how do you know sorlag isn't black

He just assumed his race.

He probably assumes that Sarge identifies as white and a male too. What a bigot.

Scalebearer is basically the black dude. :D

oh yeah, because dealers are always weighing drugs

Nah, because he sounds like Darth Vader, who is black. :D

He also gives me a Ronnie Coleman vibe with his size, and his default outfit, including his face, is a dark colour.

The voice is from a black dude, the guy in the suit actually is David Prowse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Prowse

Yeah, I know. I was referring to the voice.

Chill bro, it's beta

For betas

From betas

Keel incoming.

That's racist, keel is green!

Cyan around these parts. With green helmet.

Keel is white.

Supremacist.

Turn brightskins off and check him. He's white.

If your gamma is 2.

: D

because

Thought it was nice that QC was the only game like this because if I want to watch anything like it I have to check out the videos from the 50s. Seriously if you want to look at negroes or other colored races you can play this game, its called over-watch ok? Tim willits is a white man and so is everyone at id software. Everyone being white in our media was a not a problem ever, and JEWS whining about it does not mean anything. Also you have anarki which is basically a gay jewish honorary black as far as I am concerned.

Well aren't you a fucking cunt.

Anarki lover detected.

Lol haven't even played QC yet or watched any extended gameplay. I have other things going on but judging from his response he seems an old fuck who despises racial diversity. And what the fuck did Jews have to do with any of it.

But he appears to be an American so whatever, the majority are thick as shit.

^ lol @ this nerd taking him seriously

The real problem is that there are so many pussies with 0 sense of humor now. Everything is RACIST, SEXIST, XENOPHOBIC. Get over yourself ya cunt

Yeah his comment was real fucking hilarious. Shit let me catch my breath.

Even if it wasn't funny, as you claim, it was dripping with satire. =\

As a member of the nation which created satire if that was it, it was executed fucking awfully.

So you are greek?

No I'm British. Although I just looked it up. The more you know... Either way it's fucking awful. Not to a native anyway, though he's American so I don't know what his excuse is. Oh wait he's just a cunt.

Yes, it's much easier to just call people cunts when you don't get the message.

Enlighten me, what's the message?

If it went over your head, no amount of explanation would help you understand it.

That's what I thought

:)

A brittard with his head so far up its ass he believes brits created air and water. What a surprise.

I can't lie it is pretty fucking great being British. The way some of you ESR hermits act in London you'd have seven shades of shit beaten out of you by 'Negroes'.

Please stop. You're shaming yourself and your country, that I respect and like very much.

Sure, you don't have to respond to me. I haven't been on ESR in months but god this place is a shithole, the initial comment in particular just triggered me. We're a very diverse country, something the majority of people here likely have never experienced. Hope I haven't offended you.

I understand some people can approach the subject w sattire but from the way it's phrased it's pretty clear he hasn't.

N I G G E R
I
G
G
E
R

: D

You're embrassing yourself, your nation, the queen, the beatles, chips with every meal and the memory of all those lost in battle. Shut up.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/news/2...QSTCg.jpeg

Looks pretty awesome, I wish I lived there.

Whoa you took a single riot. Clever guy. Selective bias ftw.

To my knowledge there hasn't been a single riot over here, and I am such a reactionary person that I like it.

D
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y

Your nation created the Americans so you have a bigger connection to thickness than satire

I don't think that's how cultural evolution works... but okay.

99.9% of british people would recognize this as satire tbh, within 2 words that's what I thought

First let me say to you that I am not afraid of your "tough" stance for your racial communism ideology and I will feel good if my view might make you feel 'disgusted". I am convinced that unless we the Europeans would get rid of all the liberal scum nothing good will arise but things will just get worst and worst. This requires rivers of blood, so whatever let the strongest prevail. To me you are the degenerate enemy who we the Europeans will have to eliminate if we have to survive so reciprocity is solid here. I don't see this thing happening too soon though, at least unless the racial engineering will touch the Slavs, at which point the whole hell will break loose.

As ideology racism is good. It is real and it is natural. It is the reason why you have kids in the first place, to perpetuate your genes. So nature in its design is racist. Similarities wise, ie the reason why you hang out with friends instead hanging out with monkeys or worms is that you have more in common with creatures who share with you the same kind of genetic material, the more similar the easier the dialogue -to the extend that the dialogue with different organisms could not be possible at all -I mean do you share NYTimes news with bacteria? Now, with humans people might think that races does not matter. Probably because Western people did not even experience life inside ethnically and culturally cohesive communities, so they don't know something else. But they should not pretend then to understand. Individually many people might be great, regardless the race, but this is not about one individual, but about the entire cultural specter and about the sense of identity without which troubled societies and nations arise -something I doubt that libtards understand. Well, they will say, even if racial differences exist in terms of intelligence, by mixing them we will get the middle of all. Well, if this a good thing to drag the IQ or mankind back by mixing all races? While some countries might get busy just doing that, other would use this time to advance even more in terms of technology and weaponry just because they will not have to expend huge amounts of energy and resources to bring half monkeys to the civilization. This is a dead end so all the nations that practice now "racial diversity" are doomed. The fate of Western European countries is sealed already but the disastrous effect is not yet very visible just because the high influx of East Europeans who come to work in Western Europe, thanks to the horrendous European Union scam, but in time the influx will stop and the West will rapidly collapse.

As for "old fucks" they build Europe they invented the Internet and made modern laws possible so that stupid worms like this shit here can have a say in this matter. What is the big contribution of his lazy young generation? "Smoke weed every day"? Our parents and grandparents went to war to defend their country so now the scum have something to destroy.

Racial diversity the libtards do not even know the meaning of it. Having many races on Earth is good having all packed together inside ones house is called a sanatorium. You cannot put together antagonistic ideologies and not expect the explosion this should be basic math.

rofl better silence

just some years ago you were called subhumans by your "fellow european master race colleagues"

couple of years and it's another "we" vs. "them" again... idiots all together

There surely must be a correlation between being roped into right wing propaganda to this extent and being shit at Quake. 😄

I was reading this thread this morning, and I just knew the Baron would arrive. :D

That's fine, I'm certain a disproportionate amount of people here share your views. It's ESR after all, it basically represents the dregs of society.

Still better than Reddit. :D

At least Reddit has pretty intelligent people too lol I feel like anyone with any sense on this site just avoids topics like this. But I was too triggered at the time Kappa

ika triggered you, and you triggered baron. It's the cycle of triggering. :D

It's always a pleasure to trigger the right wing, even at the cost of my own triggering. Sacrifices must be made. Maybe he'll realise a utopian society is inevitable and blow his head off with a shotgun.

You must be a happy guy if you think we're gonna be in utopia any time soon. :D

Probably not anytime soon, but assuming we don't all nuke each other to bits, it's inevitable.

No idea why you'd think it is inevitable.

You expect everyone to suddenly agree on what "utopia" is? :D

Maybe it'll happen when we've all been genetically fucked with so that we think the same, and there goes your diversity.

