ESR - TEK9 Launch Worldwide QuakeLive Top 10

ESReality - Where Gaming Meets Reality

About | Contact | Guide | Filters
Users | Preferences | Search | FAQ

News | Forums | Columns
Journals | Articles | Polls | Wiki

Files | Galleries | Demos
Events | Coverage | Movies

ESR Shop | Betting Fixtures

Not Logged In | Login | Register

04:47 CDT - 1394 users online

ESR Discord Channel

no live streams found

Scheduled Listings

Latest Threads

Latest Comments

Movie fragged by phorest (4k update) (8)
News QL LAN Stuttgart 2025 (8)
Article Setting up your QL mapping environment (33)
News HoQ TDM 4v4 Winter Season 2025 (7)
News Frazer "Fraze" Hockley has passed away (52)

Latest Forum Threads

Latest Journals

2z faye (26) by stpbozin
Quake Live, the greatest esports game ever made? (6) by vr_and_games
we meat again (1157) by aggnog
Why this game sucks to hard? (29) by The_Sh33p
Mars died as his temple burned. No new gods of war exist. (57) by ShadyVoltaire

Hot Topics

ESR Virtual Betting

Lamur
E$ 238,131

E$ 176,304 omek
E$ 129,238 fazz
E$ 61,723 lithz
E$ 58,635 nsx0r
E$ 57,658 nk121

News

TEK9 Launch Worldwide QuakeLive Top 10 (183 comments)

( Major News: QL)

Posted by crow- @ 06:07 CST, 12 February 2010 - iMsg

TEK-9.org launched their new monthly QuakeLive top ten ranking today, voted by TEK9's expert panel and the world's top players every month. With no sanctioned tournaments, no spam and no fees, the TEK9 top ten simply brings you the views and votes from the people you want to hear from each and every month.

Shane "rapha" Hendrixson has been on top for some time now but can he hold off the challenge of Europe's best after a shock defeat at the IEM American Championship? The biggest names in QuakeLive share their thoughts on who's the real favourite ahead of the global finals. Next month their votes will be joined by those of the previous top ten players, giving a clear and balanced ranking each time around.

TEK9 Voting Panel:

-

Michal "Carmac" Blicharz
-

Rod "Slasher" Breslau
-

Paul "ReDeYe" Chaloner
-

Marcus "djWHEAT" Graham
-

Duncan "Thorin" Shields
-

Liam "crow" Crowley

Click here for a quick peak at the February top ten...

Find out who made the top four and read up on the panel's views on TEK-9.org.

Edited by crow- at 06:45 CST, 12 February 2010 - 43238 Hits

8%

<< Comment #1 @ 06:16 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

cha0z_

Epicness! Or should I say: COOLLERness!

Edited by chaos.spwnrpd at 06:17 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #18 @ 07:59 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Sora

The top 10 seems close to the reality, i agree !

<< Comment #2 @ 06:29 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

twister

I do not understand, are those some wannabe AGP rankings?

<< Comment #3 @ 06:36 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Raist - Reply to #2

WANNABE AGP points? I sense an incoming wave of agp related jokes and how much worse this is if it would be wannabe.

<< Comment #113 @ 18:39 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ralph - Reply to #2

lol thats what i thought too. this is just stupid. :|

<< Comment #4 @ 06:38 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

uNstoned

Hmm surprised to see Z4muZ in the top ten.. sure he played good at dreamhack but I'd at least swap him for Spartie even if he hasn't shown great form lately.

Edited by Unstoned at 06:38 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #6 @ 06:44 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Six16 - Reply to #4

Spart1e > Zamuz for sure!1

<< Comment #7 @ 06:45 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Slasher - Reply to #6

Chance got my vote for final slot. IEM USA might have been easier, but he still qualified for the finals.

<< Comment #27 @ 08:53 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #7

Chance gets such a hard ride :(

<< Comment #136 @ 08:18 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

rupertt - Reply to #27

I'll leave that to chance.

<< Comment #5 @ 06:42 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Bob

.

Edited by Bob at 22:22 CDT, 27 June 2024

<< Comment #8 @ 06:59 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

h8m3

why do you hide #1 if everyone knows there's cooller? :U

<< Comment #11 @ 07:05 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ReDeYe - Reply to #8

They wouldnt accept my voting of 1.cooller, 2.cooller, 3.cooller 4.cooller, 5.cooller :(

<< Comment #9 @ 07:00 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Dronar

YAY! THIS WILL BE AWESOME!

oh wait...

<< Comment #10 @ 07:01 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

gyr0

How is stermy or fox supposed to be better than strenx?

<< Comment #17 @ 07:51 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

f0rk123 - Reply to #10

placings before euro championships and their not french

<< Comment #53 @ 10:18 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

yikes - Reply to #10

Because fox is a legend and stermy has a better haircut.

<< Comment #83 @ 13:05 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Raist - Reply to #10

Because both did not get a lecture from cooller atleast.

<< Comment #12 @ 07:11 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Mav_

Probably the first ranking that point granting rules' make sense.

