to authority argument.

These are normal people who unlike you are not bound by paranoia or childish speculation stemmed from spending your life interacting with people just like you in some far away server.

"Normal people" are capable of discussing a topic, rather than just trying to "win".

This is not a murder trial, I don't have to prove anything, I will continue to talk about my life as I see fit, if you choose to try throw a spanner in the works, that's up to you, becuae its you that's making a fool of himself and the demographic and site you choose to talk on.

You're free to speak about it as much as you want, but as soon as you want to bring it into a discussion as an arguing point, don't be surprised when people point out that it's invalid.

your logic casts potential doubt on nearly everyone. Mine doesn't.

It's not about WHAT you do, it's about how you try to use it in an argument. Nobody here cares how successful, or unsuccessful, you have been. If you want to discuss a topic, discuss it without dishonest arguments. The only reason anyone even bothered attacking your "life" was because you refused to use any other argument. It's just an added bonus that you were lying about it all, because it really shows how desperate you are.

Once again, how can it be dishonest if you have no proof I am being dishonest?

Yet your whole basis for accusing me of lying IS BECAUSE I have not posted proof. So using your own "logic" and "reasoning" you must be wrong and lying also. because YOU have not posted proof either....No-you don't like that, well that's the logic you're using for me, so right back at you :)

Face the facts, you don't add up, your logic or lackof encapsualtes potentially everyone here not just me. you would be laughed out of any serious place of debate with that logic.

If someone does not post proof of something you demand, they are liars, but if you do not post proof, you are not a liar and are correct.

That's bat shit crazy. Right there.

Once again, how can it be dishonest if you have no proof I am being dishonest?

We have no proof that you are being honest.

Yet your whole basis for accusing me of lying IS BECAUSE I have not posted proof.

No, your claims merely conflict with the publicly available information we have on Jamie Williams. Even if your claims matched up, you still have yet to provide any evidence that you are Jamie Williams.

Face the facts, you don't add up, your logic or lackof encapsualtes potentially everyone here not just me. you would be laughed out of any serious place of debate with that logic.

A debate requires discussion, based on evidence. Thus far, you have provided no evidence. This does not "encapsualte" everyone, because most rational people don't try to use an appeal to authority argument.

If someone does not post proof of something you demand, they are liars, but if you do not post proof, you are not a liar and are correct.

No, someone is a liar if their claims do not match up with the evidence. Your claims conflict with what we do know of Jamie Williams, and you have yet to even offer any evidence that you ARE Jamie Williams.

"We have no proof that you are being honest."

You have not proof I am being dishonest. We do however have proof that you "logic" you use to accuse me of lying you are using to prove you are right. Amazing!

"No, your claims merely conflict with the publicly available information we have on Jamie Williams. Even if your claims matched up, you still have yet to provide any evidence that you are Jamie Williams."

No, when i posted that information it was correct, it was only AFTER I posted it on ESR were BOTH<<< those sources contamined. Its all there to see with web archive.

(http://www.archive.org/web/web.php)

http://www.mobygames.com/developer/sheet/view/developerId,61249/

&

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1844015/

And yes I know some of you are like that...
http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2187185#pid2187185


"A debate requires discussion, based on evidence."

No it does not, people talk about things all the time that are potentially untrue if scrutunised to a level where no one believes anything unless they have proof, this is just you spending all your life hanging out with paranoid nerds and having no real life rooting in reality. It just so happens that my claimed credentials unsettle you.

No, someone is a liar if their claims do not match up with the evidence. Your claims conflict with what we do know of Jamie Williams, and you have yet to even offer any evidence that you ARE Jamie Williams.

If you had evidence you would have posted it here, your only evidence seems to be the mobygames and IMDB records, BOTH of which were contaminaed AFTER I had posted them on ESR as a light reference, and BOTH of which were originally for the guy who worked on perfect dark.

Also if you check those records even today on moby games, you will see that..

Banjo-Kazooie (1998), Nintendo of America Inc.
Heart of Darkness (1998), Ocean Software Ltd.
Blast Corps (1997), Nintendo Co., Ltd.

