Anyone can aim

Can *I* aim?

There's a lot of fluff and I do need to edit it a bit to make my points clearer, but I have to go to lectures soon. And yes, you can. As long as you have hands, and a brain.... (that works)

Cool braw thx for answer.

Can *madbringer* aim?

Does the pope shit in the woods?
































If he weren't dead, that is. :(

OMG POPE DIE IN 2005 UNRESPECT [*]

Now that's out of the way, I have another question:

Can matr0x aim?

To the most sound ninth percentile with yonder thrower of rail-slugs. )))

Thou should glance upon the highest left corner should the chance arise, good sire

Verily, a fit of hearty laughter has displaced my bottocks.

Why I believe tis a statement which henceforth reflects back on thouself!

Sir, thou hast forced me to retract my respect for thou post-haste!

I would like to proclaim Sir Krogoth as the comely maester

Thine statement put me in a peculiar state of agitation, akin to a Polish knave engaging in a spell of Quake the Third, revision one point thirty one.

Henceforth, please find a written statement of my dissatisfaction towards the monstrous distortion of the Queen's English, and the confusion between the verb "to meet" and the noun "meat". I am lost in the search for the punchline, and am inclined to ask whether there is a punchline at all, or have thee just mis-typed, Dear Cousin from Warsaw.

Sir, i do steadfastly believe thine confusion stems from the irrefutable fact that thou are, in fact, of intelligence quotient lower than the typical inhabitant of the Polish realm.

During the current state of affairs, I can only raise the query which attempts to question your reflection in regards to what the particular subject you are on about, since the topic at hand leaves me guessing

I was looking for a comment to work with but the only one i could find was the photoshop one, and the one that would fit contextually i used before. :@

A well orchestrated strategem, friend. Salut.

Well orchestrated indeed :@/

could you explain what claw, fingertip, and palm grip styles are?

claw i get (angry eagle holding mouse), palm is the "normal" grip of your average computer users, but fingertip i dont have a clear vision of.

http://www.google.ro/search?q=fingertip+mouse...mp;bih=612
n00b

u mad cuz u aimbot?

edit: but ty anyways. i have seen fingertip b4 but it looks so similar to claw that without additional data (such as vedic's post) i was unable to properly compute the varied aspects of each stylistic approach

why would aimbottin' make me mad?...:\

idk im not in the kkk

There is some disagreement on which one is which. Claw grip should be the actual "claw" shape you make from only having the very tips of your fingers touching the mouse. This style is best for very high sens play, and controls the mouse almost purely with the fingers. "Fingertip" (or "grip") still has the palm elevated above the mouse, with only your fingers touching the mouse. Movement is primarily controlled by the wrist, and it's good for medium to high sensitivity. Palm is, of course, resting on the mouse, and controlling the mouse almost purely through the arm. This is generally best for low sensitivity.

nothing really useful imo and by ur definitions I am a beginner aim wise (I don’t consistently hit at least 50% rail vs players in my level, duel wise)

at least u point some good mouses

trololololololol

i started to time items lately :D

good, c u at mega then... lets say... at 1:14 :p

i dont hit 50 rg as well :(

.

hey man I can't aim worth shit

Well, accuracies means really nothing due to spam, you can have +30 lg in every battle, but accuracy will show only 25 because of spam. Most good players spam a lot (Cooller, avek, cypher), others don't spam almost at all (k1llsen, strenx). Same goes with RG.

.

*but not like Daddy

Nice effort and some good info, next I think you should have a go at writing a guide that focuses more on the actual techniques and thought processes used in-game while aiming. It surprises me I've never seen (maybe there are some?) aiming guides before that focus on actual technique, after all as a kid I spent thousands upon thousands of hours in different sports purely being taught and training my technique.

I kind of feel the majority of players in quake and other FPS think they will eventually improve to their best just playing game after game, yet in the real world there is no sport that would ever take this approach to improvement.

