what?
because 3 people replied to you, basically diagreeing with what you said you question the freedom of speech of esr?! that does not make sense to me whatsoever.

talking about my comment in particular, were you offended by anything i said? cause i feel like my post was just picking up on things you said and giving my oppinion on them. its an on topic discussion, nothing more

I don't mind if people disagree with my comments... in fact I thought yours was just fine and perfectly acceptable. I was more talking about the people further down, who were not really giving opinions on my post but just trolling and saying "lol @ the post above" as if I'm not allowed to have my say.

well i think those comments are kinda stupid but thats how it goes. i made comments like that in the past aswell when i felt like the post does not deserve more (ones like "ololol it sucks 0/10", not yours) or i was just lazy.
anyway you are not the only one who gets them and i dont see a problem with them. we cant force people to only write elaborative, actually that would be restricting the freedom of speech. thats why i dont get your point. just ignore them

tourist is a retard

lol @ the post above

:)

umad?

Ironically what you are complaining about IS the freedom of speech.

Attacked where? In the thread? 2 obvious troll replies, and one rather benign reply? Do you even know what "freedom of speech" means?

If you're not trolling, delete this before you cause the attacks that you are currently imagining.

Even I don't complain about freedom of speech here, what with xou and demiurge being a nazi and stalin respectively.

Alright, I'm sorry about all of this.

I mainly posted this not because I was offended by the comments, but because I was concerned I offended the author of the video. It sounded to me like I said something that I shouldn't said and that I was being disrespectful towards the author of the video, which I wasn't trying to be. I just got up at the time though and made the topic rather quickly and didn't point out the real reason for all of it. Basically put, I didn't want to look like "the bad guy", I just wanted to be respectful and know that I wasn't doing anything wrong.

If I offended the author of the video, then I'm sorry.

Thank you.

No, you didn't offend me. I'm hard pushed to imagine how one could offend me through the internet.

:)

worlds most disgusting smiley = offended u

never underestimate the internetz ;)

Wait a second... someone didn't give an opinion and just trolled?

What has the world come to :S

can we keep posting naked girls photos?

where

lol @ op

ESR is filled with trolls now... Makes me long for the good old days of XSReality.

were you alive back then?

No, I was dead.

Rofl at stupid questions.

are you sure you were born that long ago???

No, I was dead.

lrn2read

But are you sure?

Also, what does 'lrn2read' mean?

I'm sexy and I know it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyx6JDQCslE

u have to be born first

<stupid reply>

fuck the police

COP KILLER

Lets find out...

LMAO@France's AAA credit rating being downgraded and raging at the UK cos we didn't buy into their sinking euro plan.

Still here, look's you're just wrong!

i think you're mistaking freedom of speech with respect for your opinion, gang mentality and intolerance of dissent and intellectual exploration

At least we still have the freedom to not care.

I don't see what this has to do with Jamerio losing 50 - 0 at a local internet cafe? We need to get back on topic.

Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games

You stil mad I beat you at CPM with less than weeks play?

My keyboard was broken, I'm surprised it wasn't 100.

You didn't beat anyone at promode, let alone me. More Jamerio lies. The only truth is you losing 50 - 0 at your first and last lan. A dream shattered, an ego forever bruised. :'(

You're forgetting that you don't need to be on the same server at the same time and with the same players, for Jamerio to beat you. Eg: when Jamerio beat cooller on winters edge.

True that!

i think all chuck norris jokes should be Jamerio jokes.
Jamerio beat Cooller 50 - 0 while reconnecting!

My equipment was broken, there was nothing shattered or bruised, especialy two weeks befre I had taken a dutch national quake 3 player into sudden death on the same map (with minimal quake times), and posted a video of the keyboard not working from the event, before i even played a game.

I did beat you at CPM, for years you've been this pathetic jobless child stuck in a man's body blabbing around the net IRC, doing anything you can to take you away from whatever undiagnosed condition you have.

You know it, I know it. This is why you're talking about a lan from over 6 years ago out of nowhere, becaue you came here to escape, and you just can't accept the fact that I got to you on a genuine basis.

And the more you cry, the more it tells me things are still the same for you and I wouldn't want it any other way :)

But you tried so hard! You even took public transport the entire way there.
It's sort of like those people that climb up Everest then freeze to death after a couple of hours.
Believing you can do something doesn't always mean you CAN do something. It's a hard lesson to learn. For some it means death. For you it means year after year spent trying to convince a small group of people who think you're a piece of shit that you aren't a piece of shit - and failing horribly.

so he didn't have a car despite allegedly being a millionaire (who turned out to earn less than average salary)?

I know with megaupload being taken down its a tough time for you, but try not to be stupid all your life.