So the guy left rare to work on an ocen game, then rejoined the company?

Its obviously two different people, but before I posted that link online, the earliest entry was 1996, not 1987.

Face the facts, every single reply I made pointed out the holes in your discussion, all you do is recycle your flawed logic for me to point out again and again.

You say I am a liar becaue I posted no proof, but you have neither. I can prove both records were altered afte I posted here and readers here have shown they are prepared to contaminate proof http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2187185#pid2187185

You say the evidence you checked out does not add up, but it DOES add up BEFORE I posted it on ESR if you use the archive tool, then you see that both entries were mysteriosuly changed, I guess those sites never thought people like you would exist.

I can keep on pointing out the holes in your logic all day, my counterpoints correct you, your counterpoints merely provide more holes for me to correct you.

People will come to their own conclusions for you based on that pricniple of seeing everything you write being shot down as its never airtight, but you seem to think it is...

You have not proof I am being dishonest. We do however have proof that you "logic" you use to accuse me of lying you are using to prove you are right. Amazing!

You seem to be having trouble with this whole "claim" concept. You made the claim, and you have no evidence for it. What little information we have on Jamie Williams contradicts your claims, yet you have no evidence otherwise.

No, when i posted that information it was correct, it was only AFTER I posted it on ESR were BOTH<<< those sources contamined. Its all there to see with web archive.

Really? Where is your comment on ESR to back up your story? We instantly replied to you when you linked to IMDB to point out that it contradicted you.

No it does not, people talk about things all the time that are potentially untrue

That's not a debate, that's an argument.

If you had evidence you would have posted it here, your only evidence seems to be the mobygames and IMDB records, BOTH of which were contaminaed AFTER I had posted them on ESR as a light reference, and BOTH of which were originally for the guy who worked on perfect dark.

What does that have to do with you? These are possible things that could be argued about Jamie Williams, if you had evidence to contradict any of these sites. You have yet to provide any evidence that the sites are wrong, and you have yet to provide evidence that you are Jamie Williams. All we have are wild claims by you, that do not add up with these sites, or even the positions that Jamie Williams is credited to in the games you spoke of.

o the guy left rare to work on an ocen game, then rejoined the company?

Why would he have to leave? Game testing is not a full season job.

You say I am a liar becaue I posted no proof, but you have neither.

No, I say you are a liar because your claims contradict what we already know about Jamie Williams. I don't need to prove anything, since these are your claims. They don't match up with reality.

"That's not a debate, that's an argument."

Finally, I see no point is having any form of conversation on fine issues with someone who doesn't even know the difference between a debate and a argument. BUT THINKS THEY DO...

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/debate

Finally, I see no point is having any form of conversation on fine issues with someone who doesn't even know the difference between a debate and a argument. BUT THINKS THEY DO...

A debate is a formal argument. An argument from authority has no place in a debate, as it is a dishonest attack of desperation. You cease to be debating, and you are merely arguing.

You're only capable of a conversation (albeit hostile), since you don't respect, or understand, how to debate.

Original mobygames before i posted on ESR and upset people like you.

http://web.archive.org/web/20060306171505/htt...rId,61249/

Current version.

http://www.mobygames.com/developer/sheet/view/developerId,61249/

Note..

A) A game has been added to 1987, which you're now using as proof of my age being wrong. So why would these records originally be correct in chronological order, then when posted on here someone adds an entry for a game in 1987, 21 years later.

B) Also note in 1998 (Heart Darkness) was a french developer, while the other guy was at rare |(UK). And the bio is for the guy at rare.

It was inaccurate AFTER I POSTED. Deal with your delusions.

Not proof no, but you can't deny that its hugely dubious that that source got contaminated. With really old entries to sustain your age point 21 years after that game in 87 was released and after it was posted on ESR.

And like I said above, we've alreadt seen people vouching to have seen a photo I posted as something they had seen elsehwere, so we know some of you are that lost as people.
http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2187185#pid2187185

My advice would be to take your head out trolling, playing games and downloading files and maybe apply yourself a bit better.

