ESReality - Where Gaming Meets Reality
Not Logged In | Login | Register
12:02 CST - 1479 users online
All Posts
HoQ TDM 4v4 Winter Season 2025 (2 comments)
Posted by doz3r @ 10:16 CST, 15 November 2024 - iMsg
The sign-ups for ql Quake Live TDM 4v4 Winter Season 2025 will be open from Sunday 1st December until Sunday 22nd of December 2024.

The Tournament start will be Monday 13th of January 2025, when hopefully all are back from their holidays.

The donated prizemoney so far is 1200€ donations which will be payed out over top3 placements. Donations will be possible until the end of the tournament.

Check below for all needed informations and sign-up! If you already have player and clan account on House of Quake, feel free to sign-up right away. Otherwise make sure to register yourselves and your clan first.


Streams: twitch ???
Links: Rules 4v4, Signups 4v4, HoQ Discord
Edited by doz3r at 10:16 CST, 15 November 2024 - 406 Hits
115 Hits
World's Greatest Gamer Event - QC - Punk vs Leffen (1 comment)
Posted by an1me @ 04:36 CST, 4 November 2024 - iMsg
https://www.youtube.com/live/ONksnc4X2g8?si=5bBBY1BrB83WB8RT

Youtuber Ludwig holds the Worlds Greatest Gamer event where Quake Champions is one of the game. This match was pretty exciting actually, at about 7 hours 47 minutes, two Evo champs going at it, Punk vs Ledden. What do you think of their level for first time players? Apparently they both thought the game was fun
289 Hits
Cooler Interview 9.8.24 (1 comment)
Posted by rockz @ 12:57 CST, 3 November 2024 - iMsg


unfortunately in russian tongue
376 Hits

<< Comment #1 @ 06:01 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
You had one option that made sense at the moment (won't get made). Ask this question in like 5 years from now and we'll know, then we might have actually tried the game. :)
<< Comment #2 @ 06:05 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By boatclub tom  - Reply to #1
I don't expect results to be taken to heart by anyone
<< Comment #3 @ 06:05 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Italy borda 
will be never get made / will be played by no-one
<< Comment #4 @ 06:09 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By omg! remix by Exe Cuffahid 
haha h8ers xD
<< Comment #5 @ 06:13 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By England arQon 
"ruined by an arqon mod"

Priceless. :)

If Severity manges to be the first game ever that's actually PLAYABLE without a mod, it'll be (a) such a shock people will die, and (b) a huge success.

I've touched on this before, but the reason Q4 has been such a fiasco is that it was just SO shamefully bad that 99% of the mod time spent on it is "wasted" on fixing all the retarded bugs it came with and adding *basic* MP functionality that should have been there from Day One, instead of actually being able to develop new gametypes for it.
<< Comment #7 @ 06:26 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By WayBetter way2ez4gtv  - Reply to #5
ye pitty u didnt have time to develop super flying drunk mode for quake4.
<< Comment #13 @ 08:11 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Nuke Explosion raithza  - Reply to #7
you're right, a playable version of q4 would've been cool.
<< Comment #117 @ 13:13 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By US-California AK  - Reply to #13
w/ out q4max...q4 wouldnt have seen half of the tourneys its had
<< Comment #136 @ 08:22 CST, 20 January 2007 >>
By Sweden Ztrider  - Reply to #117
care to play q3 without osp/cpma ?
<< Comment #137 @ 12:29 CST, 20 January 2007 >>
By US-California AK  - Reply to #136
exactly
<< Comment #154 @ 20:20 CDT, 31 March 2007 >>
By amerikkka voodoochopstiks  - Reply to #136
XBM XBM XBM :;DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
<< Comment #15 @ 09:40 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Nicky ESR Nicky  - Reply to #7
2k4 had a beer mod was funny as
<< Comment #18 @ 14:41 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Quake 3 HamidoOs  - Reply to #5
Playable without a mod? Ummmm... Warsow?
<< Comment #22 @ 16:47 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By wc3_undead mammon  - Reply to #18
OH YEAH AND ULTRONO ARENA TOOO
<< Comment #25 @ 17:30 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By CPM Biohaz (Blue) m1ndphuq  - Reply to #18
which is funny considering the many simularities between warsow and that super flying drunken golden monkey mode arQon apperently forces on us innocent quake3 players. :-p
<< Comment #155 @ 14:26 CDT, 4 April 2007 >>
By SC_Terran Venim  - Reply to #25
not sure how he's "forcing" anything on you
<< Comment #156 @ 21:59 CDT, 5 April 2007 >>
By CPM Biohaz (Blue) m1ndphuq  - Reply to #155
I was being sarcastic on that. It was more of a punn on many of the comments we have seen twords arQon and CPMA's roll in the competitive Q3 comunity. :)
<< Comment #41 @ 15:49 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By clawo .syL  - Reply to #18
For all practical purposes, wsw is a mod, although technically it's stand alone.
<< Comment #52 @ 01:38 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By France sansai  - Reply to #41
No. That's called a total conversion at best, and basically here they made everything from scratch just using a heavily modified Q2 engine, so total conversion barely applies here either.
<< Comment #152 @ 11:22 CDT, 12 March 2007 >>
By war§ow 0.1 beml  - Reply to #41
For all practical purposes, wsw is a mod, although technically it's stand alone.

