ESReality - Where Gaming Meets Reality
Not Logged In | Login | Register
11:46 CDT - 1523 users online
All Posts
Users online (3 comments)
Posted by gSTRUCTOR @ 21:27 CDT, 1 August 2025 - iMsg
Aug 1st 2025

23:25 -03 - 2359 users online

I see most topics are dead, even some that have interesting information.

How is the users online calculated? hmmm
2472 Hits
Reflections with Makaveli: Changing my narrative (8 comments)
Posted by Thorin @ 13:56 CDT, 28 July 2025 - iMsg
In the 500th episode of my "Reflections" series I interviewed United States of America Victor "Makaveli" Cuadra, elite dueler and Quake legend.

Makaveli was one of the pioneers of the professional Quake 2 duel scene in the late 90s, along with friends and rivals United States of America Thresh and United States of America immortal. Players like United States of America Fatal1ty and United States of America ZeRo4 have credited him with inspiring their approach to pro play. He became the "unofficial world champion" after beating Norway Shub in an exhibition series after the Norwegian had won EDL.

Makaveli discussed his recent recontextualising of his playing career, the reasons he chose a life without esports and how archiving his past has changed his perspective.

Edited by Thorin at 09:40 CDT, 30 July 2025 - 740 Hits
Requiem for Quake II (2 comments)
Posted by baron Railgun @ 18:56 CDT, 21 July 2025 - iMsg
So a few words or ideas about the actual situation of gaming and (defunct) id Software MP games in special.

I think that irony with all newer games after Doom2 was that their MP was better than the SP where they focused more on SP, like Quake2 and Doom3, and the game that was designed especially for MP, Quake3, did not rise to the level of Quake2 Nor Quake1 or Doom3 in deathmatch.
After looking again at all those epic matches, I started to think that Quake2 was the most perfectly crafted, sometimes balanced, sometimes not, but giving importance to aspects like denying weapons, positioning and making in general brain matter more than in Quake3. What made Quake3 bad compared to Quake2 was the perfectly timed items, the imposed faster gameplay paced and improved accent on aiming. Filling all maps with too much armor and reduced respawn times for weapons were supposed to make games more frantic, fight, fight, fight. Instead it produced boring arse matches, where the spectator watches in awe at perfectly executed stunts with refined aim, and left you after empty, like watching a movie filled with special effects but garbage story.
To its due, Quake2 because is more slow and more methodic in its action is not fit for anyone, not for the stupid.

But Quake2 did not escape the garbage.
What f-ed up Quake2 still is the modern gaming hordes, who learned to abuse maps architecture. Like on The Edge, you supposed to pick mega and armor by rocket jumping and using the stairs, not combo-jumping and pick up all fast. This would slow a bit the pace and would reduce the control of the guy defending the room since he could not be exactly so easy all around to pick all in 2 seconds. Then they started to buy expensive mouse hw to aim better (to cheat in a way the limits of the railgun and of chaingun -hitscan weapons) and they cheated even more using crazy fovs to see more around. As an irony the end result was that players who became good at this kind of play, based on aim, execution, fast action and +forward, in Quake games, lack brain and general strategy knowledge, and got owned by brain players like Rapha.
So in a way the concept of Quake2 and Quake3 gameplay got its revenge, having the abusers getting kneeled by people with brain. Unfortunately not many rise up in the scene like this, because things are increasingly difficult with games where pro players can use execution to such extend, thanks to gimmicks, advanced hardware and all that garbage, that would overcome smartness. Unless smart guys have to spend huge amounts of time to get at closer level with the established "elite".
So I seen guys commenting about older Quake players and how they would stand no chance versus "enlightened" new wave or shall we say players after 2000. Well, I say, give them a ball mouse, reduced bind options, less strafejump mechanics (add a block depending on armor carry), and deny wider fov and all that s (supposedly improved) stuff that made them cheat their way to the top. Would they dominate then? After 2 decades of building just muscle memory and brain drainage? I don't think so...