As globalisation extends further and further, racial and cultural barriers will break down further too. That's just common sense. Now the argument is, how much further can globalisation go?

I obviously don't mean an absolute utopian society as that's subjective like you've said.

As long as people have different races and cultures, they will conflict. Hate doesn't come about by itself. It usually comes from a threat, real or perceived, to the things you value most. So unless by "break down", you mean assimilate everyone into the same homogeneous thing, a great loss in my eyes, conflicts will remain; and then people would have to agree what that one thing should be.

Besides, globalization today is more about trade and transactions than anything else, as well as conflict-inducing high immigration rates.

In fact, in the past 15 years, the only part of globalization I think has been particularly useful is the internet and the spread of knowledge and information.

Not necessarily, I think personally it boils down to education and precisely recognising other cultures aren't a threat. Besides things like radical religion.

The internet is obviously a compounding factor in globalisation but it's also very much in it's infancy. Future technologies such as sophisticated portable translators etc will also contribute. Even the basics like Duolingo and other language learning apps are helping integrate different nations. Given the effect technology has already had I think we can expect an exponential rate of exposure in the future for more isolated countries.

But at the same time, taking countries like Russia for example, how do you break down their cultural barriers when as a population they're so unapproachable to begin with. I don't know!

When cultures come together, they have to tone down the parts of themselves that are offensive to the others, some being more willing to do this than others. They influence each other and affect policy. Some people grow rather fond of their way of life and do not really embrace these changes. Those are their values.

For instance, the Japanese love their Japaneseness, so they want to preserve it, and that's great because when you go to visit you get a unique experience.

The justification for changes is usually economic and nothing to do with coming together to sing kumbaya. Tolerance is promoted because it must be---but ultimately tolerance means there is something unpleasant going on that you have to put up with. If you're not putting up with something, you can't claim to be tolerant.

The faster the changes, the more angry people will be. This creates discrimination, which has a snowball effect.

It's nice to talk about diversity, and it really is great having exposure to all these cultures, but just you wait until Europe is coming even close to being less than 50% native European. I fully expect the shit to hit the fan.

This all makes me rather pessimistic about your utopia.

Wow, OP sure did open a can of worms with this thread. LOL

Well that's largely down to your own cynical view. London is now a majority non native city and really most people couldn't care less. Free movement is a different matter altogether.

I think a culmination of cultures doesn't require any toning down. If a Chinese Family, and English family and a Jamaican family all live on the same street how does it result in any toning down? You just get some badass foreign exports or a more diverse skillset creating a more competitive free market.

Religions like Christianity are toned down in the UK now because of education. And that means nobody gives a fuck about the Church. It'll be the same for future Muslim generations in 30 years and the same for other religions too. But apart from religion I don't see why other parts of a culture should be toned down at all. In the UK they definitely aren't and we're better off as an economy and as a nation for it.

So now I'm cynical?
Yeah, it's true. Most of the time, people are motivated by self-interest, and that includes people as groups. Last I checked, London is still pretty white (no other single group coming close to their numbers), but it is not the whole country and as such is not dictating policy.

In any case, I'm no stranger to multiculturalism; I'm from Australia, you know. If you don't see people getting angry at rapid change, I don't know what to tell you. Do you think if you moved 20 million French into Japan, it'd stay the same? Frog sushi anyone? :D

And if cultures are so infinitely compatible, why is the word tolerance thrown around all the time. There'd be simply nothing to tolerate.

Religious cultures are as much an example of a culture as any other. They are just examples of people having strong beliefs about the way things should be done. People who don't care how things are done won't have any problem adapting to anything.

Economic benefits primarily come from cheap labour and addressing the aging population. Unfortunately, it is not sustainable to prop up an economy with perpetual mass immigration.

We could talk about this a lot more, but it is a touchy subject for some, so maybe we should just call it a day. :D

Anyway, maybe you're right, and it will all work out in the end.

Haha yeah let's leave it, fun chat though. I'll just say I think globalisation regarding humans needs to be a trickle rather than a flood for it to run smoothly, so in some respects we agree. Maybe.

My aunt is currently living in Australia with her German husband. They live in Darwin.

A complete nuclear wasteland is a kind of utopia.



Peace, silence, you can feel the warm breeze while human-faced newt-mutants playing puckish in the radoiactive dirt.

yer intelligent people sucking each others dick on highly upvoted comment bubbles, in sum it's pretty shit

I enjoy Reddit in my spare time, a lot of the top comments can be quite witty!

I've started to sort by controversial by default, keeps you in check a lot better than grinning stupidly at a monitor

Haha that's a good strategy, the grinning is all too common for me.

Nah, sometimes I need the popcorn-stuff, you know.

Reddit doesn't have intelligent people. What are you on about?!

Well don't assume that some people just wanna have fun and be really honest whilst not following the current rightwing/woman hating/.. propaganda.

Lmao, I mean to be fair I've not come across any of these guys in actual games bar UNIVERSSEHITT but we've had reasonable conversations before. I don't even know why they use ESR tbh, there's probably better places to collectively shitpost with like-minded people who also don't play Quake...

It'll be OK. Girls will talk to you if you are nice to them first. Give it a try and then you will learn to smile in time, and from there who knows what could happen?

despises racial diversity

what the fuck did Jews have to do with any of it

: DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Nice post!

Now first of all I am not old and you are older than I am according to your profile =o But perhaps I seem more knowledgeable (like an older person ;> ) because I abstain from watching the "electric jew" or browseing websites like "reddit". If you hate ESports R why don't you go back there?

"I havent been on ESR in ages reddit is so much better xD I wish some niggers beat you up on the street" -t. you

The next time i'm at a gas station and some black guys are saying "hey snowflake" to my girlfriend i'll be sure to put on some Jay-Z as I drive out of there so they know i'm Down with the brothas, yo.

You sound bitter. Some black guy tried hitting on your girlfriend, big deal. Either man the fuck up and do something about it or get over it. You don't need to talk shit on the internet.

Wouldn't doing something about it be racist? ; - ;7

Why, if he was white you should feel the same way. Being bothered about the guy that's black hitting on your girl is what makes you a racist. :) It must be hard for a Pole to understand that.

Who's being racist now? ;)

No that's stereotyping. There's a difference. If you're going to try and jump in when you couldn't even give me a rebuttal to the initial response in the first place at least do it properly.

It's all the same for me. But I guess I'm just a dumb nigger.

And you're also shit at Quake.

You had to rub it in, didn't you? :'(

Sorry.

I don't believe you. You are such a fake, snowflake.

I think you're shit at quake too.

I think I beat you once though so I'll take that =D

QL nick?

Shahe, my name.

Unusual name.

Is that pronounced "Shay" or "Shah-hey" or what?

Shah-he

Shahnaynay.

Well, I like that you can see that difference; there's plenty of people who like to talk about racism who can't.

Stereotyping can be a sign of racism depending on the context, but it is not racism itself.

But these days, the meanings of all these words get extended to cover just about everything because of people's propensity to exaggerate the severity of a thing for their own purposes.