It was a 600 mile round trip there and I went up in car with DOZO and HELL. The fact that you are trying to correlate public transport to some murky implication of class is quite funny.

It was the best part of a 600 mile round trip, so even more insight into your clueless claims of it being a local lan.

The fact you are trying to use a lan from over 6 years ago to somehow launch an unprovoked attack really shows how badly I have gotten to you. Always on your mind am I? Hit a nerve?

I went becaue I was invited, interviewed and my hotel was paid for by the event. If that had not been the case, I would not have gone.

Don't blame me for the failure you became.

You lived the dream for a day! Your dream. Allthough it turned into a nightmare. Hence the wasted years spent here every day since :'(

The event was in January 2006, I have been on this site since Feb 2002. That's 3 stupids in a row.

Sorry I spoiled your online escape. No really I am :)

30 Mar 2005. Prior to the lan you looked up to these people, you dreamed of the day you to would become "pro".
When this dream was shattered rather forcibly (and cruelly, what with you being invited as a joke at) then the next half decade or so you went from adulation and envy to pure hate (losers, timefraggers) etcetera.
You hate the very person you are, someone who so badly wanted to be a professional gamer yet failed horribly, this is the main reason for your absolute hatred of everyone on here, it really is self loathing.

You honestly give me so much amusement, I can go 6 days or 6 months without checking this website but the thing that remains the same is you utterly humiliating yourself all day, every day. It really is the one constant in the world. And it is absolutely hilarious. Please, never leave this website.

Its Feb 2002, this is not my original account and the user comes before every alias, even if I take into consideration your mental health problems and give you the benefit of the doubt, you've just admitted I joined here March 2005, but the LAN event wasn't until 2006. I had already posted thousands of posts over a period of years before it even happened.

You just can't quite seem to make the point you want, and in the process you dig yourself a deeper hole.

huskyjizz - 1009 posts
dr lecter - 211 posts

Since you said that these are your only accounts, where are you getting the "thousands" from? You're not stumbling over more lies again, are you?

You "forgot" this id=23236 which takes it into the 1000's before 2006. Even this id alone would have been in the thousands from 30th march 2005 - Jan 14-16th 2006, and even if it was not, its clear I have posted 1000's of posts LONG before the lan took place with the other two accounts and this.

P.S.
The .swf of your most recent failure will follow shortly. To add to all the rest.

First you try to say that you don't post much, and now you want to say that you post a ton, because the truth came out. Really, you should make up your mind before you start lying.

You made a "point", you were once again made to look stupid and foolish by me. You're now trying to move the goal posts (as usual) in the hope you get another opportunity to redeem yourself.

I'll let you have the last word though and let you do that self convincing thing you do that you usually lace with lies, innuendos, negative views and basically anything that imples everything and defines nothing to anyone but you so you can get through the rest of your day.

Can't say fairer than that.

They're YOUR goal posts, that you have moved more times than you can keep up with. I just want to know where the goal posts are going to stop, or if you intend to keep moving them as your lies continue to wind up.

Oh you still want to me to make you look stupid?
No problem.

I simply said I had made 1000's of posts before 2006, you accused me of lying (http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2215517#pid2215517), and I simply pointed out I had in fact made thousands of post prior to the LAN in 2006.

I'm not moving any golaposts becuase they've already fallen flat on your face based on what you said.

Do you want to keep trying?

I simply said I had made 1000's of posts before 2006, you accused me of lying

Which you have yet to prove.

Classic Vedic self ownage again...

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/thou...housand__2

"(thousands) the numbers from one thousand to 9,999:"
(usually thousands) informal an unspecified large number:

You had already listed my other two accounts here...

http://www.esreality.com/index.php?a=post&...pid2215517

If you check Huskyjizz you will see it has over a 1000 posts with the last one being made in April 2005 (http://esreality.com/?a=users&user_id=4882)

So by your own admission I had already posted over a 1000 posts, which can be verfied by date here .

So based on the oxford dictionary definiton of Thousands, I was telling the truth. I'll take that over a german living in texas.

Even If I give you the benefit of the doubt and JUST COUNTED THIS ACCOUNT, I have to date on this account 16454 posts which AVG over 2300 posts a year from March 2005 - Jan 2012.

The LAN event was middle of january 2006, I would have easily made over a 1000 posts in a 9 month period. Especailly as I was actually playing quake then.

Why don't you just admit you didn't understand the definiton of the word "thousands" and you've once again made a clown of yourself and allowed me to expose this of you ONCE AGAIN?

That's certainly ONE thousand, but certainly not thousands. See, that's what we call "plural" - you may know it better as "more than one".

Your average post count says nothing about how many posts you had at any certain point. Now, if you had more than 3 accounts, we might be able to find more posts to prove your point. You seem to still be struggling with that, though.

"Your average post count says nothing about how many posts you had at any certain point."

