http://www.esreality.com/post/2344664/benq-xl2411t/

Yeah I've seen that but the other games I will be playing will run at 30-40fps so if 120/144hz was not there, would you still recommend it as the fastest display?

[img1]

Yes.

its not all about input lag.
led monitors makes ur reaction time better!
up to 20%!
dont have an inet source for that atm, just this local newspaper but its true

Actually, LightBoost monitors can improve your reaction time even further -- far more than 20% faster human reaction time.

LightBoost gives you the CRT "smooth-as-glass" motion feel. The improved human reaction time of zero motion blur, far outweighs the small amount of input lag (for most good gamers who are used to CRT), and pro competition gamers (e.g. Team Exile 5) have said they like LightBoost.

baseline - 60 Hz mode (16.7ms frame samples)
50% less motion blur (2x clearer) - 120 Hz mode (8.33ms frame samples)
60% less motion blur (2.4x clearer) - 144 Hz mode (6.94ms frame samples)
85% less motion blur (7x clearer) - 120 Hz mode with LightBoost set at 100% (2.4ms frame strobe flashes)
92% less motion blur (12x clearer) - 120 Hz mode with LightBoost set at 10% (1.4ms frame strobe flashes)
http://www.blurbusters.com/zero-motion-blur/

You should try to find a way to activate it in 144Hz :P

I know i know.

Incidentially, some of us accidentally activated LightBoost at 144 Hz, but it was framedropping (as if it was running at only 120 Hz). The monitors seem to have a limitation preventing the strobe backlight from working properly beyond 120 Hz.

So far, the most reliable rates for LightBoost is 100 Hz through 120 Hz.

Must have VGA input as well.

For what? All GFX cards producing pure digital stream, using VGA cable adds DVI->VGA->DVI redundant transformations in case of LCD monitors, which means:
a) additional input lag
b) additional analog distortion from vga channel