So up until now, watching thousands of matches for quake1,2,3,ql,d3, q4, all I can think is that the ones played in the beginning are more valuable because (raw) superior gameplay mechanics, during the times of Quake1 and Quake2, and Quake2 gets the top of the cake. Quake1 was also close, until players learned to use and abuse strafejump to perfection and add new hw for improved aim, which changed the whole picture and the animation of the gameplay into -again -execution instead smartness.


[maybe I'll add more thoughts in the future]

side note: the only weapon that I don't like, never did in Quake2, was the blaster -design wise, usability, rate of fire and the shot effect is like you shoot colored spagetti
Edited by baron Railgun at 18:59 CDT, 21 July 2025 - 627 Hits

<< Comment #1 @ 07:52 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By United Kingdom Six16 
Firefox 3.5.7 with Adblock plus, a theme addon (i forget its name) and greasemonkey (for ql addons).
<< Comment #3 @ 08:15 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By knirtlotz*deotrip deotrip  - Reply to #1
personas?
<< Comment #4 @ 08:17 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By United Kingdom Six16  - Reply to #3
Yep!
<< Comment #17 @ 13:43 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By SC_Zerg [mash]  - Reply to #3
wow, this is pretty sweet.
<< Comment #66 @ 05:56 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By United States of America MUNG>esh  - Reply to #3
gay
<< Comment #125 @ 13:53 CST, 22 January 2010 >>
<< Comment #126 @ 15:07 CST, 22 January 2010 >>
By knirtlotz*deotrip deotrip  - Reply to #125
hehe nice
<< Comment #81 @ 16:24 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By SC_Terran Venim  - Reply to #1
yep. nothing beats firefox + adblock plus when firefox is working properly (no random crashes)
<< Comment #91 @ 12:41 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By pandabearguy KekS  - Reply to #81
chrome + privoxy does imho
A LOT faster, more reliable and i like the overall look better (don't care that it uses less ram since i've got enough anyway)
<< Comment #100 @ 20:27 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By zerg vedic  - Reply to #91
I'd say they are both fine, but without noscript or noscript-style protection, Chrome has no business surfing the general internet. I do notice some significant performance issues on certain flash sites with Chrome, but other than that, neither is "faster".

There is also an extension for FF that makes it look identical to chrome.
<< Comment #2 @ 08:14 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By knirtlotz*deotrip deotrip 
ff with noscript, adblock plus, auto copy and ietab
<< Comment #5 @ 08:29 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By Beer! meh_ 
firefox 3.5.7, adblock plus, modify headers and tamper data :)
<< Comment #93 @ 13:44 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By ratmstar Kaloos  - Reply to #5
little hacker :p
<< Comment #6 @ 08:36 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By 2k2_2 Nukm 
using chromse atm but i miss some of my ff addons
<< Comment #18 @ 14:04 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By Colour: white link  - Reply to #6
same
<< Comment #40 @ 07:14 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
<< Comment #7 @ 08:41 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By nade browser 
ff w/ adblock+ betterprivacy download statusbar flashblock flashgot forecastfox hide menubar quickrestarter session manager
€ littlefox theme
Edited by browser at 08:48 CST, 11 January 2010
<< Comment #8 @ 09:32 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By clawo ini 
Nerds
<< Comment #9 @ 10:06 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By wc3_undead mammon 
first person to vote IE is a cunt
<< Comment #13 @ 11:19 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By QW tbone  - Reply to #9
:(

I use firefox for quake and porn... does that count for anything?
Edited by tB0nE at 11:19 CST, 11 January 2010
<< Comment #14 @ 11:33 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By Beer! becks  - Reply to #13
The question says choice not what you actually use.
I use ie at work, but firefox at home -> so I voted firefox for those few hours :D