But I never said my defintion of thousands did I?

http://picturepush.com/public/7455666

But what we do know is I made at least a 1000 posts before 2005, we also know on this account based on id I AVG 2300+ a year, so if you do not have the exact data to hand that shows how many posts over what time I made, then the avg will be used, as its used in all walks of life from insurance paymout to estimating gas bills when they do not have sufficient data to hand.

We also know within the context of high posts on ESR, I am king..
http://esreality.com/files/misc/2012/85440-Jamerio-wins.swf

So an AVG is certainly more factual than your nothing. And even if it was not.

http://picturepush.com/public/7455666

I always said I had 3 accounts here and I still do.

But I never said my defintion of thousands did I?

I don't care what you want to imagine the definition to be, I care about the actual definition. On this site, we use English. If you intend to use a different language, you should prefix your posts with a disclaimer that you intend to be an idiot.

actually... just do that anyway.

The defintion I gave was from the Oxford dictionary.

But if you want precision, let me be generous and say that thousands constitutes any numerical numbers over 2000?

I had already posted a proven 1000+ under my otehr two alises from 2002 to 2005.

This Jamerio id was setup in march 2005, from the period of march 2005, to the lan in 2006 was 9 months from the time this id was setup and I was actively playing FPS here.

So I would have EASILY have exceeded 2000 posts IN TOTAL based on me as a person.

Even if it was NOT under this user id, I am still the user behind the id's, the user comes before an alias, so you lose either way.

And while I can see you're keen to hide behind rates of post basd on time, given you have ZERO DATA and I have an Average, my data would still be still be used for a forcast.

That forcast puts me well over 2000 posts and even if it doesn't (which it does) I still have the OXFORD English dictionary on my side to hide behind, using your patended smoke and mirrors antics, so I get to win either way.

You have NOTHING but big claims and no data as USUAL.

The defintion I gave was from the Oxford dictionary.

Which gave you the contextual use of thousands. It can be used in a way such as "in the thousands". You used the plural form.

So I would have EASILY have exceeded 2000 posts IN TOTAL based on me as a person.

Is it possible? Certainly. Do you have any proof of it? No, none.

And while I can see you're keen to hide behind rates of post basd on time, given you have ZERO DATA and I have an Average, my data would still be still be used for a forcast.

No, average is a projected spread across the entire set. For instance, you're WELL above your average today. The average isn't wrong for what it does, it just doesn't do what you want it to do.

Which gave you the contextual use of thousands. It can be used in a way such as "in the thousands". You used the plural form.

Actually it gave that one too, but you didn't like that one as it was effective.http://picturepush.com/public/7455666

Is it possible? Certainly. Do you have any proof of it? No, none.

maybe, but its more credible than the nothing you have.

No, average is a projected spread across the entire set. For instance, you're WELL above your average today. The average isn't wrong for what it does, it just doesn't do what you want it to do.

I agree, but my average still beats your nothing. I had already posted a proven 1000+ posts by april 2005, I find it hilarious you're trying to make out I would not have managed to post another 1000 posts in the 9 months from march 2005 to the the LAN in 2006.

I'm not saying what I have is 100% proof, I'm saying that...

A) few things are 100% proof.
B) the data I have is more than you have, the data I have is more credible than your nothing, so whether you like it or not, what I say is more credible than you :)

Actually it gave that one too, but you didn't like that one as it was effective.

"Effective"? You used the plural form, and you are trying to excuse it with a context-based use. If you had used it in such a contextual form, that would be one thing, but you didn't.

maybe, but its more credible than the nothing you have.

No, it's completely unrelated to the discussion. I don't NEED anything, because I'm not making a claim.

I agree, but my average still beats your nothing.

I have made no claim - you have. I'm not proving anything, while you need to prove your own claims. You have not done so in any way, shape, or form.

I'm not saying what I have is 100% proof, I'm saying that...

Good, because you're currently at 0%.

its already been proven, my account prior to this id was over a 1000 posts, based on my avg per year I have around 2300 posts a year on this id, which is more useful than the ZERO data you've provided, so the AVG will be used.

And based on this defintion...
http://picturepush.com/public/7455666

And me being known as the sites bigest poster
http://esreality.com/files/misc/2012/85440-Jamerio-wins.swf

I would say I have posted 1000's of posts, this is afterall an informal environment.

Average posts say nothing about posts at specific times. An average rate would help, but could still be inaccurate. Since you are now claiming just 3 accounts again, your current numbers do not support your claims.

"Average posts say nothing about posts at specific times. "

no, but as I said, seeing as you have jackshit data, then the AVG gets used. Cos my average trumps your NOTHING.
You can argue all you all want, my AVG beats your NOTHING.
As it would with a weather forcase, as it would for a gas or elctric reading if you were not there to give a reading. So either come up with the data or pay the price.