Makes me think of feminists' use of the word "rape". :D

Yeah people like to throw around buzzwords for no reason. Or in this case try and defend against incredibly appropriate buzzwords...

We need stereotyping at least for its comedic purposes. People enjoy taking the piss out of each other. :D

True

u be sayin' all da people r da same?

I have : 3 nice posts here

you have a lot more (anger posts) here than that!
whats on your mind ?
If you aren't cultured you would know what book that is from. If you have'nt only talked to "cool black people" on the TV and Reddit, a more sane additude is the result. BBC says that X% of people need to be [colored]. What impression will the third parent of everyone in the UK make next?

I only speak English, try again.

Ok, kid.

Your third parent is your government, I believe. :D

Someone gets it. =]

Glad to be of service. :D

When's Red Man 4 coming?

I haven't worked on any videos in a while, but I can tell you that the next video will not be a red man video. Maybe the video after the next one.

You gotta think of your fans, bro. :P

This is a motivational problem, but what I am working on is going to be a really good video. Might be pretty long for what I put out too. You won't be disappointed!

Haha look forward to it. :D

Ok, kid.

I love Slash's arse, I'd suck a fart right out of it

i thought this was an ika thread

thought i would avoid calling attention to this topic , also im busy

there is a black woman coming)))))

We need to consider this in terms of post structural queer epistemology. The "shooting enemies" trope is stereotypically cis white male centric. There should be a character who engages in discourse with others, wielding philosophy as a weapon instead of phallic tools of mindless destruction. This niche must be filled by an african american non-binary gender studies major xho makes end meet by brewing Venti Pumpkin Spice Frappucinos. This would right some of the colonial wrongs without appropriating any indigenous cultures. Or else id software is literally Hitler, John Carmack voted Trump, and should be shot in the hip!

so you want to shoot black people? I wonder who is the real racist here

WE WUZ KANGZ!

'N SHIT!

KANGZ OF DA ARENA

The fact that I can not play as a light skinned negro is preventing me from signing up to this beta, there are times in life when you must stand up for what you believe in.

We need TDM where one team is police and the second one is black.
Police can shoot blacks only after getting offended over VOIP.

Pretty sure police can shoot blacks whenever they want, according to the black society.

They say that because they know blacks are commiting crimes 24/7 :---)

are blacks new poles?

Someone has to do that job in EU.

plot twist: All characters are actually albino blacks

easy fix: just add dark brown skins and basketball jerseys.

I can't see enemies in this game, let alone their skin color. Wtf you on about.

1/10

[img1]

l m a o

skin looks good actually :D Download here http://gfx.quakeworld.nu/details/368/afro-ame...orld-skin/

todd hollenshead.

if they add a black guy should he be able to jump higher?
probably should be the fastest champ.....running from the police, and from crime scenes.
should probably have bad credit too.... harder to grind new skins since they get payed less.
purchase of the champ includes free rare obama phone accessory and enough food stamps to buy q1 rl

not sure if trolling

It is.


/thread

Ye you are right. I want to shoot some blacks.

To me caring too much about the lack of black or whatever races and crying like this looks the same as racists that you are talking about.
Stop caring about races entirely and start paying attention to each person's personality, abilities etc.
I can understand people categorize aliens though.
It's already but still 2017.

Blacks are so oppressed in America you have no idea. They have to work 60+ hours a week like the white people just to get by. Almost as if employers will hire minorities with far less qualifications than their white counter-part. It's almost as if they're essentially handed government benefits over a white person who needs it more. It's almost as if they can get into any college with a 3.0GPA (with half tuition paid) instead of their white counter-part with a 4.2 who will get denied because he's too white. It's almost as if they can create their own Black only groups, but if a white person created a white only group they'd be done for. It's almost as if they have their own 'black' entertainment channel. Black people can make fun of white people for being white in public, but if a white person did it in public HOLY SHIT!!! You're done son.

Now that's all fine and dandy. I don't really care about all that too much, but at some point these retarded liberals have to realize the whining is coming from being FUCKING LAZY.

what about slavery doe

All that you need to know of slavery is that it's a white, American male invention. Throughout the history of mankind, there was no racism or slavery until those white devils from NA hit the scene.

There's been plenty of slavery in the past, it just depends what standards you want to set upon yourself as a country moving forward.

It might be less relevant in modern America but it's still important to remember the stains in history even if they're messy and easier to forget. The east is awful in this regard and it's why slavery is still a problem there in 21st century. Neoliberalism spiralled out of control.

"It might be less relevant in modern America but it's still important to remember the stains in history even if they're messy and easier to forget"

Then blacks will never move on and will play an eternal victim game, much like women who follow feminism.

The only way you can stop sexism/racism which is never going to be fully possible is to stop talking about it.

I don't think anyone besides BLM movement plays the victim game, they're a very small minority. it's mainly the middle of America that's extremely racist still. Obviously you'll know why if you know your history.

But the coasts are pretty cool, got a few friends in California and it's very diverse. And obviously the majority of blacks live on the east side.

It's also important to remember reparations have never been explicitly given to anyone, so it's owed to them to an extent to have a bias which self corrects societies view, and in America a lot of hillbilly retards still see black people as sub human. It's why we have minimum quotas on ethnic minorities and attempt to take the brightest students from less privileged backgrounds.

Anyway rant over lol.

"I don't think anyone besides BLM movement plays the victim game, they're a very small minority"

Pretty much all of feminism is a victim game, the "wage gap" has been debunked a million times and is objectively wrong but feminists will still quote it when defending women's rights, which in the western world they have the exact same rights as men do, at this stage they're just wanting special privileges and female superiority, that's why if you notice they make female quotas for job applications which really fucking sucks for men who are more skilled but won't get it.

"it's mainly the middle of America that's extremely racist still. Obviously you'll know why if you know your history. "

Everywhere's racist in the world, you'll never completely eradicate it, but if we keep bringing up black history month, all this bs, it'll never truly die.

"and in America a lot of hillbilly retards still see black people as sub human"

That's not a completely isolated case, happens as much on the affluent, libetarian side.

"It's why we have minimum quotas on ethnic minorities and attempt to take the brightest students from less privileged backgrounds."

Happens to white folk too, you shouldn't be hired for a position or accepted into a university on the basis of your skin colour, but on the position of your merit and achievment and skills.

I was referring to racism specifically with BLM. I'm not going to get into feminists, their ideology confuses me.

Specifically within America, central north is very racist, the rest is fairly progressive, especially as you tend towards the coasts. I'd disagree re everywhere is racist, to a certain degree yeah. But the UK, England specifically I dunno about Ireland, it's one of the best places in the world for acceptance and tolerance IMO. There are some other areas though, Singapore, HK to an extent I think.

I don't about affluent libertarians but they're always in a minority. Fuck them anyway, especially the media moguls.

Yeah white students are also taken from poorer backgrounds, but white privilege is still a real thing in the West. In the East too actually, I know from personal experience a British passport will open a lot of doors, white skin even more so. So as I say these limits need to be offset for blacks especially.

