Do you have any ideas what is happening? Putin saving poor russians?
240775 Hits
USA created EU
WW1 and 2 are the most important topics to this day that is why they are the most underdeveloped subjects in schools.
They had so much power after WW2 they wanted o keep Germany and France under a protectora without government.
so tell me why every company says that there are no skilled people after graduation?
also we let a lot of people study for eg. sociology even if we know that there is no jobs for them.
The best interships are paid ones but from companies and they are only during summer break. interships which people can get from school sucks balls. I graduated about 4 years ago.
will be interesting if you will be ill in the future, so I should let you die than?
And interships depends of studies. I couldn't do anything during a year. We got some exercices/laboratories which we couldn't skip. And that was frustrating.
And this is interesting. If you will read some biographies about geniuses from our world... you will notice that some of them really screwed it. Because school will be always some standard, schema and will kill imagination of people. For me that schema is fking boring already and can't stand it ;p
everybody got a chance.
poeple got chance but most of them not even trying.
btw. funny to hear it from somebody who is from western europe, where probably almost everybody got better start than us, in Poland.
If you really want to know, my parents didn't have great income, maybe in 90' + years only
People in UK who earn 'minimum' money there seems to got better life than our average guy.A doubt someone with minimum wage has a great life in London.
On 2nd year of my studies I didnt even have internet connection, so yea, I was sooo rich...
now I will never go to school again, prefer to learn by myself from books, tutorials in internet etc.The whole point in going to university is that you get offered higher education and it is on you to develop and enhance your knowledge.
Unfortunately, in Poland people like papers. So... certificates>skills sometimes... or mostly.
collage/universities are a bit better, but still there are too many unnecessary things to learn and far away from practice.Who are you to judge what is necessary and what not?! For you maybe but for others it isn't.
also we let a lot of people study for eg. sociology even if we know that there is no jobs for them. But ofc, schools will be paid for every student, because this is how this system works.Yeah and it hurts you so much, right?
If somebody want to study for himself and he doesnt want to give anything to society later (by his job), he should pay for such studies.
"polak who thinks everyone in the west (germany) grows up as a spoiled brat"I don't think like that. Still there is easier than here. Still its ok for me, I can go abroad or something, if I want. Still I will need to work hard.
A doubt someone with minimum wage has a great life in London. "True. But i didn't talk about it.
Who are you to judge what is necessary and what not?! For you maybe but for others it isn't.I'm part of society, paying taxes, so I can judge it. Lol its like pub-chatting... and you ask me 'who the fuck Im" ...scary.
Do you listen to music? Do you read? Do you play games? Do you watch movies?
NOBODY IN THIS WORLD GOT SAME CHANCE OR SAME START.
This is how this world works.
You know when people are equal? In communism. And guess what? Everybody got there low life level and its worst thing for civilization.
I don't think like that. Still there is easier than here. Still its ok for me, I can go abroad or something, if I want. Still I will need to work hard.
Yes, If my mother will be single, still I got choice. It will be harder and more complicated. Probably I wil lstart work faster...So you slowly start to understand it. Now imagine you were a really bright kid but due to your mother's financial situation you are forced into an under qualified apprenticeship to earn some moeny. Doesn't sound good to me, does it?
I talked about internet... because you said about above 'average income', if it will be, don't you think that I will have internet? And yes, internet is great for studing. If I will get it faster pprobably my life will be also different.
I'm part of society, paying taxes, so I can judge it.
and? is it free now? because i didn't notice it...
one question. What is more important? food or playing games?...
USA is not perfect. There is also lot things to fix.
Again you sound like we don't work here :DAgain, you didnt understand. We need to work hard everywhere. But it will never be equal. And you will love minimum wage in UK instead of minimum wage in Poland...
So you slowly start to understand it.But you don't understand. This bright kid will handle it but will be hard. And I want to give its mother more cash by lower taxes. Also in many Times harder conditions are making better persons. I made myself some peasent work, and it forged me as better person, gave different point of view. On the west skill>school and its good. In my belief i want more responsible society. Cash/services from gov. make people envy to each other. Other people should help such people.
Like they don't pay taxes :D?they? everybody can judge, but when most people think that something is unnecessary on studies?...
We are in an age and time where not 90% of the population has to be farmers.Lol. Most people fight for survival or work for their families. And most people are some kind of 'farmers', manufactors... also game devs etc. survival > culture. It's obvious. Its just more important. But my question was tricky. If you will handle basic needs, you will go and buy a game. Every job when somebody want to pay for it is productive. And some game devs got great wages. We pay for it. So what the problem? Artists got their money, because people want to pay for it... and you want what? they should sit at home?
