he also divorced the same woman twice

Go MGTOW!!

eww

We at least agree on something

Perhaps Elon Musk is Thresh?

WHAT IF ELON MUSK IS THE PACO

UNRESPECT

or STX-Kash!

Definitely bullshit.

Just spoke to WinD and he said he got 1st in that tournament with his AE team. So yeah, confirmed.

Hi Alborz,

Who is WinD ?

Is elon musk in AE? wow...

Elong musk is like the next tesla ok? He has inventions coming of his fingertips, its like steeve jobs but with cars =] so what did you think? Of course , hes like if silicon valley went into his brain to make inventions. SO EXCITED::


I cant wait for the future of clean are, unlike airplanes which polluted the enviroment? Listen, I have a boat in my parking space, once the apocalypse as predicted by al gore happens I will paddle my way to califronia

Lots of money in Quake tournaments now.

I don't know if it's true, but he certainly play games. He mentioned in one of the interviews that he plays Overwatch with his sons.

He also grew up in South Africa, so his actual exposure to pro players was limited. Maybe we should ask phantom?

Doesn't seem far fetched though, by that definition I've won money playing quake at local lans and junk.. doesn't mean much at all.

Also as far as talent and whatnot goes, Czm seems to be a good counterexample to what you propose. It's more about time, they both had time to tinker and wreck faces when they were young, etc.

He grew up in South Africa, but he moved already to Canada for a bachelor and to the U.S. for a masters degree, in his mid or early twenties he started the zip2 company together with his brother instead of going for a phd at stanford (but the university still gave him that option as a backup plan) ... he is born in 1971 and Quake was released in 1996, so he was about 25 years old when quake was released and at that time he should have been in the U.S. already, so must have played in the U.S., i.e. if he really played quake he must have played at lans there or been active in the online scene ... but I just doubt it, the biographer just makes him bigger than he is, but still this is the most popular biography about him and there are many 5 star reviews on amazon. CZM achieved his results while studying, I am not sure how much free time studies leave you in the u.s., but it could give you enough time to practice. But Elon was working in company already, I doubt he found the spare time to play quake, according to the biographer he was also a workaholic working 12 hours a day, etc., I doubt someone with that kind of attitude is willing to spend much time on games, at least in the early phases of building a company and being directly involved in engineering, now things maybe different as CEO where he prolly just manages people and advertises his products.

Moved from one shithole to another shithole. Decided to upgrade and hit US of A for a really expensive piece of paper. Started a shitty company instead of spending more money on more paper. He's got a brother, who rides his coat tails. He was born, then Quake. By then he was fucking old. Some stupid book on amazon. CZM is the god of quake. I stopped reading after that.

I read in the paper today Elon called one of the rockets he's working on Big Fucking Rocket, so I have no doubt its true.

There were only two NA Quake 1 team dm tournaments with > $1000 prize money. All of the finalists were well known players in the scene at that time like Thresh, B2, Gollum, Rix, Kurtz, Honus etc. None of them is Elon Musk.

Musk pulling a WinD

EXTREMELY late to the game here. But yes, Elon is 100% correct. We were the team that beat him and Zip2. We were Clan Olympus (dumb name, yes). It was the first tournament held by MPath/Mplayer (that eventually hosted the Red Annihilation single player game that awarded the Ferrari). I remember distinctly going to their webpage after playing against them in the final and seeing their "about" page with their executive profiles. All were unremarkable looking 20-something unkempt nerds, much like we were, and didn't think anything of it until Elon became a billionaire and his ties to his older companies became public knowledge. I remember distinctly playing against a particular Zip2 player in a deathmatch before our scheduled final and how much shade he was throwing at the fact I was on superior bandwidth on the mplayer server that game. "Are you bribing the MAE East admins to sit on their bandwidth?", "You should be handicapped" (I was on UMD's Digex T3 connection back then for the record). It was absolutely Elon, lol.

Fucking epic!))

Might we collaborate altogether for an open letter through change.org or smth for Elon to buy out the Quake franchise from olden retarded possession, and make QL great again? With reworked ladder, matchmaking, same (or larger) off.server pool, defrag arenas, community mod tools, and multimillion tourneys at that?...

great idea, he could tank quake as quickly as he tanked twitter and we wouldn't have any false hopes anymore

Imagine if Quake was as tanky as twatter.

saying anything positive about twitter is now wrongthink (and a threat to our democracy)

I'll take "things nobody here said" for 500, Alex

You are saying it, you just don't know it.

normally i'd trust you as an expert on unintentionally not realizing you're saying totalitarian, radical things, but that's really just not how the convo went

Take meds.

rich

Pedo loving commie can't stop thinking about wealth :-(

Son1 exposed himself.

literally none of that applies, but I do wonder why this man makes you so happy

why this man makes you so happy

SOURCE?

http://esreality.com/post/2967943/n-a/#pid2967924

lol
lmao even

You hate reddit mods too?

Care to explain this picture for us leftist Alex Jones?

I don't know, care to explain your earlier responses in the thread first? It sounds a little too much like you wanna slander me without having any arguments and are only asking more questions to dump more gifs and positively respond to more slander.

Why did you read "Pedo loving commie can't stop thinking about wealth :-(" and instead of calling him Alex Jones said I exposed myself?

I delved into the specifics before you replied with https://esreality.com/post/2875079/elon-musk-...pid2967930 also, do explain why this kind of a response.

You think Twitter is bad or dying and I disagree. It was always a shit social media company and I believe it’s slightly better now without the millions of bots social engineering thought. You seem to think people should think as you do. You’re an sudo intellectual who thinks people on esr give a shit about your parroting of leftist language, because that’s all I hear from you is the same exact crap everyone has already said about Twitter. Just go away if you don’t like it?

As a matter of fact no matter how “free” speech is there will always be opposing views and no matter how much truth there is the person screaming about it sounds like a lunatic. But I’d rather be a lunatic than a sniveling snob who snuffs out debate, wipes the game board with his ass and pretends he won.

No one wins. Good shit throwing contest though.

Literally nothing apart from the first sentence relates to what I said or explains why you reacted to me this way. No specifics whatsoever either. If what I said is the same shit you hear leftists say, you could have specified my views that match that and rattled the criticisms you have for the left. But instead you just wrote a mini-rant about what the left wants, why that's bad and pinned it on me. This is a decent example shit-flinging, and in the exact opposite spirit to a culture of free speech that I wish existed. Hell I even brought up how I think Musk undermines free speech, something you should ostensibly care about, but like all specifics you didn't notice any of it.


Anyway, after you positively interacting with someone baselessly accusing me of being a pedo lover, a communist and obsessed with wealth, and not coming up with any reason for why you thought it was a reasonable thing to do, I don't know that I want to answer your queries so that you can fling more shit at me.