The good thing is for top institutes there are typically several interviews so these people aren't just names on a piece of paper with the ethnicity stuck next to it, so they are chosen just as much on merit and achievement. But re achievement you better believe the rich kid with Mummy and Daddy driving a Porsche will have the better resume.

(This is the first decent conversation I've had on ESR in years, it's wonderful lol)

Respect for debating civilly with me, usually it ends up that the other person just insults their way to winning an argument instead of attempting to refute anything i say.

Anyone who blindly insults you, don't worry about it, theyre just keyboard warriors.

*Fistbump*

"That's not a completely isolated case, happens as much on the affluent, libetarian side."

Some proof, please.

This is why republicans (maybe independent someday) will continue to win elections. The retards on the left just don't get it. There are no people running around hunting black people. The 'KKK' is a group of what maybe 100 retards (probably people on the left pretending to be republicans as they always do). There are hardly any people actually running around calling black people n1ggers. Fuck out of here with your chosen youtube videos. Hardly happens in the real world. I've lived all over the US.

It's all a game to get these weak minded people to vote for them. Calling 'trumpanzees' racist just further enforces everyone to vote the same way again. Maybe 1% (the retards) really give a shit about someone being black or mexican.

And BTW I lived in California for 5 years. It's fucking awful. Hard to even get a decent job without being able to speak fluent spanish in SoCal. Everything costs much more. Housing is fucking ridiculous. Sure there are some cool people (as there are everywhere) but the negatives FAR outweigh the positives.

Can't stress enough how Shahe's way of thought will lead us to Trump for 7.5 more years. I love it.

" It's why we have minimum quotas on ethnic minorities and attempt to take the brightest students from less privileged backgrounds." This is the absolute dumbest fucking thing i've ever heard. Preach about not judging people by their skin color yet there are all these rules about hiring people based on their skin color. Getting selected for this grant because you're black. Getting admitted to this university because youre black. Soooooo fucking dumb.

I could go on for days with this shit. So ironic these numb nuts preach about race and have created all these ideas about doing this that and the other for people based on race.

Edit : I see this kid is 22. Has essentially no real world experience. Sad that this is the shit he's probably learned in college.

I doubt you've ever had a decent education mate but no I didn't study this at college, holy fuck that would be a waste of time.

lol, edukat pls.

Educate yourself, picking up books and reading them isn't difficult. Instead of playing Quake.

Now if you want a list of books I'd be happy to oblige.

edukat pls

Tbh I'd have to agree with Qkumbr in pretty much everything he said.

Don't automatically dismiss it.

We are devolving as a species, instead of getting a job position through hard-work and merit people get it merely through what gender or colour they are, it's not right.

Blacks are still massively underrepresented as are females. So no people don't merely get it through their gender or colour. Those that do are typically the 1% and a cut far above any of their peers, regardless of race, class or gender.

"Blacks are still massively underrepresented as are females. So no people don't merely get it through their gender or colour."

Why does that matter at all? The equality act makes sure discrimination of that type can never happen, it's their own choice if they want to major in something.

We go on about how there's not enough women in science, why don't we apply that too manual labour like I do? Oh wait it's because they don't want to do it since men and women are different.

Also check up on alot of positions nowadays, they'll explicitly say "Female applications are encouraged" essentially meaning they have priority now over men which in itself is discriminatory

Would you rather have a cabinet have equal genders (which is absolutely fucking retarded) or be made up of a collective of people who are the best at what they do, regardless of what sex they are?

Also

"Blacks are still massively underrepresented as are females."

Really? Why is it that there are women's only gyms, women's only coffee shops, women's only everything nowadays, you don't see it being reversed do you?

men and women are different

You seriously fucked up, cracker!
We are all human, you subhuman piece of racist shit.
I hope you die.
#nohate

Systematic positive discrimination is necessary to offset institutional bias. You know racism and sexism still exists right, Human Resources are people too.

No they don't want to do manual labour because manual labour is shit, nobody wants to do it. Including the guys... you don't need equality for shit nobody wants to do because 1. People don't want to do it anyway and 2. Women would be discriminated negatively,.

Now if manual labour was something people (including women), WANTED to do, of course measurements would have to be put in place to prevent discrimination.

Not everything is black and white, looking at things from other peoples perspectives helps

Discrimination happens everywhere, but not to the extent or what you've been taught that it has.

What are you talking about? Plenty of people want to do manual labour, it's why trade schooling is so popular, I have a lot of buddies who are also grafters and they love what they do (one is an electrician, the other is a plumber) the only reason the feminazis go for stem is because they want female superiority over men, there's a good reason hardly any women are in science, it's because most women do not want to go into science.

It will never happen with manual labour because women could not do the work that men do, it's impossible to do as good of a job as a man could do in labour, our bodies are biologically superior in terms of raw strength and endurance.

I can't take conspiracy theories seriously so I won't respond to that.

Okay women are at a physical disadvantage when it comes to manual labor type jobs. Like I said there isn't a flock of women clamoring to fix sinks or wiring is there. It's not a problem so what's the point of bringing it up?

So women not flocking to STEM is not a problem either. :P

They don't need perpetual "encouragement" to do so any more than they need that encouragement to do plumbing.

If anything, men need more encouragement to get into university than women do since 60% of graduates are female.

Why would women flocking to STEM be a problem? They're just as smart, studies show they work harder and do you realise how beneficial progression in STEM is to our race as a whole?

Are you reading the same conversation I'm reading?
Women don't want to go into plumbing (and a whole bunch of other areas).
Women don't want to go into STEM.

Women are encouraged to go into one and not the other in an attempt to make up for their lack of wanting to.

Encouraging neither is a problem. Encouraging women only is a problem.

If not enough people in STEM is a problem (which is not the reason it is done), you'd encourage both genders equally to get more people going into it because that's what equal opportunity is.

If they do work harder, which is highly doubtful (they actually work less hours per week on average and in much cushier jobs), they could just as well be working harder in whatever they did chose, like plumbing. :P

And re encouragement, that's just for those who have families who believe they should sit at home being housewives and knitting.

We live in the 21st century, women have had the right to work since 1874, they don't need any more encouragment especially since they have exactly the same rights as men do, get paid the same etc. If they choose to be housewives and bringing up children which is perfectly natural, why is this a problem?

I'd rather we encourage everyone to follow their passions and turn it into a career if they can instead of one particular section of people, you know, help everyone.

If it isn't a problem, then why is women in science a problem then?

How are facts conspiracy?

Women in science isn't a problem... I think that's the point I was making? Maybe we've gotten confused.

If they're facts send some empirical data my way from a credible source supporting said facts.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-healt...ience.html

Even with all the feminist bullshit agenda they're pushing, as a whole, we are both wired very differently and want to work in different areas, that's why women tend to go into more social jobs like caring, hospitals whilst men prefer more masculine jobs like trades, science since men are wired more logically and women more emotionally.

I also want to add that there will always be a small percentage of genders who want the opposite, variables exist in all groups, but I'm talking as a majority not a small minute.