Also: cunt!
<< Comment #15 @ 12:04 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By QW tbone  - Reply to #14
Damn! I probably deserve it then.
<< Comment #21 @ 15:49 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By 004 bsk  - Reply to #15
Holy shit that was you? :/
<< Comment #23 @ 16:14 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By QW tbone  - Reply to #21
It integrates with Windows 7!
Edited by tB0nE at 02:29 CST, 12 January 2010
<< Comment #33 @ 01:45 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Beer! becks  - Reply to #23
that sneaky bastard!
<< Comment #10 @ 10:23 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By l0wfly funnyb 
firefox 3.5.7 with adblock plus, multirowbookmarkstool or smt and gmail notifier.
<< Comment #11 @ 10:30 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
Firefox, newest version. I really have to say that Firefox has been getting slower and slower as the new versions come out. FF used to be super quick in 2.0, and just got worse from there.

Plus, bookmark management sucks a LOT. FF hangs for ~2 minutes when moving roughly 400 bookmarks from one folder to another.
<< Comment #19 @ 14:25 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By clawo .syL  - Reply to #11
And man, what's a morning without some coffee, soft boiled eggs and a near instant bookmark transfer
<< Comment #51 @ 11:17 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Unset gnarf  - Reply to #19
:>
<< Comment #12 @ 10:54 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By Germany Putton 
firefox all the way baby..
<< Comment #16 @ 12:53 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By Skåne unikum 
Used ff for so long now, since it was called phenix or somethin.. But trying chrome now when it supports extensions. It feel much faster than ff. Doesnt support QL yet thou. :/
<< Comment #20 @ 15:28 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By zerg vedic 
Firefox with:

-NEW Glasser
-New tab homepage
-NoScript
-FireGestures (<3)
-AdBlock
-IE Tab
<< Comment #22 @ 15:56 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By Lithuania son1dow 
Polls like that are rather worthless, web data > this, even though there are some advantages.
Addons:
Prism
Noscript (most valuable one)
Greasemonkey
FFClickone for 2DFighter.com
random bookmark sync. addon when I need it.
<< Comment #24 @ 16:23 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By zerg vedic  - Reply to #22
Lack of noscript is one of the only reasons I don't use chrome. =P
<< Comment #32 @ 20:10 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By Colour: white link  - Reply to #22
i'm interested in what browsers/addons people use here.
<< Comment #46 @ 07:50 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Lithuania son1dow  - Reply to #32
Something Sujoy could collect, like actual statistics on ESR would be more valuable for browser usage, that's what I meant.
<< Comment #63 @ 03:36 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By Colour: white link  - Reply to #46
i'm surey sujoy will put the time in and give me the statistics.... yeah
<< Comment #64 @ 05:24 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By Lithuania son1dow  - Reply to #63
:)
<< Comment #25 @ 16:54 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By Transparent cumrag 
firefox w/ noscript, adblock plus, fire gestures

i have safari installed to dl a few youtube videos. i'm sure firefox can do it but i cba.
<< Comment #26 @ 17:49 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By nade browser  - Reply to #25
strangely QL wont work if im using noscipt
any1 got an idea bout this?
<< Comment #27 @ 18:03 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By wc3_undead mammon  - Reply to #26
you can actually make ql run in chrome, and it feels much faster than ff over here
<< Comment #38 @ 07:08 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Pink Smiley Melachi dansen  - Reply to #27
elaborate..
<< Comment #43 @ 07:34 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By wc3_undead mammon  - Reply to #38
try logging in to ql using FF then closing it and opening it in chrome. my account stays logged in and works in chrome. but my chrome is faked to look like ff, i hexedited something for that so may have to elaborate on that ?
<< Comment #45 @ 07:40 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Pink Smiley Melachi dansen  - Reply to #43
nah, its fine, thanks
<< Comment #78 @ 15:57 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By France epsy  - Reply to #38
1. Go to http://www.quakelive.com/
2. Ctrl+Shift+I
3. Click console
4. quakelive.CheckBrowserCompat = function(){ return true; }
5. Log in and you're ready to play :)
<< Comment #79 @ 15:59 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By France epsy  - Reply to #78
but beware there might be bugs, on linux for instance it can't download anything, and I've heard it would systematically crash on windows
<< Comment #94 @ 13:51 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By ratmstar Kaloos  - Reply to #79
On linux i had to change my user agent in about:config to this :
general.useragent.extra.firefox -> Firefox/3.5.2
<< Comment #105 @ 12:49 CST, 15 January 2010 >>
By France epsy  - Reply to #94
I use this trick on linux and it needs nothing more.