I think you mean vice versa?
<< Comment #58 @ 04:01 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
Games from Blizzard and others are very well playable without mods. Actually, most games. Hence the community sizes.

(Just a comment to that it would be the first game playable out of the box; strongly agreed with the rest though.)
<< Comment #61 @ 05:55 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By France sansai  - Reply to #58
I think he was referring to FPS in particular. :)
<< Comment #65 @ 09:12 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #61
CS is playable straight out of the box
<< Comment #67 @ 09:22 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By France sansai  - Reply to #65
well it used to be a mod which took years of open betas before it went final. :)
But yes, that probably applies more particularly to DM FPS.
Edited by sansai at 09:23 CST, 15 January 2007
<< Comment #71 @ 09:30 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #67
Or were you using the "215" FPS description?
<< Comment #73 @ 09:34 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By France sansai  - Reply to #71
Nah, I don't know about that. Was really thinking DM FPS, asin Quake 3, Doom 3, PK, Quake 4, UTx, etc.
Edited by sansai at 09:34 CST, 15 January 2007
<< Comment #74 @ 09:35 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #73
Well, I did know that :( but thought I'd do the "smartass" reply
<< Comment #77 @ 09:37 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By France sansai  - Reply to #74
Can't get it, I don't know what you're referring to damnit !
<< Comment #79 @ 10:32 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #77
By Stickmen incrates_ ++++| - Reply to #61
CS is playable straight out of the box
<< Comment #68 @ 09:24 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By SpawnRaped anal justice  - Reply to #65
ye, by millions of sheep around the globe
<< Comment #94 @ 08:01 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By Tibet Bnew  - Reply to #65
CS wasn't playable since they screwed bunnyhopping (beta 5.2?) and added randomness to the weapon firing patterns
<< Comment #91 @ 06:00 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By Finland randomness666  - Reply to #5
CoD2 is playable without any mods =)
<< Comment #153 @ 15:38 CDT, 12 March 2007 >>
By Sweden luKrek  - Reply to #91
cod2 is not playable.
<< Comment #151 @ 11:19 CDT, 12 March 2007 >>
By war§ow 0.1 beml  - Reply to #5
Warsow is quite playable. :)
<< Comment #6 @ 06:19 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By psychoxou xou 
Other answer: I won't judge a video game that isn't being developped yet.
<< Comment #11 @ 07:43 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By jazz_carrot fern  - Reply to #6
thats no fun
<< Comment #8 @ 06:38 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Exelent Omen- 
voted for "ruined by an arqon mod" for a laugh :D
<< Comment #9 @ 07:26 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By 2k2_2 Nukm 
dunno, but i will definitely try it out
<< Comment #10 @ 07:33 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By United Kingdom grimbob 
What the hell is severity
<< Comment #12 @ 07:53 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By WayBetter way2ez4gtv  - Reply to #10
tv series and movie by the dude that made buffy and angel. its pretty cool.
<< Comment #102 @ 16:06 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
severity is the name of the movie, firefly is the name of series.
(firefly is the ship model and severity is the name of the ship)
<< Comment #103 @ 16:17 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By WayBetter way2ez4gtv  - Reply to #102
wow try serenity numb nuts.
<< Comment #104 @ 16:31 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #103
LOL

NERD.ES
<< Comment #123 @ 19:07 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By United States of America cdogg  - Reply to #103
HAHA you beat me to it.
=/
Serenity now!!...
<< Comment #54 @ 02:16 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By Colour: white link  - Reply to #10
it's the new game from CPL, apperently e-sports future.
<< Comment #86 @ 19:19 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By Germany - Hamburg unihumi  - Reply to #54
man, you totally ruined way2ez4gtv's joke :O
<< Comment #14 @ 08:24 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By France chuky 
You forgot and answer : Will have a Prey sized community.
<< Comment #16 @ 09:41 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Nicky ESR Nicky 
where is the "FU LOBSTER" option ?
<< Comment #17 @ 09:57 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Colour: black h3i  - Reply to #16
I'M A COP YOU IDIOT.
<< Comment #19 @ 14:44 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Uruguay gSTRUCTOR  - Reply to #17
FU LOBSTER
<< Comment #23 @ 16:50 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By 011 nemecel  - Reply to #17
IDENTIFY YOURSELF.
<< Comment #108 @ 23:05 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By Australia gk_nz  - Reply to #17
Whose your daddy and what does he do?
<< Comment #36 @ 04:31 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By Morocco Pushpabon  - Reply to #16
YOU LACK DISCIPLINE
<< Comment #43 @ 18:52 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By exclamation point CLains  - Reply to #36
rack disciprine!
<< Comment #20 @ 15:33 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
gameplay -> gay play
<< Comment #21 @ 16:44 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Belgium Fryght 
While i voted for 'never even get made', i mean that it probably won't make it to beta. Even if it does, there's a fair chance that it will still get cancelled, imo.

