so they show dead gadaffi but not bin laden?

They are not in the same league and osama was killed under very controlled circumstances.

GG for sky news airing the video in the day:/

sooo this hehehe

You have lost the lead

Very conclusive pics!!!!

how come those pictures are always the worst resolution ever? are they running around with a webcam or what? A share picture would probably defeat the purpose i.e. you know its him. This way you can still rumour if someone had some epic photoshop s(kills).

Smart phones aren't really common in those kind of countries, so you're left with average phones that can take alright pictures, but shit video.

R.I.P.

72 virgins... wouldn't call it peace!

nor rest.

Cool now they can put some stooge in that wont kick our oil companies out

oh... my... god...

I don't even know where to start

Not starting is a good place to stop.

You can start by...

A) Admitting wars and military occupations cost billions.

B) Libya will be a better place thanks to western interventioin and would never have gotten rid of the Gadaffi famility without them.

C) If Libya etc can pay something towards this, then a few barrels of oil to help the costs and secure their future is nothing.

A. thats why they are happening since ww2, its good business
B. better place, ruled by this guy for 42 years the same way, now was the time
C. you know there is oil in the country, unfortunately that is all you know

And maybe you should learn what he did for his country unlike the other countries we call allies(saudi arabia where women get beaten to death if found talking to men on the street)

Shouldn't of been there in the first place it would of cost nothing

oh so that what you were doing, saving them. so I presume that means you saved Uganda, Kenya, Sudan, Somalia?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-20513...Sirte.html

Another one bites the dust. (I always wanted to say that.)

lol, in all your time casting matches you never got to use it? :p

I can't recall tbh.

why everyone calls the man Gaddafi?
Kadhafi it is...

qaddafi

This. but with a gulf accent it's sometimes pronounced gaddafi

So?

So... a couple years ago, all the guys on the left licked the balls of the guy on the right for oil/contracts after he dumped many turds on their faces.

Now they're all happy he's dead after that 3 weeks 7 months war.

While all of this happened, millions die in Congo in much more deadly dicatorships than Gadafi's (not saying im not glad the cunt died, just saying how they'll ignore other much more terrible dictatorships and they'll not "liberate them" until there is profit to be done on the land).

1st: Do you even know how much he did for his country during the 42 years of him being the leader of Libya? Sure he went fuck-duche at the end (like pretty much every "Dictator"), but without him Libya would be fucked up as hell (like it is right now after the revolutionary guys give it it's "Freedom" back).

2nd: Give it 1 year and there will be another idiot at the top of Libya's politics. You think there will be democracy in this country? And what other delusional stuff do you believe in?

Do you know how much hitler has done for Germany before he started his rampage. LOL

Did I ever say anything about Hitler only doing evil stuff? 90% of what he has done was evil, but there was good stuff too. Sadly it can not repay for what evil stuff he has done. Same goes for Stalin, Hussein and some other "big" people of our history.

i am pretty sure its not just oil, but to also weaken countries like russia and china, who are the only countries competing with usa for world dominance (in a non peaceful way), all of russia allies lie in the middle east and china, mostly, since most of these countries are less developed, and not so much open-minded, like those countries, russia is probably the most inteliggent non-us ally, which is why all these lesser middle eastern countries get dismantled, to pave way for complete dominance in the world. the question is is it good or bad for the world, where will all those jobeless revolutionaries go, except to create more conflict on the continent. europe is full of refugeess as well as many other non-us countries, do these refugees feel sympathetic to the west, not a completely positive answer, so they destroy as much governments as they can, perhaps they are desperately trying to avoid ww3, or make it happen sooner by their hasty wars, all they do is create more hate for us, now ukraine sips from democracy, did the country become better, with peacefull citizens shot in the head on the streets, for protesting usa-led democracy, idk, usa seems to start loosing that savior angel reputation, instead all i can see they simply try to survive by turning lesser developed countries into colonies. pure survival, no demcracy, no any other bs, if you see clearly they simply create governments that dont care about theyr people, thereby creating a surpluss of resources directed to other countries instead of helping their own people. and in return they get free press and media, fair trade?

we cant argue that its all for the better, but i mean, they dont just use peace talks, there is direct military interventions that never do any good in the long term. first of they create more jobless people who got nothing left to loose, then those jobless people god know where they go, the only sign of that would be war in caucasus after soviet troops withdrew from afghanistan, in other words, once you start pissing someone off, they will come chasing right after you. war is no way to deal with conflicts between nations.

i think ww3 is somewhere very close, since iran might be close to nuclear weapons, which would explain all these chatic wars, i mean ukraine, is no dictator driven country, maybe just a tad worse than what other call a democracy, but , again its mostly due to lack of resouces in europe perhaps, but europe has better system for developing countries, but they still kinda shot themselves in the foot since russia is not iran, its a relatively peacefull country, and its in the best interest to keep it strong, i mean who is going to protect europe from invasion from middle east, without russia as a stong buffer zone, those rebels from countries like syria have a straight route by land to move back to their masters, its all fucked up, world needs a strong russia with a strong army.

i think the end goal is thta with todays technologies they can use land much more efficiently so that means that russia would be under much more pressure, since its technological base is more outdated, but hopefully there wont be any revolutions, i really dont see russia being take over by someone else, this land is very hard to protect with so many bordering countries, borders are huge, which is why a usa or uk style democracy is unlikely, there simply is no way to control such landmass the easy and soft way through media and closer immigration controls since, people just run through the borders illegaly. so its really like asking a wolf to be a vegetarian.