PS: And afair, chrome doesn't have about:config
Edited by epsy at 12:51 CST, 15 January 2010
<< Comment #106 @ 02:18 CST, 16 January 2010 >>
By ratmstar Kaloos  - Reply to #105
oh sorry, i thought you were talking about FF
<< Comment #80 @ 16:20 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By Pink Smiley Melachi dansen  - Reply to #78
lol silly rabbit, tricks are for kids
<< Comment #87 @ 03:25 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By clawo .syL  - Reply to #80
Tricks is something à whore does for Money...or candy
<< Comment #88 @ 03:30 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By Beer! becks  - Reply to #87
I got a shiny Euro piece right here.

Now do your trick.
<< Comment #127 @ 08:39 CST, 23 January 2010 >>
By nade browser  - Reply to #80
you share!
<< Comment #28 @ 18:05 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By zerg vedic  - Reply to #26
...do you have the site allowed?
<< Comment #31 @ 19:48 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By nade browser  - Reply to #28
sure do
<< Comment #29 @ 18:37 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
Firefox + Chrome (mostly on my old laptop, 4 the speed)
<< Comment #30 @ 18:58 CST, 11 January 2010 >>
By United Kingdom green 
i use firefox, but it shits me off. i feel like it reloads pages entirely everytime i revisit them, costing me data and precious seconds of my life
<< Comment #34 @ 01:51 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
FF
<< Comment #35 @ 01:56 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Spain jal 
I use firefox, but, tbh, just because of habit. It actually crashes more oftently than IE never did, and doesn't open pages any faster.
Edited by jal at 11:55 CST, 12 January 2010
<< Comment #37 @ 06:28 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Colour: white link  - Reply to #35
did you mean habit?
<< Comment #47 @ 08:47 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By zerg vedic  - Reply to #35
http://noscript.net/

I haven't had FF crash in years.
<< Comment #36 @ 02:07 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Nuke Explosion raithza 
using firefox but moving on to chrome as soon as it has enough addons..
<< Comment #39 @ 07:09 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Pink Smiley Melachi dansen 
using chrome at home because its there right away and not 3 seconds after i click the item.
<< Comment #41 @ 07:14 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Iceland hnns 
Win7 + Chrome for the laptop. light & fast is the key.
<< Comment #42 @ 07:18 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Beer! becks  - Reply to #41
I agree laptops get so much heavier with xp and ie.

Can hardly carry the damn thing :/
<< Comment #44 @ 07:37 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Iceland hnns  - Reply to #42
exactly! desktop is XP + Firefox where persistance & compatibility is the key
<< Comment #48 @ 09:44 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Turkey Dingabagi 
i experience fps problems and some pl in ff , so started to use i.e again..is that even possible i dont know how come..:(
<< Comment #49 @ 10:12 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
Chrome ,really nice browser the only bad is that i cant play quake live from it...
<< Comment #54 @ 14:43 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By France chuky  - Reply to #49
chrome is nice if you like to install a spyware on your computer
<< Comment #90 @ 08:59 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By Iceland hnns  - Reply to #54
Only if you suck at browsing.
<< Comment #92 @ 12:50 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By pandabearguy KekS  - Reply to #54
Only if you're too stupid to uncheck the "Help to make Google Chrome better by sending usage statistics and crash reports to Google automatically" box either during installation or even afterwards
<< Comment #132 @ 19:43 CST, 2 March 2010 >>
<< Comment #50 @ 11:16 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Unset gnarf 
Firefox plus these addons: NoScript, Adblock Plus + Element Hiding Helper, Cookie Button in the status bar, Long URL Please, View Cookies.