There's too many people wanting too many different things out of this game, which i dont see happening any time soon.

On a side note: Daikatana
Edited by Zaex at 16:44 CST, 13 January 2007
<< Comment #150 @ 07:49 CST, 13 February 2007 >>
By Germany berth  - Reply to #21
[+] for Daikatana, didn't read the rest.
<< Comment #163 @ 02:48 CST, 25 February 2009 >>
By Unset bobbles  - Reply to #150
[+] for reading posts in reverse.
<< Comment #24 @ 17:29 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By 011 nemecel 
I have the hope only because the engine is Q3.

Maybe if they don't release a gay'd up game, with weak textures, stupid models that move on a totally homo way, "realistic or so super sophisticated weapons that takes 3/4 of your screen and they look like spaceships, and sounds that have the punch-feeling of glam metal, it can succeed.

The game really needs the aggresive look of Q3 or QW. Haven't seen something that gives me that feel since Q3. Well, PK textures where decent, but models where gay (for example, WHY you have to make a shotgun that looks like random red pipes filled together, and why it had a secondary stupid alternate fire that freezes the enemy), instead of a proper, goddamn agressive looking shotgun that actually LOOKS LIKE A SHOTGUN. Thats an example of why not always is good to innovate, specially with those fag, stupid ideas on mind.

(Needed to write that up, thanks).
<< Comment #28 @ 19:07 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #24
haha yeah PK had great textures/theme even the player models were pretty cool, then you pickup any other weapon than Stakegun and it looks terrible :/
<< Comment #70 @ 09:28 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By SpawnRaped anal justice  - Reply to #28
ut? worse weapon/player models ever
<< Comment #72 @ 09:32 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #70
UT is pretty horrible all round in my opinion, models/textures/sounds. The engine seems pretty good but the UT games itself just look *ergh*
<< Comment #76 @ 09:37 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By SpawnRaped anal justice  - Reply to #72
the engine is gay too. q3 was/is better. unfortunately thats not the case with d3/q4.
<< Comment #26 @ 17:52 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Crossfire Nellie 
Cynical cunts.
<< Comment #27 @ 18:16 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Poland SpOOnman 
I hope it will be 2 years late so they can make it as good as possible. Look at comment #5 - it's like arQon says. I'm ver happy ET:QW is laaaate. It can be late even another year, just do it well. We don't want another Q4s released 2 years too early.
<< Comment #29 @ 20:29 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By Quake 3 (black) storm 
It might be successful if they include something similar to the Quake 3 single player game so that new players can pick it up, learn how to play against bots and then move on to multiplayer. If it's just multiplayer out of the box then I don't think it'll do very well.
<< Comment #30 @ 22:40 CST, 13 January 2007 >>
By cup_gold sudstah 
Will be played by nearly all FPS players: 19% (21)

Thats gullable and a stupid vote, because that to me doesnt mean play for a few days then stop totally, it means play consistently on an on going basis because you enjoy it. Therefore, as all games dont appeal to all types of people dictates it will be impossible for all people to want to play the game.

P.S. I suggest none of us talk about the game after this, other then to the developers, as you know what happens! we over hype it to be gold and get hugely disappointed!
Edited by Exe at 22:42 CST, 13 January 2007
<< Comment #44 @ 18:54 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By exclamation point CLains  - Reply to #30
maybe it's definition #215 of FPS ;)
<< Comment #31 @ 01:57 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By cpm_biohaz_2 SyN 
"will be the size of a PK community" and be "played by noone" should be merged into one
<< Comment #32 @ 02:04 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By omg! remix by Exe Cuffahid  - Reply to #31
same with qw :<
<< Comment #37 @ 04:34 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By Morocco Pushpabon  - Reply to #32
Well recent qw 1 on 1 cup just got 256 signups so I guess that's something. :/(
<< Comment #39 @ 10:09 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By 011 nemecel  - Reply to #32
QW is still alive after 11 years. Will Q4 have lans has QHLAN and tourneys with 256 people signed up after that time? Heeell no. This separates real games from pseudo DM games.
<< Comment #42 @ 18:48 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By omg! remix by Exe Cuffahid  - Reply to #39
mainly because its the first mp dm game :>
kinda tough to switch to slow shit getting played nowadays if you love speed and that stupid rocket.