If you were on fire I would not piss on you. If you were starving I would not feed you a bowl of my shit. If you thought this was or was going to be a conversation, let me remind you that this is the internet and real discussions happen in real life.

I do not share your toxic assumption about discussions online: I have plenty of good discussions online, some no worse than the ones I have IRL. Just have to find people who don't take their emotional issues out on targets they find permissible online while pretending it doesn't reflect upon them as a person. But it's not my job to fix you.

I just find it funny you clearly think you have principles that you were alluding to in this thread while showing they're not worth even the shit you fling.

Pacmanpl is God Emperor Overlord of ESR, YOU my friend ARE OUT OF YOUR DEPTH.

all the trolls refusing to respond to anything whatsover specific and posting 'LeftistNPCMustAttackMusk.jpg' are very convincing

I mean every one on the left and especially Reddit had a boner for him years ago.

Then he dared criticized the media and what he thought was certain injustices that he saw and now all of a sudden he's a nazi or something.

I'm not a huge fan of him either, he comes across as a bit of a smartass (no pun intended) but I don't have an irrational extreme hatred for him like a lot of the left now seem to do and Reddit in general.

He's a smart man, a very smart man who made a lot of money and lazy people are probably jealous of his successes tbh.

You won't find the truth about why people act in a way you don't like if you only read rough narratives from the people that hate them.

I don't take sides nor browse only the kind of reporting that I have a slight bias in as we all do to some degree.

I study all sides of the dice then come to my own independant conclusion.

I study all sides of the dice then come to my own independant conclusion.

I know that this is the mantra that many would repeat, but repeating the narrative that one side is currently repeating regarding Musk without any ability to bring in context any of the details of why people are criticizing him says the opposite.

Except I said that I think he's a bit of a smart arse and that I'm not 100% liking him but it doesn't mean I have a hate boner for him because that's the trend nowadays.

So I'm kind of walking my talk.

Just like I don't have a hate boner for the orangeman, but he's done some stupid and immoral stuff like sell weapons to the saudi's when he was president.

You having criticisms of your own is different from you understanding the criticisms of those that dislike him

Well from what I've seen, people dislike him mostly because like I said he dared to criticize the media when Trump was president in 2016 and from then on out Reddit and a lot of leftists made it their mission to shit on him at every possible opportunity.

I very much remember pre 2016 Elon Musk Reddit and the left had a boner over him and were basically saying he was "The next Messiah". Then they proceed to turn on him when he has opinions that they disagree with like they do with most people.

The only criticisms that I can find from people who majorly dislike him is that he's a billionaire which in today's terms always means "bad" even if they're not "bad" and he's some how a nazi because it's 2022 and every one apparently these days is one.

Right, so you're only aware of the ways the right portrays criticisms of him and not any detail from the way people on the left criticize him, including me in this very thread in detail you still apparently haven't read. And you act like them turning on him doesn't make sense!

Right, so you're only aware of the ways the right portrays criticisms of him

Nope. I browsed the main stream elon musk hate boner threads on Reddit which are still plastered on the front-pages and honestly that's pretty much the only thing people seem to hate him for. A) Billionaire bad B) Apparently lazy because Billionaire which I don't quite understand that logic.

That or bringing up comments he made like 10 years ago. I'd like to see a lot of people who are slating him look into what they said in the past. Nobody is perfect and I'm not defending him, but the guy isn't Hitler - nothing close to that.

Now if he does something majorly wrong like diddle kids or commit some grevious human-right atrocities then my opinion of him will definitely dramatically change since I'm a critical thinker, I don't just blindly love or blindly hate some one because of a narrative. Like I pointed out in one of my previous comments. I prefer Trump over Biden 10/10 times, but does that mean that Trump is amazing? He is far far from it and has done a lot of shady stuff and if there were better options for president candidates I would support them instead (Tulsi Gabbard showed her true colours when she dropped her political campaign and supported Biden, a bitch move imo).

including me in this very thread in detail you still apparently haven't read. And you act like them turning on him doesn't make sense!

I haven't read everything you've said regarding him in this thread because you've written quite a lot of things and it's just tl;dr for me. The jist of what I've read is essentially what Reddit seems to think about him and you know my stance on that.

i think there are plenty examples of criticism towards Musk I have pointed out here, but also others have pointed out (and I can't imagine they don't point them out on reddit either) that simply don't correspond to the way you're grouping them.

Things like, in no order:
unionbusting;
attacking free speech while claiming to be a free speech hero
selling the carbon credits from his companies, negating his claimed environmental impacts;
lying to boost himself, including which companies he founded, the contributions of the real founders etc;
lying repeatedly about when and what his companies are doing/will do. In some smaller cases, the companies are almost nothing but those lies

I could go on for a long time but it's pointless I guess, the real question is if it'll register or if it's somehow something you can easily dismiss under the same categories you've been dismissing these under

I could go on for a long time but it's pointless I guess, the real question is if it'll register or if it's somehow something you can easily dismiss under the same categories you've been dismissing these under

Thanks for the points you've laid out as you're the first person who's actually presented points of discussion as opposed to 99% of people who just blind hate him because he's out spoken and a billionaire.

I was going to look into these but you already have seemed to have made up your mind about me through these brief interactions so I will bid you a good day.

I can promise you none of these criticisms are hard to find if you look for them.

I'll take this one...


unionbusting; lol, never been more convinced you're a commie :)

What's wrong with union busting, people like you think its ok for nurses and train staff to strike during christmas to maximise their leverage of their already relatively well paid jobs. Commies love unions btw, you keep getting offended I call you one, but you think like every one I ever met :)

Try being unemployed in the UK and living on 4k a year vs a nurse living on 30k moaning she can't live.

So holding the country/company ransom if they don't get what they want at the expense of peoples lives is superior to the person who doesn't want to empower them that much GOT IT.

If I owned a business with staff who felt the need to boycott coming into work without a really good reason other than "we're struggling a bit atm-its called a global recession) then I would gladly tell them to fuck off and hire someone else.

What I wouldn't do is sit back and let them dictate what I do with my business. You can find replacement workers easy, its much harder to replace the guy who revolution-ed the EV car business and puts shit into space. No one at Tesla is being paid peanuts.