I don't trust Google so Chrome is nothing for me.
<< Comment #52 @ 13:44 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Jolly Roger Sa1cor 
What is Safari good at?
<< Comment #58 @ 15:45 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By SC_Zerg [mash]  - Reply to #52
yeah, i'd like to know that, too.
<< Comment #117 @ 05:31 CST, 17 January 2010 >>
By wc3_undead mammon  - Reply to #52
apple fanboys
<< Comment #118 @ 05:31 CST, 17 January 2010 >>
By wc3_undead mammon  - Reply to #117
who can't afford a mac
<< Comment #53 @ 14:39 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By France chuky 
How many people who voted Firefox have tried Opera ? It looks like they're proud but they don't know what's in the competition. Opera is way better that Firefox, you don't need all the extensions and plugins and you can cancel when you close tabs and still go backwards.
Also the latest version is faster and as always is more compatible with standards but who cares.
Edited by chuky at 14:40 CST, 12 January 2010
<< Comment #55 @ 15:22 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Mario zonehack  - Reply to #53
[+]
<< Comment #57 @ 15:44 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Austria noctis  - Reply to #53
and it works great with quakelive
<< Comment #62 @ 01:44 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By USSR Lamur  - Reply to #57
ID
<< Comment #65 @ 05:35 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By Lithuania son1dow  - Reply to #53
I find most opera users so proud about using their browser that they don't feel how it screws up more websites (like ESR profile page for a good example), and doesn't filter any ads. You can skip the last point if the urlfiter.ini works good as I haven't tried it, but it's still the inferior browser, even if with the "no-loading" +backing.
I think all of the popular non-IE browsers are ok, tho.
<< Comment #108 @ 07:17 CST, 16 January 2010 >>
By United Kingdom xanhast  - Reply to #65
whats wrong with the profile page? :S
<< Comment #109 @ 07:17 CST, 16 January 2010 >>
By potat p4r4  - Reply to #65
The mere fact that it doesn't pop up stupid windows like "OMG!!!! Your Firefox version has updated!!!", "LOL!!!! There are new updates for your extensions!!!!", "WTF!!!!! Now this extension is not compatible with your Firefox version anymore!!!!!!", etc, etc, makes me choose Opera over Firefox no matter how many sites it screws up (and I haven't encountered any, at least majorly, screwed up sites yet; for example, it shows ESR profile page exactly the same as Firefox, so I don't really understand what you're talking about). I don't like when browsers consider themselves the most important thing in my life, I don't fucking care what version it is, or what extensions there are, or whether they're compatible or not. Browser should know its place and should never bother anyone with its pitiful problems.
P.S. And Opera's ad blocker works perfectly fine for me, so I don't understand your that point either.
<< Comment #111 @ 08:35 CST, 16 January 2010 >>
By Lithuania son1dow  - Reply to #109
opera was showing it wrong, at least before. And I don't care about the addon/update popups,
they only waste a few secs of my life each week.
<< Comment #113 @ 09:24 CST, 16 January 2010 >>
By potat p4r4  - Reply to #111
You waste your life as you wish. I consider mine not worth to waste on so insignificant things like browsers.
<< Comment #114 @ 12:07 CST, 16 January 2010 >>
By Lithuania son1dow  - Reply to #113
I think I waste less time loading ads and trying to view fucked up websites, but if all of your visited sites are correctly displayed and you can bother installing whatever the fuck that adblocking thing is, suit yourself.
<< Comment #115 @ 13:55 CST, 16 January 2010 >>
By potat p4r4  - Reply to #114
The adblocker is built-in (and always was), no need to install anything.
<< Comment #116 @ 13:56 CST, 16 January 2010 >>
By Lithuania son1dow  - Reply to #115
well I'm pretty sure that it wasn't ALWAYS installed (or configured perfectly), but otherwise, ok.
<< Comment #103 @ 07:48 CST, 15 January 2010 >>
By Sweden apoxic  - Reply to #53
Noscript.
<< Comment #112 @ 09:08 CST, 16 January 2010 >>
By nade browser  - Reply to #53
i did
and it sucks
just liek the other
stuff.
<< Comment #142 @ 04:23 CST, 11 November 2010 >>
By Quake 3 ischju  - Reply to #53
been using it myself for a while now. I always was a fan opera :)
<< Comment #56 @ 15:22 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Mario zonehack 
Chrome with Adblock extension...