I meant nobody *new* plays qw, its kinda dead end.
Edited by [CopperHead] at 18:50 CST, 14 January 2007
<< Comment #64 @ 06:30 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By Beer! becks  - Reply to #42
doom was earlier ;)
<< Comment #69 @ 09:28 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By France sansai  - Reply to #42
You're wrong. There's only a small addition of newbies over time but there are newcomers indeed, and some even get further and get to join clans, and become decent QW players.
That's maybe why there is still that many QW players nowadays, even though the best of the best are most likely guys who have been playing QW for 5 to 10 years, there is still a fair share of players who have started playing past few years.
I know a bunch of those and I'd probably be amongst them if I didn't have a Q3 clan with a great spirit, and which consists mostly of IRL friends to whom QW isn't appealing. :)
Edited by sansai at 09:30 CST, 15 January 2007
<< Comment #33 @ 03:55 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By zthor sign by mic zeicon 
this poll is divided between the extreme pessimists and the extreme optimists it seems :p
<< Comment #34 @ 04:10 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By boatclub tom  - Reply to #33
i never said it was a fair poll!
<< Comment #38 @ 08:42 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By Sweden Ztrider  - Reply to #33
expect the worst and you'll never be disappointed ;)
<< Comment #46 @ 18:59 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By WayBetter way2ez4gtv  - Reply to #38
i did and quake 4 still disappointed me
<< Comment #90 @ 05:45 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By exclamation point CLains  - Reply to #46
ZING!
<< Comment #109 @ 23:07 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By Australia gk_nz  - Reply to #46
wah wah wee wah!
<< Comment #60 @ 05:43 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By Italy soulnrgizer  - Reply to #33
I WANT TO BELIEVE
<< Comment #95 @ 08:07 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By Tibet Bnew  - Reply to #33
there isn't really much middle ground in the poll though... its either played by everyone, or a variation of played by noone (pro players only, PK / QW sized community, noone)
<< Comment #35 @ 04:30 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By Sweden xaus 
c'mon the guy don't even have money to make the game.
it'll never be made is my vote here
<< Comment #40 @ 13:36 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By Quake 3 InDepther 
bad poll tbh
<< Comment #45 @ 18:59 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By exclamation point CLains 
Lets see.. 35% it won't get made, 30% it'll be decent, 25% it'll be a flop and 10% it'll be really good.
<< Comment #47 @ 19:00 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By exclamation point CLains  - Reply to #45
i can't decide what to vote, how many qw-playahz?
<< Comment #49 @ 20:35 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #47
I think the "options" for community size were slightly skewed. I went with QW anyway as they seem to have a pretty damn awesome and dedicated community which seems to be pretty large too (Maybe not "statiscally" by server count and what not though)
<< Comment #48 @ 19:06 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By DoublePlus Vayne 
I hope the rocket explodes before it even lifts off.
<< Comment #50 @ 21:22 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By WayBetter way2ez4gtv  - Reply to #48
why? shouldnt u be hoping its perfect?
<< Comment #51 @ 22:29 CST, 14 January 2007 >>
By DoublePlus Vayne  - Reply to #50
I dont really care,chances are im not gonna play it I just gotta put my 2 cents in.
<< Comment #53 @ 01:48 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By France sansai 
Can't vote on that. I'm tempted to say another PK/Q4 alike game that gets picked up by pros and ends up given up by pretty much everyone bar a handful of players once the big tourneys are a past thing.
But that's just the bitter me speaking, somehow they could come up with something decent this time, who knows.

I'm just really not optimistic about it, because as I've stated many times, and I'm not going to stop any soon, game designers and game developers are proper casual players with no clue whatsoever when it comes to competitive gaming.
Even if they claim they will listen to the "community", and make a huge beta test, which "community" are they going to listen to ?
The Q4 pro-players ?
All DM FPS players including a broad range of clueless newbies, much more numerous than the players who actually have a clue and a decent experience of various DM games, including those that were out before Q3/UT ?
How will they tell the clueless advice/feedback (and there is going to be an insane amount of it for sure, just read an ESR thread about anything gameplay if you doubt about that) apart from the actual insightful one ?
And so on.

