FUCK YEAH PLUSES EVERYWHERE

here u go

FICK YEAH PLUSES EVERYWHERE

and here

Oh you and your plusses. You disgust me!

(pssss - plus me...)

i expect u to do the same =)

honestly, who got time for that grinder shit :DDDDDD

on another note, brb mephiso 4h

offer sacred armor 4os 1350, n fg

Bye bye social life, Baldur's Gate is coming right after D3 with enhanced edition :>

Baldur's Gate still exists?

LINK LINK LINK!!!!

http://www.baldursgate.com/news/language/en/ - there was an announcement yesterday about releasing enhanced edition this summer.

That's going to be so good. It will probably outshine Diablo 3 imo.

HOLY FUCK WHEN DOES IT COME OUT?

Summer 2012. There is no specified date.

imho. rpg's are pretty easy to make from developer point of view ...
you just need a lot of manpower for all the graphics ...
but the gameplay is always very very similar ...
imho you have to be pretty dumb to do a bad rpg ...
tbh. I don't there exist any bad rpg's from gameplay point of view ...
always the same ... hack and slash + some magic ... and leveling up ...

Your post gave me brain cancer. Wow. Just... wow.

Very rational counterargument.
Btw, try to name one single really bad rpg (that is bad because of its gameplay, not because of bugs)

Christ.

Off the top of my head: Oblivion, Birthright, Neverwinter Nights, Lionheart, Ultima 8, Ultima 9, Dink Smallwood, Albion, any Final Fantasy game after 6 (if i was puritan i'd say any Final Fantasy game plus every jrpg game ever made but fuck it), Fallout 3, Gothic 3, Shadow Vault, Fable 1 thru 3... i could go on.

Note that some of those games aren't bad games per se, but they are bad rpg games. You seem to have no idea what the role playing games genre is actually about. Graphics and magic, fuuuck. :D

and why exactly are these games bad?

Gee, i don't know, maybe because they market themselves as role playing games and don't conform to genre standards? Anything from shitty writing thru excessive linearity to retarded combat can destroy an rpg game.

no to: oblivion, neverwinter nights, gothic 3, final fantasy 9. ALL GREAT; DONT DENY MAN

For all i care they even might be the best games ever, that's not the point.

i dislike every TES game, wont argue about oblivion...

but man, nwn was horrible... it was great engine to make ur own games, but the single player was awfull :<

they fixed it in nwn2 tho

Oblivion, Neverwinter Nights, Ultima 8, Ultima 9

not sure if not sure or not sure, but you've no idea bout rpg's.

Wrong post? :-E

why u gotta hate on dink smallwood bro

dink smalwood is the shit. I remember playing the fuck out of it back from when it came as a free game on one of those pc gamer cds. good times!

Haha I think that's where mine's from too; that plastic sleeve is ripped off some magazine atleast :D

imho. fps's are pretty easy to make from developer point of view ...
you just need a lot of manpower for all the graphics ...
but the gameplay is always very very similar ...
imho you have to be pretty dumb to do a bad fps ...
tbh. I don't there exist any bad fps's from gameplay point of view ...
always the same ... point and click + some guns ... and running around ...

nope, level design has a much greater impact in a fps than in a rpg ...
because in fps you have direct player control and you coordinate yourself in a real 3D environment, you can make much more use of the creativity in the level design ...

a rpg the game is rendered in 3D, but the leveldesign is actually 2D ... you just move your character on a plane ... and you only have indirect control ... you tell the character with your mouseclicks to go there or to attack this ...
2D leveldesign with indirect player control just doesn't give the gamedeveloper a lot of freedom of choice on how to design his game ...

Wow, really, different things matter in rpg than in fps games? You must be some kind of visionary. Also there are rpg's that make use of real 3d environments, but i suppose you wouldn't know anything about that (Gothic and Arx Fatalis for example). Heck, some rpg's aren't even based on 3d engines! Perhaps platforming and shooting rockets vertically is not the real focus of the genre, just a thought.

when I think of rpg's, I don't think of game from a 1st-person-perspective. Real-time 1st-person-perspective rpg's are basically fps games with a greater focus on character-development.