Original mobygames before i posted on ESR and upset people like you.

Where is your post on ESR? You say it was before, yet we replied to you instantly after you quoted them.

A) A game has been added to 1987, which you're now using as proof of my age being wrong. So why would these records originally be correct in chronological order, then when posted on here someone adds an entry for a game in 1987, 21 years later.

If they were correct previously, and are "incorrect" now, how can we trust that they were correct before? You can't have it both ways. It's your word against theirs, until you have evidence.

B) Also note in 1998 (Heart Darkness) was a french developer, while the other guy was at rare |(UK). And the bio is for the guy at rare.

Game tester. It's not a stay-on position, and is often out-sourced.

Not proof no, but...

That's where you should have stopped, deleted your post, and came back with actual proof. Thanks for pointing it out how bad your argument is in advance, as it saved me some time.

As you can see from drexs post, there was NO ONE ELSE on the list at that time. Its only AFTER I posted it on ESR was it changed.
And I have worked with games up until 2005, just not credited.
Exlcuding re-realease on xbox arcade.

"Where is your post on ESR? You say it was before, yet we replied to you instantly after you quoted them." -Vedic

http://picturepush.com/public/7065005

You made a boo boo. Again.

they were correct before becuase if you check the credits for every game that was on the list, you will see that person was on that game, which is why I also posted the IMDB link too, becuase these are collected by other people.

You go on to say game testers are not a stay on postion, and then in the same sentence you say its often out sourced.
How conclusive!

It appears your ego can handle me as tester, but if you look at the credits of those games, the person you called a tester was then on a design role on perfect dark. It even says in the credits, "manic Welsh Designer" and IMDB even has him under a design role. While the majority of credits are joke types, you will see the testers are all grouped under their own heading, where mysteriosuly that person is no longer there. But in a design roles instead. Its called a promotion.

If I came back with actual proof you would just deny it.
"It was photshopped", in fact we've seen that aspect of some of you already claiming my MX pic was on reddit, no link though, besides the image is encrypted, so anyone who claims its not mine is in for a fun time. Any takers? didn't think so.

I don't care if you believe or not, that is why I have not pushed anymore info out there as I'm not sure I would respect myself, just pointing out the holes in your logic, and how the principles of what you are saying cast doubt on anyone and everyone reading this if they ever come across someone like you.

You may also read an interview of me on this site.
http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=979724

Oh wait, that was a lie too right. Haha.

"I was sponsored by Trocadero/London back in the 90’s to play…

Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo"

Here is me vs the evo world champion in 2009.
http://www.esreality.com/files/placeimages/20...VsAfro.jpg

A little of me playing KI in an interesting way.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yI0jbMKrO3c

Its funny because the whole point of what you're doing is to discredit someone who you can't handle, and all the while you're making me more known and cementing your idiocy for future net-nerds just like you to learn from.

That's why I'm doing it :)

they were correct before becuase if you check the credits for every game that was on the list, you will see that person was on that game, which is why I also posted the IMDB link too, becuase these are collected by other people.

Funny, I don't see the IMDB link there. You're going on a tangent now. Do you have the post where you brought up IMDB, or not?

You go on to say game testers are not a stay on postion, and then in the same sentence you say its often out sourced.

... what? Much of game testing is done by third parties, and you can do so when it opens up, much like signing up for a scientific study. If you were Jamie Williams, you'd know this, since that was his job.

It appears your ego can handle me as tester, but if you look at the credits of those games, the person you called a tester was then on a design role on perfect dark.

We already went over the joke credits in Perfect Dark.

If I came back with actual proof you would just deny it.

What actual proof?

"It was photshopped", in fact we've seen that aspect of some of you already claiming my MX pic was on reddit

What? I didn't say anything about reddit.

I don't care if you believe or not, that is why I have not pushed anymore info out there as I'm not sure I would respect myself, just pointing out the holes in your logic, and how the principles of what you are saying cast doubt on anyone and everyone reading this if they ever come across someone like you.

