ESR - Doom 4 Screenshots leaked - General Gaming Forum

ESReality - Where Gaming Meets Reality

About | Contact | Guide | Filters
Users | Preferences | Search | FAQ

News | Forums | Columns
Journals | Articles | Polls | Wiki

Files | Galleries | Demos
Events | Coverage | Movies

ESR Shop | Betting Fixtures

Not Logged In | Login | Register

08:21 CST - 1614 users online

ESR Discord Channel

no live streams found

Scheduled Listings

Other GG threads

Need maps for q4 (0)
Quakecon 2024 (22)
Question about old Doom ingame demos (2)
Re: Quake Champions Classic Mod for Quake 1 (1)
DIABOTICAL ROGUE TRAILER (22)
Esports World Cup (9)
I did it guys (7)
My FPS-Z Game Axial Drift is Now Free on Steam (2)
Jennell Jaquays, Q2 and Q3 level designer, passes away (17)
Having trouble with Quake 4 (2)

Latest Threads

Latest Comments

News Learn to play quake live with FraZe (90)
News HoQ TDM 4v4 Winter Season 2025 (2)
News Cooler Interview 9.8.24 (1)
News World's Greatest Gamer Event - QC - Punk vs Leffen (1)
News 250 FPS QL League (6)

Latest Forum Threads

OT Donald "Trump" Trump wins Elections 2016 (582)
QC =]<o~~~ Possible Scenarios for Quake 5! =]<o~~~ (23)
Q4 all pk4 files collected so far (2)
GG Need maps for q4 (0)
Q3 Why cant id learn from Valve's CS2 and give us an updated Q3 (55)

Latest Journals

2z faye (22) by stpbozin
Why this game sucks to hard? (28) by The_Sh33p
Mars died as his temple burned. No new gods of war exist. (57) by ShadyVoltaire
TEnEP ETO PYCCKu CAuT (2) by stpbozin
How to sporadically play multiplayer games? (7) by cx

Hot Topics

News HoQ TDM 4v4 Winter Season 2025 (2)

ESR Virtual Betting

Lamur
E$ 238,131

E$ 176,304 omek
E$ 129,238 fazz
E$ 61,723 lithz
E$ 58,635 nsx0r
E$ 57,658 nk121

Forums > General Gaming Forum

Doom 4 Screenshots leaked (85 comments)

( Forum: Gaming)

Posted by kapca @ 03:46 CST, 29 February 2012 - iMsg

There are some leaked screenshots on allgamesbeta.com. The pictures indeed look like id tech 5 and showing a post apocalyptic scenario.

id software let go 30 people in january (after rage release). a week after content popped up on artists profile websites. Including the websites of Thao Le (pics) and Mick Gordon (music).

Downloads: 170 pics, screenshots, assets, models, 4 mp3s
Filesource: doom3.ru

UPDATE: (Matt Hooper via twitter)

"Those images have nothing to do with what you're gonna see in Doom4. When we officially show things you'll see awesome."

Edited by Badb0y at 07:28 CST, 2 March 2012 - 28020 Hits

<< prev GG thread || next GG thread >>

<< Comment #1 @ 03:59 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Badb0y

they could be real i must say, but the light setting is different from rage.

<< Comment #3 @ 04:13 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #1

I agree, but this one - for example - looks very suspicious.

<< Comment #2 @ 04:08 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Six16

Looks decent, i'd rather they do a quake 5 multiplayer game though.

<< Comment #6 @ 04:22 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #2

It's really hard to judge the look of games while they are under development, it's definitely doesn't look good enough for a final title in 2013-14, but looks decent for something "work in progress".