What I consider as classical rpg, is game in a perspective like Secret of Mana or Diablo or Final Fantasy ...

Heck, some rpg's aren't even based on 3d engines! Perhaps platforming and shooting rockets vertically is not the real focus of the genre, just a thought

Neither are these elements focus of games similar to pong, which are considered games for a casual gamer, doesn't change the fact that these games are pretty similar ...because the developer just doesn't have much choice to do something in a different manner.

Now that's odd, because when i think of rpg's, i think of games closely emulating the p&p experience in story development, character progression expressed via statistics and some experience counter, a set of rules governing the in-game world and it's inhabitants, being able to make meaningful choices and having to live on with their consequences.

It's only fitting that you put jrpg's and Diablo in the same row, because on a lot of levels, they are the same: weak, combat driven derivatives that railroad you through a series of encounters, where the storyline is an excuse for grinding, character progress is not exposed by any literary means, only by improved statistics, NPC interaction is flat, linear and does not affect anything at all.

Neither are these elements focus of games similar to pong, which are considered games for a casual gamer, doesn't change the fact that these games are pretty similar ...because the developer just doesn't have much choice to do something in a different manner.

It's almost as if the concepts of genres and "trying something different" are completely alien to you. Refer to this for further insight.

Oh yeah, also this:

Real-time 1st-person-perspective rpg's are basically fps games with a greater focus on character-development.

No, they are rpg games shown from a first person perspective. Unless, of course, you also believe this, this, this and this are shooter games with bigger emphasis put on different gameplay aspects...

People who think that Diablo = rpg make me sad :8

It's the stigma of the character screen. People see stats and character level counter and automatically assume it's an rpg, neglecting the fact that stats and combat are just a part of any real rpg game, not paying any attention to the "role playing", only to the "game" part.

Yes, it is sad. I wish more people could distinguish between the rpg, hack and slash/action rpg and dungeon crawler and the odd hybrid game. Then again maybe i'm stupid and Stonekeep really plays like ADOM and ADOM really plays like Mass Effect and Mass Effect really plays like Daggerfall and Daggerfall really plays like Fallout and Fallout really plays like Titan Quest and Titan Quest really plays like Anvil of Dawn and Anvil of Dawn really plays like Geneforge and Geneforge really plays like Shadows Over Riva and Shadows Over Riva really plays like System Shock 2 and System Shock 2 really plays like Betrayal at Krondor. I MEAN THEY ARE ALL RPG GAMES AND THEY ARE IDENTICAL ACCORDING TO SOME PEOPLE ROFL

don't worry be happy :( uhhuhhuhhuhhhuuhuhuhuhuhhhuuu

mad but good reply :'|

umadbringer?

I HATE

You're screwed

Error: You have already judged this post

1) Most of those games involve levelling up, magic and a blonde chick that shoots fire
2) Most of those games follow same plot: YOU ArE SAVIOUR OF MANKIND AND MUST KILL EVIL BOSS
3) Deus Ex: Invisible War > Deus Ex cos graphics looked more cool, it was more futuristics and it had helicopters

1) If you don't have any tangible character advancement, then you're playing an adventure game, not an rpg game. High fantasy settings are more dominant than others because they're easier to design, but that's all that is, magic is setting specific, not genre specific.

2) Again, it's the dev's responsibility to be original. There are RPG games where your objectives are vastly different to the tired old from zero to hero saving the world formula (Torment and Bloodlines, for example).