If you don't care that I believe it, why are you trying so hard to get me to believe it? Why are you going out of your way to post anything but real proof? You've spent a dozen replies telling me why you don't want to post proof, and why you shouldn't have to. You obviously WANT me to believe you, because you think that it will validate your position. It doesn't.

Here is me vs the evo world champion in 2009.

Really? I don't see a "James Williams" placing in any Street Fighter tournament... ever. Why did you decline to play me, if you can beat the world champion?

A little of me playing KI in an interesting way.

Grats on beating the computer.

Its funny because the whole point of what you're doing is to discredit someone who you can't handle, and all the while you're making me more known and cementing your idiocy for future net-nerds just like you to learn from.

That's the worst part - there is nothing to discredit. Who you are has nothing to do with how invalid your arguments are, but you always fall back on it as an arguing point. If you just fess up that you're a poor, lonely, McDonalds worker, you can move on. You can try to actually learn to discuss things with people, without having to lie about your past in order to "win" an internet argument. I won't hold my breath, though.

I haven't read what you guys wrote but there's a saying I think applies here, "You can't remove something with reason that wasn't put there by reason in the first place."

FAIL #1

You mentioned mobygames, the web archive only goes back to 2005 for IMDB, if I was lying why would I not pretend to be a VFX supremo who made the transition from Videogames to the VFX industry as tech director on irobots. Regardless the PD one was there first in 2000.

Face it, your accusation of lies do not stack up. On the one hand I am a fantasist trying to take credit for someone else, but when there is an opportunity to take credit for a more impressive role, I say its not me. Interesting. Hey what unfounded variable you thinking, reverse psychology would be go a good one to go with. yeah I would go with that.

FAIL #2

As for testers, yes some are some ar not, this is why Jamie Williams is telling you testers at rare were fulltime.


FAIL #3

We already went over the joke credits in Perfect Dark.

Yes, but when one says "Manic Welsh Designer" it don't take a genius to work out its not a testing postion, especially as all the testers are grouped under one heading and their names are all consistent with testing roles in other games.

FAIL #4

If I came back with actual proof you would just deny it.
What actual proof?

I said IF.

FAIL #5 (This is 5th consecutive public mistake you've made)

"It was photshopped", in fact we've seen that aspect of some of you already claiming my MX pic was on reddit
What? I didn't say anything about reddit.

I said some of you, not you. Your self obsession is now comical.

FAIL #6)

If you don't care that I believe it, why are you trying so hard to get me to believe it?

Another insight into your one sided logic, if what you said were true then you've encapsualted yourself with your own logic.

I'm not trying to prove it because I haven't. I'm making a point and leading you down the garden path before I make this your legacy, oh and don't think hiding behind an alias will help, cos I already have the LAN REG details from the 04/05 qcon database, so I know exactly who I am dealing with and unliek you I do share aspects of my real life while you think you live behind an untouchable alias with no consequences because if the worse comes to the worse, you'll change your nick.

FAIL #7

No, I want you and people like you to keep making fools of yourself before the plug is pulled and I get the hall of fame award.
I'm a man of principle's you're damaged goods who needs a reality check. All in good time.

FAIL #8

Here is me vs the evo world champion in 2009.
Really? I don't see a "James Williams" placing in any Street Fighter tournament... ever. Why did you decline to play me, if you can beat the world champion?

I never declined to play you or offered as it would be pointless for you (are you not some marvel scrub), all the big tourneys were in the USA, tourney or not, you don't lose by a pixel to this guy if you're not good and I was posting it to coincide with my interview.

FAIL #9
A little of me playing KI in an interesting way.
Grats on beating the computer.

In a way which has never been seen or done before even when I posted it online 3 years ago, again, more of a link to the info on my interview.

That's the worst part - there is nothing to discredit.

Shortly before you then try and discredit me with your usual repotorie of pitchy insults most of which are a projection of your life and your obligatory Mc D's comments.

Doing what you do you can deny pretty much anyone, so I don't take offence, I just think you need help and I'm going to ensure you get it :).