A min wage job in the uk is like 22k, most of those in jobs run by unions are on much more than that.

attacking free speech while claiming to be a free speech hero

You're dumb if you think twitter/world isn't more free speech now than it was. Twitter is infinitely more free speech more now than it was, so Elon's net contribution to global free speech is off the scale since his take over given the reach twitter has and is currently exposing how biased and anti free speech the platform was.
You didn't have a problem with widespread abuse of free speech when it sang your tune, because you're corrupt :)

Yet still you attack him because your side don't like free speech (while pretending you do) or an open debate because you end up looking stupid and wrong every time. A bit like you have in my reply to you. It literally just takes anyone with an ounce of impartiality and a free, non conformist mind to see how pathetically confused you are. And you actually believe the shit you write don't you :)

selling the carbon credits from his companies, negating his claimed environmental impacts;

Who cares, the bottom line is, EM is an EV pioneer whose done more for ridding the world of cars than anyone. So yeah, I'm pretty sure elons done good in terms of environmental impact, if the metric of that is fossil fuel cars bad = EV good.

And yet you STILL attack him because the bigger issue that concerns you is he's in charge of twitter and doesn't sing the tune of your overlords and now he's the devil to you.

Hilarious.

"lying to boost himself, including which companies he founded, the contributions of the real founders etc;"

The guy put stuff into space, and you're somehow making out that he cheated his way in the EV car industry on someone else genius :).

If the other people had invented Tesla and were the true brains, there would be no need for Elon. Tesla needed Elon to be what it is now, not the other way around.

I bet you could go on for a long time, its clear you love to post stupid, easily countered point of views because your brain is so narrow minded and made up that he's a bad guy because the only thing you really care about is he owns a big chunk of the worlds digital discourse and he's not playing your tune and you've been programmed into attacking him.

That's the >>>>ONLY<<<< reason why people like you are riding his dick.

Before he bought twitter, you all thought he was amazing.

selling the carbon credits from his companies, negating his claimed environmental impacts;

I don't follow these business celebrities but this one accusation is ridiculous. This is what carbon credits are for, so that green companies can sell them and provide lower prices than competition. If they don't sell them, then they are probably gonna lose to fossil fuel products and the policy of carbon credits achieves nothing.

That and I'm not sure if you are a frequent Reddit user but you must notice that since 2016 that place has just become a hardcore crazy leftie echo-chamber where any discerning or other opinion isn't discussed, it's just instantly down-voted into oblivion where you cannot see it (I wonder why that happens) or you're just outright banned.

I used to really enjoy Reddit for the most part, but it's basically a cesspit nowadays. There's no actual discussion or mature discourse. It's just "MY OPINION IS THE RIGHT ONE, IF YOU SAY ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY THEN YOU ARE A NAZI, ALT-RIGHT, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBE, TRANSPHOBE etc. It gets tiresome.

How are people ever supposed to come to any form of conclusion or have any form of rational discourse online or in person if automatically you jump to conclusions regarding a person's beliefs, character etc.

Also the mass bannings/downvotes of any opposing viewpoint so no change ever happens. Just one side is perpetuated over and over again as "the right opinion".

I mean you're interacting positively with a guy that's slandering me as a pedo-lover and a communist, which I think is symptomatic of you not realizing what you're saying or approving of. I mean that or not caring about the truth, likely both. This must be what leads to reddit reacting to you this way, because the website isn't that political for the most part. If it happens that often to you, it's you that brings it out.

[q][because the website isn't that political for the most part. /q]

Rofl stopped reading.

Literally browse /all/ or /popular/ and it's post after post about either orangeman, shitting on republicans/conservatives and being pro democrat in every aspect.

Btw I hope what you wrote is parody or satire bevause if you genuinely believe that then you're a lost cause.

Reddit is worse now than Twitter these days and that's saying something. It's maybe the worst echo chamber on the web right now.

If they really wanted free speech and free opinion there would never be an option to hide comments after mass downvoting.

if you say so

Go to www.reddit.com

Go to /all/

take screenshot.

ifyousayso.exe

I'm saying it's you that brings it out because there's plenty of posts that aren't political and plenty of posters that rarely post about politics. In other words, if you are having a massive problem with them constantly engaging you and calling you out, this is you

I'm saying it's you that brings it out because there's plenty of posts that aren't political and plenty of posters that rarely post about politics

Nigga you must be trolling. Even in non-political subreddits like pics they still talk about Trump or republicans lmao what are you smoking my guy. It's one of the reasons why I don't even browse some of the niche subreddits that I used to frequent because even they are infected with political aids when they have nothing to do with politics.

if you are having a massive problem with them constantly engaging you and calling you out, this is you

Again.

https://googlethatforyou.com?q=https%3A%2F%2F...r%2Fall%2F

Can you explain to me how political posts existing means that there aren't posts that aren't political and users that aren't political?

Can you elaborate why it is that you must engage in politics so that you get attacked? Do they trigger you? Why can't you just chat about car parts or pen collecting or whatever it is that interests you? Or are you yourself attracted to politics, you just wish it was politics you agree with?

Can you explain to me how political posts existing means that there aren't posts that aren't political and users that aren't political?

I never said that nor is that what I implied.

Your original comment was that Reddit isn't political and that there's not an inherent bias, my point literally proves that's false aka browse /r/all.

Can you elaborate why it is that you must engage in politics so that you get attacked?

Well I don't, I haven't made a comment on Reddit in probably close to a year. From that time though, I was banned from multiple subreddits for posting twice in /r/The_Donald which was actually criticizing Trump not glorifying him since with Reddit you will be banned in any subreddit that links to conservatism or Trump if you've made any comments in those particular subreddits then you make one comment in something as mainstream as say /politics/.

That and if I chose just to reply to some one I disagree with and say "Actually I think that's wrong, this is my opinion". Instead of mature, rational discussion 9/10 times it will result in me being called a "homophobe, racist, mysoginist" etc. No rational discussion about the topic at hand, just insults to shut me down. That or I'll just get outright downvoted into oblivion and my comment hidden since, you know, there's a reason for that and we both know why.

Do they trigger you

Nope, but they certainly get triggered by everything any one with an opposing opinion does.

Why can't you just chat about car parts or pen collecting or whatever it is that interests you

I never said I couldn't. But those subreddits, even with things as niche as car parts, pen collecting as examples you've used actually is political some how because Reddit.

You know it's bad when /Science/ of all subreddits is political. That's how you know the place is a cesspit.

Or are you yourself attracted to politics, you just wish it was politics you agree with?

Are you being deliberatly obtuse? I've stated multiple times that I've came into mainstream political subreddits politely and maturely challenging things that I think are either a) False or b) Misinformation and instead of a mature rational response I just get heckled because you know Reddit is basically kindergarden at this point.

Your original comment was that Reddit isn't political and that there's not an inherent bias, my point literally proves that's false aka browse /r/all.

Nah, I'm just claiming that I think you're willingly or unwittingly finding the political posts. It's not so political so as to enforce political discussion upon you if you were reasonably looking to avoid it I'd say. That was my point.