It's weird how feminisms original goal wasn't this bs agenda where they pretty much dictate and push whatever retarded quotas they feel like, it was to give women the choice with what they want to do, if they want to go out and get a career in a business boardroom like a man then that's fine and if they want to instead stay at home and raise a family that's perfectly fine too. Unfortunately, feminists shame any one, especially celebrity women who choose to stay at home and bring up a family, that's why it is cancer.

Okay, so none of the claims in that article have actually been backed by studies, just a bunch of 50 year old academics with a semi outdated view giving their biased 2 cents. i.e zero credibility given.

The one article that has conducted a study has said that wiring of the brain could easily be down to environmental factors post birth. It is highly likely to be down to that reason, as we learn from the moment we're born social conditioning is also wiring our identities.

Was a random article I googled, if you really want I could go out of my way to find proper scientific analysis on how men and women are different and how it affects what jobs we go to, there was an amazing documentary yin time ago i saw about it in Norway if you want a link to it.

Women by nature are more nuturing, caring and that's why they tend to go for more social and nuturing roles whilst men's brains are more logic and reasoning based and that's why we tend to go for more masculine roles in society.

I enjoy debating with you though, we have very polar opposite opinions on things, but we don't have to resort to childish insults and petty ad hominems to get our point across.

It's very refreshing since I'm pretty middle/right when it comes to politics and things of this nature. It usually ends up with more liberal thinking people that they just hurl insults at me and call me "retarded" instead of challenging any of my points and attempting to refute a single one.

I don't think anyone sat on ESR arguing about social constructs and irregularities with another member has the right to call anyone retarded!

But there's always the few who will...

But can you acknowledge that men and women's brains are hardwired differently and that we view things differently?

Yes, but I believe that's down to social conditioning and environmental factors, rather than inherent from birth BECAUSE of our gender.

there is a lot of conditioning, but there are also genetical differences between genders ... there is a lot of political correctness talk in schools/universities and media, but life will teach you the reality

Is it so hard to believe that a species that has evolved over millions of years in which each gender performed different roles may have specialized each gender at least a little to its function?

And indeed it has. We see the physical differences at a glance. But we are expected to believe that the sacrosanct zone called the mind was somehow spared any divergence (and no, we're not talking about intelligence here) despite the fact we see these differences all the time too, based on the assumption that we are born tabula rasa---it doesn't matter that we see animals that certainly seem to have behaviours coded into them that they never had to learn. Even if you measure and analyze physical brains, you will find differences.

But if you want to convince yourself there is no physical difference or disposition from birth, and that all mental differences are environmental, so what?

Women are what women are, and for the most part, women are happy being what they are---probably more so than men. They make their choices just like anyone else. They are not impressionable and stupid and need their behaviour "corrected" by some self-appointed authority. There is no problem to be fixed here.

What is the benefit to anyone of making them more like men, or making men more like women? Doesn't sound like "diversity" to me.

While some minority has a fantasy ideal model in their heads of what women should be and try to manipulate things to make it a reality, the rest of us are perfectly happy with the differences. They make life interesting. In general, femininity is attractive to men, and masculinity to women. This is perfectly fine, normal, and natural. I don't see any benefit to making the genders clones of each other, if it were even possible. Equal opportunity is all that needs to be provided. Beyond that, equal outcome is bullshit.

There are always going to be outliers in behaviour, and that is great too, because it is interesting. I don't see some pervasive evil in society actively discouraging women from doing what they want to do, in family, in friends, on the TV, anywhere. In fact, I see quite the opposite. Everywhere you look, women are being encouraged. This is not bad, but they are certainly not up against a resistance that justifies them receiving any special treatment.

Your last point is where we'll continue to disagree.

If you want to argue for legal policy that discriminates against men, you need a strong case for that. In the case of doubt, the default path should be not to discriminate. And I'm not seeing this rampant discrimination against women, especially not at university. People are actually often wary of not appearing to treat women differently and over-compensate as a result.

The discrimination is not nonexistent, but the kind that is the most common isn't severe, and it is certainly not at a level where two wrongs suddenly make a right (the second wrong supposedly coming from the one with the higher moral standard). What it is is punishing innocent people for the misdeeds of a relative minority that is allegedly responsible for a lack of equality of outcome that can be explained by other things.

Besides, if we want to use this logic, we'd need a policy discriminating against women in order to get more men to choose to go to university. You could just as easily come up with some elaborate theory about how men are negatively influenced by society into choosing not to.

Women who love engineering are not choosing not to go into engineering because of discrimination. You must think women are truly pathetically weak if you think so. It didn't stop them getting into other previously male-dominated fields, and it wouldn't stop them here either.

Which previously male dominated professions have been broken into by women? I can't think of any where there's a significant proportion tbh. Even in areas like restaurants, vast majority of chefs are still male.

Given that a significant majority of university entrants and graduates are women, if they were evenly spread out, they'd be dominating everything, so whatever they are in general choosing to study, we know they are definitely dominating it without even needing to look up specifics. Add to that the fact that nothing at university was not dominated by men at one point, and I think you can see that women are perfectly capable of entering these areas if they so wish.

The thing is, the outcry is loud about the one area in which women are not outpacing men while you hardly ever hear about the dearth of male graduates.

Tell me, what kind of woman is interested in STEM, learns it is full of men (which we all know young women find very icky and repulsive), and therefore decides to study a degree in the arts or humanities instead? Oh she went for law or medicine? Well, what's the problem. It is even more prestigious than STEM anyway.

Women are no longer the ones who require assistance at university. We are no longer in the 1950s.

We're not talking about university. Universities are all very left and progressive enough that there's vast social mobility for everyone. It's mainly after university when trying to break into professions discrimination occurs, not only breaking into but progressing up the career ladder.

Actually university is what we're talking about. That's what I'm talking about anyway (I've mentioned it a few times now in this thread, and encouragement of women to choose STEM doesn't pertain to people who already have their degrees.), since that's where this conversation began, where UNIVERSESIXHIT was talking about getting women into STEM, which you do by studying it at university, and that was in the context of "positive discrimination". So yeah, I'm talking about any quotas, support, resources, money, positions, scholarships, etc that women get preferential access to purely because they are women, at universities.

In any case, those graduates who leave university and who are actually any good at what they do will usually end up in a place in the industry, so it is a good predictor.

Well I'm talking about discrimination at all levels, not just university, where as I've said, you're most likely to receive the least discrimination.

"It's mainly after university when trying to break into professions discrimination occurs, not only breaking into but progressing up the career ladder. "

I want actual proof of this and not anecdotal.

I think you've been horsefed a lot of shite from your liberal professors at your former Uni.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-r...dy/8664888

That's shite shite feminists don't want you to see.

"Leaders of the Australian public service will today be told to "hit pause" on blind recruitment trials, which many believed would increase the number of women in senior positions. "

It's things like that which make me absolutely, 100% hate feminism, that and the majority of it is a complete victim game where they refuse to achknowledge that bad things happen to men as well as women.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_ceiling...-_2006.png

That's all I can be bothered to send in my current state (12 hours of packing and moving flats), you can easily find other empirical data if you take a look.

