[22:45:45] <+jetro> Insan3
[22:45:51] <+jetro> enlighten me, how on earth did you get that pic
[22:45:52] <+jetro> seriously
[22:45:58] <+Insan3> i was in that bathroom with him
Ins went back to the dark side and is following half-naked men to their bathrooms again c:
Holy shit its Frank Yang :D I too have been following him for the last 6 months. It's so fascinating how he possesses all these talents (great violin player, possesses perfect pitch, great drawing skills, strong guy, seems to know quite abit about philosophy / psychology) , yet still is completely fucked in his head...
mildly relevant:
I almost named my firstborn (born yesterday) Pavel. Not because of the quake player, we just thought the name was pretty - the fact that one of the best ql players is named Pavel was just a bonus.
Both wife and I considered it for a few months, but last week I decided it would be too inappropriate a name for my country, so we named him Marko, a common name here.
The little guy was 4780 grams and 55 cm at birth, if quake will be around when he's 10-ish I'll start training him to be the next Anton Singov, or at least dkt :)
tl; dr ALL HAIL MY COLLOSAL PROGENY, THE NEW QUAKE 6 CHAMPION!
Marko seems like a big boy name, and one which is kind of global so good choice there! I recall a lot of Croatian/Serbian gamers whose names seriously lacked vowels (Hrvoje, Zeljko etc)
thx mate :)))
ye, it's hard for Anglo-Germanic speakers to pronounce most of Slav names.
on the other hand, try saying "gwyneth" in my pronunciation system.
marko is a widespread name throughout all of ex yugoslavia, (Slav version for Marc/Mark/Marco, obviously) , I'd say Janez is the "most Slovenian" name there is.
Given my hungarian surname, I thought the kid could use a common name to balance out my "unusual" last name, rather than Pavel.
you could have call him "pal" which is the hungarian version of pavel =) its also a universal word in english speaking countries =)))
not sure if anyone called that under the age of 40 tho
yeah, totally. communism, which is about sharing, is just like fascism, which is about racism. oh yeah, and you told me how much you want all present day russians to pay and suffer for something that has nothing to do with you. you're a brainwashed piece of nazi shit, so try to never reply to me again.
The main idea of national socialist parties wasn't about KILLING AND RAPING WOMEN.
...yet it proved to be ridiculously wrong when in the "hands" of the wrong people.
Likewise, the main idea of communism wasn't about BANISHING THOSE WHO OPPOSE THE REGIME AND KILLING STUFF.
...yet it proved to be just as corrupt and unjust as any system out there.
Should we judge a system by its ideas or by the deeds it has done?
Personally, I think this is a double edged sword.
I fancy communism to some degree, it looks great when it's written down on a piece of paper.
But once active in our community, shit was messed up big time.
People aren't prepared for communism and I'm not even sure if we'll ever be.
The thing I'm wondering is... do we even want to be ready for it?
Edited by Anhedonique at 19:34 CDT, 9 September 2012
Dude as both a present-day Russian and someone proud of the Soviet regime (bite me, Baltic states c: ) I have to say: your point of view is extremely one-sided, communism is just about sharing as the US Military-industrial complex is about spreading love across the universe.
It's one thing to be proud of your country and origins (like me), and another to blindly ignore the majority of 20th century history, especially considering how some of that century's atrocities were done by communist states (primarily China, with USSR a close second).
uh what? communism is about 'communism', and us military is about us military. and ussr is about united soviet Socialist republics. being able to differentiate between the intent of an ideology, the intents of people using ideologies, and which way the responsibility for peoples actions goes is not "extremely one sided", it's "not being a brainwashed emotional idiot unable to exercise logic".
Yet do you know why communism failed so far? Maybe it's time to start asking to yourself the right questions ans stop copying what most people says because they are clueless and yet try to look smart and educated.
It's awesome to see that people always have opinions about everything and feel like they have knowledges on every subject. While all they know is almost MEDIA + a few years of studies at best.
yes, and the concept of prison was invented by karl marx and they don't exist in capitalism and did not ever exist before gulag! oh my, such insight, i would not dare to get you started on "any" thing!
you shouldn't dare talk at all, but just for you, there's a slight difference between concentration camps and prisons.
but here's an idea: why not go live in north korea or china and have some fun with that awesome political system? just don't forget to put the button of the leader on your shirt before you walk out of your 30m^2 apartment you had to wait for 15 years, or you may end up in one of those prisons :(
so you're not aware that gulag was a colony prison, not a concentration camp? you're not aware that USA imprisons this day more than gulags imprisoned over 20 most populated years? maybe you don't even know who invented the term 'concentration camp'??
the reason i don't live in north korea or china is because USA will bomb these poor countries any day, er, bring democracy and liberate them. and also i am not asian.
Edited by Demiurge at 09:25 CDT, 10 September 2012
since we are exchanging wikipedia links, here is one for you.