.

anyone can aim:
lmgtfy.com/?q=qlhook

nuke :O

anyone can aim:
lmgtfy.com/?q=quakelive how to aim like a pro
lmgtfy.com/?q=quakelive aim skills
lmgtfy.com/?q=quakelive human skills
lmgtfy.com/?q=quakelive aim good
lmgtfy.com/?q=quakelive aim
lmgtfy.com/?q=quakelive human aim
lmgtfy.com/?q=quakelive smooth aim
lmgtfy.com/?q=quakelive aimbot

hacks / links to hack videos on utube on first page for all these terms gg, just shows how ez it is for noobs to find hax even w/o looking for them by name

Thanks for making it that little bit easier.

http://qkme.me/35vnmt


nice effort tho, claw grip for life ! (:P)

not anyone can aim. some people have better brains while others have shittier

k, shitty brain

little did you know i have one of the best aims in FPS, bro

this idiot thinks because he can shoot 70 acc on space maps vs noobs means he has good aim ahah what a joke this guy is

u must have a shitty brain then since ive never seen you shoot over 20 acc in anything

orly? http://www.quakelive.com/#!profile/summary/Je...fd90/ctf/1

why are you bragging about this? you only played for 2 minutes in and your team did all of the work. and its on a space map you fucking twat. rofl god ur such a shitty scrub and thanks for letting me know your current alt so i can report it to iD for ban evasion you scrubby fuck. i hope they ban your ISP this time.

do it, you jelly? wont they see its dutra reporting someone for ban evasion when you're the one who has had like 10+ accounts?

So to make up for a little of the trolling and bullshit I write here, I thought I'd try and do something helpful.

weak

mouse + not very high sense => done

or read How to Aim by tbone

I enjoyed Tbones post... I've played quake for too long and the more i play the more i think about my aim and thus I miss.. I find a good healthy week break and my stats go up.. but 2 days of constant play and it's down again :D FUCK STRENX

What is a beginner in terms of aim? Someone who can't hit (without spamming too much) at least 30% shaft and 50% rail with consistency against players of his skill level or below. A very good aimer will hit 35/55, and world class aimers will be able to hit 45/65 quite often.

Crap

Physical positioning and movement

That whole part is wrong too. Just because it's your objective opinion it doesn't necessarily mean it applies for everyone hence it's crap.

.

Not that I know off but I should see a doctor about my ADHD problem :o

Back on topic most people is still wrong or did you do a survey?

Your whole "guide" seems to be about lg/rg only. What about rl/plasma? I guess you don't need aim for that. At least in tdm/ctf :P

Btw. there aren't many who hit 50% rg in every duel hence they all suck at aiming :(

.

this guide was about rg/lg only because of what nargle believes is "raw aim".

aim is 90% positioning and movement except for the hitscan weapons in certain situations (because sometimes they simply can not be evaded), but even with those, setting up properly is more important than anything else, most of the time. if you play a game where you rely on "raw aim" a lot, you're doing it wrong, no matter the gametype.

that's also why his percentages seem to make no sense, a better way to do this (if you have to) would be to say hitting x percentage in a "perfect" situation, perfect as in: right distance to use said weapon, no obstructions aka. a shot you have to hit.
with those, good aim would probably mean 40% lg/ 60% rg with great aimers hitting 50/80 and above.

/e:
i also disagree on the part on grip styles. in no way does wrist aim mean your mouse should be at the edge of the pad or table.
you can play like that, but you lose the extra arm movement you could use when playing in the mid and just pivoting on your wrist joint. that's also what the players he mentioned are actually doing iirc.

I probably came off badly but at that moment I cba to gave a proper answer :x

aim is 90% positioning and movement except for the hitscan weapons in certain situations (because sometimes they simply can not be evaded), but even with those, setting up properly is more important than anything else, most of the time

I disagree. Imo (offensive) rockets require raw aim, too. Everyone can basicly hit +back rockets but there aren't many who can shred with rockets. I'm always puzzled when I see cyher doing it. The way he rapes people with rockets is just :o and I think it's rather raw aim than movement and positioning ;).Setting up a fight is very important tho especially in duel but imo raw aim allows you to fight in worse positions and gives you overall an edge over your opponent because you'll get unpredictable.

I'm not against guides and he gave some insightful hints but I just don't like it when someone says "most people" without any actual proof :O. Especially when some great high sens players put almost their whole lower arm on the table (stermy, cypher etc.). It would have been better if he had written about pros and cons about different arm positions, accel/no accel etc.

after this anyone can aim, even the limbless

.

such bullshit...

i mean u gave us, or the newbies, a lot of usefull informations, but it doesnt mean anyone can aim well...

you can see whos really good aimer if u put them in a position that doesnt give him advantage.... normal player will do minimum of possible damge, while good aimer will max dmg...

lets not forget that aiming is also about being consistent... rapha did hit 90% rg against strenx during last DH, but he did only 25[?] against cypher in final...


in the end, ur either skilled aimer, or u should give up and work on positioning and other aspects of the game...

in the end, ur either skilled aimer, or u should give up and work on positioning and other aspects of the game...