The wage gap is a myth, it doesn't take into account job occupations, time off work, it's a flawed study which has been debunked a million times.

Also why is everyone under the assumption someone who's had higher education is 'fed' their opinion by a bunch of professors. Again that's not how a university functions!

Because most liberal universities now basically forcefeed you feminist propaganda, teaching men not to rape etc.

Feminizing young men should be abuse lol.

No that's not true at all. Even from the article you sent me, a lot of those top academics have very backwards views supported by zero evidence. It's fair to say views are dependent on the individual, institutions promote free speech and equality but that's hardly the same thing as shoving feminism down our throats. We've had to ban a one far right student who was extremely anti Jew and was actually the leader of a Nazi like cult.

They traced the site back to his dorm room lol.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58arQIr882w

Proof that the wage-gap is a steaming crock of shite.

promote free speech

had to ban

::::^^^^))))))))))
ouch gg

I'm not going to try to persuade you to change your opinion because I think you're pretty determined not to and that's fine, it's your opinion, but you'll have quite a hard-time down the line when aquiring a spouse and believing that we're mostly the same.

Spoilers, she talks in a completely different language, lots of emotions :P

I doubt it, I'd prefer to marry a more traditional good girl but my wants are irrelevant to this discussion. And girls are emotional, that's why I haven't dated in a long time lol. Emotional doesn't translate to incapable though.

I never said they were incapable, what I was referring to was is if you have the mindset that we're so similar then you're gonna have a bad time lol.

Traditional girls are a needle in a haystack nowadays, if you ever do find one, hold onto her

Yes they do get it through race nowadays. I've seen it first hand where X black guy gets hired with less qualifications than Y white guy for literally no reason other than his race.

You know the world is truly fucked whenever 200 pound ex-army vet goes to apply for the fire service and gets rejected over some hispanic 140 pound woman, I shit you not.

Studied it from the news

It also doesn't surprise me you'd hate California, I have plenty of friends who live there. It's very ethnically diverse.

So what if it is; so what if it isn't.

Exactly.

Shahe you're making such hypocritcal statements. Mildly amusing.

All you do is post ad hominems and bullshit facts. No fun talking to you.

oh my gosh are u defending slavery

what about south africa, australia, etc the list goes on?

I hope this is sarcasm.

While it's never possible to tell, I'd say it's a safe bet. :D

How many times can you contradict yourself in a single paragraph, Jesus Christ. Your rant is also incoherent to the point of pitiful.

Lots of blacks(maybe mostly rappers) openly admit being racist when they say "ye my homies can call me nigga all they want, whitey can't". Nobody calls them out on that shit. Yeah, different rights depending on the color of your skin, nothing racist about that.

Of course there are racist black people. Goes without saying, but some people think only white people can be racist, like they invented it or something.

Enjoy this bitch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zPtpRrpU-g

Well to be fair to her I didn't see her write that only whites can be racist, but I only read the description. I do wonder though if people like her would have been okay with slavery as long as there were white slaves too. In the end racism in and of itself is just a thought, an idea. Without actions it can't hurt anybody. And yet reading shit like BLM I get the impression that it's not trigger-happy cops killing innocent people that's the problem, it's that it's not proportionately spread between races...

I wasn't saying she is an example of someone who thinks only whites can be racist (although I wouldn't be surprised if she does). She is an example of a racist black person, of a worse kind than the rappers you brought up. She is saying all white people are racist; not all people are racist, which implies she thinks other races are superior to whites.

You read that long arse description but didn't watch the video? Haha you only need to watch the first couple of minutes to get the cringe.

People's values inevitable influence their actions, and I wouldn't be surprised if many cops have a disposition to believe a black person is more likely to be a criminal and treat them differently. They deal with this shit every day, and I can't imagine they don't get jaded. But I'm also sure there are a lot of other factors that lead to blacks being shot at a higher rate. I also think American cops are trigger happy in general. :D

Well of course I read it, I nope'd at the 14 min long video, doh.

I find her bullshit harder to read than watching the first minute of the video, cringing, and then closing it. :D

Yeah, they treat them differently. They're less likely to shoot them because they don't want to end up on TV and become a political kicking ball.

The #1 cause of death in the black community for young black males is other young black males. But I'm sure that has nothing to do with the increased police presence they face.

And there have been studies on this. And the statistics bare it out too if you care to break them down. Fact is, due to a massive and system destruction of the family, the black community is in big big trouble right now.

White families are headed down the same path.

Of course there are also differences in IQ between groups which contributes a bit, but blacks were doing much better demographically in the 1950's than they are doing now. So any talk of systemic racism is generally going to be nonsense at least as it pertains to black people. The system is quite generous with them. Now I'd argue the people behind it know that giving people shit for nothing destroys them, but I know that many people reading this don't believe that so I won't go there.

It doesn't help a black kid who scores an 850 on the SAT (which is an IQ test btw, and blacks consistently score much lower, whites higher, Asians even higher and Jews the highest) and pushing it to 1300 just because he or she is black does no one any services, especially the kid who is being put in a situation to fail. Or worse, the courses are simplified and dumbed down to the lowest common denominator.

:)



Arrest me, I dare you.

Tsssssssssss!

"I do wonder though if people like her would have been okay with slavery as long as there were white slaves too."

As long as? I hope you're talking about america. And even in that case, there were plenty of white slaves. Like the Irish for example, that were treated worse than blacks because they were cheaper to replace.

But who cares, right? Never happened, doesn't fit the narrative.

And if you're talking rest of the world, then the great majority of slaves in history have been white in europe and asian in eastern countries. Every country in europe, and particularly the places under the roman empire, has been built with white slaves.

Slavery was an incredibly common condition, and every one in this forum has had various slaves in his ancestry at some point.

Yeah, was talking about the US.

;(

This is a game breaking character with his ability and LG.

Told you.

https://clips.twitch.tv/SpookyPlumpGoldfishBudStar

Sorlag had 147/120, so to kill her in what looks like 1 second like that, BJ needs 95% accuracy.

Maybe we're just seeing the side effects of a laggy game, and it looked different from BJ's POV.

Either way, it's a pretty devastating ability that I expect will get nerfed.

Now I find out that BJ was only doing 1.5x damage, not 2x, which makes it more inexplicable how he managed that kill so fast.

It's been nerfed to 1.25 for guns like LG now.

Special ability: collect welfare ammo every 15 seconds

I dunno. Could be a white, single mother too? Maybe make them race to the check to see who is the next char?

But the dad was black, right? :P

Just kidding. :D

yeah, this is an important point. Maybe Baron Railgun can measure his head and cranial features and discern the baby's father.

don't assume any of their gender or race u racist ignorant vegan eating penis goblin

ooga booga kill whitey

is there even a Ghetto map?

My nigga! Keep up the good fight brotha. Blm we needs some representation ya feels. Stay woke

AYO HOL UP

qc is not racist, lockbox is basically a ghetto map

As many already know, I post quality shit on esr all the time... so I know when I see exceptional posts and you sir have posted the most important and most beautifully written post I've read in all my years of reading esr.

you're welcome, m8

First of all, we're all from Africa

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170523083548.htm

hoax.