Proof or not, the bottom line is I am more convinving than you, which isn't saying much, but as long as you're willing to make a fool of yourself even more, I am happy to keep feeding you rope.

It can be your legacy to the online world. Similar to how schools invite in reformed convincts to teach children not to be like them :)

You mentioned mobygames

Where?

if I was lying why would I not pretend to be a VFX supremo who made the transition from Videogames to the VFX industry as tech director on irobots.

Obviously because they don't match up with the lies that you've already told.

As for testers, yes some are some ar not, this is why Jamie Williams is telling you testers at rare were fulltime.

What does that have to do with anything? He was obviously doing game testing, and the other companies you said that he worked at could easily have been third party.

I said IF.

What proof could you provide? If your provided proof, it couldn't be denied. If you provide vague details that don't actually prove anything, of course I wouldn't trust it.

Yes, but when one says "Manic Welsh Designer" it don't take a genius to work out its not a testing postion, especially as all the testers are grouped under one heading and their names are all consistent with testing roles in other games.

There's no way to know WHAT the position is, but we know that EVERY other position Jamie Williams had was a game tester. Feel free to contact Rare and have them clear it up.

I said some of you, not you. Your self obsession is now comical.

So why bring it up?

I'm not trying to prove it because I haven't.

Why do you keep trying to validate your position by linking to sites like IMDB and mobygames, and why do you keep trying to explain why your stories don't make sense? You're trying to prove it without proof, but you're still trying to prove it.

No, I want you and people like you to keep making fools of yourself before the plug is pulled and I get the hall of fame award.

You just said that I wouldn't trust any proof that you post, so which is it? Do you have said proof that you could post, or do you not? Since you seem to be saying that you do, and that you're waiting to post it, your excuse that I wouldn't trust the evidence seems to be falling apart.

I never declined to play you or offered as it would be pointless for you (are you not some marvel scrub), all the big tourneys were in the USA, tourney or not, you don't lose by a pixel to this guy if you're not good and I was posting it to coincide with my interview.

I see a screenshot of a game with no proof that this is the person you claim that it is. I notice that, despite all your time spent playing fighting games, there isn't a single tournament in any fighting game that you have placed in - most certainly not any of worthy skill. You're afraid of a "marvel scrub", so what chance do you have against a real player?

In a way which has never been seen or done before even when I posted it online 3 years ago, again, more of a link to the info on my interview.

... because nobody would want to. It's like being the best at rock, paper, scissors.

Proof or not

Not. The answer is, "not". No proof. Not now, not ever.

Continued Fails..

ME: You mentioned mobygames
YOU: Where?

"Original mobygames before i posted on ESR and upset people like you.

Obviously because they don't match up with the lies that you've already told.

Oh so I'm telling truth when it suits you and can be consistent with the truth (stemmed from the initial lie) when it suits you. ok usa.

Rare were an exclusive Nintedo developer with a small full time testing department (see 3rd party link above). Once again, your lack of insight into the issues you try to talk about become apparent which is why instead of offering any firm answers your replies are nothing more than could be's. And even then they are not even that when verfied.

Proof is subjective, you have a natural bias to disbelieve because it upsets you ego, if I was a plumber or an electrician, you would not care, its only because its something which you feel gives me an external rank over you in the one demographic you were comfy in in life, is it so.

This isn't a murder trial, if you need 100% proof to belive someone, its up to, becuase you're the one trying to push it without unfounded facts, while I am simply poining out the holes in that logic and talking about aspects of my life which you refuse to belive because I suspect you amounted to nothing.

I would say if a title had manic welsh designer in it, most non retarded delusional people would probably say its design related . Especially as that very same person who you admitted was a tester was not in the testing credits on this game or any other future game.

Why do you keep trying to validate your position by linking to sites like IMDB and mobygames, and why do you keep trying to explain why your stories don't make sense? You're trying to prove it without proof, but you're still trying to prove it.

Do CTRL+F and type in "rare" unsurprisingly it was you that brought it up yet again,I am not proving anything, same as millions of other people do no prove anything when they talk about thier life and experiences.


