ESR - Movie Streams

<< Comment #1 @ 20:44 CDT, 9 September 2007 >>

By

Shooter Movie

http://www.megavideo.com/?v=B1NNT9WA - Shooter CD1 stream

http://www.megavideo.com/?v=DHLO57NW - Shooter CD2 Stream

Edited by Exe at 20:47 CDT, 9 September 2007

<< Comment #2 @ 05:34 CDT, 10 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

HamstaHue

good quality but mostly old movies:
http://joox.net/cat/2

new movies but not great quality:
http://www.onlinecinema.org/

tthos are the ones i mainly use, along with this forum:
http://quicksilverscreen.com/ipb/

i'll check yours out.

1%

<< Comment #10 @ 20:05 CDT, 10 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sudstah - Reply to #2

cheers bud extremely useful! thumbs up

<< Comment #3 @ 05:48 CDT, 10 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

HamstaHue

noticed an interesting post on that forum!

have a look at:
http://www.freewebs.com/movieforumzinfo/

<< Comment #4 @ 05:59 CDT, 10 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Demiurge '

thanks, ive been using:
www.videostored.com
http://www.tv-links.co.uk/

<< Comment #5 @ 07:38 CDT, 10 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

luKrek

100mbit>*
I stream dvd quality and not from some shitty page.

Your countries suck.

<< Comment #6 @ 08:26 CDT, 10 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

mammon - Reply to #5

hey you!

Edited by nvck at 08:27 CDT, 10 September 2007

1%

<< Comment #7 @ 11:35 CDT, 10 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Demiurge ' - Reply to #5

Where from do you stream it? :)

<< Comment #8 @ 14:21 CDT, 10 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

luKrek - Reply to #7

from other ppl using 100/10mbit of course. Thousands of them.

<< Comment #9 @ 17:06 CDT, 10 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Demiurge ' - Reply to #8

i wouldn't use "of course" in there, thats not really obvious, for people living in normally backwards countries

<< Comment #11 @ 22:26 CDT, 10 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

luKrek - Reply to #9

oh oke. but that way anowho. :o

<< Comment #12 @ 09:24 CDT, 11 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Naghokez - Reply to #5

maybe our countries suck but at least we don't

<< Comment #13 @ 11:26 CDT, 11 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

luKrek - Reply to #12

no, I'm pretty sure you suck aswell.

<< Comment #23 @ 23:03 CDT, 28 October 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Anonymous (exit01.tor.theplanet.dfw.tx.us.def-con.org) - Reply to #5

100 megabits > 100 microbits, in my opinion. but if you somehow meant 100 megabits, then you're wrong.

101 megabits > 100 megabits, and there are a lot of connections with more megabitzzzzzz than that.
that's absolutely nothing.

<< Comment #31 @ 16:38 CST, 21 November 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

CLains - Reply to #23

spellingnazigh

<< Comment #34 @ 03:50 CST, 22 November 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

link - Reply to #31

i see what you did there

<< Comment #35 @ 07:21 CST, 22 November 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

CLains - Reply to #34

==]

<< Comment #14 @ 11:53 CDT, 11 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

tewic

as luKrek said, who would watch movies from some low quality stream? I MIGHT just consider it with some standup comedy - but the odds that something danish standup will hit those pages is rather small.

DVD is the minimum acceptable quality, 720p x264 or above for the win!

oh and no, I don't have some swe 100/100 mbit connection, but a sad 4/.5 mbit connection :P

<< Comment #15 @ 12:03 CDT, 11 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sudstah - Reply to #14

im fed up of the swede arrogance with thier connections i really hope somebody nukes thier connections back into 1990 but then again they need thier high connections because they are SHIT GAMERS excluding fox and toxic, AND LUKrek U LOOK LIKE A GIRL!

Edited by Exe at 12:05 CDT, 11 September 2007

<< Comment #16 @ 14:01 CDT, 11 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Bluder - Reply to #15

:/

<< Comment #18 @ 18:17 CDT, 11 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

sudstah - Reply to #16

im joking btw dont take it too seriously :P

<< Comment #19 @ 19:56 CDT, 11 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Bluder - Reply to #18

ow :D
i feel much better now.

<< Comment #17 @ 17:18 CDT, 11 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

mammon - Reply to #15

so what

<< Comment #22 @ 17:18 CDT, 28 October 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Pushpabon - Reply to #14

Fuck you and fuck off. A shitty movie is shitty regardless of quality. A good movie in VHS quality doesn't get any better on HD. 15 fps 320x240 256 kbps hell yeah I'll watch it. Fuck you snob fucks insisting on artificial "quality". I bet you buy gold plated volume knobs and wire holders for your audio system aswell.

Edited by Pushpabon at 17:19 CDT, 28 October 2007

1%

<< Comment #24 @ 06:08 CDT, 29 October 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

link - Reply to #22

damn right

<< Comment #27 @ 10:08 CDT, 29 October 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

spring-afk - Reply to #22

:D

<< Comment #28 @ 10:22 CDT, 29 October 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

tewic - Reply to #22

I just spent 1150� on HiFi :P but it wasn't on wireholders, so that's aside the point.

and imo a movie gets better in better image quality.

it wont make a shitty movie into a good movie.

But it can make a nice movie into an even nicer movie.

It's just like digital cinema, it's just a tad better than everything else.

You see many people go to the cinema, wonder why? Sure it's partly because of the social experience, but you can also get that in the comfort of your own home. So why go there, because of the experience with a massive screen with incredible detail, and an audio system that blows your mind.

<< Comment #29 @ 11:35 CDT, 29 October 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Demiurge ' - Reply to #28

Tell that duchie to fuck off. There is obviously a matter of realism, special effects, and other things they work on to make a movie more immersible experience. I, personally, can't watch an action movie with 15 fps, because I just don't see shit. But on the other hand, there is obviously a lot of quality material that doesn't rely on sensory effects.

<< Comment #20 @ 20:32 CDT, 11 September 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

By