<< Comment #13 @ 07:15 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ted

expert panel?

imo the players themselves can decide who is in the top 10.

<< Comment #15 @ 07:25 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

p4r4 - Reply to #13

What do players know!!!

<< Comment #29 @ 08:55 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

wheat - Reply to #13

Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds? Should we let every sports team begin ranking themselves? I'm sure that would work out pretty peachy.

<< Comment #32 @ 09:04 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #29

It's not actually as ridiculous as it sounds.

I presume this isn't going to be used for tournament seeding, which itself would be ridiculous, so the players have no reason to in particular to lie and you just don't allow them to include themselves.

Happens all the time in other sports for end of year awards etc.

<< Comment #58 @ 10:28 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ted - Reply to #29

I don't think it's that ridiculous, and furthermore why is it that my suggestion has to be applied to a larger scale ("every sports team") for it to be a valid point...

You're good at what you do, but are you anymore qualified or credible than they are? As noctis has suggested, you could just ask them to make a top 10 excluding themselves. These rankings would then have more value in my eyes.

<< Comment #68 @ 11:48 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Borl - Reply to #29

There's a story that at the first World Series of Poker in 1970 the players were each asked to vote for who would be crowned the world champion. Naturally they all voted for themselves, so instead they were asked to vote for whom they considered the second best player... and thus Johnny Moss became the first WSOP champion.

A bit irrelevant, but fun nonetheless!

<< Comment #130 @ 04:40 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

Naghokez - Reply to #29

How is it ridiculous? The gotFrag CS rankings have worked like that for ages... You're simply not allowed to include yourself in your ranking.

<< Comment #66 @ 11:46 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ReDeYe - Reply to #13

Votes are collected each month from our community panel as well as (starting next month) the previous month's top ten players.

<< Comment #81 @ 13:04 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #66

Why bother with you media drones at all?

<< Comment #172 @ 12:06 CST, 15 February 2010 >>

By

ReDeYe - Reply to #81

Why bother breathing?

<< Comment #175 @ 13:16 CST, 15 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #172

Great comeback there, you sure told me why you guys are required for this vote!

<< Comment #14 @ 07:23 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

tbone

I mostly agree with the ranking, however I would say stermy over fox, and possibly rapha over cypher, but those two are about the same at the moment I think.

<< Comment #30 @ 08:56 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

RMS - Reply to #14

How do you know they are even at the moment if Cypher is definetely better now than he was at Dubai and Rapha havent played for more than a month?

Edited by RMS at 08:57 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #33 @ 09:07 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

tbone - Reply to #30

Quality of players. A lot of the top guys stop playing between tournaments to keep their sanity. Rapha wasn't going to any tournaments so he decided to take a break. (I assume)

He will probably begin playing loads again and be in shape for finals. He has the right amount of experience and looks like he has the talent not only to get to the final rounds, but win them too.

<< Comment #74 @ 12:20 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Kwibus - Reply to #33

I sure hope he will.
I read in the Silent Gamers competition thread that he pracs with zero4. Let's hope everyone has practised maximum for Hannover.

<< Comment #80 @ 12:39 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

tbone - Reply to #74

I have looked at his match history a few days ago, and yes he has been playing a lot with Zero4, which can only be beneficial for both of them. The skill difference seems quite large looking at scores though.

<< Comment #43 @ 09:36 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

JDMYO - Reply to #14

Nah dude, Cypher over Rapha. The rankings they posted are pretty spot on. I don't think you can argue.
The only thing is, "if" Cooller didn't be so overly kind to Av3k in Cologne, it would most probably be:-

Cypher
Rapha
Cooller
Av3k
Dahang

Another thing is, "Dahang". I think its maybe a tad unfair to rank him 5th. I think Dahang is stronger than this, although there's no recent match ups to prove it. I'd still go with the rankings suggested but wouldn't be at all suprised if Dahang was a couple of places higher come the world finals.
My own opinion would be:-

Cypher
Cooller
Dahang
Rapha
Av3k

Av3ks hard to place because he's abit up and down. When he's up he "could" beat anyone.
The world finals are going to be awesome! For the first time in as long as I can remember that "all" of the best players are going to make it and play. Throughout Quake 3 there always seemed to be at least one player that didn't make it to the tounrey for whatever reason.

<< Comment #47 @ 09:50 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #43

Cypher
Cooller
Dahang
Rapha
Av3k

Depends who prepares best for the finals.

<< Comment #55 @ 10:20 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

yikes - Reply to #47

Agreed. Any of them could take first.

<< Comment #75 @ 12:22 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Kwibus - Reply to #55

Spot on.

It's hard to predict the americans right now, but I guess rapha and dahang are among av3k/cypher and cooller. Since Av3k, cypher and Cooller can beat eachother anyday the same goes for the americans.
Hannover will be very hot if everyone arrives in good shape and health.

<< Comment #96 @ 16:09 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

yikes - Reply to #75

Yeah.
Forget meaningless pre-game rankings. This should be an epic tourney.