3) YEAH WELL I'LL TAKE MY MORE CONCISE AND LESS HOLE INFESTED PLOT AND NON-CONSOLIZED SIMPLIFICATION OF THE GAMEPLAY AND UI OVER YOUR SHINY GRAPHICS BRO 8=====D

1) OK

2) No, they are all the same style even if developers try: genre is same and elements

3) You don't understand. Invisible revolution had cities based on real cities. And people like it more. You just want to support old game cos trve. :@

2) All RPG games have the same plot, what?
(unless you mean mechanics, in which case please show me where the mechanics of, say, Bloodnet, intersect with the mechanics of, say, Baldur's Gate).

3) metacritic disagrees: http://i.imgur.com/wrWxo.jpg c: Also it's "Invisible War". :@

I played also other games like Secret of Mana, Chrono Trigger, Final Fantasy IX ...
what game do you consider to be a *real* rpg?

There is nothing like a "real" rpg, but Baldur's Gate for example covers many aspects like an interactive storyline, development of characters + social relations and classes + fights that follow a set of rules.

Diablo mainly focuses on the last part.

lol dude, either ur dumb, or just bad troll...


not true, rpg games dont need graphics... But they need story... Good one, that wont get boring after 2hours of gameplay... You also need to balance the game, so it actually will be challanging, otherwise even good story wont save you...

To make a DECENT rpg game you need a lot of creativity, unlike fps games, where all u need to do is make shooting enjoyable, and even bad gfx wont be a problem...

The details is what matters mate, the small things that make good game--->epic game.

I wasn't so impressed by latest gameplay videos, but will still try it.

I have the beta at the moment and I'm not impressed either. It's pretty boring.

well image how a video of the first act in diablo 2 on normal difficulty would look like

not even that, it's 2 hours or less of gameplay so really only up to Tristram in d2

I would like to know what will happen to the release of torchlight 2 now ... they seem always to orientate themselves on diablo 3 ...
when diablo 3 was scheduled in december, they scheduled for november, when diablo was scheduled in march they scheduled on february, I guess now that diablo 3 is scheduled in may they try to release it in mid-april ...
I can understand this behavior from a commercial point of view,
but morally it"s just cheap, they try to profit from the diablo 3 hype and want to steal their sales ...
but of course I can understand it from a commercial point of view,
without diablo 3 noone would really care for their game

FUCK YEA

hack and slash = boring & a lot of time lost for nothing.

yeah, for two years most of my friends were talking about this game and their insignificant findings of randomly generated items

at least it was a little more meaningful when they were obsessed with the Championship Manger games (the text-only eariler ones)

won't be as good as diablo 2







I'll still buy it though

O H M Y G O D !
H
M
Y
G
O
D
!

Yeah. Already planned LAN with my mates the first week!

Cya on ladder boys!


\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD//////////////////////

no pvp on release and it will prolly end up being a DLC u have to pay for.

No PvP on release?

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-03-12-...o-3-launch

Not buying this crap even though I spent thousands of hours on D1 & D2. No LAN? Fuck that.

Lol. Everyone played closed b.net in diablo 2 anyways. Why would you want lan? :O. You can just play private games on B.net alone or with your friends if you want to.

who cares? rpgs suck. this is an fps forum

i heard it kinda aims for you

Forums > General Gaming

winter is coming, for Quake.

Is that the kind of stories the little Lord wishes to hear?

Oh you are so right. I'm not buying this in fucking summer...wtf blizzard? no way. I'm buying in autumn when live begins to suck again

It is known

Brilliant, my last exam this year is on the 21th of May. And guess what next :>

what?

Anyone got a beta key they would like to give me? :)

The beta is a shit representation of the game.

ive always loved d2, wc3 and quake. only games I really enjoyed thoroughly.

broodwar > wc3 mkay. On a side note, at any time now I would still play d2, HoMM 3, Q3 or role-playing wc3 maps. No matter how incredible games will become in the future, these games will stay forever in my heart and their immortal souls will never dissappear!

Ya, my favorite games are Quake Live, Broodwar, Kotor 2 and Diablo 2

most probably I won't play it this year, but I want a plus.

