good for Strenx, i would say. :]

..and rapha

and me :D

Cool stuff. Just wish they could make them much lighter.

Sooo... are these still flawed?

waiting on the reviews to get posted on overclock.net still, they had ppl given mice to test and how they put out a pro version

http://www.overclock.net/t/1183274/kinzu-v2-kinzu-v2-pro-and-kana

what's the difference other than MORE COLORS and teflon feet?
(read: does it have the same sensor?)

According to that webpage, no.

They say its a different sensor - supposedly without the built-in accel

Sensor
Frames per sec: 3600
Inches per sec: 65
CPI: 3200
Lift distance: 2mm / .08in

If someone could explain the difference between the Kinzu V2 and the Kinzu V2 Pro that would be great though. I've lost track of this shit.

Pro has better microswitches and better mousefeet.

yea the v2 has the cheaper switches that could mean alot less clicks from all buttons than the "omron" of the pro version. So if you click alot or dont change mice constantly, pro should last longer and maybe feel better to press.

Are the prices are known yet? I don't see on the site. How much more expensive the pro version is?

who needs 100$ mice, when u can pwn with ballmouse like z4

Frames per sec: 3600
Inches per sec: 65

=

fail

Pixart sensor = fail! :<

Reading through the ocn thread I feel a little disappointment but I will wait for some reviews to judge. Why didn't they used the 1600cpi lense in the pro version? Would make sense imo.