"forced labor camps" with the aim of political repression is anything but a "normal" prison.
as for usa, they have about 2mio prisoners right now. 14mio people passed through the gulag from the 30s to the 50s according to that wikipedia link. so no, i'm not aware of your "facts".
i never claimed the soviets or the nazis were the first to utilize concentration camps, but they were the first to utilize them on a large scale.
and i very much doubt you don't wanna live in north korea because you're not asian. as for usa bombing the shit out of nk or china, yea, all they wanna do is gonna start a thermonuclear war with those countries, sure.
a forced labor camp is by definition a form of political oppression, so yeah, that makes it a "normal" prison.
the highest real concentration for a year in gulag was 120k, that's real numbers, and not made up 60 million from Solzhenitsin. of course you're not aware of facts, because everyone quotes numbers that are physically impossible in terms of capacity of facilities, 2 railroads and a handful of village colonies. the internet zero fact based information on gulags or repressions.
no, they were not the first ones to utilize them on large scale. the first was Lord Kitchener who imprisoned and starved almost entire civilian Boer population in South Africa.
why do you doubt that I don't want to live in north korea because i'm not asian? do you think any westerner can just go live in any society, no matter how culturally foreign it is?? and yeah, i'm pretty they really do want to bomb them, and they're going to, but not with nukes, because that will ruin any resources they might have. these days USA uses precision guided bombs and drone aerial strike. also, what's the difference between thermonuclear war and nuclear war?
what? "normal" imprisonment has nothing to do with political oppression. you can't seriously compare, idk, a modern norwegian prison to the fuckin gulag.
show the sources for your "real numbers" please. if they can be proven and accepted by peer review, i'm sure they would be widely available and can be easily reproduces. don't post any anti-communism conspiracy theory bullshit though.
26k people in the Boer camps is no doubt a tragic number but is hardly "large scale". large scale is the ukranian famine induced by the soviet government in the early 30s that claimed a couple millions of victims. not gulag, but still victims of communism.
and you don't wanna live in north korea because it's a piece of shit hellhole where they turn the fuckin electricity off at 8pm and all you are taught in school are stories about the great mongoloid leader. if you forget to put your button on you are going to one of your "prisons" so you can enjoy an (admittetly short) lifetime of torture, labor and hunger. you wouldn't have internet either, you're aware of that, right?
and nobody is going to bomb a country with nuclear weapons, bot usa, not russia, not china. how is this gonna work out, how do you think? brain washed generals having their country bombed and not launching a nuke? yea, right.
any imprisonment is a form of political oppression.
the sources are google maps. all the camps, logistics, allow for only so many people. the population ratios of siberia as well as russia simply doesn't allow for the numbers of these camps to be as high as being claimed. all these 'peers' reviewing each other are just circle jerking each other, without actually having been to russia, or care for a fact. kind of like you just reciting horror stories about north korea without actually knowing a single fact about it.
and again, i would want to live in north korea, but i'm not asian and i don't really like the asian culture. but naturally you have to project your brainwashed notion of these places you know nothing about and not believe this.
north korea doesn't have any nuclear weapons, and the only reason it's not being liberated is because of the strong resolve of my communist brothers and lack of any actual resources worth stealing for the usa.
as for china, it is being attacked constantly, look at nepal, and google in hong kong. just because they're not going to drop a nuclear bomb on the country doesn't mean it's not in danger of being 'liberated' by inciting internal fighting. this is how usa has taken over so many countries, and is doing right now in syria. so yeah, i would love to move to any other country, but usa is going to destroy every other pace on earth in the upcoming years, so it's not worth the effort.
so, no sources at all, correct? just claims about anti-communist "circle jerks", just as i thought.
what i know about north korea is from reading dozens of different sources, looking at interviews with people who have escaped from nk and also from looking at covertly taken photos of pyongyang, the border and other areas. it has interested me for a long time.
and yes, they do have nuclear weapons. that's why south korea are shitting their pants and dare not make a fucking move.
yea, i don't know about your spy movie stories about china, still nobody is ever going to bomb it.
Nobody is sure that they have usable nuclear weapons. Seeing how most of their various missile launches went they'd probably bomb themselves or Mars while aiming for South Korea. And maybe the nuke wouldn't even work at all.
They do have a shitload of soldiers however (about 8 millions counting the reserve personnel vs 3 for South Korea), and even though they have terribly outdated equipment they could probably do a lot of damage to South Korea or China. Also, most of the population is starving so if they decided to make a move we could stop giving them food and it would actually be a form of genocide. The real reason nothing happens has more to do with their close links with China. Yeah, it's not a simple situation at all.
he has a decent body, if 12 decent russian girls would suck his dick it would be perfectly normal trust me(!), the fact that another male is taking the pic is the fact that worries me bigtime (ins admited)
oh you use the word gay like when mr bean discovered the fuck off hand signal and everybody gets it who comes towards him, I see now, good day to you too