But it is a nice place for your ehtics ;)USA is not correct with my ethics.
In my belief lower taxes are better and when education, medical care etc are not 'free'. Ofcourse to change it need to be step by step plan and very smart, which is probably impossible in Poland, when we got so many 'groups of interest'.as there is no common sense.
Also, the French government is very unpopular here in France (President +/- 20% followers in polls), while it seems Putin is pretty popular in Russia (I'd like to hear about Russians about it please).
on Feb 20th '21 protesters' were killed. Wrong, 72 was the count at first, lately it has gone to 100.
phone call between EU deputy and some estonian deputy was a private matter and they hadn't said anything for A FACT, just thinking out loud if you will - their conversation were all over the news.
Like that overblown 'fact' that Ukrainian temporary goverment accepted the law on _forbidding_ Russian language for regional use which was never true.
So, in order to evaluate a message, it is important to establish if the message aligns with the agenda of the source. In all your examples, the agendas are political. However, this organizations (not guy) agenda is truth seeking.No, it is political as well. Take a look at their channel and you will see a rather clear anti-interventionist political line on display, which also applies to this video.
Sometimes, conspiracy theories are wrong and require huge leaps of faith. In this case, he is not even talking about a conspiracy. He is talking about the official agenda of the US government.I did not say this was a "conspiracy theory". I mentioned a tendency to "select, present, interpret and perhaps outright distort the information" according to their biases and to the political message they want to push forward.
Some things in geopolitics are extremely simple, one of which is what US keep doing in the world by imposing control over countries through coups benefiting the US. This is not a conspiracy, and this is, very simple.No, it's anything but simple. You are making a simplistic statement about a foreign policy which is much more complex both in its elaboration (there is no unanimity within the Obama administration, let alone within the U.S. political spectrum, as per what is this exact line to follow in Ukraine and elsewhere in the world) and in its implementation. General trends can indeed often be identified in retrospect, but your statement is not even an accurate description of what happened in Ukraine (where the U.S. sought to profit/turn the events to its advantage rather than instigated the protests). If you want an example closer to what you mention, the Reagan doctrine comes to mind since it was about supporting armed movements fighting USSR-affiliated governments in various countries.
Another simple thing is that it is irrelevant who these people are and US doesn't care what and how exactly these people get power, as long as they let the State Department have control.Another simplistic and inaccurate description. The U.S. does care who gets in power, since they would much rather not have extreme right members in the Parliament and the government: they make Russia's propaganda job easier and complicate attempts at bringing stability in the country. "Let the State Department have control" is another nonsensical statement: the U.S. obviously prefers friendly governments than hostile governments, but it does not "control" the government, and although it has more sway currently because of the volatile situation and the economic help it has pledged to provide, the influence will further lessen on the mid- and especially long-terms.
Now, you can keep throwing ad-hominess around, but it's because there is really nothing more you can say about this video.I already told you exactly what this video was about, namely selecting, interpreting and sometimes distorting information in order to push forward a political message. It is not even remotely close to a scientific analysis of the situation in Ukraine and of the respective actions of the U.S. and Russia. The authors are clearly interested in criticizing U.S. interventionism and not Russian interventionism, and in highlighting what they see as wrong with the Euromaiden protests rather than the other side. It's their right, but it also makes it a very biased and very incomplete source.
So, apparently, if he did make a video about WMDs in Iraq being fake, and that the true reason for invasion was oil and influence in the region, it would be a shitty source, and therefore not true. You win.I already said that not everything mentioned in such videos is necessarily wrong. I'm sure if they did a video on the Iraq invasion they would rightfully highlight that there were no WMD found and that the invasion was perfectly illegal with regards to international law (I 100% condemn it as well, by the way). But given that their videos are clearly colored by their political stance and objectives, and that they seem to have a rather elementary understanding of international relations, their analysis would probably be quite basic and contain several simplifications if not outright inaccuracies/false statements. For example, what you just said is already inaccurate - research has shown that there were several different positions within the Bush administration with regards to Iraq, and that the advisers which favored intervention (without a UN resolution) had different motives. Beyond what you mention (and it's not only influence in the region, btw), neoconservatives such as Paul Wolfowitz did want to spread democracy, notably because neoconservatism sees the spread of democracy as beneficial to the U.S. and its position of power on the international scene.
Politics are dumdum.
Enjoy