<< Comment #16 @ 07:25 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

dem0n

I don't understand why ~~the americans~~ people still give rapha the edge though, as good as we all know he is.

They give quakecon as an example, but had quakecon happend in january, you would have had another set of good players, and I doubt the finals would've been as 'easy' as it has been.

Same for gamescom, not every good (eastern?) players were there.
Before now, top4's looked like rapha, noctis, spartie, fox. Now they look like cypher, av3k, cooller, strenx, rapha, dahang... see what I mean ?

Also strenx his great performances at IEM should grant him a better placing imo. He came 4th of IEM behind the eastern trio, only to lose in a 5-mapper.

Other than that it all falls into giving opinions. So I think these ratings are pretty fair and the post was a very good read, thanks tek9 !

Edited by dem0n at 07:28 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #20 @ 08:11 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

tbone - Reply to #16

Basically because you don't base rankings off 1 result. Rapha has won everything that he has taken part in apart from coming second in the last tournament. Someone doesn't immediately drop 5 places in rank because of that.

The same applies to Strenx, if he won the last tourny, should he have been made number 1? In the same argument, should he be number 4?

Also, whether the games are close or whether it is a 5 mapper should not matter, only victories should count.

I think we will see at finals whether the rankings were bad or not, but I predict the results will be similar (although not the same) as this ranking.

<< Comment #22 @ 08:39 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

dem0n - Reply to #20

rankings should be made so that they represent the actual level of play right now, not of all times. And that is actually what they were saying. Afaik this ranking isnt that much 'best ql player of all times', atleast if you read carefuly what the voters say.

<< Comment #25 @ 08:47 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

tbone - Reply to #22

Then in that regard, there is no reason to have any rankings, and we should just take the results of the last tournament.

<< Comment #24 @ 08:41 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

dem0n - Reply to #20

also you totally ignore my arguments that were that some of these players (from europe and dahang for usa) werent playing or not taking as much effort as what we have now.

Yes Brazil won a lot of football world cups, but today's rankings say Spain is the best football nation.

<< Comment #26 @ 08:49 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

tbone - Reply to #24

Yes, but Spain did not just win 1 game to become the number 1 team. Their ranking is a measurement of their average wins and losses over an extended time period. If they go out in the group stages in the World cup, they will not suddenly drop 10 places in rank.

<< Comment #117 @ 21:36 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

sn1kzZe - Reply to #24

rankings represent your average performance, no one can be on fire all the time so we have rankings to place you by your recent performence.

they always say "fighter is only good as his last fight" but in context with rankings the good fighters usually deliver, and if some fail, you shouldnt just drop them to the end of the list, they will prolly get back on sooner or later. (as long as they maintain activity, if you want online example)

<< Comment #89 @ 13:32 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ia - Reply to #16

There's no way in hell strenx is ranked higher than rapha.

<< Comment #19 @ 08:03 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

frozen`

1. Cypher
2. Av3k
3. Cooller
4. DaHanG
5. rapha
6. strenx
7. fox
8. stermy
9. spart1e
10. noctis

<< Comment #35 @ 09:08 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Bluder - Reply to #19

lol rapha at #5, you're opinion isn't biased at all.

<< Comment #21 @ 08:23 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

GUArd

1. Rapha 100%
2. cypher 100%
3. avek 100%
4/5. cooller/ dahang

ps. voting players sux hard.. exept 2 persons.

Edited by GUArd at 08:27 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #137 @ 08:23 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

rupertt - Reply to #21

I actually agree with you, how strange that might sound.

<< Comment #151 @ 11:19 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

dansen - Reply to #21

thats some confidence there...

<< Comment #23 @ 08:39 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

CAREEM

I'd say:

1.] Cypher
2.] Av3k
3.] coller
4.] strenx
5.] stermy
6.] fox
7.] dahang
8.] rapha
9.] noctis
10.] z4muz

<< Comment #28 @ 08:54 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Melted - Reply to #23

Cypher
Av3k
rapha
cooller
dahang
fox
strenx
stermy
noctis
z4muz

<< Comment #34 @ 09:07 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Bluder - Reply to #23

lol rapha at #8, you're opinion isn't biased at all.

<< Comment #71 @ 12:02 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

CAREEM - Reply to #34

rapha sux atm euros rox atm =[

<< Comment #45 @ 09:41 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

JDMYO - Reply to #23

Thats possibly the worst ranking suggestion I've seen :D
Dahang and Rapha only need to fear Cooller, Av3k and Cypher.

<< Comment #57 @ 10:23 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

yikes - Reply to #23

How the fuck do you misspell Cooller? :/

<< Comment #59 @ 10:45 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

p4r4 - Reply to #57

Easy! You just leave only one of the double "o".

<< Comment #73 @ 12:17 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

RMS - Reply to #59

but he didnt

<< Comment #31 @ 08:58 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini '

Why are these the voters?

It's kinda like how conference football players are allowed to vote in the PFA Player of the Year award despite never playing against any of the players they vote for...