You just said that I wouldn't trust any proof that you post, so which is it? Do you have said proof that you could post, or do you not? Since you seem to be saying that you do, and that you're waiting to post it, your excuse that I wouldn't trust the evidence seems to be falling apart.

There is more on than route through nevada.

I see a screenshot of a game with no proof that this is the person you claim that it is. I notice that, despite all your time spent playing fighting games, there isn't a single tournament in any fighting game that you have placed in - most certainly not any of worthy skill. You're afraid of a "marvel scrub", so what chance do you have against a real player?

Oh right, it was a fake. Ok. haha. Note the bit that what I said that even if I did post proof you would deny it. If I run to within a second of the fastest 100 meter time in the world, nobody is going to say I'm slow cos I didn't do it at the olympics, but like I said, you would deny it anyway. As you've alrady indicated.

... because nobody would want to. It's like being the best at rock, paper, scissors.

There are 1000's of players who upload videos of the game and its one of the best recalled old school fighters, once again, your opinion is unfounded, only laced with your usual manic depressive dim, doubting outlook to get you through the day.
I guess 28,000+ people who saw it think otherwise.

Not. The answer is, "not". No proof. Not now, not ever.

Few people post proof of their lives when they talk about it, it doesn't mean they are lying. It just means your're a paranoid child *stuck in mans body) who instead of making a life for yourself in the one area you always wanted you try to get by on knocking everyhinng and everyone that reminds you of you.

Obviously because they don't match up with the lies that you've already told.

You just quoted yourself. I said that you posted your IMDB link when IMDB had all the information that you said was incorrect. Keep digging that hole.

Rare were an exclusive Nintedo developer with a small full time testing department

While we don't know if they also did third party testing, it does not stop the OTHER company from being third party, and it's most certainly not a full time position in any case.

Do CTRL+F and type in "rare" unsurprisingly it was you that brought it up yet again,I am not proving anything, same as millions of other people do no prove anything when they talk about thier life and experiences.

You don't have to use Rare in a sentence. You've now attempted to prove another lie without proof by posting a picture of a child on a bike.

Proof is subjective

If proof isn't objective, it isn't proof.

There is more on than route through nevada.

So you have many ways that you can prove it? Then what of me not believing them? Unless you have "proof" that is easily dismissed, what good is waiting on it? I'll laugh at it when you do, just as much as I laugh at you now, but you will no longer be able to lie about it. You could just do that now, or admit that you were lying, and you can move past this.

I would say if a title had manic welsh designer in it, most non retarded delusional people would probably say its design related . Especially as that very same person who you admitted was a tester was not in the testing credits on this game or any other future game.

They are joke credits, and only Rare can tell us the real positions. Again, since you say that you worked there, you'll have no problem getting them to verify your story. Additionally, while you're at it, why not phone up IMDB and have them fix the credits?

This isn't a murder trial, if you need 100% proof to belive someone

100%? You haven't provided any proof. None. It's like you being charged with murder, having your story not add up, having absolutely no evidence to support your story, and then having your closing argument "NO, YOU GUYS ARE WRONG BECAUSE YOU ARE JEALOUS".

Oh right, it was a fake. Ok. haha. Note the bit that what I said that even if I did post proof you would deny it. If I run to within a second of the fastest 100 meter time in the world, nobody is going to say I'm slow cos I didn't do it at the olympics, but like I said, you would deny it anyway. As you've alrady indicated.

What proof? Anyone can name themselves anything, just as I can name a bot czm and take a screenshot of my victory in Q3. Do you have evidence that the person you were playing was actually who you say it was? ANY evidence? If I ask him, will he be able to validate your story? Again, you've spent so much time playing these fighting games, and what do you have to show for it? You have never placed in a single tournament. Not one.

There are 1000's of players who upload videos of the game

There are tens of thousands of players who uploaded videos of rock, paper, scissors. At least they play against real players.

Few people post proof of their lives when they talk about it, it doesn't mean they are lying.

