It probably has plenty of input lag. What is your source on "low input lag"?

Edit: Also, 120Hz on HDMI is possible to my knowledge, yet I've never seen anyone who use HDMI for 120Hz 2D images. Maybe it's just because HDMI isn't cheap or there is something fishy (like input lag).

It kinda says "6.5ms". but that might be gray-to-gray. The whole thing seems kinda fishy, considering the price and the stats in general.

Just what I was thinking..
The Samsung TV below is 1700$+ and it's 1080p 120hz. The Seiki is 2x that res. Although you might be paying for the brand. I love the review though.

It says 6.5ms response time, which is not at all the same as input lag. Monitors don't market their latency because it's hard to measure and if they measured it the results would probably be so bad that they wouldn't want to announce it (as for TV:s).

Also, TV:s are designed for Movies, not games, which means that a sharper/better image is more prioritized than latancy and response time.

Yup, exactly, that's the response time not the input lag, I wouldn't recommend this model :3.

Probably not "true" 120hz.

Quite cheap for a 50" tv with all those specs.

Yep, true 120Hz confirmed:
SEIKI 4K HDTV can do 120Hz natively at 1920x1080
(Multitool confirmed!)

Also for HDTV's that can do true 120Hz, see:
HDTV Refresh Rate Overclocking HOWTO: 120Hz from a PC

will read after LoL. Thanks.

Holy tits!

do they ship moldova?

Nothing makes an online retailer shiver more than an online transaction made from eastern europe.

I could swear I've seen an identical comment of yours back when QL introduced premium subs. Good memories.

You're right, Its a standard line I have for that part of the world.
Have one back.

" the specifications listed are based upon the manufacturer's exact model specification as published on the manufacturer's website"

The TV is not even listed on their site, wtf?

http://www.seikidigital.com/products/televisions.php

EDIT:

humm

"A single HDMI 1.4 can do 4k up to 30fps. Upcoming 2.0 should be able to do 4k at 60fps"

Taken from a forum thread.

"The problem is the HDMI 1.4b standard only supports 4K rates of 24 Hz and 30 Hz. due to the overall bandwidth limits of that interface. The soon-to-be-completed HDMI 2.0 standard supports up to 60 Hz. for 4K video signals, but the first UHD TVs with HDMI 2.0 inputs are not expected to show up on dealers shelves until sometime next year. All of the current first generation of 4K UHD TVs, including the $20,000 ones from the likes of Sony and LG, have this same limitation. Of course these UHD TVs will refresh the display at a higher rate (e.g., 60 Hz, 120 Hz) for 4K input signals at 30 Hz."

http://www.avsforum.com/t/1466270/seiki-se50u...ltra-hd-tv

Seiki has a 15pin D-SUB that should allow it to use higher refresh rates unless the TV is limiting to 30hz. The XBR is limited to 30hz but it will do 4096x2160 at 24hz ... Sony for over the past 5 yrs stopped providing proper PC D-Sub/game port input (they suck).

http://static.highspeedbackbone.net/pdf/Seiki...0Sheet.pdf

Thanks.

so 4K2K at 30Hz. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.

Pretend it's a 50" TV with 120Hz native refresh support for 1080p

It's reportedly good for low-input lag gaming (only 8ms input lag)
SEIKI 4K HDTV can do 120Hz natively at 1920x1080
(Multitool confirmed!)

Amazon reviews looks pretty good. Some people are incredulous but this appears to be a great bargain.

BTW, 4K glass in the 39-inch size costs only $430 in factory quantities listed through places like Alibaba, so the floodgates are open for chinese manufacturers to make $1000 4K televisions later this year.

http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/F...esolutions

It's basically a nice large display for gaming. The 4k res will suck for motion @ 30hz but can still display a lot of fairly static info pretty well...