You're question raises yet more questions.

Economically, it's a disaster, and it won't improve the quality of the tracking, nor the malfunction speed.

The Optical sensor technology/manufacturing process has matured; with the correct lens/implementation of the sensor, simply nothing else is needed.

Your enthusiasm is admirable; two sensors simply isn't required these days, nor ever arguably.

For some more info on mice malfunction speeds etc, you can check out ESR's own mousescore article created by none other than Sujoy here:

http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1265679

I thought the 7.3 m/s would have given it away.

hint: the logitech mouseman is a disaster.

MOUSEMAN BEST EVER U DNT BUY IT UR A FUCKING RETARD

shut your whore mouth and quit lambasting the best fucking mouse of all time.

not only is it made from some sort of outer space material making it work for decades to come, unlike new mice that break a day after the 2 week warranty expires

it also comes in a before-its-time potat shape that i only came to recognize with the new esr header.

so shut up and just watch the pros

http://i.imgur.com/WNQ3Adt.png

YES!!

I think he is working for Razer

I think it lives with its parents on £30 a week.