I love quake, and I would love to see Q5 returning in a Q1-ish settings, I really do, but Doom has a much higher chance a success imo, and the original Doom is also really close to my heart:)

<< Comment #4 @ 04:16 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

vedic

I hope it's from very early development, as those textures are horrible. =X

<< Comment #5 @ 04:21 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

aeoL - Reply to #4

They look like screenshots from cutscenes from a 90s games

<< Comment #7 @ 04:34 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #4

Probably they are... the whole thing looks horrible to me tbh, except one thing; The quality and the resolution of the shadows are very impressive imo, even by today's. standards
I also think it's from several different artists, because I see three different styles there at least. But again, it's not fair to judge something while the artist is still working on it, shits can turn into last-minute miracles in talented hands;)

<< Comment #8 @ 04:41 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Leth4L

They cancelled Doom 4? (Didn't even knew there were such a thing in the making) Good! Maybe they will stop shitting on this classic franchise once and for all. If the game actually comes out, it's very possible I will enjoy it. My expectations couldn't possibly be any lower. Anyone up for a Doom movie sequel? The Rock still got it.

<< Comment #9 @ 04:43 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #8

They did not cancel doom4 afaik.

<< Comment #10 @ 04:44 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Badb0y - Reply to #8

the canceling rumor in october last year was a bad fake.

<< Comment #11 @ 04:45 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Badb0y

on bluesnews somebody wrote

Those aren't screenshots from Doom 3, they're taken from some game designer's portfolio website and were posted some 6 weeks ago on a Korean website as well. Of course this is just what I read on Reddit, but I'd have to agree that those shots don't look like anything id would produce, even if the game was Doom on Earth.

<< Comment #13 @ 04:50 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #11

thank you sir...

also thanks for reminding me about bluesnews, what i was reading all the time in the 90's... wonder what made me quit that habit:(

<< Comment #17 @ 06:18 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Badb0y - Reply to #13

bluesnews is cool today, they like quake doom related stuff. i did send them news from time to time when i see something when im fast. but most of the time im not fast anymore :|

Edited by Badb0y at 06:25 CST, 29 February 2012

<< Comment #19 @ 06:43 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #17

Yes, I remember they were always the first to post lots of id related things (e.g.: devblog of J. Carmack). I also remember asking for internet access in San Jose at the game developer conference to have a look at bluesnews:)

<< Comment #57 @ 17:51 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

yank3 - Reply to #19

thanks guys for making me feel young

<< Comment #12 @ 04:47 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Leth4L

Christ, no more Doom games please! ID!!! Listen to the crackling and fading voice of the peddling little consumer!!

<< Comment #14 @ 05:01 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Bored

WTF is this shit??? This is not Doom! You could just replace the title with "Rage 2" and noone would notice. Fuck this...

<< Comment #15 @ 05:23 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #14

why rage?

<< Comment #36 @ 09:26 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Bored - Reply to #15

well D4 will be the very last attempt to revive the fast paced shooter genre (at least i hope so the multi will be fast paced, it has to be) and considering that Rage was a commercial failure, they are better fucking make a real Doom game instead of Rage 2

<< Comment #39 @ 09:37 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #15

no:D, I was asking why do you rage:P but it was only a little joke, I did not expect an answer;)

but I agree, they can't fuck this up or it's over.

<< Comment #78 @ 07:14 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

Bored - Reply to #39

but I agree, they can't fuck this up or it's over.

this is why i was rageing, because it seems like they fucking up big time

<< Comment #16 @ 05:37 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

acid_reptile - Reply to #14

Looks like a Rage sequel to me too. + I read on another site there's a screenshot with a DOOM3 wallpaper. So guess it's from ID.

e:
http://www.allgamesbeta.com/2012/02/rumor-doo...eaked.html

12.

Edited by acid_reptile at 05:43 CST, 29 February 2012

<< Comment #32 @ 09:07 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

dddddddddddddddddddddd - Reply to #16

It's probably doom 4, since they're working on that, and every character is LOADED with shotgun shells.

<< Comment #18 @ 06:23 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Badb0y

new stuff coming through. some websites say the material is from ex-artists.

http://doom3.ru/forum.php?fname=name_def&...3&n=45

4 mp3�s
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?cloebtyeq4u34ud

154 jpg screenshots, assets, models
http://www.mediafire.com/?wjsy8ixf6lvwm2b

the villa model reminds me of danny trejo http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001803/

im not sure if its fake. if its untrue id will do maybe a twitter statement. if its true they wont mentioned the pics. i think thats the handling in the business.

