Okay, now I'm expecting it to bomb lie daikatana did.

you guys are so hard to please, i bet no game at this point would make you think "wow an awesome game". then maybe thats why quake live is falling apart with all that cybersport nonsense put into it.

rage looks so fucking generic.. sigh

Am I the only person that actually kinda liked the commercial?

About people whining about shooters being too generic and realistic nowadays and people wanting more 'fun' games with demons and dinosaurs and shit... That game Bulletstorm came out with that shit and Rage's video has footage of a giant troll and mechanical spiders... How that's considered generic is beyond me

i liked it, thought it wasnt as cheesy as some of the commercials of similar type are...

contrary to what anyone might think, demons and dinosaurs are not antithetical to this. the gates of hell aka zombies aka aliens are part of the invasion, which is in turn part of the end of the world. post-apocalyptic steam-punk style is just a sign of the masochistic human rebellion that in this scheme feeds on feelings of inferiority, resentment and delicious decay. thought it was obvious.

(notice that as soon as any organization gets strong enough to actually be capable of saving the world, it turns evil and we are left with the jesusbellions and their accessory made of various garbage)

No match for Jonesy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=296XU5ksrKI

:D

............................................________
....................................,.-'"...................``~.,
.............................,.-"..................................."-.,
.........................,/...............................................":,
.....................,?......................................................\,
.................../...........................................................,}
................./......................................................,:`^`..}
.............../...................................................,:"........./
..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../
............./__.(....."~-,_..............................,:`........../
.........../(_...."~,_........"~,_....................,:`........_/
..........{.._$;_......"=,_......."-,_.......,.-~-,},.~";/....}
...........((.....*~_......."=-._......";,,./`..../"............../
...,,,___.\`~,......"~.,....................`.....}............../
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-"
............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\
.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__
,,_..........}.>-._\...................................|..............`=~-,
.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\
...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\
................................`:,,...........................`\..............__
.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``
........................................_\..........._,-%.......`\
...................................,<`.._|_,-&``................`

saw the gameplay videos, sorta like doom 3 in open spaces.

Terrible commercial (their E3 doom 3 trailer was superb back in the day), but must be doing something right as I overheard some guy at the football today saying to someone did they see that game rage. and that was in UK.

Americans have bad taste in commericals, come to the UK and most of our adverts are like works of art compared to theirs.
Literally.

I'll be buying for pc regardless. Not expecting much, but I know it will have some nice touches in atmosphere/graphics at the very least and I love the whole post apoc thing. Plus id still has a certain old school charm to them that so many devs have lost.

I wonder if they'll include some kind of editor, or tools etc to build levels. Would like to see how they do the whole megatexture thing and how their tech/editor/tools has improved.

"Pull down the console, type ‘id studio’, then press enter; Then, bam, there’s all the tools we use."

– Tim Willits

.

There were some videos of the editor they are using released some time ago. Textures overlaid with textures overlaid with textures etc.

Some of your commercials are made here in New York. Also a few of our commercials are made in the UK and Sweden.

http://www.1stavemachine.com/
http://buck.tv/
http://www.psyop.tv/
http://www.themill.com/
http://framestore.com/

To name just a few.

What am I watching

he was better on norm's sports show

Rage's probably most interesting to developers for idtech5

q3 was originally only planned as a small tech demo, yet its been around for over 10 years..

maybe id should stop trying to make a real game and focus on a real engine again, it worked like a charm befor :)

It was a commercial failure.

20+ games is a commercial failure?

The game was a commercial failure. They didn't need to release Q3 to license the engine.

Even still, I don't think id can manage to compete in the engine market anymore.

Q3 sold 50,000 units in 3 days of it being released, I would hardly call that a failure.. Who knows how many units it sold after.

But yes, I will be supprised if the IdTech5 engine will be as popular as the UT3 one.

Less than 1 million since release, and it's even on steam now.

When Q3 was released, Q1 sold 500k, Q2 sold 600k, although i'd imagine those numbers have gone up since due to steam sales.

