ESR - .mkv for gaming movies? - ESReality Site Forum

<< Comment #1 @ 03:43 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Aaron

.mkv is just a container

<< Comment #3 @ 03:56 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

subz` - Reply to #1

.mkv is just a container but with many attributes superior to .avi, and there are people that don't use .mkv's and would just freak out not knowing what to do with it

Edited by subz` at 04:09 CDT, 28 August 2008

<< Comment #2 @ 03:49 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Six16

720p mkv please, qualitys usually much better than divx/xvid imo!

<< Comment #4 @ 04:57 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #2

wait what?

<< Comment #6 @ 05:25 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Six16 - Reply to #4

720p xvid vs mkv 720p is usually 100% better quality!

<< Comment #7 @ 05:41 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #6

mkv is a container...

it's like saying:

always buy Goodyear tires, they are much faster than a Ferrari!

<< Comment #10 @ 06:01 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Six16 - Reply to #7

H.264 im talking about i guess!

<< Comment #12 @ 06:05 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #10

That's what I thougth actually, but h.264 works for .avi, too :)

to me the biggest advantage of .mkv is that you can have multiple audio tracks.

/edit

damn it, you fooled me :)

x264 is what you and I mean ;)

Edited by becks at 06:11 CDT, 28 August 2008

<< Comment #25 @ 13:06 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Lisk - Reply to #12

x264 is a free codec for encoding h264
h264 is the standart

Edited by Lisk at 13:01 CDT, 29 August 2008

9%

<< Comment #27 @ 13:51 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #25

as you will know codec is short for coder-decoder, and as you said yourself x264 is a program for encoding and decoding.

h264 is a standard.

also you can not simply compare h264 and xvid as you do in your other post.
Since for example divx and xvid both use the same standard, MPEG-4 ASP, while the standard h264 (or MPEG-4 AVC) is used by x264 and others.

tl;dr:

encoders: xvid, divx, x264

do not equal

standards: h.264, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 ASP

2%

<< Comment #31 @ 02:48 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Anonymous (66.230.230.230) - Reply to #27

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264

tldr:

H.264 is a standard for video compression. It is also known as MPEG-4 Part 10, or MPEG-4 AVC (for Advanced Video Coding). It is one of the latest block-oriented motion-estimation-based codecs developed by the ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG) together with the ISO/IEC Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) as the product of a partnership effort known as the Joint Video Team (JVT).

<< Comment #34 @ 04:45 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #31

oh, so where can I download h.264 to encode my video?

<< Comment #39 @ 07:49 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Anonymous (ip-195-24-77-134.server.lu) - Reply to #34

you've looked dumb at least 5 times in this thread so I guess you're tired of it?

<< Comment #40 @ 11:56 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #39

I did?

Oh god, I think I have to write a email to sites like doom9.org cause they have it all wrong!!! They completely fucked up when they took x264 in their codec comparison

but have fun quoting wikipedia. They often fuck up when it comes to technical terms ;)

<< Comment #61 @ 09:59 CDT, 31 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Anonymous (pool-71-112-17-166.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net) - Reply to #40

you can't get over being wrong, can you?

<< Comment #62 @ 10:26 CDT, 31 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #61

yeh, i couldnt if I wre :(

at least I am able to make a login :)

<< Comment #42 @ 12:17 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #39

and the russians too. It's a nightmare!!!

http://compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/...06_en.html

<< Comment #43 @ 12:54 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Lisk - Reply to #27

You're right indeed, the word I wanted - standart.

<< Comment #44 @ 12:59 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #43

yes, and now only change "free library" to "free codec" and you're done ;)

<< Comment #45 @ 13:01 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Lisk - Reply to #44

:>

1%

<< Comment #46 @ 13:40 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #45

:P

1%

<< Comment #49 @ 00:07 CDT, 30 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ashr - Reply to #12

avi is terrible for h.264 even though it's functional.

<< Comment #51 @ 04:04 CDT, 30 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #49

true, but if he wants mass compatability it's probably the way to go, atm.

<< Comment #5 @ 05:05 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks

If you just want to encode without (much) filtering I can recommend staxrip.
It works for almost all containers and codecs (video and audio) and actually uses vdub for the encoding, just that it automatically does two passes, etc.

Very easy to use, too

1%

<< Comment #8 @ 05:49 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

cYmoZz

mkv is fine, but I dunno if pc "newbies" who have only wmp can open it
staxrip is a great tool

1%

<< Comment #9 @ 05:53 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

subz`

i reckon i'll pass the mp4 and try a mkv and a regular avi, see what i come up with

Edited by subz` at 05:53 CDT, 28 August 2008

1%

<< Comment #11 @ 06:02 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Six16

yea if ur gonna do an mkv, do a readme file how to play it for newbs!

1%

<< Comment #13 @ 06:34 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

[mash] - Reply to #11

"Use VLC"

that really requires a tutorial.

1%

<< Comment #14 @ 06:57 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #13

the microsoft approach,

FUCK YEAH!!!

and as if people, who don't have vlc or know how to play mkv, ever opened a readme...

1%

<< Comment #15 @ 07:06 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

[mash] - Reply to #14

uhh, whats the problem with VLC?

Edited by Magnus Magnusson at 07:06 CDT, 28 August 2008

1%

<< Comment #16 @ 07:19 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #15

none really, personally I prefer zoomplayer for vids but use vlc for streams.

I just don't like the approach to force people to install this program to view it, just like microsoft does...

instead you could just put a codec in the rar...