You know it's bad when /Science/ of all subreddits is political. That's how you know the place is a cesspit.

It's well established as part of a political divide. It's not a good thing, but I don't think we'd blame the same people for those reasons. Trump has very actively attacked whatever science he hasn't liked... You're not in a good position to argue this as someone who wishes he won over Biden.

Are you being deliberatly obtuse? I've stated multiple times that I've came into mainstream political subreddits politely and maturely challenging things that I think are either a) False or b) Misinformation and instead of a mature rational response I just get heckled because you know Reddit is basically kindergarden at this point.

Did you miss how you interacted positively with someone slandering me as a pedo-loving commie? Again I don't think you're aware of how you yourself are behaving, so even though reddit obviously might well be acting like a bunch of kindergardeners, I wouldn't be surprised if you weren't metaphorically the biggest kindergardener there. Rich talking about heckling at this point!

Either way, my entire point was about you inviting politics. In this case, you're admitting you're going there yourself

Nah, I'm just claiming that I think you're willingly or unwittingly finding the political posts. It's not so political so as to enforce political discussion upon you if you were reasonably looking to avoid it I'd say. That was my point.

It's hard not to find them whenever they're on not only the front-page of Reddit in numbers but essentially every single page.

It's well established as part of a political divide. It's not a good thing, but I don't think we'd blame the same people for those reasons. Trump has very actively attacked whatever science he hasn't liked... You're not in a good position to argue this as someone who wishes he won over Biden.

Tbh I'd rather take crazy Trump or mr grabby hands likes to sniff kids Brandon any day.

Did you miss how you interacted positively with someone slandering me as a pedo-loving commie?

That's a valid point, he's a friend, a long time friend. I don't condone his actions, but I don't or can't control what he says nor thinks lol.

Again I don't think you're aware of how you yourself are behaving, so even though reddit obviously might well be acting like a bunch of kindergardeners, I wouldn't be surprised if you weren't metaphorically the biggest kindergardener there.

False, I don't go on a tantrum and block people I disagree with. I actually attempt to discuss opposing view points. :D

Either way, my entire point was about you inviting politics. In this case, you're admitting you're going there yourself

I may browse the all section of Plebbit just out of sheer boredom/tiredness/procrastination whenever I'm too tired from working, working out at the gym and studying and seeing that stuff makes me eugh.

That's a valid point, he's a friend, a long time friend. I don't condone his actions, but I don't or can't control what he says nor thinks lol.

You don't, but one could imagine redditors calling you names undeservedly, really nasty ones, making shit up about you, and then others interacting with them, saying haha you're the best, like it's all fine because oh they're friends and they're on the right political side.

Doesn't leave you much space for you to complain or say you have principles, really.

I don't care what people think or say about me that's what the block/ignore button is for.

I also don't care for politics, 99.9% of all politicians are useless.

pacmanpl is best pacman

Such a legend.

:D
<3

How many steroids does he take?

Let me say it this way, if Puddzianowski cries and a tear accidentally hits a baby, the baby will grow a mustache and sixpack over night

Twitter is doing fine. The haters can’t stop tweeting it’s like heroin to then.

Yea. Elon fired political mods, who protected us from disinformation and conspiracy theories, hired a hacker and even unbanned the orange devil. I think we can all agree that twitter is literally Hitler now.
Luckily, the good guys are ready to do some mostly peaceful protesting.

Sadly more or less nowadays.

No actual counter talking points, no mature responses, just "You're an ist/ism".

Rocketmanbad.exe

esr realize that buying into 'they want to take <insert super rich and powerful man> down because he's doing good" narratives without looking at criticisms makes you more, not less suspect to propaganda challenge

Isupportthecurrentthing.jpg

propaganda

Realize that actual people only care about companies they are invested into. Your corporate aspirations will not lead you back into humanity, regardless of what the US supreme court or TV say.

Isupportthecurrentthing.jpg

Isn't that Musk? Or does it not count when rightwing media says it's the current thing to support?

Realize that actual people only care about companies they are invested into. Your corporate aspirations will not lead you back into humanity, regardless of what the US supreme court or TV say.

It's not a matter of which you care about. Analyzing what's happening means looking at all the things involved. Otherwise you're easy prey for propaganda, don't you agree?

I've no idea what corporate aspirations you're assigning to me or how SCOTUS or TV could be linked to it

Current thing is whatever is trendy to parrot for virtue points and just so happens to align with the interests of corporations rather than individuals. It is the embodiment of useful stupidity. For instance, pretending to be about free speech, but attacking anyone who wants to return some of it to you. Oh but the PROFITS and ADVERTISERS you say??? Yeah, I don't have twitter stocks. And if you want to pretend you are looking at all the things involved you should have at least a couple of ways to defend Elon's decisions, no?

Current thing is whatever is trendy to parrot for virtue points and just so happens to align with the interests of corporations rather than individuals.

So again, Musk's twitter?

For instance, pretending to be about free speech, but attacking anyone who wants to return some of it to you.

Musk again?

And if you want to pretend you are looking at all the things involved you should have at least a couple of ways to defend Elon's decisions, no?

Definitely. If he implements Signal protocol for DMs and we find out that it actually was his initiative, that's one big plus

There are thousands of posts on twitter of people attacking Musk, in fact I just read loads.

The funny thing is, you and people like you never gave a shit about people silencing before twitter was taken over because you know damn well it was silencing those with views/policies you opposed.

Within a month of him taking over you're all of a sudden bothered about admin abuse on Twitter, yet despite your account being here from 2008 I doubt you could return a single post from your 14 yr old account expressing an issue with any of the large social media companies being biased towards anyone, even though you know they were.

Funny that.

The left are so stupid, they don't realise that they're making a world which will one day persecute them the SECOND they do not agree with their overlords wishes. because you're being baited by commies using seemingly worthwhile social taboos along the way.

Greta being a good example, They literally choose an autistic child so she was harder to attack and oppose, marxists always use a tool to leverage their message. Its all part of the commie training and indoctrination.

There are thousands of posts on twitter of people attacking Musk, in fact I just read loads.

Of course. Doesn't mean some people aren't banned for their views, or for being disliked by the group of alt-right to fascist memers that Musk has made a habit of responding to.

Here's some on his free speech commitment, and twitter ban policy.

https://twitter.com/JoshuaPHilll/status/1597614237093953536

https://twitter.com/murphtracks/status/1596204487215312896

https://twitter.com/donmoyn/status/1597636834141491201

https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1597565268766572544
(one could go a long time about him endorsing republicans who are currently mounting massive attacks on free speech atm)

His entire plan for making money is based "shadowbanning" the speech of nonpaying users in favor of paying users:
https://twitter.com/somebadideas/status/1588876465915166721
He'll also "shadowban" negative posts: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1593673339826212864
No explanation of what that means, because obviously he's not thought this out.