Nuke that racist white boy.

( ( ( S H A H E ) ) )
(
(
(
S
H
A
H
E
)
)
)

Did I just become a meme?

You sound like one.

I really hope you are just 80lvl master baiter.

God bless your beautiful soul <3

Thabks? I guess lol, not sure what to make of your comment

We don't see communists from reddit much here =] It is surprising when: one person can have an argument with everyone else?

Too bad we couldnt dow-n vote you like on (another place) to hide any dissent!

[-]
doesn't work? D:

Marxism isn't quite the same thing as Communism but let's not get into that.

Diarhea isn't quite the same things as solid turd.

Socialists shit rainbows and unicorns though, didn't you know?

Marxisim isn't quite the same thing as the thing Marx believed in but lets not get into that

This is another thing I noticed about commies... there are a million made up commie ideologies. "But we`re diffrent!" They all say? When it is the same conclusion. When you suppress the need to identify with a label, it is the semantics of the same thing. It is like politics where the two sides pretend to be diffren't, as long as they agree on everything worth voting against.

The left see the entire right as cunts, and the right see the entire left as cunts. That's the general gist of it. Online anyway.

Do you think I didn't know that? What are you trying to say?

That you're making a pointless observation, just like me.

He says all these "it wasn't r-e-a-l communism" memes 'n shit is worth nothing. It doesn't matter how you call it - real, unreal, quake, rayman, leninist, trotskyst, maoist, marxist, shahist - it all ends with the same totalitarian bullshit utopia where everyone is a slave that deserves everything and gets nothing.

were you born a faggot, or did you decide to become one?

2early 4 esr

no, we need more GAYLORDS

qc is .......racist aaaand homophobic!

First of all, we're all from the Ass. Or at least some of us. I know a couple of such quakers.

There's not even a homosexual champion in the game!!! in 2017 COMEON!!!! We need kissing each other bones and sarge ffs, or some another robot specially for clutch wich is definitely GAY after last update.

Just listen carefuly patch notes:
- Clutch has a new passive! (HUH???) - sounds homo
- Press the ability key a second time while the Barrier is enabled to lower the shield. (u need to lower your shield - sounds like homo-dates site promo)
- and activate the Mining Drill !!! (I want to see ur mining drill this night man, yes)

see?

YOu're forget ting about ANARKI who is obviously contracted with "the gay" . SLash is definiely a lesbian on the side also.

I don't know about racist but QC surely is sexist. Let me explain why:

Oftentimes when you look at distributions of features associated with success, men are overrepresented on the right tail of it (best chess players, most successful in business, etc.) This is where the feministy story ends and they're off to shout at people on TV or throw rocks at them. But I'm getting off topic here...

What's also true, men are overrepresented at the left tail of such distributions as well (homeless, mentally disabled, JamJam, etc.) For the science buffs among us, such a distribution is described by statisticians as leptokurtic.

Given that there are more male champions in QC, we have to conclude that in order for the game not to perpetuate blatant sexism, it has to be either wildly popular or a complete flop.

We can easily discount the former (if, however, there are among us those who do think a great deal of success awaits QC, I would like to wish them a speedy recovery and offer a suggestion that repeatedly stabbing oneself with a fork isn't the best example of an evening well spent).

The game will probably not be a complete disaster, either. It's being cunningly spun to the audience as a continuation of the iconic Quake series (even the name would suggest so to the unsuspecting gamer) and with the astronomical money prizes, the game has garnered attention of the most skilled players like cypher, makaveli or rapha, to name just a few.

And so we are left with the seemingly less exciting middle of the spectrum. This is where an overrepresentation of women is observed (take Katy Perry's singing or Zanzan's game as exemplary cases).

And since this is where reasonable people expect QC to end up in, the preponderance of fallic characters in the game is evidence of its strongly sexist tendencies.

Too many Oxford commas. 2/10

The Oxford comma is superior in every way. :D

But I didn't see him use any.

Its funny to see that even native speakers have problems with this poor excuse of a language.

Shahe getting owned, wow thats new.

Lol Matte all you do is get high while playing Thunderstruck all day, shhh.

Im not matte, but I know who you mean, its that CA guy. Anyway, I'm just your friendly neighbour tdm/duel player

Oh then in that case you can't even be decent at Quake.

(Sorry for the roast real Matte if you ever see this)

You ain't roasting shit, nigga.

Wouldn't surprise me if you do the same thing so I can see why wouldn't consider it a roast.

Thunderstrucking 24/7?
I don't know if I'm too autistic or not autistic enough to do that...

Lol. Yeah that's fair. I spent a lot of time training my aim on Thunderstruck so I'm not really one to talk...

Did beat matte at thunderstruck 1v1s/2v2s, but I dont remember ever playing u, maybe u werent around when I played CA (when i was new to quake)

England is fucking terrible unreformed language indeed.

How?! It's such an easy language to learn, far easier than German for instance.

This is solid overview:
https://www.oxford-royale.co.uk/articles/lear...-hard.html

It's easy to learn because it's the most used (from the spread of speakers to entertainment), not because it's inherently easy. My personal biggest gripe is that you pronounce and spell words differently. In Estonian I can derive correct spelling from the way I'm used to saying words so more memory regions (muscle memory) help.

It is true that other languages (Estonian also) are as hard or harder, but that's besides the point. I expect more clarity and organization from the de facto international language.

Spelling words in a phonetic way in English would just result in every tom, dick, and harry spelling words differently. People are using slightly different vowel sounds all the time. Anyway, spelling is the easiest part of learning any language IMO, and your English seems just fine.

His English is fine because like he said it's the easiest to learn by virtue of popularity. And if you ask me manufacturing rules to pronounce sounds kinda defeats the purpose of letters.

The rules aren't manufactured. The spellings are the product of borrowing words from other languages, combined with attempts to create consistency, combined with misspellings that became popular enough to become standard.

It is pretty much impossible for any authority to come along now and say this is how words are gonna be spelt from now on because no one owns the language.

And if we wanted to make the language more consistent, I wouldn't do it by using phonetic spelling, which is highly ambiguous and would also erase etymological roots and any meaning they contain. The sound of the word would still not tell you the spelling, and the possible spellings it would indicate would become so similar that they'd be at least as confusing as what we already have. Sound is just a mnemonic at best.

Would colour be
kuller?
kullah?
kallah?
etc

What if the standard one doesn't line up with your regional accent? Go from AUS to NZ, and you already have people saying pig the way we say peg.

All these variations become so damn similar they are harder to tell apart. It's easier to remember big differences than subtle ones. Besides, no one except a beginner reads a word by looking at the individual letters and pronouncing the sounds they represent. The word is absorbed as a whole, pretty much as if it were one symbol. This is often demonstrated by the fact people can still read if the order of the letters is jumbled but the first and last latter preserved.

I (and I imagine Nzr0 also) understand why the situation is like it is now and that it's near impossible to reform it at this stage. It's just one of those things that needs to be accepted, but is terrible/silly when you analyse it. It's the same for near all languages that aren't artificially crafted.