But hey, I hope I'm just beeing my usual bitter pessimistic self and something decent actually comes out of this project. Fingers crossed, I guess.
Edited by sansai at 01:53 CST, 15 January 2007
<< Comment #55 @ 02:22 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By Colour: white link 
Will never even get made
<< Comment #56 @ 02:27 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By Aussie tNaCarN 
why dont the CPL just get PK again make the weapon models better / sacred meatless and few others from PK world tour and make a PK TV thats awesome :p... i like qw
<< Comment #57 @ 03:20 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By omg! remix by Exe Cuffahid  - Reply to #56
OMG ITS 2 FAST 4 TACTICS!!!11
<< Comment #59 @ 04:31 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
"played by pros only..."
whats this , always thinking pros are instant good at anygame , the fact is q3 and q4 just happened to be very very very smilar ,
see em playing qw or cpm and they would fail until year of practise or more.
<< Comment #62 @ 05:58 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By France sansai  - Reply to #59
the "pros" here would be players interested in practising the game to play major tourneys and go for the cash nevermind how lame and unsuccesful the game is, not a pre-defined group of players in particular, I guess.
<< Comment #66 @ 09:14 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #59
Quite a few Vq3 "pros" have played and placed quite well in CPM tournaments in the past.
<< Comment #63 @ 06:15 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By rtfm Backstab 
This poll was ruined by an arqon mod
<< Comment #75 @ 09:35 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
Will be played by just the pro players... and me :)
<< Comment #78 @ 10:06 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
The chances that this game will be better than Warsow or CPM are zero (add .3% if you must).

I just don't understand why at least half of you are not playing Warsow right now at this moment. I just don't get it?

That fully featured Beta game plays the socks off that clunker Q4.
<< Comment #80 @ 10:33 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #78
Because I can't stand the gameplay in CPM/WSW?
<< Comment #81 @ 11:25 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By Earth Heartlesss  - Reply to #80
Maybe cuz u prefer +back rail ?
Or cuz you ve been playing OSP for 21551 years ?
<< Comment #82 @ 11:26 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #81
From what I've heard WSW is quite +back anyway.

"ZOMG YOU MUST BE SKILLESS +BACK RAILING NOOB FROM OSP FOR 5 YEARS TO NOT LIKE STUPID FLYING DRUNK MODE 3"
<< Comment #93 @ 07:27 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By Nuke Explosion raithza  - Reply to #82
indeed, you must be a skilless +back railing noob from osp for 5 years to not like stupid flying drunk mode.

Stupid flying drunk troll you.
<< Comment #84 @ 18:38 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By 2k2_2 Nukm  - Reply to #81
stop telling ppl what gameplay they have to prefere...
<< Comment #88 @ 05:42 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By Earth Heartlesss  - Reply to #84
They have to prefer promode. That's all.
Same thing when you say to a Cser : "Hey, your game sux, play quake, so much faster and so less campy"
<< Comment #89 @ 05:42 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By Earth Heartlesss  - Reply to #84
They have to prefer promode. That's all.
Same thing when you say to a Cser : "Hey, your game sux, play quake, so much faster and so less campy"
<< Comment #96 @ 10:14 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By United States of America KitesAreFun  - Reply to #80
I'm sorry, but I find that odd.
<< Comment #97 @ 10:18 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #96
Why is that?

Do I have to like all those boring air control games? or instant weapon switch? or the ACTION/ACTION/ACTION "mantra" these games are based on?

No, some people like cricket, others like baseball. Some people like Football others like Rugby, Tennis - Badminton etc etc.

None of those games are "superior" just different games for different people.
<< Comment #100 @ 15:37 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By art of eXecution reslox  - Reply to #97
how does air control make for boring play? i can't even wrap my mind around that. Variety keeps u interested, and air control increases the variety of ways u can move. This isn't like preferring chocolate over vanilla and so there can be right or wrong opinions
<< Comment #101 @ 15:48 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #100
Are you so insanely stupid that you cannot even consider why some people find it boring?

Jesus open your fucking eyes. Air control is not a BLACK/WHITE issue.
<< Comment #105 @ 18:53 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By art of eXecution reslox  - Reply to #101
was expecting an answer to my question, but i must've been insanely stupid to expect that. stating that there are right and wrong opinions isn't the same as saying it's a black & white issue. when you're done putting words in my mouth u can reply like a person, instead of an emo kid who needs some time away from his pc

edit: removed expletive!
Edited by reslox at 18:58 CST, 16 January 2007
<< Comment #106 @ 20:13 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #105
Ok, because I find it boring. I don't enjoy flying about a map, nor do I enjoy watching others fly about the map.

Here is one reason:

- Air control allows you to (Generally) traverse a map for too quick for my liking.
Edited by incrates_ at 20:20 CST, 16 January 2007
<< Comment #113 @ 08:54 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By art of eXecution reslox  - Reply to #106
running speed is a much bigger factor in how fast a game feels. for example, UT'04 has much more air control than vq3 but it's not faster than. Close quarters combat is more hectic than vq3's, but that's due to dodge more than air control
<< Comment #115 @ 09:39 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #113
I know that. I didn't mention ground movement.
<< Comment #116 @ 10:51 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By art of eXecution reslox  - Reply to #115
u think that provided ground movement isn't "too fast" and calibrated/balanced with air control, then it's worthwhile having?
<< Comment #118 @ 13:27 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #116
I just don't like air control like it is in qw/cpm/wsw/etc.
<< Comment #119 @ 13:34 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By CPM Biohaz (Blue) m1ndphuq  - Reply to #118
*inserts arguement about how your wrong to not like cpm/qw/wsw/pk*