Another thing that's importnat for free speech that I've been talking about forever is that the most basic requirement is consistency and transparency. Musk promised a balanced council making decisions. I know I won't be happy with it, frankly a lot of rightwingers won't be happy with it, but instead, he's currently just banning and unbanning users left and right, taking ban advice from various far right memers, taking polls on whether to unban trump (on a website where that he famously called out for bots problem. As a person that might be using bots himself, personally
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2022-0...marches-on ).

Within a month of him taking over you're all of a sudden bothered about admin abuse on Twitter, yet despite your account being here from 2008 I doubt you could return a single post from your 14 yr old account expressing an issue with any of the large social media companies being biased towards anyone, even though you know they were.

Man, it's like you're setting me up to own here. If your account was new, people would think you're my sockpuppet.

I've talked about this plenty, here and elsewhere. For example, look at this post and my next response here:
http://esreality.com/post/2906510/some-of-my-...pid2965916

oh, and look who I'm responding to. You. Maybe the reason you think the left doesn't talk about it is that you don't listen?

The left are so stupid, they don't realise that they're making a world which will one day persecute them the SECOND they do not agree with their overlords wishes. because you're being baited by commies using seemingly worthwhile social taboos along the way.

Everyone knows this. To take an easy example the entire point of the far-left is that they're anti-capitalist. This means that they think the companies are structurally evil. Just about every conclusion that one could make from that has been made. Including, obviously, that they'll silence the left whenever they can. I could link dummy basic online socialists (that are mostly morons and want to revolutionize the world without even bothering to read the books their ideology is based on) like Hasan or Vaush repeatedly saying that capitalists are looking to silence them and will do it when given the opportunity.

This would require thrawling through their shitty content tho, which I just don't feel like doing. Especially as, you know, I'm not a communist, unlike you said earlier, and everyone that actually watches leftist content would know this is a common view. And you don't, so I'm typing way too much considering I'm responding to someone making shit up.

"Social media is biased, even though this is exactly where the antivaxx and far right nutjobs that have created most of the trouble since 2016 in the west got radicalized and continue to be."

You said social media is biased, yet accused people of being nut jobs for not buying into the whole vaccine crap and so did social media and implied its biased for a valid reason. Hardly the sentence structure of your average centrist and free speech advocate.

Did it ever occur to you people on the left are just dim witted idiots who don't question authority?

Oh and if you're wondering why no one wants to talk to you, maybe not calling or referring to them as NUT JOBS for not wanting to inject themselves with an unknown, untested vaccine which has pretty much been proven to be a giant fail from day 1 given I know people on their 5th jab and still got covid, I also know doctors who were told to put covid down as cause of death when it was not.

I had two jabs (so I could get into the USA) I won' have anymore, I was fucked upfor nearly 18 months, I have videos of my eyes and arm twitching for months on end.

I went from a 10 handicap golfer to a 20 in the space of a few months (slowly getting back) my mobility and speed dropped massively. This is now my imagination, this is data of my life. You don't go from a 10.x handicap golfer to someone whose shooting 20-30 over on a tangent without something wrong. Slowly getting back.
https://ibb.co/ftQVw4X

I wonder how many people died of the vaccine because of people like calling them nut jobs?

Problaby the same as when your ilk called people racists and nazis for being against illegal immigration then stayed quiet when some of them starting blowing people up and raping women. Just like they said would happen. ut were deemed as bad people, while you were the good guys?

The left are good like that.

The best thing is, you lot are usually the type that think a woman should be able to get an abortion a week before it pops, "its my body my choice", or whenever your commie overlords tell you dynamic value system to be for or against, yet had no problem telling people what to inject.

The only standards the left have are double.

Your being wrong about vaccines isn't an argument about free speech or an excuse for painting the left with a broad brush before reading what they say.

Misjudging your ability in various competitions is like your most famous trait here so it's rather funny that it's your argument against the covid vaccines

Hardly the sentence structure of your average centrist and free speech advocate.

Why would I need to be centrist to be for free speech? You seem to be admitting that you won't accept that a leftwinger is for free speech just because they're leftwing

Your free speech heroes (that you actually defend) undermine free speech, and when it's shown in detail as I did here, you continue ignoring it and talking like the left is the cause of all of your and society's problems. Also of the problems your heroes (like Musk) cause for themselves by doing what centrist businessmen warned them against doing.

The way you think big capitalist companies are aligned with communists (that are against the existence of those companies) is beyond parody

whenever your commie overlords

Ah, so you get to characterize the left based on nothing and it's freethinking, even after I demonstrate your resistance to learning anything about what particular individuals or leftists think, whereas what I think is the same as what other lefties think and it's decided by 'commie' overlords. Great

Musk is one of if not the richest person on the planet.
He'll soon have the most twitter followers on the planet.
He puts stuff into space.
He's revolutionized the car industry.

I find it hilarious 30 days into ownership of a social media company you (a random person at the ass end of the internet with less money than his daily interest) and your dreary bunch of lefties are looking to destroy him and already writing him off as a failure and somehow making out Twitter is less free under someone like him, while your camp acts like crying little bitches all the time.

First it was internet guy can't do rockets and cars.
Now its rocket and cars guys don't do the internet.

Fun times ahead :]

i wonder if when you just start repeating your narrative in place of argument, you're doing so to convince others or yourself

I admire your patience.

Thanks. I don't do it often, and largely do it on topics where I could type out entire paragraphs with my eyes closed, but sometimes it's still frustrating having a bunch of trolls jumping at me with the same false narratives and no ability to comment on anything specific.

Even more so when they'll just hint at their opinions and tell me I'm a moron because of it, when the hint is something false (like that Musk is cleaning twitter from child abuse content https://twitter.com/WIRED/status/1597320366002610183 ) lol

Anyway, you're right, Jamerio was always like this. Needs something external to blame for issues in his life

I keep repeating myself becuase you'keep saying how unhinged and terrible elon is because he's a free speech (If not 100% free speech then a lot higher than the pathetic soy boys who have been running it for years) advocate whose just bought a large portion of the online discourse and is attempting to make it more fair.

That's all the argument I need (for now) so you have none.

He's much more successful than you or anyone slating him and unlike the left, he's inviting both sides to the table because the platform was a politically biased shit hole and everyone (bar the most extreme) deserves a chance to have their voices heard without such a marxist group of woke areseholes falsely elevating one sides points of view as racist, or sexist and using that to bully the world into accepting what is right.

Come back in a few years and you'll be in a better position to argue, for now, you and your lefty mob are just shitting yourself and trying to create as much negative PR for Elon and Twitter as possible, because you're so used to abusing your power and are nothign iwthout it.