This is a joke surely? What makes someone able to work on positioning and "other aspects", but not their aim? People who give up on improving their aim will be far worse than they should be.

positioning, timing, strategy - it all can be learnt...

you cant learn to aim great... u do aim well, or not, its simple... everyone has a limit when it comes to hand eye coordination, and its one of these limits u cant lift off...

Aim is about technique, and technique can be learned and improved over time. Much the same as improving your technique in any sport.

Also find it weird you seem to believe hand eye coordination is a set thing that can't be improved and worked on.

nope...

we could compare aim to physical feats... noone expects 1.6m guy to be good at basketball, yet if he masters his movements and throwing he still can play as playmaker... on any other position he wouldnt be any good, because he lacks the basics to do well...

its the same with aim.... you are born with certain hand eye coordination*, and you wont get past ur limits... you can however became master of positioning to help your aim...


*- you actually can improve ur hand eye coordination, but only when u start it at very young age... thats why there are so many decent aimers among young players... they play games since they were 6, so they improved their aiming skills... but it was done during long years of playing many hours a day, something normal adult cant do

ps. please explain why u find aiming a technique, dude its just moving ur mouse around mousepad :-|

remove your lid and experience the greatness you deserve

ps. please explain why u find aiming a technique, dude its just moving ur mouse around mousepad :-|

Yeah and playing tennis is just swinging a racquet at a ball, playing football is just swinging your leg at a ball, no technique needed for either LOL.

There's improvable technique with every fucking thing you do in life.

looking on nadal gameplay, then yeah tennis is just swinging the racquet....

you could say u can improve ur aim technique, but in the end u will always aim worse than natural born aimer...

So the first time I held a crossbow I got 3 bullseyes in a row and the last 4 close to the bullseye, Does that make me a natural born aimer ?

dunno, never held a crossbow...

i once shoot with a bow, but i wear glasses and dont see too good on long distance :<

I wear glasses too and I can barely see distances, imo the only reason I was able to do that was not luck it was that I mentally prepared myself and visualized how it would react when I shot it and how my arm should react so I made a up a technique in my head and used it and it worked same goes for aiming in quake I have a visual feel in my head for mouse movement when I see pov moving even in frag movies where I sort of get a sense that the mouse is moving in my head and that feeling double after I taught myself to switch between inverted mouse and back.
also to make my point my handeye coordination is not that good it's decent but not amazing and I can aim just fine.

you switch between inverted mouse back and forth midgame?

yeah

why, is it part of some bdsm ritual?

mix of boredom + high ping so I wasn't really that bothered about playing people so I taught myself inverted in 1 week and 5 days , one week later I messed it back up be switching back and retaught myself un-inverted in in 2 days and the I tried inverted agains 1 day later and the switch seemed like it took nothing.

You're fucking retarded mate, vor is right - accept it and move on.

.

no im not, and the faster you ppl will get you wont improve you're aiming, the better...

i think strenx said something to prove my point in one of zotacs, when he was refering to pavel... something like "blablabla u play a lot, and dont aim like toxic, and u never will, but u can get better at other aspects, become mini cooller"

.

I thought the same thing and started to intensively play CA and TDM, my aim and technique became OK after a while

If you keep playing duel vs. some lowbobs you'll just keep abusing easy strategies and bad habits keep forming

So how is my crappy technique to your crappy technique :p?

you wont ever pass ur hand eye coordination limit.

in the end ur bad or good aimer.

hand eye coordination limit.

Feel free to prove that a) there is such a thing and that b) it varies between people (of a similiar age) to a big enough extent that it actually matters when you control for technique used.

I bet you can't.

in my opinion as long as you train correctly you can get extremely good at anything regardless of your age unless you're at a point where your body or mind is weak ( which can also be avoided given the right work)

Well, it's a fact that e.g. reaction times are worse when you're 30+ than when you're 18-20, even in special reaction time tasks that the 30+ person has trained more than the 18-20 year old.

That's why I included the 'similar age' part. I wasn't implying that technique or hand-eye-coordinaten (what exactly does this entail?) have to be associated with age to a big extent, but it's not impossible.

well I guess to maintain that kind of reaction time you need to make sure your training is more specialized for it to be possible.