Lol, how come every comment is plus'd here lol

EDIT: Oh it's just mefajpE^

In an interview, one of the developers said not to get your hopes up about the game. From the beta footage, that's probably a good idea. I think a lot of people are going to be pissed.

blizzard always keeps updating their games for years. Some are better than others when they are released, but give it a year and it's going to be an epic game (pun intended).

I dunno, the cash shop alone should be enough to ruin the game.

Why? Ever heard of jsp and item shops? At least they get rid of all those fucking scammers and as long as they prefent dupes Im fine with it. Bots will come sooner or later but not in the same amount as in d2 were u could run countless games on one machine.

Tho I still think the game will suck for someone who has played the previous ones more than just casually :P

pay2win games always end up being bad for the casual gamer.

I've been on the beta for months, I preordered the game a couple of years ago (because it was 25 euro at Amazon) and I'm trying to find a single reason not to cancel my it.

pay2win?

Taking that off the list for the indefinite future, then.

Link to interview? I don't play much online rpgs, which ones tried the real money auction house thing and how did they fail?

http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/02/22/blizz...ectations/

It's bashiok, not a developer so whatever to be honest.
Whicho online rpgs tried online auction houses and failed because of it?

What are you talking about with other auction houses?

http://www.esreality.com/post/2238824/#pid2238824

I dunno, the cash shop alone should be enough to ruin the game.

I've never heard of an online game ruined by an auction house but i don't follow many online communities.

Even now d2 items are traded for real money. Id just want to make it legal/easier and ofc to make profit from it.

It's not about an auction house, it's about pay2win.

i think the issue lies with people having a broken idea of what a "win" can be. this gets obvious with a game like diablo, which features many ways to get a personal success. like beating the enemy in a pvp duel, finding a rare item, having luck with enchanting, meeting people, surviving, etc..

there has to be more than competition in gaming, but since it crucially reflects society, you won't face it. therefor it is not that reprobate about letting people pay, if they want their success faster, wouldn't get it otherwise(closing gaps) or need to show off.

"pay2win games always end up being bad for the casual gamer."

it's a problem for both the casual and the hardcore ones, since they get more competition and might get in the need to pay themselves, actually i like it since it triggers social features in all of us (do i really need to be the best, etc..). good thing is it will lead to an interesting/complex economic system, which will help the game to survive.

"win" has to do with PVP, and if you have to spend hundreds of dollars in order to compete with the people who do, it's going to ruin the system.

But it's impossible to stop a real money market from rising, just like in d2.

It was always a minority, and people did get banned. Regulating it will make the problem worse.

but you see diablo 2 was about tons of different builds and equip and less about skill, in other words it's not balanced by nature and pvp always lacked comparability imo.

I am not sure i understand what you mean. A big portion of the d2 player base uses d2jsp already, what is the difference?

ill prolly wait to buy d3 though. id rather be outside enjoying the sun than play d3. this game should be played in the winter, not summer :D

Who wants to play this shit nowadays.

posting in lol thread

Ladder race anyone

more like shitablo

never played diablo. I guess it's still kinda good? Or is it just the nostalgia factor?

Do you really expect a real, "untrollish" opinion from ESR users on this kind of question?

yeah man... it's still the worst game ever, you should try it!

what are possible problems with this game?

Always online DRM. Cash shop. No lan mode.

does starcraft 2 have any drm?

Doesn't follow the diablo 1/2 art style
4 players in a game down from 8
Can't name your game lobbies
No skill points

str till enigma =>life

except es sorc


yeah stats are so fucking important :D

I still like the illusion of choice

They will crack that game most likely, tho I will buy it for sure.

Why are you guys so sceptical, it's Blizzard after all. They don't fuck up their games.

[+]

We need to keep plussing mefajpE^ to keep his plus-ammo refilled... it's a team effort

yeah ;]

bollocks.. why release in middle of exams :@ grr..