I keep repeating myself becuase you'keep saying how unhinged and terrible elon is because he's a free speech (<...>) advocate

This is one of the things in contention. Stating that he is when he's acting differently isn't an argument

he's inviting both sides to the table

By banning them or what

The best thing is, you lot are usually the type that think a woman should be able to get an abortion a week before it pops, "its my body my choice"

OH what a coincidence, you just happen to sound like every other trumploving MAGA fuckwit.

What's the point of venturing out of reddit when you're going to act as if you never did?

what do you mean

To stay on reddit or develop a persona that can't be matched by the millions of bots engineering consent there.

but what do you actually mean? that jamerio isn't just parroting psycho republican talking points?

You sound like an AI.

How's the crime in the USA going since trump left?
How's the world peace going since trump left?
How's the economy going since trump left?
How's indoctrinating kids and performing gender surgery on kids going?
Hows the employment rate going since trump left?
Hows making it easier to kill babies going?
How's the black death rate going since trump left?
How's tanking Facebook going?
How's losing Twitter and inspiring trump to make his own platform going?
How's the green issues going since trump left, I hear you pissed off the Chinese and they have pulled out if working with you. That's funny, being OCD about green issues and literally pissing off the biggest polluter to the point where they don't want to work with you. But orange man bad!

The left have fucked up everything they've touched in less than two years so you don't get to call anyone names.
These are not talking points I found elsewhere, merely observations I made based on having a non indoctrinated mind and reasonable metric if what the US should be doing. When the USA does badly, the world does badly.

Everything is worse under your sides watch.

I suppose you have excellent sources to explain all these things for me, right? Can't wait to read them all.

I wanna comment specifically on a few things:

How's indoctrinating kids and performing gender surgery on kids going?

What the fucking fuck.

Hows making it easier to kill babies going?

What the FUCKING fuck. Come on, man.

How's losing Twitter and inspiring trump to make his own platform going?

Losing Twitter...? I'm sure the pink twitter Trump created and made the guy who lost a lawsuit to a fictional cow run is doing well. lol

what the hecking yikes my dude!!! gender surgery on kids??

that is not happening! (unless it is happening, in which case it's a good thing)

what the hecking yikes my dude!!! gender surgery on kids??

that is not happening! (unless it is happening, in which case it's a good thing)

Sadly it is happening.

Why do you think it's a good thing?

bruh

it was satire

Knock yourself out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvyhKmfbtx0
https://youtu.be/Mi6yBbCUp_w?t=254
https://youtu.be/LQIWRqxa3Ig?t=346
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Krf0Cm-FKro

Hows making it easier to kill babies going?
What the FUCKING fuck. Come on, man.

Its democrats who are pro choice and advocating policies which will make abortion legal until the very end.

Since you're such a big fan of Trump, how do you like his healthcare plan? I hear it's coming in like two weeks.
or him denying the results of the election
or him inciting a violent insurrection on the Capitol building
or him letting covid take hold of the US cause he assumed it would only hit blue areas
or him calling neo-nazis 'good people'
or him fucking stealing government documents and 'keeping them safe' at his golf club

but sure, get mad because someone wants women to have the right to chose what to do with their own body or something.

There is a very decent chance there is election fraud going on in the USA and the dems are the ones who are against more secure voting methods. You don't think flooding the country with desolate foreigners isn't an attempt to add millions of dem voters to the country?

How about suppressing the presidents sons laptop just before the elections because it implicated biden and the MSM all saying it was fake, and its now proven as true.

How about an admission of conservative bias from the big social companies?

Russian bots were apparently a problem, but home grown bias was not? The left are such corrupt, selective liars, honestly, no characters standards which is probably why they are easy to manipulate and indoctrinate.

How about allowing fake stories of never ending russian collusion about trump?

How about implementing fake fact checkers which always worked for the left and were often proven wrong?

I could go on and on.

Trump didn't incite violence.

however the dems did incite violence leading upto he summer of 2020 with the BLM demos. You know, when dozens of people were killed and over 2 billion in damages were done over months, but all you hear about is a few hill billies on january 6th, where the vice president compares it to 911 and pearl harbour!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXrWGJ96B14

Number of deaths in pearl harbour =2403
Number of deaths in 911 = 2996
January 6th=5!!!
And they were REALLY REALLY DODGY DEATHS that mostly happened after the event.

Forget politics, just look at the numbers yet they still make the comparison, which gives an idea of how much they left will lie and are numerically corrupt.
And that's the VP!!! imagine how much the scumbags in the media, or randoms online will behave.

Resident ESR lefty son1dow is already attacking elon musk, for being a failure :) These people are hilarious.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJCDe7vdFfw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fsG5tyxRjw

And as a servant of the left, the lies extend to you.
Trump praises neo nazis???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmaZR8E12bs

Actually ^^^ and I watched the videos, leftist idiots came to town looking to topel statues like they've been doing, attacking people in cars, the so called nazi who ran them over was being attacked in his car, this is happening right now in another example.
blocking roads and atacking people then crying when they get bitten. Even if he was a nazi, he wasn't thre to run over people, when you choose to attack people with bats you deserve all you get, I would say the same if it was trumpies doing it to dems.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioVqEP4AMuM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cF9dngn8ZA

Note the LGBT flags.

And finally, here's a video of what happens to people when they don't drive off after being attacked by democrat voters/protesters.
And there are many worse online.

https://youtu.be/XTm_hi5kAZQ?t=25

And she, just like you, "you voted trump, you voted trump!"
You have Trump derangement syndrome.

If someone or a group is blocking the road and attacking you, you have every right to drive off. If they get killed, the left would rather you get killed, so they can send their lynch mobs around everytime they want to cause trouble,

Is why you all hated Kyle getting off.
It send a message to americans they can defend themselves against these domestic terrorists who the left and dems are trying turn against america so they can rebuild it under their commie utopia.

There is a very decent chance there is election fraud going on in the USA and the dems are the ones who are against more secure voting methods.

There's a long history of both parties going back and forth on this, yet you're choosing to skip the issues with the party that actively lied about the 2020 election..? Talk about bias. The amount of ways in which it's obvious that their election claims were dubious is beyond enough for any reasonable people. They'd have people without any legal background, paid actors, just talking complete nonsense in court looking like they're drunk or high. They'd have lawyers claiming big issues with the elections here and there, then refusing to repeat it in actual court because they know they'd be risking their license. There's no evidence for the issues you speak of, if you have evidence, do post it and I'll debunk it.

Number of deaths in pearl harbour =2403
Number of deaths in 911 = 2996
January 6th=5!!!