I haven't found any credible info on Q1 sales, especially not with any sort of timeline. Link?

http://uk.gamespot.com/news/2440372/quake-iii...h-the-roof

PC Data, hmmz :)

So no real source? Not trying to be annoying, but I've sincerely been looking for some place that has some actual info on Q1.

So what else would you have released instead of quake 3 to show off its engine, bearing in mind the studio had bpent the last 10 years making FPS games and were at the top level in their field? You're very good at being crital under the guise that you know of a better answer but never put it on the table almost giving you the false impression you can never be wrong about anything.

It made perfect sense given it was a franchise game which was in demand and the simplicity of game play meant it was nothing more than a few graphics and A.I. and Carmack could basically do whatever he does from a core point of view.

Even the majority of the graphics (excluding characters/textures) could be created in the editor and lit, so there was very little need for high end artistis, keeping costs down etc (important for small dev team). Hardly any scripting or any of the things that actually add years to the development time of a game.

They didn't need to release it no, but it was better they relesed it than that thing you imply should have been done but seem relucatant to define or put under the spotlight.

You don't have to release a game to sell an engine. Epic had licensed out U3 engine before UT3 even came out. The fact that it wouldn't take a big team to make Q3 doesn't change the fact that id isn't a big team total, so the resources they did have to devote to it were a major portion of their staff.

compared to epics engine its a total failure, UT & ut2k3/4 have been used in 100s of games

how does that oppose to what i said?

id selling the engine tons is a commercial success.

i said it was a small tech demo, and it was:
no single player, no story. a good multiplayer game by chance, afair carmack even wanted to take out the strafejump

edit:
ill say again, id shoudl stop TRYING to make a good game, and just do another tech demo :) maybe it will work out a second time :)

for me id is dead ...
I don't expect anything special from rage ...
rage will still have some sales, because the brand id means something, but after the release of this game, the brand id is nothing special anymore, just another developer on the market ...

feel like rage has the most potential from all of their latest releases tbh

this video has some footage of rage:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdNrAyABDXI
for me personally it is enough to see, that it will suck,
mediocre racing paired with doom3 single player = SUXX!
This Tim Willits guy should really not be in a leading game design position, doom3 was a failure (yeah, I know it was still successful commercially, but only because of the doom brand) and he also produced quake4 ... also looking at the video you easily see this guy is a career guy with no real clue on gaming, guys like this can only produce failures ... through his entire talk you feel he has no passion for the game he is the director of ...

He joined id Software in 1995 after impressing the owners and development team with DOOM levels he forged in his spare time and distributed free over the Internet. Willits has worked on Strife, The Ultimate Doom, Quake, Quake II, Quake III Arena, Quake III: Team Arena and Doom 3.

those damn business guys!

and if you had read/watched a bit more about rage then you should know that it differs quite a bit from doom 3 with racing in between. anyway he didnt really deliver with his last projects and i dont wanna judge rage before played it, just seems to me that your skepticism is a bit over the top

well career guy was maybe over the top,
there are people who should stick to the technical aspects of a game, e.g. that is programming or graphical design, because they have no clue on gamedesign and gameplay ... many people in the mod community are only interested in design or programming, but they are not interested in playing, and this also seems to be the case with this guy ... he is just interested in delivering a product ... man they have a john carmack engine, have billions of dollars and produce such a shit, it's unbelieveable ...

just take a look at the 2nd part of duke nukem 4 ever:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Snt4blcBGoc&am...r_embedded
I don't say this game will absolutely rock, but at least it looks like it could be interesting and fun to play ... and there is also driving involved ... it's also not an uber-piece of art, there is also lack of innovation ... but tbh. what can rage deliver in comparison to bioshock/call of duty/duke nukem 4 ever or battlefield 3?

look at the battlefield 3 trailer if you haven't seen it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3b2ST-yQ04&feature=fvst

Well, you said that it's been around for 10 years - so what exactly were you trying to imply?

id tried the whole engine thing again with Doom 3, and nobody licensed it. They just can't compete anymore.