"Since you are now claiming just 3 accounts again, your current numbers do not support your claims."

The numbers add up fine becuas I had alrady posted a 1000+ posts before april 2005 under the other id's, and this id has averaged around 2300 posts a years since I started it, so I would have exceeded 2000 posts (I assume you're happy with thousands being more than 2000? easily, especially as I was actively playing FPS then.

Plus the word thousands is a very loose definition in informal circles like these...

http://picturepush.com/public/7455666

So unless you can evolve your point this is kinda end of the line.

no, but as I said, seeing as you have jackshit data, then the AVG gets used.

No, no it doesn't. No data gets used, because we have no applicable data. Your claim is unsubstantiated, and remains that way until you have evidence.

Actually you're wrong, in courts of law, in utility bills, in weather forcast, models/averages based on what data IS<<< available is commonly used to settle disputes or predict outcomes when they have nothing better to go with.

You constantly hide behind the fact that if someone does not prove something unequivably, then its not suitable to say its true, because pretty much anyone can do that, its the easierst way to appear informed, without ever really saying anything of use, and its what you hide behind time after time.

And it doesn't work, or fool anyone with half a brain.

its also hilarious how last month you were trying to mock for posting so much (despite me posting server logs of you stalking me online at dawn), now when it suits you, y ou're trying to imply I somehow had a dry patch of posting, when in 2005-2006, I was actively playing quake and trolling the shit out of this site which is what got me the invite to the lan to begin with and probably taking a dutch national quake 3 player into overtime within 18 months of owning my first pc.

So trying to imply I was some quiet mouse in 2005 when it was my most wasteful year ever due to visa issues is just hilarious.

Actually you're wrong, in courts of law, in utility bills, in weather forcast, models/averages based on what data IS<<< available is commonly used to settle disputes or predict outcomes when they have nothing better to go with.

Yes, because it is actually applicable. Here's a little refresher for you on how an average works... Suppose you had 0 posts for 4 years, and 100 posts for 1 year. Your average is 20, even though you never actually made any posts in the first years.

Your "dr lecter" account had a posting average of 2.5 posts per day, and your "huskyjizz" account had an average of 1.1 posts per day. You are certainly not consistent (both in posting, and in argument), and the data doesn't actually mean anything.

But I didn't own a PC or decent net connection until 2004.

My post count shot up when I ACTIVELY started playing quake, and that started properly in 2005, when I quit playing doom 3 and played a bit of quake 3 in the run up for Quake4 which was released in the fall of 2005.

Your example is flawed. I probably posted more in the year of 2005-2006 than I did in the 3 years previous.

Ironically, you are trying to use my lowest post counts before I was an active player, to use as an average at my most active play time.

My post count shot up when I ACTIVELY started playing quake,

Again, what evidence do you have of this? You said that you had THOUSANDS, and there is no way to reconcile this with the available data.

"Since you said that these are your only accounts"

I didn't say those are my only accounts at all.

Would you like to quote, or you going to run and hide again?

http://www.esreality.com/index.php?a=post&...pid2191677

Which time were you lying?

Where is the quote?

You've given me a link to something which I have no idea how to take it becaue I don't know what you're trying to say, and you're saying very little becuase you keep getting owned every time you do.

... you don't understand your own post? I know that they're fairly incoherent, but it is YOUR post.

Here - have another from the same thread.

So... which time were you lying?

I understand my own post fine, I admitted to 3 accounts, I still do.

You're confused once again and blinded by the fact that you think you're right when you're actually just misunderstood, this is why asking you for a simple quote turns into a mystery ride of links, and more links, and implications with no real content.

Make up your mind. Is it..

I didn't say those are my only accounts at all.

or is it

I understand my own post fine, I admitted to 3 accounts, I still do.

or is it

I have no other accounts

Think carefully, and pick which one you want to be the lie.

I asked for a quote, all I got was a link and now your own options which all lead to a negative outlook for me, not becuase those are the actual outcomes, but becuae they are the ones you can comprehend or wish to entertain.

Hilarious.

You're arguing with yourself - these are your own quotes. You've obviously contradicted yourself, so now you have to set the record straight. One of these claims is false, so which one is it?

These are my own quotes to your<<< questions which you've not defined.

Without knowing what the quotes are in relation to it would be impossible for me to answer that.

You're the one linking to old therad here, not me.

Like I keep saying, you're providing incomplete information. Just how you like it.

There's no incomplete information here, only direct quotes of you claiming just 3 accounts. Not once, but twice!

Now you seem to be claiming the 3 accounts claim that you made previously was true, so you were lying in this thread. That's all you had to say.