The qw/cpm people are like a religious cult. You MUST join them or be condemned to an eternity of fire and brimstone in the bottomless pits of hell... boogity boogity boogity .
<< Comment #121 @ 17:22 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By art of eXecution reslox  - Reply to #119
it's not about imposing an opinion, just asking the question *why do u like/dislike?* and being told "cos i just do ok". that's not an answer, and i'm now beyond caring anyway
<< Comment #124 @ 19:11 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #121
Actually it is a perfectly fine answer. I have no obligation to satisfy your elitist attitude and explain in any detail why I don't like it. Even though I did give one perfectly fine answer to which you replied with talk about ground movement....
<< Comment #125 @ 06:21 CST, 18 January 2007 >>
By pong Zanno  - Reply to #124
actually, yes, yes you do

saying that just makes you look like you're mad that you got whipped 415 to -2

are you the same guy who whined that they didn't like cpm movement because they didn't like losing games to people with faster movement?
<< Comment #127 @ 07:03 CST, 18 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #125
No. I have no idea who whined they lost because they didn't have fast movement. Considering 75% of my duels are with Zimmerman in VQ3 and 85% of the time he totally butchers me, I think I can honestly say it's not because of winning/losing.

Like I said, I basically don't like the fact that air control QW/CPM/WSW/PK style gives you so much freedom and speed, it allows you to just fly around the maps getting from point A-B with no real hassle and allows you to correct "mistakes" in movement much easier.

I guess it's less air control per se (Hey reslox, so I'm not talking about ut2k4) but more to do with "bunny hop".

Another thing that I dislike about these games is instant weapon switch. Now instant switch is "cool" and fun (For a bit of light play) for the combos, however I personally feel it's too much and takes away from pre-battle tactics and ruins the "RG/LG" hum.

Lastly my other main dislike is tiered armours. I feel this forces strategy onto the RA far too much and generally lessens the amount of strategies. Because the RA gives more armour and is stronger it instantly becomes the "main" attention (except on a map where it would really be better to just keep high ground and YA's but I don't really see this in CPM all that much..) and therefore most strategy revolves around the RA first. In good VQ3 maps it's not like this.
<< Comment #129 @ 00:57 CST, 19 January 2007 >>
All that stuff you mentioned about weapon tactics, armor strategy and movement still applies to QW/CPM/WSW/ETC. The only differences in weapon switch, and movement is the speed at which it happens. One is slower, and the other is quicker. Many of the same type of situations arise just with a difference of speed. Most of the same type of armor stratagems work similar as well. The best players in all those games still do cooller like item control you see in VQ3.

You apparently belittle faster games for some personal reason. You also don't seem to want to give them a chance either. I can understand someone not being able to play at the rate required for faster games but their core gameplay is virtually identical to their slower relatives.
<< Comment #131 @ 08:03 CST, 19 January 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #129
Sigh, I know they are only small differences and that they are more or less the same. I just dislike those three things, generally I prefer the games to have a slower pace as I find it more interesting.

It has nothing to do with not being able to play at the pace or whatever and for some reason you think I haven't given these games a chance, which I have no idea why seeing as you'd have no way of telling, but for the record I have given them plenty of chances.
<< Comment #158 @ 21:52 CDT, 13 April 2007 >>
By Spain jal  - Reply to #131
I don't know why do you bother giving so many explanations. Games with aircontrol and +forward combat are simply one of the many styles of balanced and skilled possible gameplays. If you don't like it, that's all the story. Having good gameplay doesn't mean it has to be just one gameplay, there are millions of different good gameplays.
<< Comment #159 @ 05:37 CDT, 14 April 2007 >>
By clawo ini  - Reply to #158
I don't know why I did either, I was quite happy with the "because I do" answer.
<< Comment #134 @ 18:33 CST, 19 January 2007 >>
By WayBetter way2ez4gtv  - Reply to #129
100% wrong, fast weap swap = walking about with rail in hand if i get ambushed i fire once then take my chances or swap right away. either way i eat one rocket at best. in vq3 if i walk about with rail an get caught out i get fraged.
<< Comment #135 @ 00:20 CST, 20 January 2007 >>
By Unset Aaron  - Reply to #127
Considering 75% of my duels are with Zimmerman in VQ3 and 85% of the time he totally butchers me, I think I can honestly say it's not because of winning/losing.