Human Head Studios/Splash Damage/Nerve Software/Raven all licensed the doom 3 engine and achieved on average over 80% across every game made on that engine based on gamerankings.com (which averaged dozens of reviews).

Just becaue something is not a success, its does not mean its bad.

Matroska
Betamax
Linux

Are just 3 examples of this.

And Facebook is just one example of something not that good can be annoyingly successful.

They all work with id, and all had commercial failures with the engine. It's safe to say that they probably lost money by licensing it.

and wtf... linux isn't a success? How uninformed can you get?

So what if they work with id?
Many devs that license tech do.

All those devs are still in operation and releasing games whilst going through recession. No mean feat.

Linux has a tiny market share of the potential OS market.
I'm not taling about things like Apache/Virtualisation.

My point is Linux is a good example of something can be deemed a commericial falure (in comparison to windows) despite having far more potential than windows ever did.
Without support its doomed to server/small market share even all those bilions of distros can't make it work.

Doom 3 was way more advanced than anything when it came out for several years, with the right support there is no reason why it could not have done more (why should id start writing crap all of a sudden when its written 4-5-6 industry engines in a row up till then(, but my point is things do not always get the support and are seen as failures.

Linux is a commercial failure, your disbelif proves my point exactly. BUT LINUX IS A COMMERICAL FAILURE.

Doesn't mean all those boffins behind it are failures.

Somethings just are.

... Linux is not a commercial failure in any way. Just because it's not used on desktops as much as something like Windows does not make it a commercial failure - how clueless are you? Linux is a SERVER architecture first, and pretty much runs the entire internet. The fact that Linux has a desktop market share at all is just the icing on the cake.

Most people who use computers do so to.

Run software
Browse the web.

It's corrupt to imply linux hasn't tried/dreamed/failed to muscle in on the windows market or would want to. Do you think I enjoy paying 150 for windows 7 ultimate?

Stop making excuses for its mainstream commercial failure of Linux. It started life that way, but should have evolved and while it has, its still not been enough.

you can say the same thing about the Doom 3 engine, its very good for a CERTAIN and VERY SPECFIC type of tasks.

I just wanted to expose the fact that in one post when its not something you want to stick up for you'll say its crap, but when its something you do want to stick up for, you're happy to note the very SPECIFIC merits of the SOFTWARE, which is no different to what idsoftwre did with the Doom 3 engine.

Linux ISN'T a mainstream OS, and never has been. That's what you don't seem to understand. The fact that it has taken any market share as a mainstream desktop OS only makes it a BIGGER success.

Doom 3 wasn't meant to be a server platform, it was meant to be a game. Linux was meant to be a server platform. Congrats, you've found yet ANOTHER computer-related discussion that you know nothing about.

Linux is getting better and better on the desktop market.
But really how much money was invested into linux for linux to become good on the desktop, so many companys paying for developers ... several billions have been already invested into linux, so it became what it is today on the desktop ... and still it is only at the level of windows xp, of course it's usable for average things ...
but from the usability point of view still lightyears behind OS X and Win7 ...

I agree, and it's a miracle that it has any market share on the desktop at all. It is still far and away the most successful server platform.

said it before, linux will never be used on desktop around the built up world until the desktop is 100% hardware rendered when you install your nvidia or ati drivers,

when you install your cards drivers, the desktop is still 100% software rendered, the drivers do absolute nothing but give some random nvidia/ati specific apps a few new functions to be called in the code

it should be no1 priority for gnome and KDE to fix and add in the next main version releases

The point of my post was to show that like linux, the Doom 3 engine was very capable at certain tasks and a failure at others.

Making excuses for it is and pretending it doesn't want or has tried to be bigger than it is is just hilarious. Only superceeded by your inability to take me literally and ignore the obvious principle behind the comparion of me using Linux server/mainstream argument.