cia probably rules the world thanks to pwerful computers that can predict any outcome or scenario by tapping into what people do on the internet and phones and processing all of that to see the real situation in the world, the question is whether or not people with any kind of technology or whatever will be able to control those that dont use any of that and just get pissed since they have no clue whats going on, and have no job. i see usa as successor to the egyptian empire, they too had very advanced technologies, but they still failed and moved to usa, or vatican or whatever, but the fact is this tehcnological way of ruling the world is not the absolute answer, and in time it too wil get crushed under its own weight, wars are prime example that this system doesnt really work, since they cant precdict everything, if they could, there would be no an kind of wars, population control could have been simply done with no violence at all by introducing contraception and other nonviolent methods.

reviving dead thread much?

i am just trying to figure out what the heck is going on in the world, russia is in a confusing place right now, is it us ally or is us going to further destroy the industry and we slip donw to africas level of poverty, all depends whether or not russian people are dumb enough to be controlled like 3yolds. there is really no political loyalty expect if country people are dumb enough for them to become slaves,

there is no doubt russia is already a western colony, question is will it become african style colony, where government is almost non existent

if you say so

Mobutu Sese Seko Kuku Ngbendu wa Za Banga died a while ago. The other dude has a point.

there's still The Beloved Leader.

How does that disprove or prove anything.

Actually all the wars in africa are western funded too, they have a good system, keep the country in disarray and away from where the mine companies are

China (for example in Sudan) funded a lot of them as well.

Well yeah china seem to have their eyes set on Africa, pretty sure they wanted in with Libya too

Wait until India jumps in!

I believe the word you are looking for is "Hypocrites".

we just call them politicians in the uk

his party outfit was good

"Pirates were the first people to rebel against this world. They mutinied against their tyrannical captains - and created a different way of working on the seas. Once they had a ship, the pirates elected their captains, and made all their decisions collectively. They shared their bounty out in what Rediker calls "one of the most egalitarian plans for the disposition of resources to be found anywhere in the eighteenth century.""

so, your highness: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/you...55147.html

"It doesn't matter if he was a bastard. You're still celebrating a murder. A murder."

last year he was standing at the right of Sarkozy at the military parad in champs Elysee.

Occident is once again trying to make a civil war here and there to control petrol.

ach, arguing on the Internet. There's a famous quote from Lem, quite famous writer:
"I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet."

If he is famous, why do you need to say what he does?

cos of those mentioned idiots

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/video/skyworld-25537...2U-;_ylv=3

Better footage. Gotta' admit I feel a little bit sorry for him there.

and then you remember all the shit he did in libya and think 'lolpwnt'

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rJI0MC5ZH8Q/TqCGd6I...-29-52.png

sup?

http://www.webcodex.es/lolwut.jpg

drinkin a scud, watchin the cave

thjis was organized by occidental, you can also see in the video the guns from occident.

The question you should all ask yourself is : why occidental powers wanted him to be murdered?

RIP

"Good riddance, mess with the west, die like the rest."

If anyone ever needed a better reason to totally deny Jamerio any credability, this quote should suffice.

It's a good line but I dunno what he thinks he's done to the west

Hey, there is a dictator who kills and torture people in a middle of Europe, but no one give a fuck cos there is no oil in our country.

is this a pope joke? :s

No jokes, it's a reality in Belarus.

:C apologies for my (never ending) ignorance.

he's just repeating what he heard on BBC

You're russian playground, its sad but thats how it works

haha, are you serious? you must be the same as 911 conspirators to believe Lukashenko does any of this. it's pretty obvious to me, he's just trying to stabilize and subsidize the economy while telling special interests in both Europe and Russian to fuck off. Just because US is funding color revolutions and is running the best propaganda circus around, doesn't mean you should volunteer to spread that crap and undermine your own country.

yes, he should be patriotic and swallow all the crap his government feeds him!

yeah, all the crap like fresh dairy products and domestically grown organic foods! not the crap they export to europe with huge demand!

you don't get it

and I never will, because I actually know history, understand modern day geopolitics, can read multiple language media and know exactly what western media lies about.
Lukasheno is extremely popular because unlike Ukraine, Belarus is extremely stable and prosperous, much more so than Russia, and without any oil. He doesn't need to torture or kill anyone, this is not some bullshit Nikita episode from people who never left Alabama.

Extreme stable is 3x denomination and 300% inflation, beating peaceful clapping demonstrants on streets, prisioning presidential candidate for 5 years and many more? Extreme corruption and huge chain of command when average salary is 100-150$ (but food prices are european), tons of non profitable productions which are blindly donated from budget and most policemen per citizen in this part of the world. Sure he's there only because he suits Russia but this can't last long (but will).

Sure, let's have no perspective and ignore that Belarus is doing better than EVERY other former USSR republic including Russia itself while these countries enjoy 70% unemployment rate, you have less crime and better employment than any of your neighbors while Lukashenko is balancing on the differences between Europe and Russia. Not to mention that Europe is about to go bankrupt or at least into a big recession. Yeah, why don't you get rid of Lukashenko and suck Obamas dick without any dividends and let your country become a drug trafficking outpost, maybe you'll get to piss on your grandfather grave for heroically winning WW2 like your liberal friends do in Ukraine. I hope I don't read any of your disgusting posts again.

posted by Jamerio @ 16:29 CEST, 20 October 2011 - iMsg
Dead :)


By putting a smiley face you then prouve to everyone how ignorant you are about the world you are living in.

I'll use your tears as lube. Thanks.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentat...94697.html