8===============================================================D~
Edited by ZImmerman at 00:21 CST, 20 January 2007
<< Comment #145 @ 07:09 CST, 31 January 2007 >>
By zthor sign by mic zeicon  - Reply to #135
OMFG, your e-penis just grew 20 inches!!!
<< Comment #140 @ 14:51 CST, 21 January 2007 >>
By Nuke Explosion raithza  - Reply to #119
was about to + but then i detected sarcasm
<< Comment #157 @ 21:28 CDT, 13 April 2007 >>
By QuakeLive.cz baron Railgun  - Reply to #78
he chances that this game will be better than Warsow or CPM are zero4 actually
<< Comment #83 @ 11:30 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
"ZOMG YOU MUST BE SKILLESS +BACK RAILING NOOB FROM OSP FOR 5 YEARS TO NOT LIKE STUPID FLYING DRUNK MODE 3"
Exactly.
<< Comment #85 @ 19:01 CST, 15 January 2007 >>
By Iraq al-Muharib  - Reply to #83
you really made a statement
<< Comment #87 @ 03:32 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
People are so sane nowadays. If people were nuts, they'd do stuff like make Mario save Zelda and Link save the Princess. There's so much logic and reasoning... but where is all the non-harmful insanity?
<< Comment #98 @ 14:05 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By Transparent cumrag  - Reply to #87
that's where you come in.
<< Comment #128 @ 11:51 CST, 18 January 2007 >>
By Quake 3 (black) Tchouky  - Reply to #87
im totally with you there, im sick of realism in games.
bring on the insanity !
<< Comment #92 @ 06:05 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
hope is the first step on a road to disappointment. DONT GET YOUR HOPES UP !
<< Comment #99 @ 14:33 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By United Kingdom Six16 
probably played by no-one!

although maybe just the pro's if theres money in it!
<< Comment #107 @ 22:31 CST, 16 January 2007 >>
By England Krz 
Will be played by just the noobs =]
<< Comment #110 @ 03:24 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By Hearts3 BooTes 
Hmmm... 6 out of 7 answers are negative, worthless poll tbh.
<< Comment #111 @ 04:19 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By omg! remix by Exe Cuffahid  - Reply to #110
lets add: \:D/
Will be played on Olimpyc Games
Will be played by president of USA
Will be played forever and ever

and so on :p
<< Comment #114 @ 09:36 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By Finland randomness666  - Reply to #111
bush ? ... cookies !
<< Comment #112 @ 05:37 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By Switzerland veal 
voted will be played by all players :) but currently, i actually think it's not gonna be made
(sucky poll -> sucky vote :P)
<< Comment #120 @ 15:14 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By Ninja Turtle Lukin_ 
I don't get why CPL needs 5-10 million bucks to make this game... They already have a quite cheap engine, they don't need to make a single player campaign, they don't need fancy visual/sound/physics effects. Maybe Angel mentioned so big numbers to make sure the game will be considered as an AAA title. I'm quite sure it can be made with a smaller budget.
<< Comment #122 @ 18:27 CST, 17 January 2007 >>
By cpma Because  - Reply to #120
I would imagine there's quite a few gifted coders who would
love the chance to work on a game like this for free... *shrug*
<< Comment #126 @ 06:22 CST, 18 January 2007 >>
By pong Zanno  - Reply to #122
you get what you pay for
<< Comment #130 @ 03:08 CST, 19 January 2007 >>
By SC_Zerg [mash]  - Reply to #120
they used the first 5$ to make a nice presentation of the game @ http://www.thecpl.com/severity/
<< Comment #143 @ 06:43 CST, 23 January 2007 >>
By 006 DvO  - Reply to #130
You slashdotted it by posting it here. All those 15 hits overloaded their servers. :<
<< Comment #144 @ 06:46 CST, 23 January 2007 >>
By SC_Zerg [mash]  - Reply to #143
hehe

nothing interesting there in the first place .... no need to be sad about it.
<< Comment #138 @ 07:25 CST, 21 January 2007 >>
By Norway Erk  - Reply to #120
They probably figure they need a 2 million dollar price pool for first tour so people will start playing it, and another 1 million to organize all the stops.
<< Comment #132 @ 12:36 CST, 19 January 2007 >>
By US-Mississippi BalkanFM 
stupid poll, i guess your a stupid man
<< Comment #133 @ 13:23 CST, 19 January 2007 >>
By Norway wee man 
My guess is that it'll get a PK size fanbase. That basically means only the progamers will play it, with the only reason for liking it being the money.

I don't think it's possible to make a game that all gamers worldwide will like. There's a reason that people still play both qw, q2 and q3 while q4 has been released. Those four games for one can not be combined into something spectacular that everyone will like.

And then I haven't even begun to talk about the CS/HL or UT players, which is an enormous amount of people whose taste are a far way from that of the different quake games. Combining "the best elements" of all those groups is ofcourse a dream for all the organizers and managers dealing with the economy of progaming, but I seriously doubt that it can be done.

I think what CPL is trying to make here is a game that's easy to organize on big LANs, easy to incorporate with the commercial aspects (banners/clips from sponsors in-game), possibly with special treats for those with more money (to get the equals of Aegias PhysX into the game) and they will probably throw money at the game in all the first tourneys where it is in to get people to play it.