but have to switch to FF to play QL.. =(
<< Comment #60 @ 16:59 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By United Kingdom f0rk123  - Reply to #56
get prism and launch quake live as a seperate program
<< Comment #59 @ 16:21 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By knirtlotz*deotrip deotrip 
chrome users might wanna check this out!

http://lifehacker.com/5445690/make-the-most-o...extensions
<< Comment #61 @ 21:58 CST, 12 January 2010 >>
By Latvia fuzz 
Opera + urlfilter.ini

never felt need for any "addons" or whatever, tho I am not webdeveloper or some shits like that
<< Comment #67 @ 07:18 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By Uruguay gSTRUCTOR 
FF but as others said, its getting slower imo. Chrome is a really nice browser, but you cant put all eggs on the same basket, google search & google mail with a google browser? nah
<< Comment #68 @ 07:42 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By Jolly Roger Sa1cor 
And what is Internet Explorer good at?
<< Comment #69 @ 08:55 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By BiBS bjqrn0  - Reply to #68
Crashing and automatically installing malware/spyware/viruses.

It's also the very best when it comes to not following web standards.

And since version 7 it is good at stealing Firefox's interface.
<< Comment #70 @ 09:05 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By Beer! becks  - Reply to #69
sounds tempting.
<< Comment #71 @ 09:13 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By Sweden phaces 
Ff + prism
<< Comment #72 @ 10:02 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By Protossicon Adel 
FF is now the new ie...

I was using FF form 1.5 to 3.x. But i switched to google chrome for a few days when it came because FF was getting slower and slower...But i wasn't satisfied with it...Then i tried opera and i found it really nice, the only thing i'm missing is Ubiquity...

Personas was cool.
<< Comment #85 @ 18:24 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By QW_ cyronix  - Reply to #72
I used opera once too, the problem is many website are only optimized for ie and firefox, you often get problems with opera ...
<< Comment #73 @ 10:31 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By 011 rupertt 
Fire Fucks Sux
<< Comment #74 @ 10:53 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By United States of America w0nk0 
anyone else have ff crashing a lot more since the last update. had absolutely no issues with it till now but since the update every few hours the damn thing crashes. first time i even noticed ff had a crash recovery thing.
<< Comment #76 @ 14:31 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By Brazil mat-  - Reply to #74
same here, but installing noscript made it crash a lot less.
<< Comment #75 @ 10:57 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
my extensions: greasemonkey, adblock plus, ietab
<< Comment #77 @ 14:49 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
Edited by wata at 14:51 CST, 13 January 2010
<< Comment #82 @ 17:15 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By blank koekie  - Reply to #77
undo closed tabs is just ctrl+shift+t (ctrl+t opens new tab)
undo closed windows is ctrl+shift+n (ctrl+n opens new window)
<< Comment #83 @ 17:56 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By Hasu No Ue Keroppi wata  - Reply to #82
I don't remember why I use Tab Mix Plus then
scroll wheel button on tabs bar to undo closed tabs btw, easier
<< Comment #84 @ 18:22 CST, 13 January 2010 >>
By QW_ cyronix 
firefox,
but you are right, it got slow,
ie is not that bad, firefox was just first with the tabs,
and then I got used to it (do not really know why microsoft took such a long time to integrate tabbed browsing)
<< Comment #86 @ 02:27 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By Protossicon Adel  - Reply to #84
ff wasn't the first browser to use tabs:

The first browser to offer tabbed browsing was InternetWorks, created by Booklink.