"Now you seem to be claiming the 3 accounts claim that you made previously was true, so you were lying in this thread. That's all you had to say. "

Where in this thread was I lying about the number of accounts I had?

I'll make it easy for you, make a screenshot, post it here.
http://picturepush.com/upa

No links, no NO BS, where did I actually say that?

Is this gonna' be another one of those cases where you think you're right and end up with egg on your face again in front of everyone?

Can you taste the upcoming .swf, even though I warn you you're going to be wrong and make a fool of yourself, you'll still do it.

Where in this thread was I lying about the number of accounts I had?

http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2215919#pid2215919

The post I was replying to (yours) only listed TWO accounts.

So the reason I said I did not say those were my only accounts is becuase you did not mention this one, which makes up the third.

Told you you would make a fool of yourself, and I reckon there is more to come from you aswell.

Ah, so now you want to act like you just had a simple misunderstanding! Why did you demand a quote for such a claim?

You misunderstood, I always said I had 3 accounts, when you accused me of lying, you linked me to a post where you only posted 2, to which I quite correctly and consistely said that was wrong, because you had not included this account which is the 3rd and last account I ever made, apart from that troll Jamerio' one I made last year when I was put on probation to make a single post before the inevitable ban.

I didn't accuse you of lying, I asked you where you were quoting your numbers from. When I pointed to your accounts, you tried to act like you had never said that they were your only accounts. Your Jamerio account has never been in question, so you need a better excuse.

I had already posted around 1200 posts before April 2005 across my other two accounts.

To reach the term thousands, I would have needed 2000+, so all I would have needed from this Id account is around 800 posts over a 9 months period, and I posted here a shitload here from MArch 2005 - January 15 2006.

Even if I had NOT posted over 2000 posts from this ID alone (and belive me, I could have easily), as a USER behind the other id's it doesn't matter as its still the same person, its still dumb to imply you don't think I would have posted less than 800 posts in those 9 months when I was actively playing quake while waiting on a visa.

I think I even got my own user level in 2005, that didn't come from being quiet or hardly posting, neither did the invite to the LAN itself.

I had already posted around 1200 posts before April 2005 across my other two accounts.

Across a time span that gives an average substantially less than you have now.

To reach the term thousands, I would have needed 2000+, so all I would have needed from this Id account is around 800 posts over a 9 months period, and I posted here a shitload here from MArch 2005 - January 15 2006.

Well, with 1009 + 206, you've got 1215 - and an average post count between the two accounts puts you at 1.8 per day. That gives you an additional 657 posts, putting you at 1872. Nope, still not working.

edit: Oh, and before you complain, this average is quite in your favor.

"Well, with 1009 + 206, you've got 1215 - and an average post count between the two accounts puts you at 1.8 per day."

Why would you use the two dead accounts for that period when I switched over to this id in March 2005 and used this almost exclusively which averaged around 2300 posts a years since march 2005 putting me well over 2000 posts?

Ironically, last month you were mocking me for posting so much, now it suits you for me to have a lesser post count, you're actually trying to promote my lack of posts.

Face it, I can change your entire belief system, because you have none, your only goal is to disprove me and you're still wrong.

What you're saying is you don't think this user id genreated at least 800 posts in 9 months from March 30th 2005 to January 14th 2006? (when its avereged over 2000 posts per 12 months for nearly 7 years running) and you you don't think I made 800 posts in 9 months in my most active play year?

Why would you use the two dead accounts for that period when I switched over to this id in March 2005 and used this almost exclusively which averaged around 2300 posts a years since march 2005 putting me well over 2000 posts?

Because these are the only accounts that we can directly measure before the date.

Ironically, last month you were mocking me for posting so much, now it suits you for me to have a lesser post count, you're actually trying to promote my lack of posts.

I never mocked you for your posting habits. I mocked you for making fun of OTHER people for THEIR posting habits, when you post more than anyone.

What you're saying is you don't think this user id genreated at least 800 posts in 9 months from March 30th 2005 to January 14th 2006? (when its avereged over 2000 posts per 12 months for nearly 7 years running) and you you don't think I made 800 posts in 9 months in my most active play year?

Not at all, I'm saying that there is no corroborating evidence to support your claim. From the day you joined until the end of 2005, your posting habits were only a fraction of what you have now, which makes sense, since your absurd posting habits now are bringing up your average.

"Because these are the only accounts that we can directly measure before the date."

Err no they are not, are you THAT DELUDED?

The lan was not until JANUARY 14th 2006.

The user id of this account was setup 30th march 2005 and has averaged over 2300 posts per years for nearly 7 years based on average and in 2005, I was actually playing FPS then and got my own user level on this site, which I can assure you, did not come from making what you claim is 1.8 posts a day.