Nah, afaik there's no kind of training that can compensate for the natural process which is biologically determined. Note that I emphasized that the performance difference despite training difference occurs in a special artificial task. But we're getting off-topic here. ;)

ah sorry misread it.

how big on average is the difference between 30+ and 20+ ?

I'd have to ask my lecturer for an exact number, but having a look into this, it's around 10ms.

y u no aim like zero4? and y pavel aint aim god yet, despite putting a lot of time into quake for some period...


just proven both, now get lost

did you play an aim duel vs pavel?

why do you think he's a bad aimer?

compared to the top (strenx) he might be, yes

where did i say pavel is bad aimer?

im really getting tired of this thread, apparently 90% of ESR users are to dumb to read and understand even one sentence i made...

Seems like you don't have a clue what 'proving' actually means. I suggest you get some education. :|

i gave u examples why im right, doesnt it mean i proved my point? or should i make more examples?

most people don't have zero4s technique and the same goes for strenx and toxic.

if it was about technique, anyone could aim well... but its not technique, its predisposition there were born with...

well technically if you can mimic somebody's aiming technique to the exact point you should be able to aim exactly like him dismissing reaction time and ligament strength, now with that in mind you can train your reaction time and strength though peoples capacity for training is different.

i can agree to this :-)

nice to see at least one normal guy here :-)

I can’t believe it, that from everything that was said, u finally agreed to the biggest bullshit :p

high five

he agreed to me in some sense, so i support his post!

let them think they all can aim like strenx, not my problem :D

btw I generally agree with u on this

everyone has a ceiling in everything, but if u don’t train hard u will never know what ur ceiling is

I can also see his point to an extent, regarding gaming I always used to think 'youve either got it or you havnt' people who have it dont really struggle, while others strive. and not just in aim, in all areas.

I remember the ol strenx doesnt need to train thing, cos hes always partying... well, strenx is one of them natural gamers, much like cypher and some of the other top players who dont train all that much but still wreck people. to them it comes easy, or naturally.

but that being said, you can definitely improve your aim, maybe only to a limit though.

haha, what the fuck?

strenx is the epitome of play a lot, get good over the span of years of trying real hard. cypher used to nerd it out in q3 like there's no tomorrow aswell. what the hell do you base your facts on, teens bragging about not playing a game they are top5 in the world at? yeaa, right :D

if you can mimic somebody's aiming technique

like what? putting ur crosshair on the enemy model?

well you are generally moving the mouse on the ennmy but how you move it and what situations you choose to move it at , how you like to move you your mouse as in your movement habits for example heartless tenses up on his mouse and gets shaky.

I guess this is your excuse for being shit or something, you weren't born with the magic power.

im actually quite decent aimer, just dont have time to improve my timing and strategy

1) You don't prove anything by giving examples.
2) Your examples are worthless.

if i cant prove my point by giving examples then its impossible to prove anything over internet...

thx god ur stupid, and its pointless to argue with you

Nope, it is possible to argue on the internet.
You just don't have any convincing arguments because you don't have any considerable knowledge on the matter.

edit: typo

arguing and proving a point are 2 different things...

if u fail to spot i gave u perfect examples of why not every1 can be good aimer, then blame urself for being stupid... i dont care about your opinion, cause in every conversation with you its always the same: you disagree with me, but dont give any contra arguments, just keep stating im wrong... you must be one very sad mofo...

ps. you're stupid

I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm just saying you aren't able to prove you're right. And that's because you don't have any considerable knowledge on the matter.

And no, your examples don't prove a thing. Your entire assumption that you could find people with the exact same technique, hardware and experience who still differ significantly in aiming due to some obscure 'genetic hand-eye-coordination limit' is really doubtful.
Can't you see that yourself?

Your entire assumption that you could find people with the exact same technique, hardware

and thats why ur stupid...

theres are no optimal settings that would work for everyone, same as technique... ppl use settings that are comfortable with, so we can skip this part...

ur right about experiance, tbh it allows zero4 and cooller to aim decent enough to still play at highest level, but z4 always been aim heavy, just because he was born with good aim... his experiance just helps him to maintain it...