<< Comment #36 @ 09:09 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

xy- - Reply to #31

I'm really sick of your brainless questions in every thread I read, get a grip ffs.

<< Comment #38 @ 09:13 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #36

Yeah, I need a grip on reality to wonder why these were the people chosen as the voters for a ranking...

Totally brainless question that's for sure, since obviously with such illustrious names as "crow" this panel has true expertise on high level Quake duel.

<< Comment #37 @ 09:10 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

noctis - Reply to #31

should ask all the pro players to give them their top10 excluding themselves and make a ranking from that

<< Comment #39 @ 09:13 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #37

That would be real peachy.

<< Comment #42 @ 09:35 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Dynamix - Reply to #37

I don't think that would work quite as well honestly.

I mean AFAIK not all pro players even watch many matches of other players, and there's always going to be a little bias to the people they've played or the players who have beaten them.

Expert panels are where it's at.

<< Comment #49 @ 09:54 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #42

Expert panels without experts > Expert players?

<< Comment #61 @ 11:01 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

becks - Reply to #49

would they be experts for ranking others if they haven't seen their games?

<< Comment #84 @ 13:07 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #61

They would still offer more expertise than these guys, since they generally all play against each other fairly regularly and I'd expect they do actually see the majority of the LAN games (Since somehow I doubt these media guys are watching every online cup demo anyway).

<< Comment #65 @ 11:46 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Thorin ' - Reply to #49

It's ok mate, they'll ask you next time I'm sure. Till then keep doing handstands in your bikini.

<< Comment #82 @ 13:05 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #65

I'm the biggest expert in QL duel so they sure better!

<< Comment #67 @ 11:47 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ReDeYe - Reply to #37

From the site...

Votes are collected each month from our community panel as well as (starting next month) the previous month's top ten players.

<< Comment #40 @ 09:21 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Weird

hmm suprise suprise who will be the top4...
my guess is
1) rapha
2) cypher
3) av3k
4) cooller

going by the people who voted.

<< Comment #60 @ 11:01 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

GUArd - Reply to #40

its not a guess, its truth.

Edited by GUArd at 11:01 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #41 @ 09:21 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

donka '

1. C-O-O-L-L-E-R
2. O-O- - - - - - - - -
3. O- - O ahh forget it

<< Comment #46 @ 09:48 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

weltschmerz - Reply to #41

Ye, like he said: "I'm already arrived there". Better than a thousand hollow votes is one word that brings peace.

<< Comment #44 @ 09:38 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Reyn1r

1. Rapha
2. Cypher / Avek / Cooller
3.-10. Dahan fox stermy and .. blaaahhhh..

Edited by Reyn1r at 09:39 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #48 @ 09:51 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Putton

to see noctis over Z4muZ is just disgusting.. please remember the past

Edited by Putton at 09:51 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #51 @ 10:01 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

f0rk123 - Reply to #48

the only 'past' that applies here is since quakecon 09

<< Comment #50 @ 09:57 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

stunt.us

I think anyone in the top4/5 can win it.

Cept dunno bout rapha since he hasn't been participating in high level competition like cypher avek and cooller. Unless something weird happens i think it will be those 4/5 maybe strenx will have gotten some more brains.

<< Comment #52 @ 10:16 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

p4r4 - Reply to #50

By anyone you of course mean Cooller!

<< Comment #54 @ 10:20 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Jazzy

<3 for crow

<< Comment #56 @ 10:21 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

draven-

holyshit

Edited by draven- at 10:21 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #62 @ 11:23 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

_agu

omg he`s a gangsta

<< Comment #63 @ 11:40 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

skint

disgusting

also lol at voting panel

<< Comment #72 @ 12:06 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

IniqoN

1 Cypher
2 Rapha
3 av3k
4 Cooller

<< Comment #64 @ 11:46 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

aiken

"(...) Shane "rapha" Hendrixson's disappointing start to the year after an outstanding 2009" (c) crow

How can you call being 2nd player of North America a disappointment? He lost 2:3 in the final game versus dahang what is not bad. This could be disappointment if he didn't pass the group stage but this is abuse to mark someone with a dissapointment when he finishes 2nd after being 1st 1st 1st 1st. I can agree that he was expected to place 1st once again, but he's not so far from that as it was presented in article.

<< Comment #77 @ 12:29 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Kwibus - Reply to #64

It was dissapointing. It was pretty obvious he wasn't playing his best game until the final.
And i'm still not 100% sure the final was his best game.

<< Comment #87 @ 13:20 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Leerno - Reply to #64

I definitely agree with this. Especially considering rapha went up 2-0 against dahang and, from a spectator's point of view, it was looking a great deal like the American IEM final was gonna be a three mapper.

Not only that, but rapha beat dahang on t7. Had dahang ever lost a game on t7 in tourney play before this?

<< Comment #69 @ 11:53 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

w0nk0

its a vote among random people. so stop trying to make sense of it??

edit: honestly why is this even majored?