That means there was a time period of 9 months and 15 days until the start of the lan from when I reg'd this account, to which you are suggesting that this account would NOT have posted at least 800 posts over a 9.5 month period to reach 2000+ as I (as in the human behind these accounts) had already posted by your own words around 1200 posts which can verified to at least 1000)

Its quite clear you can't even follow basic instructions on what is being said, so I didn't read anymore.

That means there was a time period of 9 months and 15 days until the start of the lan from when I reg'd this account, to which you are suggesting that this account would NOT have posted at least 800 posts over a 9.5 month period to reach 2000+ as I (as in the human behind these accounts) had already posted by your own words around 1200 posts which can verified to at least 1000)

No, I'm not suggesting anything. I'm merely pointing out that there is nothing that actually corroborates your claim.

The time period of 9 months is of no importance, since your "huskyjizz" account was active directly before your "Jamerio" account, and it was only pulling 1.1 posts per day.

So, your average that you have now is nothing like the average that you had back then. In fact, if we use the 1.1 post rate from huskyjizz, you would only have made around 400 posts in that year. If your average at that time was substantially high enough to make up the difference, your current average would be much higher right now. It isn't.

Lol, you're hilarious.

Originally I said, I had made 1000's of posts on this site BEFORE the lan in January 2006.

I had made by your own admission around 1200 posts BEFORE this user id. The aliases are irrelevant as its the user behind them that counts.

So that leaves a period of 9 months and 15 days to go from the time the lan started from the date this userid was setup becuase those 2 prior accounts were pretty much put into retirement and this userid was used instead, which has averaged over 2300 posts a year over a 7 years period.

So all I would have needed from this account from the period of March 30th 2005 to january 14th 2006 is 800 posts, which over a period of 9.5 months, I would have done EASILY.

I was at my most active in terms of playing in 2005-2006, I got a lan invite and my own user id on this site, so the fact that you somehow think I was not posting much back then is funny.

Wanna keep trying?

I had made by your own admission around 1200 posts BEFORE this user id. The aliases are irrelevant as its the user behind them that counts.

That's correct.

So that leaves a period of 9 months and 15 days to go from the time the lan started from the date this userid was setup becuase those 2 prior accounts were pretty much put into retirement and this userid was used instead, which has averaged over 2300 posts a year over a 7 years period.

The 7 year period is irrelevant, as you have been very active over the past few years. The reality is that the period leading up to 2006 had you running an average of 1.1 posts per day, and we have a gap of simply no information on how many posts you had. If we use averages, we have to go by the averages that were relevant to the time frame, which put you well below even 2000 posts.

If you have data, or other accounts that you haven't revealed, they could corroborate your story. If not, there is nothing left to discuss.

"The 7 year period is irrelevant, as you have been very active over the past few years."

No. That is the average post I made FROM THE TWO ACCOUNTS I PRETTY MUCH PUT INTO RETIREMENT from around the period of March 2005 because I started using this one a lot more. CONSIDERABLY MORE.

If you add up the posts from this user from March 30th 2005, to the time of the LAN in 2006, I will have exceeded 2001 posts.

EASILY.

If you add up the posts from this user from March 30th 2005, to the time of the LAN in 2006, I will have exceeded 2001 posts.

Feel free to list them, and tally them up. After all, you did say that you had backed up all the posts on the site, so it shouldn't even be hard for you to do. If you can't provide any evidence, then it's time for you to drop the claim.

If I did that you would just accuse me of lying.

That's a job for the admins. Bottom line is on this userid I have averaged 2300 posts for 7 years straight, so I'm confident making 800 posts in 9.5 months in my most active gaming year on this site is not a problem.

If I did that you would just accuse me of lying.

Certainly not - your database should have the posts in question, so it should be trivial to provide a post/file with links to just your posts from 2005-2006. I'll even do the work for you, if you actually have such a database.

Its a backup of the site from a simple crawl, its not a database with all the backend.

An admin with root access would be able to do it better and faster as they did here.

http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2206711

Anyone with half a brain knows I would have made 800+ posts from march 2005 to the January 2006 standing on my head.

Feel free to request it from them, or do it yourself. Either way, you have nothing right now.

I have more than you, I have an average annual post count since march 2005 of approx 2300 posts, which based on a 9.5 month period would put me well of 2000 posts as I already have 1200 in the bag which are proven.

you have NOTHING at all, so while my point is not 100% proof, its a lot more credible than your claims of NOTHING.

you have NOTHING at all, so while my point is not 100% proof, its a lot more credible than your claims of NOTHING.

I'm not claiming that you are wrong, only that your claim is not supported by the evidence. Your point isn't proof at all, it's a misunderstanding of how an average works. The averages in context to the time in question leave quite a big gap for you to fill, and you have yet to even remotely try to prove it.