Doom 3 engine was designed around the Doom 3 game, sadly the market moved over to the monotomous exterior COD/CRYSIS infinite environement thing which is not what the engine excelled at. (the design for d3 engine started in 2000, so interior based FPS was still the norm back then)

But like Linux, it had a specific talent for doing a certain type of game. IN doom 3's case it was atmospheric interor based levels. Like Linux, it had a core skill and use. The only difference is, you don't want to spare the same understanding you show to linux.

Linux might have started out with a specific use, but it has no excuse for not moving on and replacing windows.

The fact that it has not should tell you that sometimes things do not succeed when they should.

If you want to keep crying like a child and telling me "but it never wanted to be what it SOULD HAVE evolved to" then by all means carry on.

No, your point was that it wasn't a commercial success - you were wrong in every way that you can be wrong.

If I'm wrong about Linux then you're wrong about the doom 3 engine. They are both commercial failures, but both do certain things really well. The only difference is you're happy to acknowledge things linux does well and make excuses for the things it does not.

If you divide the amount of computers out there running linux, its a commerical failure.

If you ignore conventional defintions of commercial success and instead focus on specitifc tasks, then its a success.

There really isn't anything to discuss other than your inablitty to be biased towards the things you like/dislike.

And its amusing for me to extract that from you and show the readers.

No, you're just wrong. Keep flailing around trying to find something, though. It's cute how badly you're trying to defend yourself now that you understand how wrong you are.

"Linux is not a commercial failure in any way."

-Vedic

OS Platform Statistics April 2011

Linux 5.1% (source= w3)

5% of a market that it wasn't sold to! Epic!

5% of the market = india/nerds/peasents

Actually it was 94.9% of the commercial market that it was NOT sold to. (http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp)

"Linux is not a commercial failure in any way."

-Vedic

So you're saying that, despite dominating its market, it has also taken from markets that it wasn't even supposed to take from. A whole 5% in a competitive market for people who were marketing to it!

I'm glad that you were able to understand.

Sorry man, the discussion has already reached critical mass and you've made another fool of yourself.

I'm uploading a small .swf file to highlight this, until approved, maybe you can cry over the last one that showed your expertise.

Bye bye :)

Attached Misc File: 82601-vedic-shows-the-world-his-insight-into-.swf (397KB)

That's a reply trend that you should certainly stick with.

edit: nope, should have known that you'd edit. =X

IS THERE NO HOPE

If you were not so furious spamming the f5 button I might actually be able to post and make a sufficient edit before you reply.

Or you could make a real post without an edit, but I guess that's too much to ask since you'd have to think out your replies.

No need to spam F5 when I have a reply right as I go back to the main page. I know the time in-between your McDonalds shifts is limited, but you really should take your time.

I'm not the one that's posting crap online at 4/5am texas time.
http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2088385#pid2088385

I know - it's awesome not having to work. Try not to get so jealous. ;D

For someone whose spent years of his life calling me a liar about my career, you sure have a funny definiton of jealousy.

I wouldn't have to call you a liar if you didn't spend years making shit up. Don't get mad, get help.

If you got the help you needed you would not even be calling people liars to begin with becaue you'de be able to interpret/acceptt hings better. You problably have early signs of schizophrenia.

We've already shown the world that aspect of your personality here beyond any reasonable doubt. http://www.esreality.com/files/misc/2011/8203...d-liar.swf

Where you claimed that someone said something, but in fact when I showed (with proof not denial or suspicion which once again every point you say revovles around) John Romero actually said they complete opposite. At which point you still insisted that what he said was true, but refused to provide a source and insisted he still did, but you did not want to prove otherwise.

I have seen it first hand with you spending years of your life accusing me of lying about working with games because it was simply too much for your ego to handle.

On this thread you've already said Linux was not a commerial failure, when proven wrong yet again, you choose to pretend that the minority was the majority and began your usual aresenal of moves such as accusing people of working at mcdonalds to take things off course and accusing them of being a liar in the hope it undoes the sticky situation you've gotten into.