Edited by w0nk0 at 11:54 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #76 @ 12:28 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

oneroomdisco - Reply to #69

- Michal "Carmac" Blicharz
- Rod "Slasher" Breslau
- Paul "ReDeYe" Chaloner
- Marcus "djWHEAT" Graham
- Duncan "Thorin" Shields
- Liam "crow" Crowley

OH YEAH, SURE IS RANDOM

<< Comment #85 @ 13:14 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

w0nk0 - Reply to #76

it is when u consider that half the people posting in this thread could do equally sensible rankings.

edit: there wouldve been a point to it if they did something like espn does for player of the month etc for the nba, along with highlights and shit. but just putting up a subjecting ranking is completely utterly pointless. (unless ofc ur an idiot who blindly supports anything to do with ql for no apparent reason whatsoever in which case ur life revolves around shit like this).

Edited by w0nk0 at 13:18 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #100 @ 17:00 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

oneroomdisco - Reply to #85

- Michal "Carmac" Blicharz - Product Manager of ESL, E-Sports Journalist for SK and other organizations. Experience = at least 7 years
- Rod "Slasher" Breslau - Community player, experienced shoutcaster, Quake player, e-sports journalist. Experience = at least 7 years
- Paul "ReDeYe" Chaloner - E-Sports and CGS Shoutcaster. Experience = at least 5 years
- Marcus "djWHEAT" Graham - E-Sports shoutcaster, Quake player, experienced e-sports knowledge, hosts E-sports podcast. Experience = at least 6 years
- Duncan "Thorin" Shields - E-Sports journalist and Editor-in-Chief at SK Gaming. Experience = At least 9 years
- Liam "crow" Crowley - E-Sports Journalist, works for Tek9, has worked for Gotfrag, 4Kings. Experience = at least 5 years)

Now you show me the people posting in this thread with equal or greater experience in E-Sports.

<< Comment #107 @ 17:32 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #100

Media
""
""
""
""
""
""
""
""
""

What qualifies any of them to rank anybody ?

<< Comment #110 @ 17:50 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

oneroomdisco - Reply to #107

Who cares if their in media? They made it into the media, the media didn't make them.

Who else do you want? Do you want the best fucking list you've EVER SEEN OMFG TOP PLAYERS AND PEOPLE FROM FUCKING EVERYWHERE GOD LETS JUST FUCKING SATISFY THE FUCKING DOUCHEBAG IDIOTS THAT IS ESR

Seriously, you've got no better solution. Shut the fuck up

<< Comment #111 @ 17:56 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

vedic - Reply to #110

An actual ranking system, maybe?

<< Comment #112 @ 18:18 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Nukm - Reply to #111

like the agp did? that would surely satisfy esr ;)

<< Comment #114 @ 18:53 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

stingerrayer - Reply to #110

you're mind blowingly stupid :(

i for your sake that you're an elaborate troll, because otherwise there's something seriously wrong with you.

<< Comment #180 @ 18:47 CST, 18 February 2010 >>

By

ralph - Reply to #114

Whoa whoa whoa. Breathe in, breathe out. Repeat.

<< Comment #115 @ 19:40 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #110

What's wrong with just looking at tournament results, or if one must be made asking the actual players being ranked?

<< Comment #121 @ 00:08 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

oneroomdisco - Reply to #115

Because some tournaments are different. 1st at a regional qualifier doesn't mean at a worldwide tournament. Since there is that difference, there must be a human calculation, because the tournaments need to be judged fairly. So, we need a staff in order to fairly calculate the data. An experienced staff.

<< Comment #132 @ 05:06 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #121

You are incapable of making this decision for yourself and need a judge to give you some ridiculous ranking?

This isn't some sort of official ranking that will be used for anything it's just a load of media guys opinion and an attempt to get people to visit tek9.

Like I said, these guys are experienced in the media arena.

<< Comment #140 @ 08:37 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

oneroomdisco - Reply to #132

This 'media' bullshit doesn't MEAN anything. You're just throwing around a word with zero substance. Oh, these guys have hair, so their immediately discredited.

Their in the media because that's how the industry goes. Most of them are being PAID for their services to the e-sports community, which means their 100x more credible than anyone else who isn't being paid. Stop with this 'media' bullshit, it means NOTHING

<< Comment #141 @ 08:55 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

skint - Reply to #140

right place, right time

<< Comment #142 @ 09:14 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #140

...seriously?...

Your entire argument here is focused around their experience, all of which is media related and not player related. They are totally different experiences that just happen to be involved in the same scene.

But because they are paid for media services within the e-sports industry that gives them some kind of credibility and authority to judge and rank the best players in the world?

I'm afraid not, the only things with credibility and authority is simply either looking at the tournaments and thinking for yourself or the players attending and participating in the tournaments opinion.

They fully deserve to be discredited here. Just as I would if I posted a Major News post linking to external site where I create a top ten.