It doesn't mean that you are telling the truth, either. In this case, your stories that don't add up with what we know are what make you the liar.

The only thing that IS ACTUALLY PROVEN is you seem to enjoy being critical and telling lies of Game Designers and making a fool of yourself denying ACTUAL PROOF with your petty tricks stemmed from your apparent belief that you're anonymous and wanting to be a part of things you only ever read from other people.

http://www.esreality.com/files/misc/2011/8203...d-liar.swf(Click .swf to see the same trend)

I already pulled you apart there and its shows a blueprint to how you operate. Its not good.

So until you can rectify your PROVEN case of lying about the merits of Game Designers, I'm afraid you've waived the right to offer a credible insight on the related matters.

Even google agrees :)
http://picturepush.com/public/7075034

When you can show you can be trusted to offer impartial views on your failed dreams, we'll look into putting you on a program where your opinions might carry more weight.

Please contain your rage to a single post.

http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2190658#pid2190658

You were wrong there too.

hah

holy shit thats awesome, the jamerio creature delivers again

http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/7025026/i...AMERIO.jpg

Indeed I do.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/580/ownedbyjamerio2.jpg/

I noticed you photoshopped something out so I tried to rectify it, its a bit sloppy but I corrected it pretty closely to the original!

You from turkyey right?
http://english.pravda.ru/science/mysteries/12...an_face-0/

You would probably hump it and then sell it at your kebab stall in the evening. Fresh!

LEAVE OUR SHEEP ALONE, WALES HAS ENOUGH

a turk plays quake, that's actually too inviting

You bad :)

haha thats a good one :)

What like a 7.2?

that is fkn brilliant : D

hahahahaha

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA I <3 JAMERIO

Laugh of my live XDXDXDXDXD Thanks dansen and definitely confirmed.

Please, no more Jamerio spam.

"hahaha this always astounds me with jamerio, he doesn't even try to tone it down to make it semi-believable. he just goes full retard, 300000 dollars, 500 medals, 10 baftas.."

This is my new greatest esr comment ever, or at least in the top3 :) I've got nothing against Jamerio, but this comment is soooo hilarious!!!11!

That's becaue I never said it and it was 500,000 dollars. Not 300,000.

500,000$,500medals,10baftas at the age of 4

It's an insult too call you a prodigy, deity is more suiting imo .Donating you my moneys as we speak

The medals and money is true.

The age and # of baftas is an inflated number made by someone else to deal with his own short comings.

I think they call it jealousy.

what a blender

Long time since I've seen Jamerio get owned by this many people in one thread.

I'm going through all of you like butter, just as I always have.

That'd explain your weight.

That doesn't even make sense...

Most genius Jamfatty-diss evar??? XD Have a plus!

If you read what I wrote and his response you would see it doesn't make sense.

But I get that I have some of you so highly whipped that you're gonna take every chance you get.

All it does is show me I got my bitches in check :)

lol whatever makes u feel better but u have to admit it was a funny twist on your words, whether it's true or not.

there's a difference between a twist and ringing its neck, picking out one word that suits the negative response you want to make and using it.

ringing it's neck would surely be wrong, you shouldn't ring youre massive intellect over it.

Oh here we go again, Jams butt hurts plenty I think.

Hey guys, I found something in my draw that I think would help your cause in proving me to be a liar about bikes too:)

http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/7025026/i...AMERIO.jpg

I'm so lucky to have such a healthy bunch of minds to help keep my fantasies under control!!

:)

how is a picture showing you on a bike supposed to help anyone prove you a liar about being able to ride a bike?

"how is a picture showing you on a bike supposed to help anyone prove you a liar about being able to ride a bike? "

HAHAHA. Best comment ever Oh man some of you people are so mentally ill, I shouldn't really, but I just can't help myself :)

your word against everyone else

and i think your full of shit

PROVE IT :&#268;

Its a picture of me riding a MX bike as kid you deluded tool.
It trumps you and your collective band of broken nerds who are bound by mutual contempt and undiagnosed personality disorders.

I just wanted you guys to lay down a few comments to show how nuts you are first.

