such a distubring avatar u have :(

?

51521-naize.JPG
that one, it looks like a cock.

was thinking snake LOVE SNAKE, kk *worm. and no its not, lol drrty mind..

what is it then if i may ask?

ok yeah its my cock.

i knew it, damn, thats disgusting :'(

jokes!!!!1

ye right!

i was gonna say "im sure we have done this before"

was that another witty avatarcomment :x


tis quite stupid and boring, i mean, ADVANCED AND INTERESTING!!!!

lol no was about the fizzy tablet thred :P

i don't get it ... seems like a bad day for me ... :(

in the tenth dimension theres like 4 tablets (maybe more, dout it) and theyre all going left, right,left, right,left, right,left, right,left, right,left, right,left, right,left, right,left, right,left, right,left, right.

there is no vs gravit0r.

Interesting:)

old!

the theory or the site?

site

double wrong

1millionvisitorz+

ye in like a week, init

very :s

OI ITS NEW!

wtfm8

ghosts are 5th dimensional creatures?

and the most important things in this is the subatomic particles vibrating in the 10th dimensions, and how when we observe an object, we reduce the probabilities of its placement. And the whole relativity bit.

We are traveling in the 10th (9th?) dimensions atm.

i hope you don't mean consciously observe? :P

he didnt say that did he, shit brick

you never know with "what the bleep!?" floating around :(

besides, i linked tezla to this site some months ago, moth.

http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1195956#pid1259485

...time stamp hack...

love you too <3

nice arguements but yes we're unfortunately not conscious of this

I've been trying to convince my friends for months that you cannot change the reality around you because you are a concious observer :( Atleast they now know that WTBDWK is bullshit.

haha, it can be a hassle; i've some crazy mystics lurking around the philosophy course looking for the "ultimate truth" ;D

I used to think that I was a philosopher or some sort, but I have now realised I hate the fuckers. Their motto should be "You can make any argument stupid."

Maybe I am too skeptical, but I really only believe in reality (like real reality!)

(Really really!)

(Like there is no god, you cannot change the world around you - by thinking about it atleast - and there is no such thing as ghosts.)

AND THE WORLD ISN'T FLAT!!!

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1324

I'll always be a philosopher i think.. I'm just trying to figure out what that means!

a philosopher is one who is never satisfied with his own definition of what a philosopher is.. no.. that's not right. x)

Stupid argument tbh...

See I told you.

it was a joke.. you know how we philosophers aren't known as apt jokers x)

Dude, just becasue you're studying Philosophy does not make you a philosopher:/

Half the dopes I know went on to uni and studied thing's like physics, or Philosophy or law , and about a handful of them actually stuck it out and are earning money in that field.

TBH my take on a true philospher is someone who does not need to go to university.
Just someone who ponders on life (and experiences it in full) and is able to come up with insightful explanations and conclusions or theories (that regular people will hear and instantly go "yes!") without being influenced by a curriculum/politics/money etc, as you risk having your views skewered by studying.

I consider anyone who's naturally wise to be a potential philosopher and IMO the best conclusions come from people who live their lives outside the box.

When you get a degree in Philosophy you always risk failing your initial objective of becoming a real philosopher and someone who is simply qualified to pass on the curriculum you were taught and continue the cycle to future generations.

1st/2nd paragraphs = agree

thats a first

Although i can not call myself a philosopher on the background of my choice of study, i'm for sure a philosopher by nature or by heart (if my philosophical thoughts are good or bad is another question) and have my own views on almost every topic i'm learning about. And I've to say that what I've come across so far is a mix of your description. While there is a lot of "academic" philosophy or what to call it, a playground for philosophers if you like, there is also a good 4-5 theories behind almost every "unique" thought i had, which was pretty .. strange for me to get my head around - as none in my close proximity of friends ever uttered anything remotely close to it. And these theories are not just ideas, they are fully developed thought through ideas that people have spent many years of their lives thinking about.

So, sure; you may have natural philosophers that develop a sort of "folk-philosophy", and they may have popularity or be described as wise, but most of their ideas are probably developed more fully in some academic philosophers work already - philosophers that have read what has been said before. And although that theory or whatever may be harder for people in general to grasp when written for other philosophers, it is in all probability more fully developed, explicit and precise.

I never thought philosophy was a study actually, until a saw it - i was amazed, i had never thought that was a possibility. I was always thinking maths or physics, probably why i still considered physics back when i had to chose, my basis for choosing study had changed and my intuition lagged behind.. My thinking before philosophy was to take physics to get a cleaner understanding of the world, a philosopher without knowledge of physics does not have much to say in my eyes, he can always be wrong in his assertions; you have to be "learned" no?

You seem to think of people along the lines of poets and prophets. Anyway, I think most people that "hitherto" have been called philosophers would've been learned about the sciences and general philosophy if they were alive today.

u made me think of what albert said “Wisdom is not a product of schooling but of the lifelong attempt to acquire it” (yes we're on 1st name terms). I basically agree with what u said and that's a weird feeling. 1st time for everything i suppose

you can if you introduce the concept of a soul.

since souls exist outside the scope of your dimension (and possibly in the tenth dimension, as this video muses on), they are able to guide your existence.

once you associate the soul with a person, then they are free, and determinism no longer exists.

I believe in souls, that's why it's important to live a good life with no regrets (and as little guilt as possible) cuz I have a theory that when you die it's just like a massive dream that you never wake up from

I do however scoff at religion and feel bad for people brought up in societies where they are force fed bullshit by people who had the same done to them.

There is no greater crime than warping a child's mind and forcing them to believe in false entities.
Partly why the Western values are so different to East and middle east.

Many are prisioners of their own society.

String theory is unprovable, elaborate and a bit weird. It's an interesting theory, but completely made up with out any observational evidence.

it isn't unprovable, it's just impossible to prove it.
was that the philosophy you were talking about?

besides, it's all about M theory these days. string theory takes all kinds.

string theory would be heavily evidenced if the gravitron were found, actually, and the bigger issue is that it isn't unprovable more than it is that it's not provable. you see?

To elaborate, you cannot say we are travelling in 10 dimensions, you should say, we might be travelling in 10 dimensions (or 6, or 11, don't you wish they would decide? ;)

strings, not 'subatomic particles.'

first, strings aren't particles; second, other subatomic particles than 'strings' exist.

also, yes, when you observe an object, you do reduce the possibility of that object having any number of qualities. the probablity changes to 1.

it is called 'collapsing the wave function.'

looks, broke spyte will fix!

Punee will fix it

i'm on the job!!!

as in ur taking a shit? or ur an undercover cop?

why the 'or'??

how come i have you on my ignore list but still see your journals troll?

coz ur a fooking noob and am haxing the piss clean out of you

because ignore only ignores comments not posts

T_T

It so sad this site allows people to post pictures of unflushed faeces and cocks in their avatars.
I mean the guy's obviously got serious mental health issues.
It's not even funny, it's just worrying and creepy given the age of people that read this site.

Admins should know better.

The picture you had of yourself was much more disturbing to be honest.

That's becasue you're a scat loving homo. I can't possibly compete.

so your picture was even found disturbing by a scat loving homo? what's your point, dumbass.

Never said I liked this. Yours is just way more disturbing!

its just ur drrty mind thats seeing that... thats really not what they are.

p.s. id be impressed if you could be more boring.