Gonna play the shit out of this game :-)

Did you play beta? What are your thoughts on it if you did?

Nope, sadly I haven't. But I'm super hyped for it.

My close friend just recently got beta access from his buddy, he wasn't that hyped about D3 but now he is after playing a bit. So my hopes are high.

I have the Beta and It is booooooring!

i think so, too. i doubt diablo 3 can deliver to the roleplaying/hack&slay enthusiast. this coming out makes me think if i just start playing diablo 2 again.

someone needs a path of exile invite?

Yes.
Give.

PLX

If you have one left I'd be grateful

only got 2

i would pay 500 dollars an exact copy of diablo 2 with good old 2d environnement BUT enhanced sprit/textures resolution and bigger maps/chapters and a few other cheap tweaks.

Wont buy D3 tho.

Anybody has a Dota2 beta invite maybe? Need it baaadly. xd

Dota2 is shit mate, THIS IS DIABLO 3!

pre-ordered today

Esr needs function to plus all the post at once! Plus whore, fuck yeah!
Edit: Diablo 3!!!!111!!!!! ~o~ mambo number 5

I've never deserved a plus ever since I joined ESR. Maybe I haven't been trying that hard.

<3

\o/

I never played diablo 1 & 2 :/ just never got round to it even though it looked good. Going to give this one a go though :) looks cool

duking heretic >:D, try diablo 2 instead.

will there be timenudge in diablo 3?

there are enough cheats for diablo... BUT its a big risk to cheat in diablo since Blizzard will BAN your account forever and 60€ for a new account...

Quakelive would be much less affected of cheaters If they would have to pay 50€ or 60€ for a new account... on the other hand ID dont invest effort in a anti-cheat system so it wont ever be found out... QL is a win/win situation for cheaters.

even better QL does not require email confirmation. Literally you can get banned and start cheating again in less than a minute \o/

What the fuck is going on here?

Someone invite me into beta so i can figure out if i should buy it or not!

stupid game... plus?

Huzzah.

anyone else just here for the [+] ?

will a demo be available or will i need to get a demo illegaly?

coming from you, probably illegaly.

Diablo 3 in May?

WHO CARES WHEN THE NEW SIGUR ROS COMES OUT MAY 28TH??
<3
http://www.sigur-ros.co.uk/

http://rizeofthefenix.tenaciousd.com/

lol@sigur ros

Nothing can top FF7, so why bother?

i just remembered: i can't do the grind thing anymore.

http://us.battle.net/d3/en/blog/4963739/Diabl..._2012#blog
Quite unexpected, open beta this weekend. : )

Just seen on twitter, defo will be testing this out when I get home.

LOL FUCK THIS WEEKEND, LETS PLAY PC

YEAH.

SCREW REAL LIFE :D!

:D

open beta demo was pretty cool.

wizard all the way \o\ \o/ /o/

Real life was too demanding :<

Was the beta fun? :|

It was alright, but I think Path of Exile is much better.

It was alright, there were a few things I didn't like:

-No skill or stat customization
-Lots of scripted events
-Items already identified on drop
-Graphics are kinda bad for today's games, but that isn't a huge deal to me
-Art direction is rather boring, and not as dark as Diablo I/II
-RMAH
-Long cooldowns on abilities (Diablo II had 3-4 second cooldown at most)
-Online only DRM (not a big deal to most but I have internet disconnects often)
-Potion cooldowns and health globes
-No rune/runewords

I'm not saying it's bad by any means, it just isn't a true sequel to D2. It changed so many things that made the Diablo series what it was. I'll still probably buy it on release though and have fun, most of my friends will be playing it. Cheers.