Edited by Badb0y at 07:36 CST, 29 February 2012

<< Comment #24 @ 07:31 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #18

The style of the models have a little S.T.A.L.K.E.R feeling for me.

<< Comment #43 @ 13:14 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Jamerio : - Reply to #18

Rough Translation from Ruski to English...

Results

Some really nice behind the scenes images, attention to detail is off the scale :)

Would like to see a video of id's workflow for rage.

Edited by Jamerio at 13:29 CST, 29 February 2012

<< Comment #61 @ 00:22 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

-Tita- - Reply to #18

Love the music

<< Comment #86 @ 11:21 CST, 5 March 2012 >>

By

p0rt - Reply to #18

cos aload of people got fired, when rage failed

<< Comment #20 @ 07:16 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

melechesh '

is doom 3 single player fun?

<< Comment #22 @ 07:25 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

hatelul - Reply to #20

it s good, but it gest monotonious really quick

<< Comment #23 @ 07:26 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #20

well, I'm not the right person to ask, because I think it was a bad game, but apparently others here are like it a lot so perhaps it's only me:(.. I just forced myself to keep playing and only finished it because I'm an id fan, but for me, it was not fun at all .

<< Comment #26 @ 08:23 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

cloned - Reply to #20

Overall I enjoyed it. It is a bit too long, so in the middle of the game it gets a bit boring. The last levels in hell are really great though. Havent played the expansion pack.

<< Comment #40 @ 09:57 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

jstn - Reply to #20

If you want, you can save your money and just stand in a dark closet while someone makes scary sounds instead.

<< Comment #62 @ 01:27 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

Leth4L - Reply to #40

Sound advice.

<< Comment #44 @ 14:04 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

vedic - Reply to #20

If you love monsters in closets, you will love Doom 3.

<< Comment #46 @ 15:11 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

madbringer - Reply to #20

The first few hours (the very beginning especially) are tons of fun. It doesn't drop the "decent" line at any point, definitely worth an honest playthrough.

<< Comment #21 @ 07:24 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

hatelul

For a minute I though I have high standards, for thinking the screens look like puke

<< Comment #25 @ 08:22 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

dddddddddddddddddddddd

http://pizzaboy2.com/images/IMG_0503.JPG

http://i.minus.com/iUQTFkK0fF6MG.jpg

<< Comment #27 @ 08:30 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #25

what's up with the dead-end sign?

<< Comment #29 @ 09:04 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

dddddddddddddddddddddd - Reply to #27

That's a road sign saying the road has no exit except from the way you came.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cul-de-sac#United_States

<< Comment #33 @ 09:11 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #29

well it tricked me because at the first look it looked like something what was added later... real life pictures are strange sometimes....

anyway, may I ask how did you find this, did you ran it in tinyeye?

<< Comment #83 @ 10:14 CST, 3 March 2012 >>

By

dddddddddddddddddddddd - Reply to #33

I googled 'pizza boy 2'

<< Comment #38 @ 09:32 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #29

there is a table with a different shape on the other side, so I understand now...

Edited by kapca at 09:32 CST, 29 February 2012

<< Comment #63 @ 01:31 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

Leth4L - Reply to #25

Every new detail I discovered in this photo made my brain shrink a little.

Low low auto rates :> yes plz!

June's cards and such :> WTF

Pizza BOY II: We deliver <- omfg yes you do

<< Comment #28 @ 08:48 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Demiurge '

is it me or does it look more like a rage mission pack content?

<< Comment #31 @ 09:06 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #28

if he really is an ex id artist who was working on rage.. well - one should be able to make different looking stuff or different styles, but if the concept artist is the same and objective is also the same (a post apocalyptic scenario), you gonna end up with something slightly similar, whether you want it or not:)

<< Comment #35 @ 09:20 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Demiurge ' - Reply to #31

sometimes you have some game specific signature cues
the lighting and blood splatters are doom style tho, i guess it's going to be hard to tell from now on, with all the 'realistic' graphics

Edited by Demiurge at 09:22 CST, 29 February 2012

<< Comment #47 @ 16:43 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Badb0y - Reply to #35

around a few corners id software admit its real footage, but old.

i was sceptical at first with the 16, 21 pics. but when i saw the 170 pieces, and it doesnt fit rage, i know it must be true. what else could it be.