The next known browser with what it called "dynamic browser tabs" was Simulbrowse, now called NetCaptor, released by Adam Stiles on January 3, 1998. The Amiga browser IBrowse introduced tabbed browsing in 1999. The browser Opera V4 introduced tabbed browsing in 2000 (Opera had earlier introduced the multiple document interface enabling cascading and tiling of browser windows).

For some reason Internet Explorer and other browsers did not immediately appreciate this innovation, and the next known browser to offer tabbed browsing was Mozilla in 2003, followed by Apple's Safari. However, once it became a discriminator, everyone had to have it, and by 2005 most browsers supported tabbed windows of some kind.
<< Comment #95 @ 14:48 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By QW_ cyronix  - Reply to #86
have you looked that up in wikipedia? :-)
Anyway, of the predecessors in tabbed browsing you mentionend the only one that counts is probably opera, but opera has the problem it was (still is?) incompatible with many sites ...

I think in order to make the user switch to another product,
the other product must have some sort of killerfeature, it must have some key feature, or must be really much better,
firefox had tabbed browsing and ie didn't, and firefox was not that incompatible to websites like opera, so firefox got the lead,
it's that easy.
<< Comment #89 @ 03:57 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By Serbia Sa1Nt_ 
try the 3.6b5 ff beta version, it's much faster :)
<< Comment #96 @ 15:46 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By SC_Zerg [mash]  - Reply to #89
you mean 3.6rc1?

it is indeed faster.
<< Comment #98 @ 18:15 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By Serbia Sa1Nt_  - Reply to #96
Still haven't tried rc1 due to some addon incompatibilities... i do use nightly tester tools that override FF's blockage for this, but I can't risk it because I do work from FF and I need some of those on daily basis :)
<< Comment #130 @ 10:10 CST, 25 January 2010 >>
By clawo Liam  - Reply to #96
Did they revert it for the release then? Because it still seems slow as fuck to me.
<< Comment #97 @ 17:49 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
By clawo Liam 
FF + adblock obv, tab mix plus, smoothwheel, image zoom and various other plugins that are too specific to bother mentioning.

Honestly not had any problems with the latest versions of firefox, I don't find it overly slow. I'll probably switch when there's an overwhelming reason to.
<< Comment #99 @ 20:18 CST, 14 January 2010 >>
firefox with NOIA 2.0 theme, download statusbar, noscript and oldbar
<< Comment #123 @ 02:53 CST, 19 January 2010 >>
By Unset amOKchen  - Reply to #99
we would all go insane without oldbar
<< Comment #101 @ 00:18 CST, 15 January 2010 >>
By Romania Aquashark 
FF 3.5 with 40 extensions.. works like a charm

those who say it got slower over the time are retards who use the default tab manager etc.
<< Comment #104 @ 07:52 CST, 15 January 2010 >>
By Sweden apoxic  - Reply to #101
Which are these secret magical tab managers, oh great one?
<< Comment #102 @ 03:10 CST, 15 January 2010 >>
safari on osx snow leopard
<< Comment #107 @ 06:30 CST, 16 January 2010 >>
By knirtlotz*deotrip deotrip 
im looking for a ff addon that lets me change brightness/contrast of webpages. anyone know of one?
<< Comment #110 @ 08:02 CST, 16 January 2010 >>
By hemostick's grenade hemostick 
Firefox w/ adblock plus; all-in one gestures, noscript, greasemonkey, QLDP.
<< Comment #119 @ 10:39 CST, 17 January 2010 >>
By Transparent cumrag 
is there something i can do to increase/change the font without fucking up the layout of some websites with firefox?
<< Comment #121 @ 08:31 CST, 18 January 2010 >>
<< Comment #120 @ 10:52 CST, 17 January 2010 >>
By Scotland Something 
I use Firefox (with fullscreen addon & ql demo player and comp server browser) for ql; and opera for normal browser.

