I will watch it and pay money for it, and it will be alright; but I will have forgotten it the next day, because it's generic. So it won't be a bad movie, but it will be pathetic in comparison to the original. Take the shot depicting the street f.e. it lacks the genuine grimeyness of the original, it looks clean and basically like a film-set. I like Ryan Gosling, but he also seems too nice a boy for a Bladerunner who operates at the edge of society. Ofc I like Harrison Ford, but all those remakes Indiana Jones, Star Wars it just doesn't feel right let the old man alone.
It's just a money grab and a lazy remake it will not have an interesting story, becvause that has already been told and it will have all those embarassing puns in it. It's sad to see the old man been dragged into this mess!
Just for the record: I was wrong.Bladerunner is awesome. Probably one of the best Sequels I have ever seen of anything. One could potentially call it a masterpiece. Also good acting from blond Mr.Defaultface.
Hihihihih.
the piece of trash masterpiece
basically let's see just a few facts
the spewing leftist Marxist machine:
-feminism checked I mean we have womenz fighters -but they are robotz ok I got it got it
-then we have womenz like bosses -sorry Hillary, not there yet, maybe next time -never I hope -police boss is a womez bc womenz are born to be leaders I know a few idiots who believe just this haha
-then we have the android born wonder another dyslexic women -or is she just autistic, on top of being sqeezed out of any sexuality or should we dare -senzuality
-then we got that strange sick -dehumanized love story between the main protagonist and his piano errmm I mean his program -or is it his facebook profile? couldn't tell -the sex scene is standing at the border of apogee of weirdom -sexually confused must be proud
-then the reference to the BIG FLOOD or CLIMATIC CATACLISM hello global warming...
aren't you sick of all this propaganda? aren't you not sick of yourselves and how low your cultural conscience is as it stands or asyou stand??are you even alive?
that shame of a movie could not be masterpiece even if you'd fuk all the womenz protagonists with a vengeance
I didn't vote them because they're a bunch of idiots. I hope they can manage to get a government and show us all how incapable of doing anything they promised are. All propaganda, and I see there are a lot of people out there that swallow everything that says that their little own private garden is in danger, because of "the big dreadful dark niggers invading our lands!".
Well, fuck your private gardens
wherever blacks go patterns emerge, when they form big groups
I wish you go and live in Uganda for a few years -but hello, without your Western money-then comeback and preach multiculturalism
I have no illusions: given the fact that you are part of the traitorous groups who turned against our ancestor's basic rules to me you are the mortal enemy
anti-sjw is still an sjw. You are accusing ppl of seeing male oppression where there isn't any, but you, yourself, are seeing some feminist agenda where there isn't any. Sad. This is an insane overinterpretation. So now, everytime there is a female in a film which has a higher position than a male it's leftist marxist propaganda.Sad and completely insane.
anti-sjw is not sjw but self defense, it is respect for history and ancestors, respect for evolution and who we are and requires merciless punishment for the traitors. Funny how you liberal scum always try to paint normal people -those who just don't want artificial change, aka passive people -into attackers, when in fact it is you mofos non-stop attacking our way of life and thus us.
If I'd be some sort of social justice warrior I'd run for my version of that but I don't even believe in justice. This is proven societal norm based on evolution. Things are the way they are because all societies who chose the cultural Marxist path did not survive. Fight for survival is not a nice pretty safe-spacing thing
This "overinterpretation" is actually reality happening as a result of political choices being pushed onto us -especially when we talk about the Hollywood slum, the progressive-regressive propaganda is running amok. Jedi Xena, KaKanda Black Pussy-Panther portrayed as "black revolution" (gimme a break...), everywhere is just happening. If my observations wouldn't be valid I could not give examples with this overwhelming quantitative weight. Anyone compare the number of women protagonists and their relation to their roles in the movies Blade Runner 20xxx and older one and tell me that there is no unbalance. The Marxist phenomenon is in plain sight for everyone to see excepting traitors who are part of the Marxist horde and who would try to obfuscate reality with relative interpretation instead looking for statistical data.
It is nothing new that usually women make less interesting roles in movies as acting if you put aside their sensuality and sex appeal like about love stories, if you are man. There is no such thing as charisma coming from women to men, there is tremendous sexual attraction and the whole hormonal effect -nature's fault, we were build to want to get into their bedroom, not to debate endless stupid women philosophy. Knowingly or not we watch movies for a reason and this is to reinforce ourselves with our role in the world as a reminder. When I see White Tiger (Belyy Tigr) ie I feel my true call for soldiery and it reinforces my view on life and war. Mainly thanks to the fact that the main protagonist is also a male. I could not relate to it if the main protagonist is a woman. The more women you put in the movie to take away our roles the more you inherit our space to develop our personality. Not only that but you also confuse women giving them unfit roles. Things are not so simple and you are too stupid and undeveloped to be able to understand. Christian religion understood this well that's why God is in the image of father or husband in the family and this is supposed to be the model for the kids. Take away this and you got undeveloped and confused kids not knowing if they are woman or man and not making kids, giving the empty space to less "enlightened" people or barbarians, like the Romans called them. Rings any bell? "Refugees much"? This is so old already and all great civilizations of the past stand witness to this. Probably that's why you seem only half grown underdeveloped. Because too often without hesitation you took women equal rights as granted and you never had the opportunity to know yourself. I call modern women the pants women bc their habit to wear pants while in good old times that was a proverb about the pants wearer.
I once read a great paragraph about women of today and how they drag Western civilization down.
"The primary woman, the peasant woman, is mother. The whole vocation towards which she has yearned from childhood is included in that one word. But now emerges the Ibsen woman, the comrade, the heroine of a whole megalopolitan literature from Northern drama to Parisian novel. Instead of children, she has soul-conflicts; marriage is a craft-art for the achievement of "mutual understanding". It is all the same whether the case against children is the American lady who would not miss a season for anything, or the Parisienne who fears that her lover would leave her, or an Ibsen heroine who belongs to herself -they all belong to themselves and they are all unfruitful.
How Civilizations Die (And Why Islam Is Dying Too)
by David Goldman
,2011
So, after all, it seems that many of my concerns will go away just because atheist regressive Marxist idiots won't reproduce, thanks to their toxic ideologies. Thank God for that!
Yeah ok, but can you really interpret the film in this way, so that it makes sense? I think not. See, I'm not criticizing your views (I don't care about them), I just disagree on how you interpret the film.
First you have to look at what the film really is about, in a condensed sense, then you start from there.
What you are doing is lay out a worldview (fair enough) and then you see one little detail (the high ranking police woman) which runs contrary to that and on the basis on that detail you dismiss the whole
film.
Just like a feminist would do who might claim, that there are not enough women in a film, who could act as a rolemodel for a little girl. So I ask you, are you that little girl?