Well here's the opposite opinion :D

-No skill or stat customization
I actually like that stats are automatically added, you can't fuck up your char by not knowing the game/mechanics too well. You can customize skills - not much but still, and I think you will be able to do it more in the full game.
-Lots of scripted events
Yeah but you have also random events, which is good thing. Exploring map will be rewarding.
-Items already identified on drop
Good thing (you have to identify rare/epic items tho)
-Graphics are kinda bad for today's games, but that isn't a huge deal to me
I actually like graphics a lot, I was surprised that the game and physics looks so good. Obviously it's not Crysis/BF3 breakthrough gfx, but still feels very Blizzardish.
-Art direction is rather boring, and not as dark as Diablo I/II
It's darker than D2 for sure, dark enough for me.
-Long cooldowns on abilities (Diablo II had 3-4 second cooldown at most)
That's not a bad thing when you have a lot of skills, I think the game takes more skill when you have such a cooldowns. Agree that some of them are too long.
-Potion cooldowns and health globes
Portion cooldowns are good, spaming is gone. For my liking there were too many health globes in beta, was too easy.
-No rune/runewords
You have runes in skills, but yeah I know what you mean. However I think there will be external runes to find in the full game. How could they reach such a number without some external items?

"So how many skill combinations are there now?

Well taking into account 6 active skills, all the rune combinations, and 3 passives we currently expect each class to have roughly 2,285,814,795,264 different build combinations. That’s not taking into account skill types for ‘ideal’ builds, but that’s always been a big part of the fun of experimenting (and longevity for Diablo II) – finding a build that shouldn’t work, and making it." (c) Bashiok

After hearing your side it all doesn't seem so bad, but I'm still disappointed a bit.

But c'mon, the graphics being good? It's like Hasbro made a game in 2003 for children, and that's how it looks. They are so lackluster and it feels clunky in general. But again, graphics aren't a big deal to me.

"It's darker than D2 for sure"
Definitely not, pay close attention to the scenery in Diablo 2 next time, it's pretty messed up.

Other than those two I can more or less agree on what you said.

I thought the beta was really fun (hey, I like Diablo and it's more Diablo, what's there to say) but yeah the art direction is really the only part I wish was a little different. I don't hate it and it's infinitely far from a dealbreaker, but I personally would've liked a much less cartoony look. The models and designs and everything are fine! It's just the colors. :(

This post (from way back when the "issue" was first brought up and people were raging / making online petitions about it) reflects my take on it rather well. Again, it's absolutely "good enough" for me and I ain't even mad (c), but I cannot help but wonder why/how in the fuck these dungeons I'm walking through are this green and purple. They used to be so perfect! <3 The insanely thick (green...) overworld mist actually made it so hard to see things that it was annoying to me, but I was also not running at the very highest settings or resolution so who knows.

This and (I don't think this is a spoiler since Blizzard showed it in 2008?) this is something I would have sprayed my whipped cream everywhere to see. IMHO, the edits look like they could've been the originals, and the originals (especially the first one) look like the ones someone ruined in Photoshop. "Image -> Adjustments -> Color Balance -> moar green because COLOR, lolz!"

The second edit is scarier (them teeth!), has weight, blades and stone tiles look wet and cold... Original kind of lacks all of that, and it's "just" a pretty cool boss (visually, I'm sure it's awesome to fight against).

Buuut but. Only bitchin' 'cause I care, and only bitchin' about this because it's the only thing I have to bitch about, while recognizing that even that one thing is subjective. Means the package is pretty darn good overall. :@

Of course, gameplay > graphics! But graphics, just like sound (that is amazing!) and story, are also an important part of the experience.

...oh yeah and my connection is trash at the moment so it was painfully laggy/warpy/disconnecty at times, really hope this isn't how it's going to work in the full version :( I'll have a stable (though high latency) connection by then but...

http://darkd3.com/
Pretty darn cool! "Effect ON" and "Sharpness ON" alone do a lot, and I'm a fan of the "Stronger" setting.

How it works:

This is a Direct3D DLL override hook that adds custom post processing shader filtering effects onto almost any game.
The filtering values were tweaked to fit different Diablo III color schemes.
It changes the saturation, color tones, gamma, exposure, sepia tone, and sharpening of the game.