And you put yourself in that situation as you do every time.

"I wouldn't have to call you a liar if you didn't spend years making shit up. Don't get mad, get help.

[+]
<< Comment #90 @ 16:37 CEST, 4 June 2011 >>
(Link, iMsg, Reply)
By jameriofox Jamerio - Reply to #89
If you got the help you needed you would not even be calling people liars to begin with becaue you'de be able to interpret/acceptt hings better. You problably have early signs of schizophrenia.

We've already shown the world that aspect of your personality here beyond any reasonable doubt. http://www.esreality.com/files/misc/2011/8203...d-liar.swf

Where you claimed that someone said something, but in fact when I showed (with proof not denial or suspicion which once again every point you say revovles around) John Romero actually said they complete opposite. At which point you still insisted that what he said was true, but refused to provide a source and insisted he still did, but you did not want to prove otherwise.

I have seen it first hand with you spending years of your life accusing me of lying about working with games because it was simply too much for your ego to handle.

On this thread you've already said Linux was not a commerial failure, when proven wrong yet again, you choose to pretend that the minority was the majority and began your usual aresenal of moves such as accusing people of working at mcdonalds to take things off course and accusing them of being a liar in the hope it undoes the sticky situation you've gotten into.

And you put yourself in that situation as you do every time.
"

See, this is an example of you getting mad. Two sentences, and you have to spend several paragraphs reinforcing your delusions to support your mental defense mechanisms.

ur both wrong, and ur both idiots.

I'm not sure what you mean, but idtech5 will only be used by ZeniMax's games

i see a future of strafe jumping in elder scrolls/fallout :D

I can't argue what i don't know, but even only then it would be a huuuuge incline for future tes/fallout games if idtech5 replaces gamebryo engine.

i always wonder why carmack feels the needs to create another mediocre game engine which only few developers would use.

mediocre? LOL!

i thought it was kinda funny, very cheesy, but kinda funny

rage looks good, the game is probaly shit

Release Rage43a and post changelogs

you download the dev patches on the zshare or megaupload link that is usually in the same post as the changelog

if you have the full release of Q43A and download a dev patch, and extract it into the full release folder, the changelog will be applied

Did you really total miss what he was trying to say?

Did you really totally miss what he was trying to say or do you not want the changelog to be applied?

just download it on all them Q43A dedicated servers that are banned and filtered from the q4master when you connect to 1 of them, Q43A does pure listen servers so download it off yo momma

and custom damage sets

I think u should make milita for it......... 5 years after people stop playing it

all you every say along with most people on here, and i say, etc etc etc, you all still crying about QL and all other quake games being dead or having the same old bugs and glitches just like all other q4 mods

Q43A is a shit load of recoding and new features, and gameplay wise you will not know any difference from the average game play of quake 4, unless you dodge jump around, bunny hop around the map, take control of a bit more air control, and etc etc etc etc

you can try Q43A or each and every 1 of you can STFU crying about everything quake

besides some FPS drops, there are only a few gameplay glitches etc in the engine, everything else that made Q4 complete shit is in the driver code

6yrs later, todays PC`s make up for low FPS

No one wants to play Q4 ever again

for reasons being, your all to chicken shit for Q43A, no other

if rage has good dev tools and such, do you see yourself making mods for it?

no, im not making another mod, especially for a game i am not going to buy

See, this is what i was talking about. This is what we need for QL. Getting some celebrity or some shit, some top players saying they've travelled the world and made thousands of money playing it and make a living out of it (even if everything are half truths, who cares). Then people get hyped, join the game, player base grows, and prizes on tournaments can be upgraded enough that you can actually make a living out of being a top player without needing to place 1st everytime.

TV is king for this.

so you dumbfucks, how would your commercial look like?

like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRuNxHqwazs

is this smth like john romero is gonna make you his bitch?

pretty much

i find it unrealistic that anyone would want to be in this game.

also, that people know what "Rage" is.