I think it's possible to get firefox to startup with different add-ons enabled (and hopefully) different homepage settings; it would have to be both for me, as r_fullscreen 0 with mouse gestures add-on is no fun :(

Could someone point me in the right direction?
<< Comment #128 @ 02:40 CST, 24 January 2010 >>
By USSR drago.  - Reply to #120
prism?
<< Comment #129 @ 05:58 CST, 24 January 2010 >>
By Scotland Something  - Reply to #128
Iirc, the last time I checked anyways, the demo player did not work with prism, or the comp server browser, one or the other. If it wasn't for that, I would use prism! Will need to check if prism works with both now, thanks for reminding me! :)
<< Comment #122 @ 02:50 CST, 19 January 2010 >>
By Unset amOKchen 
Browser: Firefox
Theme: Phoenity classic
Addons: Oldbar, noscript & Greasemonkey
<< Comment #124 @ 04:09 CST, 22 January 2010 >>
By knirtlotz*deotrip deotrip 
new firefox 3.6 seems really fast
<< Comment #133 @ 00:17 CST, 9 March 2010 >>
By Nuke Explosion raithza  - Reply to #124
Really? I actually prefer firefox to chrome but I've switched due to load time and (more importantly) firefox becoming slow/unresponsive/memory hogging after extended use, and facebook chat not working properly on it. Is it better in 3.6?
<< Comment #134 @ 06:30 CST, 9 March 2010 >>
By knirtlotz*deotrip deotrip  - Reply to #133
chrome is faster
<< Comment #131 @ 03:22 CST, 30 January 2010 >>
By Russia ralph 
need noscript for chrome before i can switch :\\
<< Comment #135 @ 03:46 CDT, 29 March 2010 >>
For more privacy and security I highly recommend these Firefox extensions in addition to NoScript and AdBlock Plus (using the ABP Tracking Filter found here https://easylist-downloads.adblockplus.org/easyprivacy.txt):

RequestPolicy - lets you control whether a website you are visiting may request resources from another website
http://www.requestpolicy.com

Ghostery - blocks trackers and more, for example GoogleAnalytics, AdBrite etc
http://www.ghostery.com
<< Comment #136 @ 03:11 CDT, 11 April 2010 >>
By India Cyn1c 
Firefox 3.6.3 + Greasemonkey (FBpurity) + Stylish 1.0.8 + Download Helper 4.7.2 = Instant Winz
<< Comment #137 @ 19:04 CDT, 23 June 2010 >>
By Brazil mat- 
Firefox 4.0 beta 1 should be released next week including massive performance improvement over 3.6 (though still slightly slower than chrome), more web standards supported (html5, css3, ecmascript 5, etc...) and prettier UI ( https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/4.0_Windows_Theme_Mockups for an idea of how it should look like, however keep in mind that not all of the neat stuff will be in beta 1).
<< Comment #138 @ 15:06 CDT, 5 July 2010 >>
By Moldova 05/08/1945  - Reply to #137
omg u guys are obsessed with browrzers.
<< Comment #139 @ 14:36 CDT, 21 July 2010 >>
By zerg vedic  - Reply to #137
The UI is nice.
<< Comment #140 @ 23:09 CDT, 26 July 2010 >>
By Brazil mat-  - Reply to #139
Apparently ESR doesn't support vimeo embedding, or I did something wrong. Anyway: http://vimeo.com/13560319
Edited by mat- at 23:40 CDT, 26 July 2010
<< Comment #141 @ 23:16 CDT, 26 July 2010 >>
By zerg vedic  - Reply to #140
Use the embed URL from vimeo with the normal youtube tag.

Or if you already have an account:
 
Read the Posting Guidelines

Non-HTML tags: [b]bold[/b], [i]italics[/i], [u]underlined[/u]
[small]small[/small], [q]quoted[/q], [s]strikethrough[/s]
[url=www.url.com]link[/url] or type www.url.com
[flag=country] (list), [avatar=name] (list)
[map=mapname gamename] (list)
Conceived and created by Sujoy Roy (Legal Notices)
RSS Feed Information, Link Buttons and Banners