I just like these numbers because beyond the fact that courts already proved that sedition was happening on jan 6th which is completely different from a terror act that kills people rather than aims to overthrow the government, on jan 6th it was Trump's followers incited by him doing this, whereas... wait, is that the idea? That bush did 9/11, and... Roosevelt did Perl Harbour?

I'm only kidding here, but it's amusing trying to see how these cases could possibly be analogous in a way which your post implies.

We have information about what was happening with people around Trump and how they wanted Trump to stop it, and they went on filming videos where he says to stop and he just... wouldn't say it well until it was too late. He was happy it was happening. The evidence is overwhelming.

The dems are the ones who want to make voting as insecure as possible.

the dems are the ones who always seems to come from behind days after via the postal system.

the dems are the ones who are big on importing demographics into america who will only vote one way.

the dems are the ones filled with anti american, nut jobs obsessed with equity and calling everything about the country rotten. While calling everyone else, a nazi or a racist for the crime of wanting the basics like secure borders or security.

Regardless of semantics, comparing two events where 5,399 people died to an afternoon of hill billies in costumes and viking horns with next to no weapons or deaths happened throwing a tantrum for a few hours is hilariously typical of the left and you.

There were more people with guns outside a recent LGBT event (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRkVEtOy3ls) than there were at that so called insurrection and that followed on from the left rioting and looting the summer of 2020 which set the climate for political protest. But of course, its ok when they do it.

The dems are the ones who want to make voting as insecure as possible.

Did you miss where I said that both sides voted in varied ways in regards to this?

the dems are the ones who always seems to come from behind days after via the postal system.

the dems are the ones who are big on importing demographics into america who will only vote one way.

A natural conclusion of GOP's elitist and white supremacist strategy. They could try appealing to different people themselves, you know

Regardless of semantics, comparing two events where 5,399 people died to an afternoon of hill billies in costumes and viking horns with next to no weapons or deaths happened throwing a tantrum for a few hours is hilariously typical of the left and you.

what part of 'they tried to overthrow the government and convinced people that the other side did so that it'd be easier next time' sounds insignificant to you? The plan extends well beyond that single night and it threatens the government in the largest empire in the world

tried to overthrow the government

It literally didn't happened.

ayyy

lmao

"Did you miss where I said that both sides voted in varied ways in regards to this?"

Voting would be be more secure under republican way, all you're doing is conceding a point as a draw knowing the side you're defending are far more in favour of insecure elections.

Which is a bit like a convicted pedophile saying he's the same as a convicted shop-lifter because they both have criminal records.

The dems are the ones opening the borders up to millions of desolate people who will only vote one way when they are fast tracked to citizenship. Not the Re-pubs.

The fact that you perceive the statistical fact of coming from behind time and time again, as white supremacy is fairly typical of the left and most commies.

Tried to overthrow a gvt?

Thousands of people, largely without weapons were never going to overthrown a GVT, if they did, they would have been there with automatic rifles and there would have been mass casualties.

The fact that hardly anyone died that day shows that was not the intention of what went on and none of the violence, death rate, or cost compares to what BLM riots did and were actively encouraged to do so.

Its framed as an insurrection because it grants the left even more emergency powers.

Like I said, the left always hide behind something.

Voting would be be more secure under republican way, all you're doing is conceding a point as a draw knowing the side you're defending are far more in favour of insecure elections.

so you didn't know about GOP's spotty record on this and you're marching on unscathed? I admire your faith

Thousands of people, largely without weapons were never going to overthrown a GVT, if they did, they would have been there with automatic rifles and there would have been mass casualties.

Sure they could, given that there's an accompanying plan among MAGA republicans, and given that they've shaken faith in elections among their base and are gearing it up for more action if needed. Doesn't have to be more likely to happen than not to be an attempt at something

Too bad the midterms showed that this and other stuff--the exact culture war stuff you care about--just makes you appear like weirdos average voters would rather avoid. So good luck with that I guess

"Too bad the midterms showed that this and other stuff."

Dems lost half the race and barely scraped the other.

Now add in two winters spanning 10 months of cold weather and deferred incomes.

Losing Twitter and the continued revelations of how the dems have been abusing social media (election fraud and virtual insurrection if ever I saw one), while of course blaming everyone else and the "Evil Russians İ" and the impact that will have on society.

Two more years of their insanity.

I think the Repubs are bang on track. two more years of these socialist nut jobs running america into the ground and hopefully they'll leave a nice long lasting taste so they don't get in again.

Dems lost half the race and barely scraped the other.

You're talking like it's the first election you followed. It's a historic failure for republicans and it's exactly because they focused on the creepy shit you and other rightwingers on this website are for the most part concerned with

Creepy?

You mean like Economy and crime, while you vote for a creepy, senile old man who touches and sniffs kids and is tanking the US while daily humiliating himself and the country?

I'll just leave these here for others to see what you do not consider creepy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbE2SmV2bs
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/op2xKuFslyg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf8sJri25kU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxVPrtXk_9c

https://youtu.be/93hT1CUErv0?t=33 (she looks like she was about to burst into tears)
https://youtu.be/93hT1CUErv0?t=301(kid fliches)
https://youtu.be/93hT1CUErv0?t=469
https://youtu.be/93hT1CUErv0?t=528

https://youtu.be/dw5H9LYeKZQ?t=3 (that's not creepy to you?)

Do you know what is ACTUALLY creepy, people like you who are so fucked in the head you ACTUALLY OVERLOOK all of the above and more to work towards whatever warped, commie agenda you consider so important.

https://youtu.be/XiF_Kya4IUc?t=46
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvyhKmfbtx0

I didn't vote for anyone in the US election, what I said was creepy doesn't depend on what the left does or doesn't being or not being creepy, and more importantly, you really wouldn't be talking about the midterms this way if you had any familiarity for how elections in US go depending on which party controls which parts of the government. This is really basic shit

Oh and could you please stop with the invocations of communism with regards to me? It's just nonsense

I didn't say you voted for anyone in the US elections, but seeing as you're attacking trump and musk, then we both know you would have voted Biden.

Yeah that's not a bad inference, if I was in a swing state I would have. Not because I like Dems at all, but oh well.

I love how you can't even tell you are engaged in currentthing.jpg. The only time you're "not a commie" is when you get accused of being one, but your social programming doesn't allow you to go there in practice.

- Musk man bad, I am objective and pro free speech, not currentthing.jpg
- Ok, say something good about Elon.
- ...private messaging.

Not, "well he unbanned Trump at least"(a fucking president) or "well shit was always unprofitable, at least he's trimming the fat, we'll see". No. "ROCKETMAN BAD, please clap for me".

right, I'm doing currentthink and communism when I read and note what experts in the field and people that stopped working with twitter say, you're a freethinker when you drop 'haha communist npc' narratives without engaging anything. You asked for something good, and because I didn't say the things you wanted but rather twitter possibly supporting a basic necessity that's crucial for free speech, you can only accuse me of wrongthink.