Inconsistency isn't too much of a problem, and as you say, pretty much every language has it, and some of the inconsistencies come from it being too cumbersome to follow the rules in certain situations. But there's obviously more than enough pattern to it that people are able to use it to communicate effectively every day across the world. It just means having to remember things, and if you're not remembering spelling when learning a language, you're remembering a whole bunch of other things.

Learning grammar and rules and applying logic to formulate sentences is gonna have one sounding like a robot and distinctly foreign. I think that's the hardest part of learning: knowing the idiom and the way things are normally expressed in that language despite the fact there may be a handful of ways to say it.

What you should know about rehe is that, while realizing he's not a robot, he wishes he was one ;)

Ps. Damn me...again with the "Oxford commas".

:D

[ , ]'d

01001011 01110101 01110010 01110111 01100001 00101100 00100000 01100101 01100001 01110100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100100 01101001 01100011 01101011 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01101001 01101110 01100101 01100110 01100110 01101001 01100011 01101001 01100101 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110011 01100001 01100011 01101011 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01101101 01100101 01100001 01110100 00101100 00100000 01110000 01101001 01110011 01110011 00101100 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01110011 01100001 01101100 01101001 01110110 01100001 00101110 00100000 01000001 01101100 01110011 01101111 00101100 00100000 01001111 01111000 01100110 01101111 01110010 01100100 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101101 01101101 01100001 00101100 00100000 01111001 01101111 00100001

Well, that's just rude! :D

I can't read that. Maybe my screen is broken because all I see are ones, zeros, and not a single Oxford comma.

Your mind is broken, you are the robot, gienon. I envy you.

Google probably isn't the best place to check what an Oxford comma is, used after any conjunctive it counts as n Oxford comma. Reread his paragraph if you like, it's not exclusively limited to 'and' or 'or'.

You're quite arrogant if you think you're the only one who doesn't have to google that to know what it is. And you are wrong. It only applies to lists; subordinating conjunctions don't count. But please feel free to point out what you think is an Oxford comma in his post.

I am fairly arrogant. I'm introspective enough to know that. And an Oxford comma is exactly what you've said it is, except subordinating conjunctions DO count.

No point getting into an argument over it though. I've got better things to do with my time than debate whether or not a fucking comma is defined correctly.

FYI original response so Gienon was in jest.

Nah, subordinating conjunctions do not count---because they don't separate elements in a list.

You might have better things to do, but you're still wrong.

It's funny how while acknowledging that you are arrogant, you find a way to pat yourself on the back for being "introspective".

It's not really funny, isn't that just being arrogant? Seems perfectly appropriate.

If you wanted to compliment yourself for something, you could compliment yourself for adjusting your attitude rather than merely for noticing a character flaw.

Its 2017 man, girls are proud to be sluts and guys are proud to be cucks, just go with the flow is what I recommend

Stop being cunts to Shahe, the guy has a different opinion and that's perfectly okay, you're not oging to get anywhere by slandering, insulting or belittling him.

He's been a gentleman this entire time, I think he's due some respect.

We are not going anywhere anyway. It's internet.

Least I tried

Lol, it's fine man. I haven't responded to some stuff because I've been busy with work but idiots don't phase me. On the contrary, it's fun having replies to read whenever I log in!

Add me on QC btw need some help with map routing on Duel, finally started playing it properly but haven't seen you online Steam in a while

I have become a victim to Assassins Creed 3 ;D

logged onto steam and I can't seem to find you, did you delete me or is steam going full retard like usual?

had it happen to me with 3 people, one being my irl best friend

Probably full retard, hadn't logged into Steam for 2 months or so till yesterday so it's impossible. I'll readd

It's all timing, aim, prediction and hitting your alts at the right moment.

I have no shame in my self- expression: Shahe would not have been bullied if not for his own actions.

Holy shit you're a massive nerd if you consider these conversations bullying hahaha

I think in this case you are the nerd (and possible autist) because you didnt get his attempt at humour, and the inability to recognize humour would be a trait of yours then hahaha

Everything here is just humour isn't it. I should remember that. Ha. Ha. Ha.

That was humour too. It was funny. Laugh.

Madness

hahaha

<<What is wrong you say? There's a girl, there's asians, there's whites... But where are African Americans?>>


- You'd forgot Australoid's, you goddamned racist!

>Australoid's

how can a political bait thread get taken past the first day lol.

cause shahe forgot to take his anti-psychotics

peter thiel about political correctness:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6cxRYgqfHY

Are you saying white poeple should go back to Europe and leave America, Australia, South Africa etc?

I bet not.

u dumb? where is something like this stated in the video?

Think of Lost_cause, he's probably still in Africa (mostly due to his team not paying for his flight back

I'm dying here hehe

more questionable than this "no black" issue (and no indian, not native american... ( damn, QC is really that racist ? )), I note that there is only NA and Europe in Quake champions ~~~~ no Asia. Asia is famous for online gaming. They don't hesitate to spend hours and money in online gaming. A lot of time, a lot of money. Asia concentrates some of the fastest growing economy and markets, including online economy and leisure market. For example, Blizzard is trying hard to conquer Chinese market... But quake is doing nothing... Is FPS market really that bad in Asia ? Or is it they don t know how to handle it ? I mean, it is new quake, why not using it to got new markets ?

How do you know Sorlag isn't yellow?

whatever yellow or not. If you can read more than half of a text (it may help you in your life, really.), you will be surprised to read questions at the end of the text. (it is often the case, that s why I invite you to read more than half text in your daily life).
If you reach this sentence, congratulations ! you prove you can read more than half of a text. you are making progress. Be careful, here comes the question: why Quake champions doesn't want to be in the lucrative Asian market ?

She does have slanted eyes...

Hi ProuT,

it's been 6 months. I told you that asia should be included in QC business plan.
You don't even consider this element.
Let's see: 0.0001% of asia play QC, it is already 20,000 people.
Does QC reaches this amount of players ?
Really, tell me the number.
How great are you ?

I don't understand your question. Are you asking about my height, my dick size, or my awesomeness in general?

"Are you asking about my height, my dick size, or my awesomeness in general?"
ProT, according to data, for all these dimensions (height, my dick size, or my awesomeness) you are under 0.0001% of average value. Which means for ya low, small and really far from awesome.

I'll trust you on that since you do seem to be the expert of tiny things.

Hi Pedro,

so, almost 6 months after, how many people are playing the game ?
Must be hundreds of thousands, no ?
What are the stats ?

did id overcompensate with wolfenstein 2?

Another reason I didn't give them any money the first was that it was a buggy mess at launch but this makes me never want to give them any money again

Shame.

I didn't buy the first one cause it used id tech 5 (60fps cap).

most triple a titles now cap to 60fps by default and you can't uncap it which is stupid.

Next we will need Gender Neutral Characters and advocates of LGBT community representing the game.

Anarki is Trans and Sorlag is a masculine looking female dinosaur

But how do we know this officially? Where's the back-story?

id software listened,

this makes me happy they think of my people