<< Comment #146 @ 10:14 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

funnyb - Reply to #140

you seem equally dumb wherever you post, loving it

ps: http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1833439#pid1833439

Edited by sucky sucky 5 dolla at 10:18 CST, 13 February 2010

<< Comment #155 @ 12:52 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

oneroomdisco - Reply to #146

So? He's entitled to his opinion. He makes a good point, what makes these people more credible than others. Well, that's subjective, but in my opinion, if I were to have a 'Staff' of people that were to judge the top 10 players in the world, for credibility sake, I would be picking people that are 'high-up' in the industry, and not just random ESR'ers.

<< Comment #158 @ 15:57 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

vedic - Reply to #155

The more you post, the better my country looks.

<< Comment #165 @ 13:38 CST, 14 February 2010 >>

By

becks - Reply to #158

I'm convinced gillz is a US-American who lives in Canada.

<< Comment #120 @ 22:41 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

[mash] - Reply to #110

if you think they are more of an expert than yourself, you should kill yourself.

<< Comment #174 @ 12:13 CST, 15 February 2010 >>

By

zealot - Reply to #110

that's a new low, even for your standards.

<< Comment #133 @ 05:06 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

Thorin ' - Reply to #107

What qualifies you to rank anyone who ranks anyone?

Don't answer that.

<< Comment #134 @ 05:11 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #133

I'm not ranking anyone here.

<< Comment #144 @ 09:58 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

hnns - Reply to #107

Who cares? Media people have their own vote of player of the year in most sports, e.g the premier league.

<< Comment #145 @ 10:04 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #144

Nobody cares?

<< Comment #126 @ 04:07 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

therogue - Reply to #100

djwheat is at least 8 years (pre-ESWC)

dunno where on earth you got 7 years for slasher, I remember he became active at least a year after me (at least on esreality), what was he doing before?

<< Comment #139 @ 08:36 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

oneroomdisco - Reply to #126

Well I know he was a Q2 player, and he also played Quake 3 competitively for a bit. So, I just kind of did an estimate of what I'm fairly certain on.

<< Comment #148 @ 10:29 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

Slasher - Reply to #126

I played Quake 2 from 2000-2007, Quake 3 and CPM after for about 9 months, and then Quake Live since. Around 2002, I was the organizer, leader and strat caller for a national USA Q2CTF team. Our major league (OGL, sigh) was dead and we had no leagues left, while ClanBase still had 40-50 Q2CTF teams, so I formed an all-star cast of players to compete in CB. We were the first American team to ever compete in a ClanBase league, and then a little while later I was writing match reports, and then after that became the Q2CTF Cup head. That was my first physical interaction with eSports if you can call it that, besides reading Cached, ShackES and XSR daily

<< Comment #153 @ 11:47 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

therogue - Reply to #148

/pwned

<< Comment #90 @ 14:05 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ini ' - Reply to #76

A bunch of esports media personalities, oh great!

<< Comment #70 @ 12:00 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Kill_

1. cypher
2. cooller
3. av3k
4. stermy
5. fox
6. dahang
7. rapha
8. z4muz
9. strenx

<< Comment #104 @ 17:16 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

rupertt - Reply to #70

lol

funniest post I've seen in long while

<< Comment #127 @ 04:09 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

Kill_ - Reply to #104

I'm a funny guy. :)

Well, if you look at recent results it looks like this : DaHang didnt do that well on DH, and he won to rapha shortly after, so that's it for me. :)

<< Comment #129 @ 04:31 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By $\0/$ fragerr - Reply to #127

u r dumb and not funny.. sry just wanted to say that :D

<< Comment #131 @ 04:54 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

Kill_ - Reply to #129

Ah, you again. Lovin' it ;) Feed the troll. :)

<< Comment #181 @ 18:49 CST, 18 February 2010 >>

By

ralph - Reply to #131

Hahaha. Long love ze fragerr.

<< Comment #138 @ 08:31 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

rupertt - Reply to #127

you might hate america, I dunno. but stermy over fox and z4muz over strenx is quite the lulz.

<< Comment #143 @ 09:21 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

Kill_ - Reply to #138

Stermy won a game and lost a game against fox in the EU finlas, and stermy is traning 24/7 right now where fox isnt even playing at all.

Z4muz over strenx is lol ? Dude, z4muz was second on DH, and strenx often can't live up to his online game on lan....

<< Comment #147 @ 10:27 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

rupertt - Reply to #143

z4muz failed at the euro championship strenx didn't. Nuff said.

btw, everyone knows fox plays better when he's not prepared.

<< Comment #78 @ 12:33 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

r1ddler

1.walter
2.dahang
3.rapha
4.avek
5.chyper

<< Comment #91 @ 14:15 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

d1z ' - Reply to #78

0.sombra

<< Comment #79 @ 12:37 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

grimbob

cooller #1

no hatin!

<< Comment #86 @ 13:15 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

1. cooller / rapha / cypher / av3k / dahang
2. GUArd

<< Comment #88 @ 13:31 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

CAREEM

lol at rapha being 1st =)))) would be a suprise for me if rapha manage to get in top5

<< Comment #102 @ 17:14 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

rupertt - Reply to #88

we'll see whos laughing come march.