Open-ended questions are only an demand to toe the party line for you huh?

I'm doing currentthink and communism when I read and note what experts in the field and people that stopped working with twitter say

You're not even sentient.

basic necessity that's crucial for free speech

"Comrade, you can speak freely in private, da."

You're not even sentient.

You just got done flipping your shit because my answer to an open-ended question wasn't the exact thing you wanted lmao

"Comrade, you can speak freely in private, da."

Can you defend your associating communism with privacy rights in any way? In my years of reading about privacy online, I'd sometimes find myself watching libertarian panels. Usually just academics. You're just making shit up according to your rightwing programming

I'm only calling you an idiot for saying privacy is a requisite for free speech.

If your way of saying idiot is by implying someone's communist, it's no wonder you're struggling with who's a communist and who isn't.

Rights are associated with one another. Frequently people acquiring privacy will mean they can speak freely, and losing it that they can't. Anyone that has read about human rights know they're inextricably intertwined. But you're a bookless moron that mocks things he's unfamiliar with so I wouldn't expect you to know this

Ok, explain how privacy in DM's is going to fix or make free speech better on twitter.

someone who would otherwise don't post because they'd be afraid of political persecution because they're aware that websites regularly leak their data might post more freely than before implementing the protocol

this should be pretty intuitive

Yeah, I hear that's why Trump left in the first place...

i don't see what you mean and did not at all have people like Trump in mind *shrugs*. More like people protesting the government in Iran, for example, or a new Snowden considering to DM someone that doesn't have their signal number listed. Snowden had the same type of issue

The whole fucking context is twitter. Musk is not the ayatollah.

the concept of a leak is that anyone can read it after it happens

"Can you defend your associating communism with privacy rights in any way?"

Go to china, be critical of the Chinese GVT and see what happens to your life. At least I can call my GVT bunch of c***s, sleep easy at night and still travel where I want without my bank account being closed down.

The only people pushing for that to be a way of life in the west is the left and the globalists/commies.

Cashless society, electric cars, your life controlled at a touch of a button. Say, think or support the wrong thing and its bye bye life.

That's why I laugh at people like you, you're literally supporting a side that will just keep taking and taking until you become smart enough to realize you helped install a system in place which is now coming for you because you don't align with their never ending demands.

And yes there are examples of abuse in the west, but its generally much lower and is rising thanks to the left.

so everything from joe biden to communists (that want corps dead) to megacorps (that don't want crops dead) to the chinese communist party to me (that doesn't want the end of capitalism) is the same ideology?

my guy you're not even capable of pretending you're interested in what "the other side" is like while you're pretending championing free speech.

Sorry mate, I don't have enough soy in my system to process that syntax.

which part is unclear exactly?

Thank god we have contrarians like you so we can all "think freely!!!"

You still have reddit.

Are you a bot?

No.

https://imgur.com/a/he03TYJ

you in 15 years, give or take. altho, musk is going to be doing the same to his followers while he sends off guinea pigs to mars.

implying that because someone is supportive of a group that they must be part of a group (of lgbtq people is who I'm taking that picture to be of) is one way of telling on yourself

You're not supportive of anyone or anything dude. You're really just being battered around like a ping pong ball going along with the trend and flow of the strongest current, because you have no will or motion of your own anymore. You're using left takes against the right and right takes against the left whenever it suits you, but you try your hardest to make it look like you are above and beyond that. You're in effect, the worst kind of neutral.

You have the ego of a hyperintellectual, but the strength, understanding and innocence of a 13 year old boy - they both really cancel out each other. The only way that's going to change is when you have a first hand experience with the people or ideology you claim you supported, when your face is finally stuck between the pavement and a black boot. And this time, the grass will not be any greener on the other side.

It's not going to be the commies, fascists, trumpists, musks, putins or the free thinking nuts who are at fault. It's going to be your armchair existence. That's when you'll finally start questioning whether all those books, mainstream academics, reputable sources and passive thinking you insulated yourself in all these years were a worthy substitute for...life.

You're very much the type of guy who's going to be in favor of assisted suicides as a solution for people who starve or struggle financially in the future. You may laugh or not agree with that now, or even understand how it's relevant, but the institutions and experts you put your trust in (often reluctantly, because you feel you have no choice), will yet again do a number on you, because...democracy, freedom, greater good and circumstantial necessity like food shortage, climate change due to cow farts and evil russians or w/e.

And by the way, that picture has little to do with lgbtq and their rights or freedoms. At least pretend that you went beyond assumptions for once and made the effort to look into it before going on with your two dimensional tirade.

it'd probably be healthier to write fanfiction about fictional characters rather than people that angered you online. at least the creativity you put into it is a sign you don't have false hopes of convincing anyone, I guess

Jamerio is a right wing nut. Who knew.

safe and effective

my favourite babylonbee headline

So there are any demos of Musk playing Q1?

how about we ask elon on twitter to save quake?
As a quake player he knows quake 3 is the best game ever

Maybe he will buy microsoft and fire Tim Willits and syncerror and get j. carmack back

we should show him this:
https://mega.nz/file/kXoVjTpB#pMpZQ3cZZpnVa7k...0Qim-3IWyE


I think elon is crazy enough to make it happen

Tim Willits 'left' id software already, who knows if that controversy that happened shortly before that where he falsely claimed to have invented deathmatch maps had to do anything with that ... afaik Joe Rogan also likes Quake, so Elon Musk and Joe Rogan should come together and do a joint venture, hire some people and make Quake great again

1) Most of the market is on consoles, the mechanics of quake need a keyboard and mouse or its not quake.

2) And on top of that most of the FPS market are not able to handle the rate of combat from from quake due to point 1.

That explains why Quake is unpopular on PC and CONSOLE.
Its a perfect storm where one cancels out the other.

Why do always we need to go for the big numbers?
You can also suceed *because* you are using a niche, capiche?

16 players is too small of a niche.
Esports team in Apex use one gamepad player because of the build in aim hack.
Imagine.

wrong, quake 3 isn't the best quake.

This guy is a legit troll.



Shit gets spicy from 3 mins on.

"This guy is a legit troll."

Who, the guy on the mic or the fat guy with the micro-penis, long hair and tits?

Nothing ever happens.

C O O L L E R
O
O
L
L
E
R

soon COLLOSEUM 1vs1 wannabee octagon

-= MUSK vs ZuckerBÖRG 2023 =-

or IT dudes MORTAL KOMBAT ^^

What about Chinese Elon Ma?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sTHLrfK54wU