Put a dildo in your ass.

Wait, what?

Pull it out, rinse and repeat.

gameplay > gfx all the way.

at least et:qw doesnt have any dx10/vista only features, such as physics and day/night effects being completely removed in the multiplayer on XP systems.

They left it out for a reason yee landlubbers, ahoy, without dx10 you get terrible performance me hearties. Shiver me timbers ETQW has both bad graphics and performance, believe it or not this does detract from the gameplay, ARRR!

sry, but as an XP user I dont give a shit about games that have better performance on dx10.. AAARRRRRR!

btw farcry sux pirate's balls.. guess what crysis will be like.

Vista is amazing, your living in the dark ages, how can you live without being able to cycle through applications in a jaw dropping style.

How can you say shit like that? "Vista is amazing" are you working for MS or something or just on crack ?

Dude u obviously aint seen Dreamscene in action.

if you want eye candy ui then use Mac OS or are you really that clueless? :)

Mac is shit, why do you think everyone uses Windows.

He was joking about 4 comments ago.

as if there was no OS with that feature before.

no Windows OS

http://www.otakusoftware.com/topdesk/index.html#screenshots


and now maybe start trying to know stuff instead of just blabbering.

Takes up too much resources.

you are using vista

Runs like a dream.

Fucking nightmare more likely

a bad one

classic win2k theme 4ever.

I had been using Vista for about 4 months and honestly: at the current state it's a shit.

So far every game which supports both DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 runs smoother on DirectX 9.

Obvious much?

people always say stuff like this when comparing id engines/games to other companies. eg quake vs duke nukem 3d, q3 vs ut... guess who won those? wait a few years, turn the graphics and resolutions to max in both, and run around. i'm betting et:qw will still look and play good, while crysis will have been long forgotten.

another issue is how many fps does crysis run at? if it's 30fps or something... it's not even worth comparing.

"Everything set to lowest (including DX9) in Crysis, still looks better than ETQW with everything set on highest."

What an argument, you should review games more often!

what the fuck

Crysis is not released, the beta is not cracked, what are you talking about?

He has a beta key?

considering ETQW is a built using an engine released in 2004 which had likely three years building time? thus past generation, and crysis happens to be next generation.....

stupid fucking retard.

hey guess what, id's new engine which will be released in two years time looks just as bad.

can i has ur time machinez plx!?

=))
n1

http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/1714/etqwbackstabjr2.jpg
im sure there a few current gen games that look better than that :E

Haha this looks like Operation Flashpoint, what a shit.

I thought exactly the same as soon as I saw that tree.

Current ETQW looks much better, your screenshot was with r_megadraw 3 or worse and medium quality or less. You get a much better image with r_megadraw 0, but in beta 1 it cost too much fps for most so you had to access it in console to get it. In beta 2 the performance increased alot and r_megadraw was defaulted to 0.

Breaking news: brand new engine looks better than a three years old engine. Some may even expect that UT3 will also look better than ETQW! Yeah, that would be a huge surprise.

LOL (+)

yay someone else that realises