Up to Blizzard if they want to allow it or ban your face off though, I guess :( Wouldn't gamble with it. Gah.

Looks great on hardcore with sharpness enabled. One more step to that old diablo 2 dark gothic picture.

diablo colours have been wowified :/

the colors are fine. If you're going to nitpick the game, I would seriously talk about something of importance.

go ahead

We did only see a fraction of the game though..

Diablo 2 didn't have dark artistic work on every Act. I don't think you can judge this aspect of the game till the full version is released

It just looks cartoony, as if made by Hasbro.

Even after all the things I listed, it was fun and I'll buy it on release. It's just not the sequel I wanted or expected.

Yeah I was expecting some slightly more hardcore graphics, and my immediate impression was just that. Although the rest of it seems pretty well planned. I'll definitely be spending much time on it :)

I REALLY enjoyed it a lot in every aspect of the game.

Hi ESR, i played the Beta for about 5 months, and here is what i can tell you :

they removed everything from the diablo 2 goodies that made this h&s fast paced and very controlable. D3 is a very bad game with nothing but okayish graphics for nowadays PC game.

Coz I really loved buying 304906349 health + mana potions and using them all in 0.0000000000001 of a second =/

sack of shit blizzard.
waste time downloading open beta and installing, get servers not responding...

wasnt this whole thing made to stress test the servers before release

I will buy this game

Anyone has beta key? :XXX

not worth it

Maybe, but boy I love farming items!

at level 10? come on D:

<sama> diablo3 will destroy my life
<sama> ppl in my age are starting a family and i will start diablo3^^

Open beta weekend was interesting. Gameplay has elements of DOTA/LoL in it. I actually felt like the combat was faster and more dynamic. I look forward to the final game.

Only thing I feel apprehensive about is the limited control over your characters stats.

as someone mentioned earlier in the thread - I think it's good that you can't customise stats.. it means you don't have to be some hardcore trolololo nerd to know the perfect combination for your class. Thank god they made it this way for D3

i remember having one char for pvp, one char for fun and one for finding items/sojs.

a pvp character was way different than a normal one in d2, non-skill-customisability sounds like every mage level 40 will have the same skills.. is that the case?

to be honest, i don't know.. gonna try get to that part of the game asap - will see how unique the features get for individuals :)

already sold-out here haha
never liked rpg games but might give it a shot with this. looks awesome!

well, it's diablo ...
I had such a great experience with the first part ...
and I also liked the 2nd part until I reached a dead end ...
will buy it regardless ... tbh. the only game I am looking forward to play =)

you reached a dead end in diablo2?

didn't beat endboss of act 2 with the sorceress class in single player

THIS GAME IS SO FUCKING GOOD.

Seriously, I'm blown how well it is made and so far it even beats d2 atm :x and I was a heavy d2 n3rd.

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/diablo-iii/user-reviews

trolololo

Rofl have u read the reviews on the side? You're probably one of those guys who check imdb rating whether a film is worth watching or not.

haha exactly :D below 7 = not watching

Yeah, I'm enjoying very much D3 as well, bye bye Quake for some time...

However I'm quite concerned that the game is a bit short or whatever, seeing yesterday stream with 57 lvl guys doing hell makes me wonder how fast can you "end" one character and the game overall. I mean, I remember doing 50+ lvl in D2 for days and then reaching 1-2 lvl in one day, playing quite a lot, was kinda successful.

Kinda weird that they had almost max level and still being 2nd or 3rd act on hell... probably they were grinding lower levels a lot since they had a lot of troubles with mobs. Oh well, time will tell.

By quoting one of my diablo III clanmates while we were partying all day yesterday:
"This is the best thing i ever seen after jesus christ born"

Really guys THIS GAME IS LEGEN.....
...
...
..
...
..
...

.... WAIT FOR IT .........

....

...
...
..
.. DARY !!!!!!