My final thoughts:
It's all about making money for CPL, nothing more, nothing less. We'll just see how many people they can lure away from their own favorite games with their huge cash prizes.
<< Comment #139 @ 08:50 CST, 21 January 2007 >>
By 016 nahraq 
Regardless of the possible results (I'm not optimistic myself), it's sad the community should usually be hoping for the CPL success, instead of poisoning against it so early in development.

Personally, I believe this is just a sign of how bitter the DM community has become over the years, and how this bitterness just spreads. It's just sad to look at some of the responses on this thread.

If this game fails, the DM community will be rendered irrelevant for any real commercial league in the future and will be forever playing their niche games, claiming how game X/developer Y/league Z ruined their community, when in reality the outcome was inevitable. It's as if people want it to fail just so they have something to bitch about.
<< Comment #142 @ 06:42 CST, 23 January 2007 >>
By 006 DvO  - Reply to #139
Why would you hope for CPL success after all these years of getting utterly screwed over by them over and over and over again?

"Oh hey, yeah, we're gonna run UT2004 tournaments now" "Really?" "Yeah, we think Onslaught is fucking awesome over at the office!!!"

"Oh, hey, yeah, we're gonna pick up Q3 now for the World Tour, it's gonna be awesome" "Why now instead of 5 years ago?" "Uhm, yeah, so Severity right, awesome?"

And last, but not least, Painkiller.

The sheer amount of bullshit that we've been spoon fed by CPL over the years is reason enough to hope that they take a $10 million hit.
<< Comment #146 @ 07:58 CST, 3 February 2007 >>
By zthor sign by mic zeicon  - Reply to #142
That's pretty ignorant in my opinion. CPL has been the single most influential force in esports in the Western world. Yes, they have made some bad decisisions, but really, that's inevitable. You haven't been spoon-fed anything. You don't like Painkiller? Don't watch it. Simple.

Hoping that Severity fails just because CPL has made some bad decisions in the past seems awfully counter-productive.
<< Comment #147 @ 10:11 CST, 3 February 2007 >>
By 006 DvO  - Reply to #146
No, I'm certain Severity will fail, because you can't force people to like a game. CPL being a crock of shit most of the time is just a bonus.

I look forward to Severity succeeding and then CPL telling every other organization to make their own damned game, causing Severity to flop.

Those are my two options, really.
<< Comment #148 @ 13:38 CST, 3 February 2007 >>
By zthor sign by mic zeicon  - Reply to #147
You completely missed my point.
<< Comment #141 @ 16:39 CST, 21 January 2007 >>
By Australia newborn 
"Will be ruined by an arqon mod"

The only way it wont need an arQon mod is if they rip off the CPMA feature set immediately.
<< Comment #149 @ 14:39 CST, 3 February 2007 >>
By exclamation point CLains 
wow, this is the pollest lol ever :P
<< Comment #160 @ 10:50 CDT, 3 June 2007 >>
By 011 nemecel 
Still no words on this?
<< Comment #161 @ 13:08 CDT, 13 September 2008 >>
<< Comment #162 @ 13:41 CDT, 13 September 2008 >>
By zerg vedic  - Reply to #161
Nobody saw this coming.
<< Comment #164 @ 11:26 CST, 8 November 2009 >>
By Sweden Paladia  - Reply to #161
Seems like it was cancelled once again, it is no longer on the developers website (possibly in favour of DOOM Resurrection).
<< Comment #165 @ 21:04 CDT, 31 March 2010 >>
By United States of America erok 
?!?!
<< Comment #166 @ 01:35 CDT, 1 April 2010 >>
By couple JayDee_  - Reply to #165
Don't worry. 3D Realms has taken over production.
<< Comment #167 @ 16:36 CDT, 4 July 2014 >>
By 017 Ephemix 
This thread exists.
<< Comment #168 @ 17:12 CDT, 4 July 2014 >>
By Lithuania son1dow 
I'd love the same poll for Reborn.
<< Comment #169 @ 18:38 CDT, 4 July 2014 >>
By Fox flag 0x5f3759df  - Reply to #168
you can download the alpha build version from their forums. the game at least exists.
<< Comment #170 @ 19:02 CDT, 4 July 2014 >>
By Lithuania son1dow  - Reply to #169
Yeah, their model of open alpha makes it a little complicated, but most of the same questions still apply.

Or if you already have an account:
 
Read the Posting Guidelines

Non-HTML tags: [b]bold[/b], [i]italics[/i], [u]underlined[/u]
[small]small[/small], [q]quoted[/q], [s]strikethrough[/s]
[url=www.url.com]link[/url] or type www.url.com
[flag=country] (list), [avatar=name] (list)
[map=mapname gamename] (list)
Conceived and created by Sujoy Roy (Legal Notices)
RSS Feed Information, Link Buttons and Banners