<< Comment #49 @ 16:54 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #47

This can't be Doom:( Somebody fix this:(

<< Comment #52 @ 16:56 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

vedic - Reply to #47

There was that other game that they were working on, that got cancelled.

<< Comment #55 @ 17:05 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #52

what game?

<< Comment #56 @ 17:07 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

vedic - Reply to #55

http://www.shacknews.com/article/53992/id-rev...val-horror

<< Comment #50 @ 16:55 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Badb0y - Reply to #31

>if he really is an ex id artist who was working on rage

actually i did read something wrong. the story was: id software let go 30 people in january (after rage release). a week after content plopped up on artists profile websites. including the websites of Thao Le (pics) and Mick Gordon (music). so it could be they working still with id.

Edited by Badb0y at 16:56 CST, 29 February 2012

<< Comment #30 @ 09:05 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

34338

Deletion requested by user.

<< Comment #34 @ 09:20 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #30

No offense, but don't you think it would be better if you would spend it on some books about ethics and morality before you jump into conclusions?
But on to you point, we don't know anything about it atm except some (supposedly) early development pics from an (allegedly) ex employee.

<< Comment #37 @ 09:26 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

34338 - Reply to #34

Deletion requested by user.

<< Comment #42 @ 11:57 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

cerb0z - Reply to #30

What game will not then?

<< Comment #41 @ 10:31 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

megaman3

probably those screens are real and once again we are up to a huge disappointment.

I don't think they'll follow closely quake5's storyline and atmosphere either, once it's released in 2017.

Edited by -=AvengeR=- at 10:32 CST, 29 February 2012

<< Comment #45 @ 14:58 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

peterg

Seems real to me, would have to be a pretty elaborate hoax if fake. Appears to be Rage tech too. The model screenshots contain a windows task bar which looked like dev info/tools. I think graphically they are impressive, not understanding people saying they look like shit (at other forums). The most telling is there haven't been any official denials from Bethesda or id.

However, I can't see this being fast spaced arcade style gameplay, the graphics are just too realistic. I also hate all this trash/items everywhere. Deus Ex was like that too and it had to high light real items because there was so much clutter. Visually it's like over active. It's like artists have way too much free time and fill up every square inch with bullshit detail. I much prefer more clean scenes. There's no way you can do this level of detail and have huge maps or a long single player experience. It'll be like Rage and beatable in 10 hours thus not worth buying unless it has superb multiplayer, coop, and mod support.

<< Comment #48 @ 16:46 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Badb0y - Reply to #45

>The most telling is there haven't been any official denials from Bethesda or id.

right.

btw, this can be a turrent for some vehicle
http://forums.3drealms.com/vb/showpost.php?p=...tcount=931

<< Comment #53 @ 17:01 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #45

Graphics won't ever make a game, so it's not that important, but this note:

"the graphics are just too realistic."

???? It's not realistic at all imho.

Edited by kapca at 17:02 CST, 29 February 2012

<< Comment #58 @ 23:03 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

peterg - Reply to #53

The look is fairly realistic style thus I can't see it being classic style Doom run and gun. That's all I meant.

<< Comment #64 @ 02:07 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #58

I don't understand you mate:(, What do you mean by fairly realistic? These are examples when the artist is after realism:

<< Comment #65 @ 03:03 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

Jamerio : - Reply to #64

No, those are examples of when an artist has the benefit of pre-rendered visuals over realtime 3d.

For every frame that video took to produce rage would have probably rendered out 216000 frames to its one (assuming around 1frame per hour)

1:216000!!!

And you're showing static, post apoc images, vs clean textures and moving images at optimum viewing angles.