<< Comment #149 @ 10:40 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

lizahd - Reply to #102

no way, there came quakecon, dubai etc already. rapha is champion, no march needed.

gtfo :P

<< Comment #160 @ 19:21 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

rupertt - Reply to #149

I totally agree.... except for the gtfo comment :(

<< Comment #166 @ 14:24 CST, 14 February 2010 >>

By

lizahd - Reply to #160

german way to teh kindness ;D

<< Comment #182 @ 18:50 CST, 18 February 2010 >>

By

ralph - Reply to #102

Hopefully not Dahang.

CHOKE, CHOKE, CHOKE.

<< Comment #163 @ 12:51 CST, 14 February 2010 >>

By

EmSixTeen - Reply to #88

Wise up.

<< Comment #92 @ 14:58 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

ArchaiK

haha vote based rankings are awful, this is like gotfrags shitty CS rankings that no one takes seriously anymore.

<< Comment #93 @ 15:18 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

weeja

this shit is so who's hot right now in europe, give me a break make a list after the global finals imo.

<< Comment #97 @ 16:14 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

f0rk123 - Reply to #93

your expecting griffin and chance to get out of groups?

<< Comment #98 @ 16:17 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

weeja - Reply to #97

no but imo dahang has to be ranked above cooller. I love cooller but its retarded that the 1st place iem usa finisher is ranked behind 3rd place iem eu finisher.

<< Comment #99 @ 16:28 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

p4r4 - Reply to #98

Cooller played DaHang twice on QL LANs and beat him both times.

<< Comment #123 @ 01:43 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

weeja - Reply to #99

so what? dahang played rapha on lan and beat him does that mean he should be ranked above rapha?

<< Comment #128 @ 04:18 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

Kill_ - Reply to #123

Cooller was ranked figher then dahang on DH AND he won to him in Dubai, so explain to me please how exacly would we rank him above cooller ?

<< Comment #154 @ 11:49 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

weeja - Reply to #128

"so what? dahang played rapha on lan and beat him does that mean he should be ranked above rapha?"
same logic as what you are saying.

<< Comment #94 @ 15:51 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

judge717

more rankings, ugh.

<< Comment #95 @ 16:08 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

lizahd

yeah, make some sort of rankings for like,,, due to 2-4 lan events a year,,, rofl lols

rapha not .1 , noticed, i give a fuck about it

<< Comment #101 @ 17:12 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

rupertt

at least Slasher got it right.

<< Comment #103 @ 17:15 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

vedic

Why not top 17? Is 10 the new 17?

<< Comment #105 @ 17:24 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

GrotesK

Top 4 is easy:
Cypher
Rapha
Av3k
Cooller

<< Comment #106 @ 17:26 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

butchji

#1 Cypher
#2 Av3k
#3 Rapha
#4 Cooller
#5 DaHang
#6 Strenx

<< Comment #108 @ 17:36 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

redeye on the voting panel hahah. he's a fucking embarrassment.

<< Comment #109 @ 17:43 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

fazz '

Yea. Sorry, I like all the voters(that I've heard about before) but, they have in no way a better understanding of who is good or not than anyone else posting on esr. This is just stupid.

<< Comment #116 @ 19:40 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

Carsomyr

Ok, this picture needs context.

http://www.tek-9.org/img/articles/qlpanel6.jpg

Edited by Carsomyr at 19:40 CST, 12 February 2010

<< Comment #118 @ 21:41 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

sn1kzZe

when it says PM of ESL, does that mean ESL has only one PM ?

<< Comment #125 @ 04:00 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

therogue - Reply to #118

no, carmac is only a product manager for the Masters, we have many other products with different PMs

<< Comment #157 @ 15:43 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

sn1kzZe - Reply to #125

so shouldnt be written "PM at ESL" instead ? :o]

<< Comment #159 @ 17:37 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

therogue - Reply to #157

"PM of Intel Extreme Masters" would be the best, otherwise "a PM at Turtle Entertainment" would be more accurate than saying at ESL

<< Comment #119 @ 22:22 CST, 12 February 2010 >>

By

rupertt

This so called ranking is too close to the euro final people can't stay objective.

Total waste.

<< Comment #122 @ 01:43 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

erok

who really gives a fuck, bring on the tournament to show who's the best

<< Comment #135 @ 08:14 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

rupertt - Reply to #122

idd

<< Comment #124 @ 02:32 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

d1z '

1. Alexey "Cypher" Yanushevsky - 47 points
2. Shane "rapha" Hendrixson - 45 points
3. Maciej "av3k" Krzykowski - 43 points
4. Anton "Cooller" Singov - 34 points
5. Tim "DaHanG" Fogarty - 31 points
6. Magnus "fox" Olsson - 20 points
7. Alessandro "stermy" Avallone - 19 points
8. Kevin "strenx" Baeza - 18 points
9. Richard "noctis" Gansterer - 7 points
10. Alexander "Z4muZ" Ihrfors - 4 points

© http://www.tek-9.org/articles/tek9_quakelive_..._10-1.html

<< Comment #152 @ 11:35 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

IniqoN

#72 was right:)

<< Comment #150 @ 10:59 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

judge717

cheesy way of getting hits on tek-9.org

<< Comment #156 @ 12:52 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

oneroomdisco - Reply to #150

Genius way.

