quake players failing at cs. never gets old

doesnt matter just pick up the railgun and send slugs into people at middle

cmon man dont be a dick i need this

Fov 90

C M O N

try 2.75 sens

how did u come up with 2.75

CS:GO fov is 75 iirc, your fov is 95 and your sens is 3,5.

Then you math it out like (75/95)*3,5= ~2,75

I use that for my zoom bind and it feels about right.

actually this works perfectly thanks man

csgo fov is 90

that depends on the resolution. It is 90 if you are using 16:9 but if you are using 4:3 it is 74.

no

Sorry you were right the fov is not 75 like I thought it is 74 with 4:3 resolution.

74 is vertical fov, which is independent of aspect ratio.

Ok then, so the horizontal 4:3 fov is 90

Yes, which is what games like csgo and ql use as fov settings still. wider resolutions just add more horizontal fov on top of that without changing the vertical fov.

Right, the calculation is below then.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozQbWdqXzkc skip to about 2:40 You can see that the fov does change when you switch from 16:9 to 4:3. I am not 100 percent sure what fov 16:9 and 4:3 are but again what I read was they are 90 and 74.

106 and 90 in horizontal FOV respectively

hey m8 dunno what u on about but Rauvzs calculations are right now it feels exactly the same on 4:3 res

You can use the sens values I have calculated for you in any aspect ratio.
It's just that I used 4:3 as a reference in my calculations, of course even though the sens is technically the same your horizontal sens will feel higher on a wider aspect ratio, but that's because you see more information moving on the screen.

I listed the fov that is displayed, not the value you put in the console. Feel free to get fovtest.bsp for source and verify.

Nope, you have to take into account vertical fov.

CS has 90 fov not 75(i believe 75 is vertical fov)
So no need to change sense use 3.5 also.

Probably different because of the movement speed, does it feel wrong if you stand still?

it was too fast somehow but 2,75 seems about right

if the 4:3 aspect ratio fov is 90 then:
3.5 * arctan(0.75*tan(90/2)) / arctan(0.75*tan(95/2)) = 3.284~ (This one is correct according to pierrow's statement)

if the 4:3 aspect ratio fov is 75 then:

3.5 * arctan(0.75*tan(75/2)) / arctan(0.75*tan95/2)) = 2.665~

Basically I'm dividing the new vertical fov by the old vertical fov to get a factor of the sens.

thanks man, that is some science fiction shit. love it.

-fiction

+fiction

uh no, there is nothing fictional about this.

Omg u srs man? Figure of speech... You need turn up that brightness. asap

Are you stupid or do you just play stupid? Stupid!!!!!

ure the one who didnt get it first time. now stop raging son

i am not raging i am matuka
hello????

Welcome.

And they say math is better than FPS games for your brane... :|

never liked math im more of a physical guy so ill stick to FPS

It kind of is now :/

The good old using your quake sens for another game in which another sens should be used.

Depends, if you use a low sens in Quake (like I use 2), it's ok to use that.

(like I use 2)

in-game sens value...... flipstable.gif

plz in fyutar gib seeM to treesexty valyoo and wheel accer when sharz sens k?

Csgo made me lower a tad bit my sens in quake, I had a solid 40-45 lg and 50+ rail after 4 days of inactivity and more before that.

It's hard to get used to a new sens in a fast fps like quake but using csgo to do that in quake was only positive so far imo.

"IMO"

can't be anyone else's opinion though can it ?

opinions are like ass holes everyones got one brah

yeah but as a matter of fact you can't have one on my own subjective experience.

Check mate

stay IMO brah

/me victory dance

wat

IMO if you use IMO too often (just IMO) it may (or may not) be sign of deep (#nohate #IMO) retardation.
But it's just my opinion.
#onlygodcanjudgeme
#canteven

random be gonE

I lowered my sens a lot to play csgo and it has made my rail better and overall accuracy better, but I can't lg battle as well because I have to physically move my arm more. I don't play with accel though.

Accel master race.

The best sens in CS is common sens.... The common sense to not play with Vid))))))))))))))))))))

:=))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Not the answer to your question but, pro-player settings:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12PSHq...y8/pubhtml

delpan: 94.7cm/360 top kek

edit:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0...ring#gid=0

asmo 148.5cm/360 WTF

It's not Quake.

I know =)

roffle

so using that formula above, my sens 3 in QL is 2.33 in CSGO?

1080p reso in both games btw, 103 fov for QL, default for CSGO whatever that is (90?)

Yes

2.55

90 / 103 * 3 = 2,6213592233009708737864077669903

no

Basically I'm dividing the new vertical fov by the old vertical fov to get a factor of the sens

Yes, CS:GO or rather source engine FOV values are usually as far as I know horizontal and referenced to 4:3, so 90 @ 4:3 will have a vertical fov of 74, and 103 @ 4:3 would be something like 88.
In TF2 if you set the fov in the console to 90 you will get 90H 74V on a 4:3 aspect, but if you set your aspect ratio to 1:1 it's now 74H 74V, or 16:9 106H 74V.
Basically, the system is stupid'

ok, what if i want CS:GO @ 16:10 to feel the same as QL, with sens 3 @ fov 95 @ 16:10? :D

Both games refer to 4:3 Horizontal values in the console when changing FOV settings.
So you would basically find your vertical FOV for 95H @ 4:3 and 90H @ 4:3.
And then divide the base the CS vert FOV by the QL vert FOV.

CS has 74 Vert FOV, your QL settings have 79 Vert FOV (roughly, it looks like +5 degrees but it isn't exactly)

So: 74 / 79 * 3 = 2.81

alright nice, thx.
receive the plusses:

That only works if those FoV values are the true showing values on a 1:1 aspect ratio

according to this: http://www.esreality.com/post/2693709/n-a/#pid2683074
what then?

formula is: sens * arctan((Yz/Xz)tan(basehorizfov/2) /arctan((Yb/Xb)tan(basehorizfov/2)

is komplikatet)))

I explained a bit more in the post above, this getting a bit too komplikat for be to barsed to type out with my phone, but
tl;dr : games handle fov these days in a stupid way and that formula aims to deal with it, it's basically QL's zoom alg modified.

i guess this would be helpfull then: http://www.rjdown.co.uk/projects/bfbc2/fovcalculator.php

Yes, what you really want is the vertical FOV because it's what should govern depth perception for the most part, it's really a combination of both horizontal and vertical FOV but since screens just get wider you want to keep the vertical FOV of any given game constant and increase horizontal FOV values, so any FOV value you enter in to the console doesn't necessarily represent what is on the screen because there are two values, ideally all games would just allow you to input vertical FOV and would automatically scale horizontal FOVs but as far as I know only ARMA does that.

EDIT: This is what I usually use: http://emsai.net/projects/widescreen/fovcalc/

you guys... :>