Edited by Jamerio at 03:06 CST, 1 March 2012

<< Comment #67 @ 05:05 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

yank3 - Reply to #64

do you really think at some point games will look like this? i mean with all the details and the consequences of interacting, who is gonna make this and how extremely laborious will it be? and is the goal of a game really to copy the world 1:1?

<< Comment #69 @ 05:19 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #67

Tbh this doesn't look like realistic for me at all, but I can understand if it looks realistic for you if you not used to look at CGI renders. Our perception is developing all the time and if you will look at this footage ten years from now, you gonna smile at yourself about this:) And yes, this kind of graphics is not very far from now, most of it could be even "pre-baked" into rage as I wrote about this here, but I hope it will never will be about 1:1 copy.. and visualization will remain to be only a tool for the storytelling:)

But back to the subject.. I did not link this because of the quality of the render.. but because the style the artist was after... The game screenshots in this thread are not about photorealism or reproducing realistic environments imo.

Edited by kapca at 05:52 CST, 1 March 2012

<< Comment #70 @ 05:41 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

yank3 - Reply to #69

you're actually right. there will always be requests to advance technology for artistic reasons.

the way it should be used is to be "hyper"realistic. like it's with experimental movies and soundscapes since decades.

<< Comment #71 @ 05:50 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #70

it's all about experience... People from the 50's couldn't tell the difference between real footage and CGI renders we see in the 21th century movies... They were not dumber nor had less IQ/EQ, just simply didn't have the visual experience with such quality.
While I'm pretty sure CGI renders from movies will do the trick, I'm risking to say that even BF3 graphics could be enough to trick some of them, but perhaps that's a too strong assumption, and we lack the time machine anyway:D

<< Comment #73 @ 06:03 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

yank3 - Reply to #71

but, there will be a point that even you can't tell the difference between cgi and real footage, so we're back in the 50s :P

<< Comment #74 @ 06:24 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #73

It's hard to tell tbh, Technology smoothly advances as it develops but there are also huge sudden changes occur from time to time, and we don't know what is ahead and how much will we be able to enhance our capabilities.

Those who create the visuals will always see the limitations of their creations, no matter if it's happening on screen, on a holodeck, or with shit projected directly into the brain. It's like evolution on a small scale, you simply accumulate experience and learn how to use it, even if only on a subconscious level. I'm thinking a lot about these things btw, and still not sure how much do we passively perceive from the "fractalness" of our surroundings, and if is there any other way than 1:1 copy.

But for the mainstream users, yes I agree, the gap between reality and artificial stuff will begin to shrink more and more and the evolution of our brain and our eyes doesn't have much chance to keep up with the speed how fast technology advances, well, at least not without changing the parts to artificial ones(e.g.: better eyes, etc).

That's why i suggested in the linked Journal, that now I see a great opportunity, because they have the technology and the resources to create something very realistic (for the mainstream) while maintaining playability and responsiveness.

Edited by kapca at 06:39 CST, 1 March 2012

<< Comment #75 @ 06:41 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

yank3 - Reply to #74

i'm excited aswell. but maybe i'm aswell talking about the human-technology
issue. does it really change anything else than our perception of things? sure the possibilities increased, but it's just a horse for our mind to jump on.

i mean, it's about ideas. the idea of making a graphic realistic is one single idea. and i would say this idea was realised with the first graphic ever. so i can't see an artistic value of making something realistic. and the better it gets the less i can.

and btw. in the 50s there was musique concrete with tape recorders etc.. what we have now with computers and music is actually just the same like in the 50s, where now the computer is the tape recorder and can manipulate everything the same way the musique concrete did. (yet, noone listens or perceives it that way nowadays).

yes, the gap will close, but once we reached this point there will hopefully a drift to a "hyper"reality.

might sound so, but i'm not against technology at all :)

<< Comment #76 @ 06:46 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #75

I did not suggest it as an artistic aspect, but purely as a selling attribute of the game, and - actually - I see it as something what kills that horse.. and the deeper and deeper we dive into chasing visuals, the dumber we will get with the rest.