Are you asking admins for help, are you going to use your database, or are you going to walk away from your claim?

I'm not walking away from anything, I made my point, you made yours, I'm confident my points are more solid than yours.

So I'm happy to leave it like that.

You haven't made a point, you've just sidestepped it.

I don't get what's your point now. First you said you spend very little time on this site, but it turns out you are by far the user who has typed the most characters on this site's history; and that's considering only one of your three accounts ("Jamerio" was registered in 2005).

Now you've gone the completely opposite way and say you wrote thousands of posts before 2005. Same thing happened when we discussed about all your "accomplishments"... which none turned out to be true (see Personality disorders).

My its almost as if time spent on ESR isnt a model for someone's entire life!

That didn't stop you from insulting other people for the same reason.

I used other factors to make that analysis.

Plus I have a bafta from gaming and made over 500,000 dollars from the medium and a job for life stemmed from that medium.

I'm not your avergage game forum user whose most enriching expereince is playing a few games and reading a magazine.

So when a gaming degerate laughs at me for making a few posts per day on a gaming website, you need to understand that its amusing for me.

A few posts a day, consisting of exponentially more characters than anyone else, with a typing speed that makes the time investment even more laughable.

that's not the point, and we already know you earned less than $100,000 in all those years (see personality disorders), and that's assuming you really worked there and that it wasn't the other successful Jamie Williams you've been impersonating for years ("evo")

If it helps you deal with reality then you do what you have to do.
It just makes me more infamous :)

All you need to take form that is that I enjoy watching you humiliate yourself. Just thinking about your obese body slumped in front of your computer, the weight (lol) of a thousand broken dreams pulling you further and further down each day fills me with happiness. Look at you down there.

You look funnier to me....

Attached Misc File: 85581-sonic-esreality.swf (642KB)

Slumped.

You don't have ANYONE in your life to tell you how sad this is, do you.

There's absolutely no one.

Awww, I do love it when you gaming degenerates project you most inner feelings onto others to escape it for a second.

Its quite cute when you stick up for a fellow degerate though when you feel they got effectively shot down. I guess all those years of wallowing in IRC meant something after all.

so... no?

I don't stick up for anyone, mate.

Apparently you yourself aren't able to grasp how wrong this really is. You're a grown man who puts together Flash files with pictures and music to ... to what really?! I don't know. Do you know why you do it? Can you give me a reason that is not completely blown out of proportion when talking about a gaming forum?
When was the last time you had a conversation with a person who is emotionally connected to you and did you tell him/her about the stuff you do online?
What do these people tell you?

"You're a grown man who puts together Flash files with pictures and music to"

The fact that you are trying to make special concessions for the fact that I used flash to add basic audio/embed URL's to a picture is hilarious, and just goes to show the petty tangents you work to (or highlights you're so stupid you think its a big deal to do). So what if I made a frag video, is a .gif ok? How about a URL with matching anchor text??? my .swf files take about 2 minutes to make?

What you really mean to say is,

"damn, those .swf files are actually quite cool and effective, I know let's try and tie some deep psycho jargon to them in the hope I stop using them because I'm too stupid to see through your BS."

You know next to nothing about my life, so stop trying to be some post war online nazi psycho freud, we've already seen evidence of your hilarious flash theory!!

Don't embarrass yourself any further with your psycho babble.

I'm sure in the next version of windows mspaint will come with some kind of flash export option for people like you.

Don't blame me for being at the forefront of forum activity. In 10 years time forums will probably have a simplified version of flash embedded into the UI for leptons like you. Jsut as they did from BOLD & italics

You know next to nothing about my life, so stop trying to be some post war online nazi psycho freud, we've already seen evidence of your hilarious flash theory!!

We know everything about your life. You spend the majority of your time posting nonsense on here in an effort to make people think you're something you aren't. No one believes any of what you say, yet you have spent years doing it.
No one would care that you were such a loser, it's simply because you try to lie about yourself to put other people down. Note the "try", because you fail horribly.

Claim: BAFTA.
Reality: Part time game tester.

Claim: Multiple business owner.
Reality: Living off of benefits. Pathetic little websites designed in an effort to start a "pc repair" business. Absolutely no customers, and no hope. Probably something to do with this.

Claim: Being naturally talented at computer games.
Reality: Far worse than average. Years spent trying to become a "professional gamer". Getting beaten daily by online scrubs then losing 50 - 0 at the only lan you ever attended - the fact that you were considered such a joke in 2006 to the point of invited you to ridicule you proves how pathetic you are.

Claim: Won hundreds of trophies for winning motocross races. (you later realised how ridiculous this claim was and changed it to motorcross bmx BMX.
Reality: The possibility that your parents bought you a very small motocross bike exists, but you didn't win anything. The BMX possibility is utterly non-existent, we can see from your physique you have never been an active person - hence the shut-in lifestyle you must lead in order to spend every waking moment trying to convince people who don't like you that you're something you aren't.