1%

<< Comment #29 @ 15:15 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

koekie - Reply to #15

Subtitle support sucks =(

1%

<< Comment #30 @ 23:01 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Aaron - Reply to #29

never ever had a problem?

it finds and matches any sub files and they're easy to activate through the menus for when they're in a container

1%

<< Comment #35 @ 05:11 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

koekie - Reply to #30

I really wanted to switch to VLC, but MPC's subtitles are just much clearer and better to read (Good font, shadow and stroke and high resolution letters at any res. video).

1%

<< Comment #19 @ 09:41 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Ignignokt - Reply to #13

CoreAVC and media player classic.

n00bs use vlc

<< Comment #21 @ 12:52 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Aaron - Reply to #19

i shit on your claims

1%

<< Comment #23 @ 13:03 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Ignignokt - Reply to #21

I shit on your sister's face.

1%

<< Comment #17 @ 08:17 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Raist

Are you still accepting demoes btw?

8%

<< Comment #18 @ 08:39 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

lolograde ' - Reply to #17

lol xD

4%

<< Comment #20 @ 10:12 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

rep

make it .asf and it will still be a 10 vote from me _o/

edit: post #1000.. holy crap, i'm a nerd

Edited by rep at 10:13 CDT, 28 August 2008

8%

<< Comment #22 @ 12:58 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

juvenile delinquency - Reply to #20

.

Edited by juvenile delinquency at 19:57 CDT, 28 March 2019

3%

<< Comment #26 @ 13:45 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

PuX - Reply to #22

no, a Microsoft format?

3%

<< Comment #48 @ 20:54 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ini - Reply to #20

:<

<< Comment #24 @ 13:05 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Lisk

.mkv > .avi & .mp4
a much better container in all aspects, except it's not supported by evil corporations

.x264 > .xvid
better quality and/or smaller in size
might be a bit demanding on pc hardware at times

I would suggest both mkv/xvid and mkv/x264.

Edited by Lisk at 13:00 CDT, 29 August 2008

3%

<< Comment #28 @ 14:42 CDT, 28 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

injx

do not put h264 into an .avi container, it's wrong, annoying and plain lazy.

do encode h264 and mpeg 4 audio, and do put it in an .mp4 container. if it doesnt work in a .mp4 container, you're doing something wrong, but if you really cant fix it, then put the above into a .mkv, but you'll have to live with the fact that newbs wont have a clue what to do with it.

2%

<< Comment #60 @ 09:06 CDT, 31 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

im a tree - Reply to #28

mkv is pretty much the standard when it comes to non-xvid video these days... where have you been?

<< Comment #32 @ 03:05 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

subz`

i've done a couple of tests with .mkv xvid now and so far it's looking pretty good, i'll run a few more tests, encode some .avi's to compare, so with all this testing around and encoding + uploading the movie will probably be ready for release somewhere mid next week.

Edited by subz` at 03:05 CDT, 29 August 2008

2%

<< Comment #33 @ 03:53 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

cYmoZz - Reply to #32

pls use h264 for the hq version

2%

<< Comment #36 @ 05:51 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

AHXNXA

BLAHAHBLABLH MKV ÖBHÖAHÖAHÖBA XVID BHÖAÖBHAHBÖAAHÖB 264 öHBRAHRÖEHKARRJBERBHEÖRERÖAER BETTER

3%

<< Comment #37 @ 06:29 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

subz` - Reply to #36

B^D

1%

<< Comment #38 @ 07:07 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

rep - Reply to #36

and here i thought the finnish language couldn't get any more complicated..

19%

<< Comment #41 @ 11:58 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

becks - Reply to #38

probably just "Hi mom"

1%

<< Comment #47 @ 19:09 CDT, 29 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

AHXNXA - Reply to #38

RAERPPIERILTLE

2%

<< Comment #54 @ 21:02 CDT, 30 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

rep - Reply to #47

X)

<< Comment #58 @ 07:57 CDT, 31 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

OvO - Reply to #38

and here i thought swedish people couldn't possibly be more gay D::D"PÅD":"DÅ:ÅD":DÅ"D:Å"D:"DÅ

<< Comment #64 @ 18:41 CDT, 31 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

rep - Reply to #58

raged as usual :\

<< Comment #65 @ 08:00 CDT, 5 September 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

OvO - Reply to #64

eyS FUCK YOU REP I H8 U

<< Comment #52 @ 06:23 CDT, 30 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

koekie - Reply to #36

That summarizes this thread :E

<< Comment #50 @ 00:31 CDT, 30 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

ashr

yea mkv is good.

<< Comment #53 @ 06:29 CDT, 30 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Raist

OMG FREE PLU...

er, .mkv is good shit yeah.

<< Comment #55 @ 05:22 CDT, 31 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

cYmoZz

...would you like to have a very high quality version, because I've managed to render an 852 MB xvid .mkv 720p that looks amazing, but is 92 MB/min. Anyone would download that?

No, I wouldn't.
Xvid is far inferior in terms of quality/file size compared to h264.
Use h264 for the hq version.

Edited by cYmoZz at 05:22 CDT, 31 August 2008

<< Comment #56 @ 05:34 CDT, 31 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Pushpabon

Above 30-40 MB/minute is deifnite overkill. Maybe use a codec that people can watch videos with instead of shit that takes 100% cpu in any player and still lags on 2,2 GHz cpu.

<< Comment #57 @ 06:39 CDT, 31 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

funnyb

JUST RELEASE IT ALREADY

<< Comment #59 @ 08:44 CDT, 31 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

subz`

well rogue bagel was 52mb/min at 800x600 and people still downloaded that :p

<< Comment #63 @ 17:11 CDT, 31 August 2008 >>

(Link, Reply)

By

Aaron

if it's good people will download it regardless

these are people who will leave a public torrent running for days/weeks if it means getting something.