Its really simple math equation:

AIM = Combat skills[positioning timing etc] + Experiance + RAW AIM POWER[hand eye coordination]

RAW AIM POWER[hand eye coordination]

You still have to prove that hand eye coordination is determined by genetics, not by deliberate practice.

I assume that you know a lot about the determinants of motor expertise, so go ahead and tell us.

And no, giving flawed examples of some people aiming better than others has nothing to do with this.

edit:

just because he was born with good aim

You can't be serious ...

never heard of a guy who pracced his way up to aim god status...

thus we can outclude practice as a factor... whats left? my anwser is genetics...

but even if im wrong about it, my point is still valid: you cant become great aimer by practice.. u got it, or not...

never heard of a guy who pracced his way up to aim god status...

Except everyone who has this status now?

You haven't proposed a valid way of measuring 'raw aim', you haven't measured the hand-eye-coordination of the players you are comparing and you know nothing about genetics.
These aren't the perfect conditions to claim you know anything about how these 3 things relate to each other.

You only speculate based on some weird beliefs and somehow think this makes you right.

Except everyone who has this status now?

nope... just look at strenx 2 years ago... he was always great aimer, but lacked skills in other aspects of the game...

ow, and I am right

So strenx started playing quake 2 years ago? Interesting.

cypher did according to one of the interviews on SK

link

http://www.sk-gaming.com/video/39890-Cypher_t...SWC_Athens

IIRC he implies that his aim wasn't good enough to be good at lan competitions or something like that.
EDIT: wrong link http://www.sk-gaming.com/video/35434-1on1_wit...anushevsky

sorry to come back to this after such a long time, but im bored and was reading my flame wars @ esr...


Hes not saying his aim was bad, it just wasnt on the level needed to play cypher sneaky ninja gameplay... lan experiance i guess

if i cant prove my point by giving examples

Everyone on the internet is retarded.
Example: Ozymandiass
-> theory proven correct!!

nope, cause u didnt prove im a retard first...

i gave examples of well known aimer, and guy whos good without being aim god :-)

nope, cause u didnt prove im a retard first...

I will take your posts on ESR as example to prove that you are a retard. :>

i mean u gave us, or me the newbie

Fixed for you

keep trying to act cool, as for now ur just pathetic

Ozymandiass
Member Since: Mar. 01, 2011
Time Played: 9 days
Last Game: 13 hours ago
Wins: 454
Losses / Quits: 810 / 148

Prove im wrong otherwise stfu

i guess you could say im quake newbie,but not fps newbie...

1 year of cod1, 5 years of ET, some warsow and UT... im hardly newbie when it comes to aiming matter

.

Don't let the trolls get to you, old chap. I found it to be a nice and informative post.

I found it to be a nice and informative post

u didn’t plus it though and he obviously spent much more time to write it than u did writing this comment (yet u fish for a plus) :)

Yes i'm fishing for a plus by offering support to a guy besieged by trolls and morons. I'm sure those same trolls and morons will plus my post momentarily, proving that they are exactly what they are.

Also, it's good to know that The Plus is the be all end all on expressing opinions and gauging one's attitude towards a specific post and comment. Hold on a second, i must go lobotomize myself to fit into this logic a little more.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

FOR FUCKS SAKE

don't listen to the trolls pal. I found it well written and thought provoking. A beginner would benefit a lot by ur advices. Well done!!

ps: bottom left, thanks in advance

Anyone can aim for good things in life...

Other than that. You are either all aim, or all brain. Or, obviously something in between. If you have both, you are a lucky sob. However, it is easier and more encouraging to improve your strengths rather than your weaknesses.

If you cannot aim with shaft, find ways to not use shaft i.e. force rocket or rail fights. There is always a way around it.

If you play TDM you are bound to be good with all weapons. Eventually, that is. I think I can speak from my point of view that TDM has helped me tremeondously to excel at duel. Not that I am that good but considering that I have only played 1.5k duels in my life, I think I am pretty good already.

But since competition in team modes is rather lacking, you might be stuck with duel where improving one's aim can be a tedious process when someone is plus backing on ztn for 6 minutes.

I see Walter syndrome is all the rage these days.

.

anyone can laime

in theory anyone can do anything with the proper motivation and practice.. but reality is almost no one gives a shit.. the ones who do are the ones who succeed.

.

fake diabz is fake

What a fucking hilarious thread.

If you can't aim, you can at least aim to aim.

nice one Confucius

I think you are Confusing me with someone else.