<< Comment #161 @ 19:53 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

esdf '

so what have we learned from this thread:

1) gillz is a complete idiot (well, that's just recap from old threads)
2) there's no fucking dj wheat on this page, even tho he is listed under panel (http://www.tek-9.org/articles/tek9_quakelive_...nel-2.html)
3) rankings fail, cooller takes places 1-10 obviously
4) i forgot.

<< Comment #169 @ 11:42 CST, 15 February 2010 >>

By

oneroomdisco - Reply to #161

You should probably give up with the idiot thing. People don't bother calling me that anymore because no one else acknowledges it. I'll give you some time though, you'll eventually get it.

<< Comment #170 @ 11:53 CST, 15 February 2010 >>

By

micke - Reply to #169

People don't bother calling you that any more because it's a well known fact. Most of esr has witnessed your stupidity

<< Comment #171 @ 11:58 CST, 15 February 2010 >>

By

oneroomdisco - Reply to #170

Most of ESR is also a bunch of trolling assholes who bash players for no reason at all. Hence why no one really cares.

<< Comment #173 @ 12:09 CST, 15 February 2010 >>

By

micke - Reply to #171

most things gets bashed but stupid/retarded shit gets bashed more (e.g agp, you and jamerio)

<< Comment #176 @ 20:46 CST, 15 February 2010 >>

By

vedic - Reply to #171

Edited by vedic at 20:46 CST, 15 February 2010

<< Comment #183 @ 18:51 CST, 18 February 2010 >>

By

ralph - Reply to #171

Tru.

<< Comment #177 @ 04:12 CST, 16 February 2010 >>

By

becks - Reply to #169

gillz has replaced idiot around here.

Example: If I reply to someone with "That was a very smart statement, gillz!" everyone knows what I mean.
Also, saying: "You are an idiot, Gillz" would be redundant.

Edited by becks at 04:14 CST, 16 February 2010

<< Comment #162 @ 22:00 CST, 13 February 2010 >>

By

wocK_

#1 YUKA
#2 SOMBRA

OH WAIT

<< Comment #164 @ 13:35 CST, 14 February 2010 >>

By

Anonymous (japanties.org)

You have to be fucking joking with this list.....

Slasher is a stoned, un organised piece of shit that shouldnt be on any list like this.

redeye hasnt even casted Quake Live games. Why should his opinion count. I bet hes hardly watched any either.

crow is a quake live writer thats at least active.

Give the vote to the players, or get rid of some of these jokes from the panel...

<< Comment #167 @ 17:34 CST, 14 February 2010 >>

By

Sa1Nt_ - Reply to #164

stop posting this bullshit as anonymous or gtfo

<< Comment #168 @ 17:40 CST, 14 February 2010 >>

By

vedic - Reply to #167

Anonymous (japanties.org)

obviously dird

<< Comment #178 @ 18:38 CST, 16 February 2010 >>

By

Anonymous (h-145-45.A151.priv.bahnhof.se)

Lists and statistics like these are something I´ve been missing from the Quake broadcasts.

When I´m watching Starcraft there is these Kespa rankings (I think) when players, commentators and other esport hangarounds are ranking the players not just in a list like this but also by individual points for different sorts of manuevers.. like macro, micro and so on.

I would love to see these kinds of stats for quake players in the ESL streams.. I´ll give one example (made up stats and numbers)

Name: F-MSI Strenx
Country: France
Age: 22

Positioning: 6/10
Aggression: 7/10
Movement: 8/10
Timing: 8/10
Map Control: 7/10
Current Form: 10/10
Aim: 10/10

Aim breakdown:
RL: 6/10
LG: 10/10
RG: 9/10

Map skill:
DM6: 8/10
ZTN:8/10
T9: 10/10

and so on.. what´ya all think? I think it would be nice to see a screen with stats like these in the pre-talk/warmup

/fling

<< Comment #179 @ 19:56 CST, 16 February 2010 >>

By

vedic - Reply to #178

KESPA rank is from a point system, not opinon based. It's still shit, though, and people only take elo seriously.

Reply to:
[Reset]

Formatting:

Content:

Enter Text:

Or if you already have an account:

Username:

Password:

Read the Posting Guidelines

Non-HTML tags: [b]bold[/b], [i]italics[/i], [u]underlined[/u]
[small]small[/small], [q]quoted[/q], [s]~~strikethrough~~[/s]
[url=www.url.com]link[/url] or type www.url.com
[flag=country] (list), [avatar=name] (list)
[map=mapname gamename] (list)

Conceived and created by Sujoy Roy (Legal Notices)
RSS Feed Information, Link Buttons and Banners