That's the whole point of my suggestion!... to silence the COD and BF3 kids with something awesome while doing it so fast that they can focus on the gameplay finally instead of messing with shadows and bumpmaps:)

You know I'm like a child dreaming.... "if they would let me tell them how to do it":D

Edited by kapca at 06:48 CST, 1 March 2012

<< Comment #77 @ 06:51 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

yank3 - Reply to #76

:D

<< Comment #51 @ 16:56 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

cyronix '

fake!? Anyway I don't care for Doom4 ...
id software is shit nowadays ...
doom3 was a failed copy of Half-Life ...
and Rage a failed copy of Half-Life 2 with the buggy etc. ...
they think they can steal some elements here and there and voila the game is made ... doesn't work like this ...

<< Comment #54 @ 17:04 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #51

I don't want to argue about how good or bad those game really were, but they are similar to HL and HL2?? Did we play the same games?

Edited by kapca at 18:17 CST, 29 February 2012

<< Comment #59 @ 23:08 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

0x5f3759df - Reply to #54

apparently not if he thinks they're trying to be clones of HL rofl

<< Comment #66 @ 04:52 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

cyronix ' - Reply to #54

in HL1 you start in a peaceful lab ... then there is an outbreak of aliens ...
In Doom 3 they just copied this setting ...
in HL2 you often have to drive around in a waterboat or in a buggy to get from place to place ... same in Rage where you drive around with your buggy from place to place ...
complete clones may be over the top, but high source of inspiration is probably not uncorrect ...
anyway ID is shit ... even Quake 3 Arena was shit ... only because the all the n00bs started to play this game, does not mean it was good ... last really good game was Quake One ... the end ...

<< Comment #68 @ 05:12 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

kapca - Reply to #66

I agree that Doom and Quake1 was the very best games id ever made. (Quake2 was a horrible dumb derail and a big disappointment for me, but Q3 - while still had the stupid retardation of Q2 - was smooth and fun for me, and because of the big playerbase, I learned to like it somehow, and became one of my favorite)

Onto the point: I see nothing similar in HL and Doom3, I could find hundreds of sci-fi novels with the same settings, but they are still different stories nothing fundamental in common, like you are jumping on platforms in every platform game, but you don't call them the clones of each other.
It's the same with Rage.. if I have to plagiarise Rage, I would go for the similarities with Borderlands perhaps.

Edited by kapca at 05:20 CST, 1 March 2012

<< Comment #60 @ 23:48 CST, 29 February 2012 >>

By

Quake 5? YEEE

Doom 4? Who the f... cares

<< Comment #79 @ 21:39 CST, 2 March 2012 >>

By

Weird ' - Reply to #60

I heard doom4 would have multiplayer though ;)

<< Comment #85 @ 10:15 CST, 5 March 2012 >>

By

boleslav69 - Reply to #79

Crysis also has multiplayer. Doesn't mean it's something good. At least i have a feeling they are on "that" path. Let's hope my "6th sense" is wrong.

<< Comment #72 @ 05:54 CST, 1 March 2012 >>

By

Badb0y

Matt Hooper via twitter

"Those images have nothing to do with what you're gonna see in Doom4. When we officially show things you'll see awesome."

<< Comment #80 @ 05:58 CST, 3 March 2012 >>

By

tony

we need something hardcore like this for quake5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmAvyk8S_V4

<< Comment #81 @ 06:28 CST, 3 March 2012 >>

By

palatka - Reply to #80

that looks cool =P

<< Comment #82 @ 06:48 CST, 3 March 2012 >>

By

hyper_ - Reply to #80

that looks awesome

<< Comment #84 @ 08:36 CST, 5 March 2012 >>

By

anapolon

no deamons
no doom

Reply to:
[Reset]

Formatting:

Content:

Enter Text:

Or if you already have an account:

Username:

Password:

Read the Posting Guidelines

Non-HTML tags: [b]bold[/b], [i]italics[/i], [u]underlined[/u]
[small]small[/small], [q]quoted[/q], [s]~~strikethrough~~[/s]
[url=www.url.com]