And there you have it. This is the information everyone here has about your life.
At the end of the day, you must realise everyone is laughing at you, right? You know no one believes your claims. That's what makes this so utterly and absolutely hilarious!

I avg around 5 posts a day on this website and most of them are replying to gaming degenrates like you on this thread who are simply trying to cleanse their online escape. You do not fool me :)

http://www.esreality.com/download.php?file_id=85581

I didn't read the rest, becuase I felt putting into perspective the amount I post and you somehow using that to map out my life already did a much better job of highlighting your poison mind.
especially when you're a long term unemployed bum who doesn't work, and spends all day in his parents spare room surrounded by comic book posters and pictures of cats while looking slightly autistic, anorexic and in need of emotional support.

I get your life is shit, I get I spoiled your online escape, I get you don't like me, but I also get that being smarter, richer and stronger than you = I don't need to give a shit what you think or do in the physical or online world, pissing you off is just a bonus.

This is why you make unprovked snipes, because you're unsetttled about me, even when I say nothing about you, you're still angry ay me from the last time you need to invoke conflict to try and feel better about yourself as you already proved in comment #26.

And I get you don't want to belive me (imply everything-define nothing (C) degerate gamer) because it would spoil your online escape even more.

Actually you missed out bafta winning game designer on the sequel to GoldenEye 64.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWD3wO7Zzbg&t=1m9s

Here's a link to my 3D graphics business aswell (INSERT NEGATIVE COMMENTS BELOW) too(www.dynamic3d.co.uk)

Have fun discreditng yourself further, it doesn't matter what you say, tomorrow you'll still wake up a very damaged and bitter turd whose too sane to be locked up and too fucked in the head to get on in life.

I'm glad my past in games fuels your envy and lies, it actually makes me think it counted for something afterall.

I'm sorry I was being flown to LA on a Boeing while you were catching the bus to school. It was wrong of me to bring a much richer expereince of games than you ever could.

But if attacking it helps you sleep, then knock yourself out, you'll just a dig a deeper hole for yourself and make me more infamous.

Fragmovies have content and a purpose. Your flash things lack both.

Are you going to answer any of my questions?

Fragmovies have content and a purpose. Your flash things lack both.

Only if you care about the game, my defintion of pain would be watching a 15 minute Counterstrike frag movie, yet millions love it.

My .swf points make a point, they usually highlight something relevant to a discussion so they are valid.

http://www.esreality.com/files/misc/2011/8203...d-liar.swf
http://www.esreality.com/files/misc/2012/8540...s-coll.swf

Be it in a more amusing way outside the limited functionaity this site offers default users.

Attacking the form of media I used to make my point shows any further questions you asked were not going to get any better as the things you think are wrong, and so any questions that arise from those wrongs are worthless.

They are not amusing either.

They are not meant to be amusing, they are meant to be informative.
To which they are.

They're not.

THey are, the romero one for example shows a user lying about what someone said, my .swf shows they they were wrong by quoting the user and mapping an audio statement of john romero saying the complete opposite, along with an embedded URL.

The other shows the same user lying once again about what I said.

These .swf can be easily pasted at a later date to remind the user and other readers what this person is like.

I know you want to downplay it because you work on the notion of an enemy of my enemy is my friend.

But thankfully, not everyone is like you.

Hope that's cleared it up, even if you still agree, its cleared it up for anyone impartial.

You didn't clear anything up. And they're not amusing nor are they informative.

I never said they were amusing. You did.

They also cleared up that some members here lie and talk complete shit. I would say that's quite important on forum.

You don't want to accept that because I pissed you off and the two .swf files show one of your bum boys getting pasting from me :)

So many wasted years, so many crushed dreams. So many empty Mcdonalds wrappers.

Its nice you're finally opening up about your life.

It's rather funny that you think you could piss me off in ANY way. You are nobody for me, mate.

Yeah it's like most other forums, full of power hungry morons. Reason I rarely post.

Yeah it's like most other forums, full of power hungry morons. Reason I rarely post.

well i guess we dodged a bullet there.

We've lost the freedom of not having an overwhelming number of retards...

LOL AS IF! Seriously, though. Stop whining.

doesn't matter.. still have jamerio posts to read..

but they are getting kind of stale and predictable

That's becuase of the stale and predictable points I am replying too.

Alyways one step ahead.

I lost my freedom of speech when they killed my father. Now all I do is bay for their blood.

Have we lost freedom of speech on ESR?

No, we haven't, and it's all thanks to Brandan. Fucking Brandan, god damn.

hate that fat hamburger.

Jamerio and vedic the two saddest people on the interweb.