So far i have seen one picture that i know is true, which is probably the only one and that kid looks nothing like you.

You mean the side on picture taken in 2006 vs the picture taken of me as child in 1986 in racing gear.

I'm not here to judge :)

Now try to look at your post from the eyes of someone who doesnt know you in real life and can only judge by your activity on esr.com only.

Nerdy 30something avg.skilled quaker guy with way to much time on his hands vs 500.000$ 10bafta prodigy

Really think about it. You can't run away from reason for ever.

And look it at from my point of view from someone who has done more with games than 99.9999% of people on this forum who are judging me based on their stupid ideals while they..

play videogames for hours on end.
Chat in irc for hours on end.
Watch TV for hours on end.
Post on facebook for hours on end.

(All of the above I seldom do as I'm running 3 small businesses)

BUT, becuase I averaged a whopping 4.5 posts a day on a website over a 10 yr period, that's suitable ground for defining me as someone who never does anything with his life.

face the facts, when I explain things they only highlight your stupid and flawed ideals :)

face the facts, when I explain things they only highlight your stupid and flawed ideals :)

Don't get defensive bro, it is what is is :>

This doesn't mean i don't like you. You provide a much needed service here on esreality.

Aww you look so cute. <3

awww kids are so cute.....before they grow up

then they get cuter?

Then they eat butter.

cutter your face with a mace, more like

I've got pictures of myself on skates from when i was three years old, doesn't mean I'm in the NHL by now.

No, but it doesn't mean you were not either.

Secondly, riding a pair of 10 dollar skates in the park which nearly every child has done in their lives, vs riding a MX bike in a sport that costs 1000's a year is little bit different given the expense, and commitment of going to real races as you will note by the tape in the background.

But if you were a pro skater good for you. See that's the difference of doing things in life, you don't need to get jealous over others.

Its only when you have a group of social lepers who escape to the internet and try and bend their own reality do you have a problem.

Did you know depressed people commit less suicide in times of recession because they feel better that other people are suffering too.

Lovely breed of people, and I'm going to train and educate them.

My point was your picture(s) doesn't really prove anything of what you've been claiming. :) Very few doubts the fact that you might've competed, alot of people doubt that you had won several hundred medals by the age of eight.

I looked closer at the dates and said by the age of 10 (which I already said). I also did BMX and counted them. MX/BMX.

Starting from the age 5, its actually more than possible over a 5-6 year period as they came in every week.

Its 20+ years ago!

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/580/ownedbyjamerio2.jpg/

here I post it again in case you missed it above.

73 comments, only 14 readable. Looks like ignored nerd rage.

Posting on ESR and pretending you're not a nerd.

Really?

Pot kettle black

why do you answer to that? he obviously has you on ignore...

I know he'll log out to check what I wrote.

he probably has you on ignore for a reason...

But if that were really the case he would not come on here trying to tell the people he had ignored that he has them on ignore.

HE CARES. I don't :)

lmao

Come on, tell us all. Why do you (jamerio) feel the need to explain everything all the time to these people that you feel are far below you? Losers/nerds/jealous/virgins/poor etc etc.
And for the record not everyone aspires to make video games or do anything in the computer industry just because they enjoy playing them for their intended use, FUN!

Simple, I'm educating a demographic of people that are in denial.
That's a worthwhile cause.

In denial of what?

reality.

Psychotherapists would find an awesome research case in you, my friend.

See what I mean.

:)
You go, Jamie!

This hypocrisy gig is getting old.

Actually the implications without defining them so they are impossible to reply against while you can imply you're right are getting old.

Nearly every coment on this thread apart from mine is riddled with holes.

yeah, your posts(especially this one) are just crystal clear.. you're quite the straight shooter.

You're doing it again :)
http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2188090#pid2188090

Thread on esr : 10 replies
Thread on esr where someone mentions Jamerio : 100 replies

yatwjmaoh

Where's the hnns btw?

please don't rage the hnns

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75ADI9p2wHY

I missed this

the roast of jamerio

tl:dr

wow